Abstract
This chapter is a synthesis of the methodological reflections from the contributing authors of this volume, Theorizing Heritage Through Resistance. These reflections, edited and categorized for clarity, aimed to be a resource for other scholars and students working in the heritage studies exploring resistance as a field of enquiry. Chapters in this volume discuss epistemological arguments about how to comprehend the social as well as specific research techniques and practices to capture the intersection of heritage with resistance. In rethinking heritage methodologies, we can address issues such as justice or frameworks such as decolonization, in order to open up the field of research and practice to these previously unseen or ignored values, approaches and perspectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmed, S. (2013). Making feminist points. Feminist Killjoys, 11 September. https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/
Ashworth, G. J., Graham, B. J., & Tunbridge, J. E. (2007). Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies. Pluto.
Autonomous Geographies Collective. (2010). Beyond Scholar Activism: Making Strategic Practices Inside and Outside the Neoliberal University. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 9, 245–275. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/868
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273–306.
Bruchac, M. M. (2014). Decolonization in Archaeological Theory. In C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology (pp. 2069–2077). Springer Science and Business Media.
Butler, J. (2016). Rethinking Vulnerability in Resistance. In J. Butler, Z. Gambetti, & L. Sabsay (Eds.), Vulnerability in Resistance (pp. 12–27). Duke University Press.
Chatterton, P., Fuller, D., & Routledge, P. (2008). Relating Action to Activism: Theoretical and Methodological Reflections. In S. Kindron, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place (pp. 216–222). Routledge.
Connell, R. (2007). Southern theory: The global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, F. L. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.
Derickson, K., & Routledge, P. (2015). Resourcing Scholar-Activism: Collaboration, Transformation and the Production of Knowledge. The Professional Geographer, 67, 1–7.
Eichhorn, K., & Milne, H. (2016). Labours of Love and Cutting Remarks: The Affective Economies of Editing. In D. Irvine & S. Kamboureli (Eds.), Editing as Cultural Practice in Canada (pp. 189–198). Wilfred Laurier Press.
Georgalou, M. (2016). ‘I make the rules on my Wall’: Privacy and identity management practices on Facebook. Discourse & Communication, 10(1), 40–64.
González-Bailón, S. (2013). Social science in the era of big data. Policy & Internet, 5(2), 147–160.
Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing post-colonial studies and paradigms of political economy: Transmodernity, decolonial thinking, and global coloniality. Transmodernity, 1(1), 1–36.
Gunaratnam, Y., & Hamilton, C. (2017). Introduction the Wherewithal of Feminist Methods. Feminist Review, 115(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0023-5
Hammami, F. (2016). Issues of Sharing and Mutuality in Heritage—Contesting Diaspora and Homeland Experiences in Palestine. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(6), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1166447
Larsson, A. O. (2015). Studying Big Data—Ethical and methodological considerations. In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (Eds.), Internet research ethics (pp. 141–156). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. Retrieved October 1, 2017, from https://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3
Lydon, J., & Rizvi, U. Z. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology. Left Coast Press.
Marttila, T. (2016). Post-foundational discourse analysis: From political difference to empirical research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved June 13, 2016, from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1091345
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2008). Writing Off Treaties: White Possession in the United States Critical Whiteness Studies Literature. In A. Moreton-Robinson, M. Casey, & F. Nicoll (Eds.), Transnational Whiteness Matters (1st ed., pp. 81–96). Lanham, MD and Plymouth, U.K.: Lexington Books.
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty. University of Minnesota Press.
Nagar, R., & Geiger, S. (2007). Reflexivity, Positionality and Identity in Feminist Fieldwork Revisited. In A. Tickell, E. Sheppard, J. Peck, & T. Barnes (Eds.), Politics and Practice in Economic Geography (pp. 267–278). Sage.
Oland, M., Hart, S. M., & Frink, L. (Eds.). (2012). Decolonizing Indigenous Histories: Exploring Prehistoric/Colonial Transitions in Archaeology. University of Arizona Press.
Ozduzen, O. (2018). Cinema-Going During the Gezi Protests: Claiming the Right to the Emek Movie Theatre and Gezi Park. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(8), 1028–1052.
Smith, A. D. (1999). Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books.
Vinthagen, S. (2015). A Theory of Nonviolent Action: How Civil Resistance Works. London: Zed Books.
Whyte, K. P. (2020). Too Late for Indigenous Climate Justice: Ecological and Relational Tipping Points. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change.
Yasar, Z. (2019). “Emek is ours, Istanbul is ours”: Reimagining a Movie Theater Through Urban Activism. The Velvet Light Trap, 83, 46–59.
Yeasmin, S., & Rahman, K. F. (2012). Triangulation Research Method as a Tool of Social Science Research. BUP Journal, 1(1), 154–163.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uzer, E., Hammami, F. (2022). Methodological Insights Within the Intersection of Heritage and Resistance Research. In: Hammami, F., Uzer, E. (eds) Theorizing Heritage through Non-Violent Resistance. Palgrave Studies in Cultural Heritage and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77708-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77708-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77707-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77708-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)