Abstract
This article aims to identify and discuss the role and place of cultural heritage in the international bi-regional relations between Europe and Latin America and the Caribbean. Thus, using a theoretical framework of the concepts of heritage diplomacy, cultural diplomacy and international cultural relations, it analyses non-exhaustively projects, programmes, partnerships, working documents, reports, communications and agreements in force, thus fostering international relations through cultural heritage. This panorama of the international relations between the regions involving cultural heritage has some specific objectives. First, to identify the main principles, purposes and narratives regarding cultural heritage as an object/arena of foreign relations. Secondly, to outline the profile(s) of the actions undertaken in the domain, their focuses and objects, how they vary across the governance levels involved and/or have changed over time. Thirdly, to identify the actors involved in such actions/policies. Lastly, to identify the impact of such actions, as for generation of value, tourism, engagement, public image and relations between the people.
Master in International Relations from the Universidad de Salamanca, Spain
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The CoE has currently 47 members: Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Republic of Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom.
- 2.
The entirety of the Declarations, Recommendations and Key-texts of the CoE concerning culture and heritage can be found here: https://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/texts-of-reference.
- 3.
The EU has currently 27 members: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden.
- 4.
- 5.
Examples are Santiago de Compostela Pilgrim route, industrial heritage, Jewish heritage, prehistoric heritage, thermal waters, ceramic, art nouveau routes.
- 6.
- 7.
University of St Andrews, Scotland. International Council of Museums (ICOM); National Museum of Archaeology, Portugal; Austral University of Chile; National Museum of Costa Rica; University of the West Indies, Jamaica; Pontifical Catholic University of Peru; University of Valencia, Spain.
- 8.
1. Science, research, innovation and technology; 2. Sustainable development; environment; climate change; biodiversity; energy; 3. Regional integration and interconnectivity to promote social inclusion and cohesion; 4. Migration; 5. Education and employment to promote social inclusion and cohesion; 6. The world drug problem; 7. Gender; 8. Investments and entrepreneurship for sustainable development. The two key areas not mentioned are 9. Higher education and 10. Citizen security, although it could be argued that by promoting the collaboration of the higher education institutions listed in the previous note, the project is helping to build capacity, deepen relations, show a successful example of joint work in this respect as well. The absence of any direct culture in this joint EU-CELAC action plan is worthy of note, pointing out its condition of a non-priority area.
- 9.
WP1: Coordination and Project Management (led by USTAN); WP2: Technology and Innovation for Bi-Regional Integration (led by MNA/DGPC); WP3: Chile Case Study (led by UACh); WP4: Museum Education for Social Inclusion and Cohesion (led by USTAN); WP5: Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Museums (led by UVEG); WP6: Peru Case Study (led by PUCP); WP7: Exhibiting Migration and Gender (led by UWI); WP8: Communication, Dissemination and Exploitation (led by MNA/DGPC).
- 10.
They are available at: https://eulacmuseums.net/index.php/resources/detail-4.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
1. Drugs in cities (coordinating city: Santiago, Chile); 2. Conservation of the historic urban contexts (Vicenza, Italy); 3. Democracy in Cities (Ville d'Issy-les-Moulineaux, France); 4. The city as promoter of economic development (Madrid, Spain); 5. Urban social policies (Montevideo, Uruguay); 6. Urban environment (Malaga, Spain); 7. Management and control of urbanisation (Rosario, Argentina);8. Control of urban mobility (Stuttgart, Germany).
- 16.
9. Local financing and participatory budget (Porto Alegre, Brazil); 10. Fight against urban poverty (São Paulo, Brasil);11. Lodging in the city (that was not carried out, since it did not get applications); 12. Promotion of women in the decision-making local instances (Barcelona, Spain); 13. City and information society (Bremen, Germany); 14. Citizen security in the city (Valparaíso, Chile).
- 17.
The last mapping of the participating cities (2012)—which are not permanently in the project, changing with its phases and working axes—has pointed out: Cochabamba (Bolivia), Cuenca (Ecuador), Manizales (Colombia), Mar de Plata (Argentina), Pereira (Colombia), Edinburgh (UK), La Laguna and Malaga (Spain), Oporto (Portugal) and Venice (Italy).
- 18.
We chose not to include the URBELAC I in the analysis because none of its working pillars, nor its deriving identified projects included primarily or secondarily on cultural heritage, being centred at (i) environmental sustainability and climate change, (ii) sustainable urban development, and (iii) fiscal and governance sustainability (EC 2014, p. 5).
References
Ayuso A (2015) La Asociación UE-CELAC y la revisión del concepto de interregionalismo multinivel. Comentario Internacional. Revista del Centro Andino de Estudios Internacionales 15:177–207
Arndt RT (2005) The first resort of kings: American cultural diplomacy in the twentieth century. Potomac Books, Inc., Washington D.C
Birle P, Góbel B, Krusche J (2019) The cultural dimension of European Union-Latin American relations through the lens of cross-cutting issues of mobility, inequality, diversity and sustainability. In: Bonet L, Schargorodsky H (eds) The challenges of cultural relations between the European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean. Quaderns Gescènic. Collecció Quaderns de Cultura n. 5, Barcelona, pp 85–108
Blake J (2000) On defining the cultural heritage. Int Comp Law Q 49(1):61–85
Bonet L, Schargorodsky H (eds) (2019) The challenges of cultural relations between the European Union and Latin America and the Caribbean. Quaderns Gescènic. Collecció Quaderns de Cultura n. 5, Barcelona
Christofoletti R (org) (2017) Bens culturais e relações internacionais: o patrimônio como espelho do soft power. Editora Universitária Leopoldianum: Santos. 466p
Clarke A (2018a) Heritage diplomacy. Australian policy and history. https://aph.org.au/2018/10/heritage-diplomacy/
Clarke A (2018b) Heritage diplomacy. In: Handbook of cultural security. Edward Elgar, pp 417–436
Council of Europe (2013). Resolution CM/Res(2013)66 confirming the establishment of the Enlarged Partial Agreement on Cultural Routes (EPA). https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx%3FObjectID%3D09000016805c69ac
Crusafon C (2015) EU cultural cooperation with third countries: the Cases of Latin America and the Mediterranean. In: Psychogiopoulou E (ed) Cultural Governance and the European Union, protecting and promoting cultural diversity in Europe. Springer, London, pp 225–236
Damro C, Gstöhl S, Schunz S (eds) (2017) The European union’s evolving external engagement: towards new sectoral diplomacies? (1st ed) Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315169958
De Jesus J (2008) Cultural heritage, impact assessment and the Council of Europe Conventions. In: 28th annual conference of the international association for impact assessment, Perth, Australia
Dominioni S (2020) Cultural routes of the Council of Europe: providing a unique platform for shared European history and heritage. EULAC Foundation Newsletter 03/2020. Cultural heritage in the European Union, Latin America and the Caribbean, pp 2–3
EULAC MUSEUMS (2021a) EULAC relations and our project. https://eulacmuseums.net/index.php/detail-1
EULAC MUSEUMS (2021b) Museums. https://eulacmuseums.net/index.php/project-en/museums-pt-2
European Commission (2007) European agenda for culture in a globalizing world. COM, 242 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52007DC0242&from=EN
European Commission (2014) URBELAC Network of European, Latin American and Caribbean cities for integrated and sustainable urban development 2010–2013. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/cooperate/international/pdf/idb_urbelac_en.pdf
European Commission (2015) Partners in development. European Union–Latin America and the Caribbean development cooperation guide. Update 2015. Brussels/Luxemburg. https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/ebook_pdf.pdf
European Commission (2018) New European agenda for culture. COM, 267 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0267&from=EN
European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2016) Towards an EU strategy for international cultural relations. Joint communication to the european parliament and the council. JOIN (2016) 29 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/%3Furi%3DJOIN%3A2016%3A29%3AFIN15/01/2019
European parliamentary research service (2019) A new European agenda for culture. At a glance. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2019/633140/EPRS_ATA%282019%29633140_EN.pdf
Fontelles JB (2020) América Latina-Europa: la “otra” relación transatlántica. Análisis Carolina 51:1
Frank R (2012) Culture et relations internationales: les diplomaties culturelles. Pour l’histoire des relations internationales. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, pp 371–386
Hobsbawn E, Ranger T (eds) (1983) The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gardini GL, Ayuso A (2015) EU-Latin America and Caribbean Inter-regional relations: complexity and change. Atlantic Future Working Paper, 24:1–24
Goff PM (2013) Cultural diplomacy. In: Cooper AF, Heine J, Thakur R The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Harrison R (2013) Heritage: critical approaches. Routledge
Haider W, Batalla IC (eds) (2020) Revisiting bi-regional relations: the EU-Latin American dialogue and diversification of interregional cooperation. EULAC Foundation, Hamburg
Jagielska-Burduk A, Stec P (2019) Council of Europe cultural heritage and education policy: preserving identity and searching for a common core? Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado 22(1):1–12
Kersel MM, Luke C (2015) Civil societies? Heritage diplomacy and Neo-imperialism. In: Koch F City-regions and their role in the Euro-Latin American relations, Reg Stud Reg Sci 2(1):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1053515
Meskell L (ed) Global heritage: a reader. Wiley, pp 70–93
Mark S (2009) A greater role for cultural diplomacy. Netherlands Institute of International Relations, Clingendael, pp 1–51
Meskell L (2018) A Future in Ruins: UNESCO, world heritage, and the dream of peace. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Mitchell J (1986) International cultural relations. Allen and Unwin/British Council, London
OCO (2013) Main achievements and impacts of the URB-AL III Programme projects. Barcelona. https://issuu.com/urbal3/docs/resultados_e_impactos_urb-al_iii.en/89
Rothfuß R (2006) Transnationale Städtenetzwerke als Instrument interkommunaler Kooperation im Zeitalter globaler Vernetzung: das europäisch-lateinamerikanische Städtenetzwerk URB-AL. PhD Thesis, University of Tübingen. 365p. https://d-nb.info/983670773/34
Ruano L (2018) Dealing with diversity. The EU and Latin America today. Chaillot papers. EU Institute for Security Studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
Sanahuja JA (2015) The EU and CELAC: reinvigorating a strategic partnership. EULAC Foundation, Hamburg
Sanahuja JA (2011) La política de desarrollo de la UE y América Latina: Estrategias e instrumentos de cooperación para la asociación birregional. Cuadernos Cealci 12:1–82
Serodes F (2007) Le nouveau rôle diplomatique informel des institutions culturelles. In: Tobelem JM, dir., L’arme de la culture. Les stratégies de la diplomatie culturelle non-gouvernementale, Paris, L’Harmattan, pp 194–216
Severo M (2017) European cultural routes: building a multi-actor approach. Museum Int 69(1–2):136–145
Smith RC (2020) Europe. In: Francioni F, Vrdoljak AF (eds) The Oxford handbook of international cultural heritage law. Oxford University Press, USA, pp 908–930
Winter T (2015) Heritage diplomacy. Int J Herit Stud 21(10):997–1015
Winter T (2016) Heritage diplomacy: entangled materialities of international relations. Future Anterior: J Hist Preserv Hist Theory Criticism 13(1):3–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
dos Santos Acerbi, V. (2021). Mapping Cultural Heritage in the Bi-regional Relations Between Europe and Latin America: Case Studies. In: Christofoletti, R., Botelho, M.L. (eds) International Relations and Heritage. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77991-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77991-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77990-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77991-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)