Abstract
In comparison to many other mammalian species, ruminant ungulates have a unique form of placentation. Ruminants initially display an epitheliochorial type of placentation; however, during the period of placental attachment, trophoblast giant binucleate cells (BNC) develop within the chorion to migrate and fuse with the uterine surface epithelium to form syncytial plaques. Binucleate cell migration and fusion continues throughout pregnancy but never appears to breach the basal lamina, beneath the uterine surface or luminal epithelium. Therefore, the semi-invasive type of placentation in ruminants is classified as synepitheliochorial. The endometrium of ruminant species also contains unique specialized aglandular structures termed “caruncles” in which the chorioallantois (cotyledons) interdigitates and forms highly vascularized fetal–maternal “placentomes.” This chapter will discuss the current knowledge of early conceptus development during the peri-attachment period, establishment of pregnancy, conceptus attachment, and placentation in ruminant ungulates. The features of placentomes, BNCs, fetomaternal hybrid cells, and multinucleated syncytial plaques of the cotyledonary placenta of ruminant species will be reviewed to highlight the unique form of placentation compared to the placentae of other artiodactyls.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Attachment of the embryo or conceptus (embryo and extraembryonic membranes) to the maternal uterine endometrium followed subsequently by development of the placenta is the means by which eutherians provide the environment needed to support the prolonged period of in utero fetal development until parturition. It is notable that the early stages of embryo development between fertilization of the oocyte and blastocyst formation are conserved among mammalian viviparous species. It is only following hatching of the blastocyst from its zona pellucida coat that distinct deviations in the steps of mammalian implantation and placental development become apparent. Indeed, there is great variation in the area and depth of placental interactions with the maternal endometrium. Examples of such differences range from the noninvasive, epitheliochorial attachment in the pig and horse to the invasive, endotheliochorial, and hemochorial types of implantation in canines, rodents, and primates (Grosser 1909; Mossman 1937; Amoroso 1952; Wimsatt 1974). The acquisition of the epitheliochorial placenta in some larger species provides an interesting contrast relative to any advantages that an invasive placental form might offer (Mossman 1974; Carter and Enders 2013). Ruminants have a unique semi-invasive type of attachment in which formation of trophoblast giant binucleate cells (BNCs) migrate and fuse with the luminal epithelium (LE). The “invasiveness” of the BNC appears to be limited to fusion with the uterine epithelium to form syncytial plaques that do not penetrate the basal lamina present beneath the LE. The “synepitheliochorial” type of attachment is functionally intermediate between the noninvasive placentation in the pig and the invasive endotheliochorial placenta in canines (Chavatte-Palmer and Guillomot 2007). In addition to the unique form of conceptus attachment, the endometrium of the bicornuate uterus of ruminant species is lined with specialized aglandular structures termed “caruncles” (Fig. 1a, b). Interdigitation of chorioallantois (cotyledons) and formation of crypts within the caruncles ultimately leads to the formation of highly vascularized fetal-maternal “placentomes” (Fig. 1c, d). The caruncles of ruminants develop in the endometrium after birth, and the total number varies between individual animals and species (Wiley et al. 1987; Hradecky et al. 1988). During pregnancy, the bovine, ovine, caprine, and Antilopinae (gazelles, blackbucks) placenta can have 75 to 125 placentomes, while Cervidae (deer) and other ruminant species may contain only 4–6 placentomes (Hradecky 1983). The number of cotyledons present in the giraffe can range from 123 to 191. The overall shape of the placentomes ranges from primarily flat (deer, antelope), convex (cattle) to concave (sheep, goat) (Mossman 1987). The camel is considered a ruminant. However, it is quite distinct evolutionarily from the Ruminantia and its placenta resembles the diffuse form of pigs and horses (Skidmore et al. 1996).
In this chapter, the current knowledge related to early embryonic development, implantation, and placentation in the cattle and sheep is discussed. The synepitheliochorial type of uterine attachment and the cotyledonary placenta are unique adaptations in nearly all ruminant ungulate species. The ruminant placenta represents a form of placental interaction with the maternal uterus that is distinct in comparison to other mammals.
2 Early Conceptus Development
After fertilization, the embryo undergoes cell divisions to reach the morula stage, which occurs around day 5 of gestation in cattle (Brackett et al. 1980). Initially both outer and inner cells of the morula do not have well-developed intercellular junctions. Instead, they are in contact only through cellular focal and gap junctions. Subsequently, the outer cells establish tight junctions, with a concomitant increase in the extent of cell-cell contacts. Meanwhile the inner cells retain the focal and gap junction. This process represents compaction of the morula. A blastocoelic cavity is formed through fluid movement into the intercellular spaces of the compact morula. The osmotic gradient driving blastocoel formation is established by Na+/K+-ATPase (a “sodium pump”) present within the basement membrane of the outer (trophectoderm) cells. Formation of outer polarized and inner nonpolarized cells of the blastocyst triggers differential cellular activity of the Ras and Hippo signaling pathways to induce lineage segregation (see Telugu, Chapter “Development of Pre-Implantation Mammalian Blastocyst”).
In mice, cellular expression of NANOG and SOX2 prevents induction of a trophectoderm lineage and leads to the formation of the inner cell mass (ICM), while activation of the caudal-related homeobox gene Cdx2 by Tead4/Yap stimulates trophectoderm lineage (Cockburn and Rossant 2010; see Telugu, Chapter “Development of Pre-Implantation Mammalian Blastocyst”). However, care must be taken in extending the mouse model to other mammals as there is variability among species (Spencer et al. 2006; Berg et al. 2011; Negrón-Pérez et al. 2018; Llobat 2020). In mice, expression of the octamer-binding transcription factor Pou5f1, also known as Oct4, is restricted to the ICM, which is not the case during early bovine blastocyst development (Berg et al. 2011). Pou5f1 is co-expressed with Cdx2 in the trophectoderm, even after blastocyst development. The possible co-expression of Pou5f1 in the trophectoderm may be related to the extended period of peri-attachment and growth that is observed in the conceptuses of ungulates.
The bovine blastocyst hatches from its zona pellucida (Fig. 2a) on day 9–10 of gestation by weakening the zona through enzymes produced by both the blastocyst and endometrium as well as expanding and contracting to create a fracture in the zona glycoprotein coating. After hatching, the conceptus takes on a spherical and then an ovoid morphology (Fig. 2b). Differentiation of germ layers (Fig. 2c) begins in the ICM soon afterwards (Perry 1981). The establishment of the germ layers during gastrulation is the prelude to formation of the chorion, amnion, yolk sac, and allantoic membranes typical of the chorioallantoic type of placenta in ungulates (Perry 1981). During this period, the spherical conceptus slowly grows from 1 mm to 8 mm between day 12 and 14 of gestation (Betteridge et al. 1980). By day 15, endoderm completely lines the basal membrane of the trophectoderm of the ovoid conceptus (Fig. 2b). Mesoderm from the ICM migrates between endoderm and trophectoderm layers to form a trilaminar trophoblast (Fig. 2c). The mesoderm separates to associate with the endoderm (forming the vascular splanchnopleure yolk sac) and the outer trophectoderm (to form the avascular somatopleure) of the developing chorion. Thus, the origin of the extraembryonic membranes begins to form in ruminants prior to firm attachment to the uterine luminal surface epithelium.
The trophectoderm covering the ICM (Rauber’s layer) is lost during the period of early conceptus expansion (Betteridge and Flechon 1988). The growing embryonic disc appears as a rounded sphere on the surface of the day 16 elongated conceptus (Fig. 3a). On days 16 to 18, the embryonic disc appears to descend (Fig. 3b) into the conceptus as the developing trophoblast layer (somatopleure) begins to fold around and engulf it (Fig. 3c). Closure of the trophoblast fold over the embryonic disc establishes the amnion and forms the cavity for fluid accumulation within the amniotic sac. Development of the vascular yolk sac, which is in close apposition to the mesenchyme of the chorion (Fig. 2c), serves an essential function to transfer nutrients from the chorion surface (choriovitelline) to the embryos during early development.
3 Conceptus Elongation, Apposition, and Establishment of Pregnancy
The changes in early embryo development, attachment, and placental expansion in cattle and sheep have been documented and reviewed (Leiser 1975; King et al. 1982; Betteridge and Flechon 1988; Assis Neto et al. 2010). Growth and elongation of the bovine conceptus within the uterine horn is accelerated from day 15 to 18 of gestation. During this period, the 2 mm diameter filamentous conceptus reaches lengths over 200 mm (Fig. 4) to extend into the contralateral horn by day 18 to 19 of gestation (Greenstein et al. 1958; Betteridge et al. 1980). Conceptus elongation in sheep is initiated on day 12, and the conceptus membranes extend into the contralateral horn by day 17 (Rowson and Moore 1966). Unlike the rapid morphological elongation of pig conceptuses (Geisert et al. 2015), the increase in the length of cattle and sheep conceptuses occurs through cell proliferation, migration, and morphological change in shape over 2–3 days (Wang et al. 2009; Bazer et al. 2010).
The bovine conceptus is rather weakly attached to the uterine surface epithelium during the period of elongation until approximately day 23 of gestation. During this timeframe, connections with the endometrium begin near the embryonic disk and spread from there (King et al. 1980). For the most part, apposition and attachment is similar among ruminants. A few differences exist, however. In sheep, the apposition steps begin with a decrease in trophoblast microvilli between days 13 and 15 (Guillomot et al. 1981, 1982, 1993). The transient loss of microvilli may promote apposition of trophoblasts with the LE. Besides cellular contacts between trophoblast and endometrial surface epithelium, the portion of the trophoblast overlying the uterine gland openings extend papillae into the superficial mouths of the glands between days 15 and 17 of pregnancy (Fig. 5a). Development of the trophoblastic papillae is proposed to anchor the peri-attachment conceptus to the uterine surface (Fig. 5b) during elongation throughout the uterine horns in the cow and sheep (Guillomot et al. 1981; Guillomot and Guay 1982). The trophoblastic papillae may also serve to absorb gland secretions until the formation of the areolae in the developing chorion.
The increase in the rate of conceptus elongation during this peri-attachment period is regulated by changes in the transcriptome and secretions of the endometrium which are programmed by progesterone following ovulation (Forde et al. 2011; Spencer and Hansen 2015; Spencer et al. 2016). In cattle, changes in endometrial secretions are sensitive to the rise of progesterone following ovulation and timing of the downregulation of progesterone receptor (PGR) in the endometrial luminal (LE) and glandular (GE) epithelium (see Lonergan et al. 2016). An earlier increase in circulating progesterone following ovulation is associated with advancing conceptus development and elongation. Exogenous treatment of bred cows with progesterone immediately after ovulation advances conceptus elongation on day 15 of gestation (Garrett et al. 1988) which is similar to the timing of elongation in sheep (Satterfield et al. 2006). Interactions between the conceptus and the endometrium during the peri-implantation period of conceptus elongation are sensitive to endometrial changes because dysregulation of these changes leads to downstream effects on conceptus survival and later embryonic loss in subfertile cows (Moraes et al. 2018).
During the peri-attachment period, sheep and bovine endometrium and conceptuses secrete prostaglandins as expression of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) is enhanced (Charpigny et al. 1997a, b). Prostaglandins modify the endometrial transcriptome and influence endometrial secretions to stimulate conceptus growth and survival (Simmons et al. 2009). Brooks et al. (2015) demonstrated that peroxisome proliferator activator receptor gamma (PPARG), a nuclear factor that binds to prostaglandins, is an essential regulator of conceptus proliferation and survival. In addition, conceptus development and elongation in sheep is severely comprised when endometrial and conceptus prostaglandin production is inhibited with a PTGS2-specific inhibitor during the peri-attachment period (Dorniak et al. 2011). The progesterone-driven uterine transcriptome, proteome, lipidome, and metabolome play a critical role in conceptus growth and elongation essential to downstream placental development and survival.
Elongation of the bovine and ovine conceptus through the ipsilateral uterine horn on days 15 to 18 of pregnancy is critical to not only provide the essential uterine surface area for adequate nutrient and oxygen exchange but to inhibit luteolysis and extend progesterone production beyond the length of the estrous cycle. Maternal recognition of pregnancy in ruminants requires not only rapid growth, elongation, and apposition across the uterine lumen surface (Fig. 6a), but conceptus expression and secretion of the type 1 interferon tau (IFNT) (Fig. 6d) to prevent regression of the CL (see Spencer and Hansen 2015).
During the estrous cycle and early pregnancy, progesterone receptor (PGR) is expressed in the endometrial stroma cells, but no PGR expression is observed in the LE or GE (Fig. 6c). Loss of epithelial PGR in cyclic females allows upregulation of estrogen receptor, and follicular estrogen production stimulates an increase in endometrial oxytocin receptor expression. The release of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) initiates release of oxytocin from the CL which forms a positive feedback loop for increased pulsatile release of endometrial PGF2α leading to luteolysis (Spencer and Hansen 2015). Briefly, during establishment of pregnancy (days 12–15 in sheep and 15–21 in cattle), conceptus growth (Fig. 5b) drives expansion and apposition to the endometrial LE (Fig. 6a) and positions the trophoblast so that secreted IFNT (Fig. 6a, d) can bind to type 1 IFN receptors present on the endometrial LE inhibiting the transcription of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) (Fig. 6e). Inhibition of ESR1 prevents establishment of the positive feedback loop necessary for the pulsatile release of PGF2α from the endometrium preventing luteolysis (Spencer and Hansen 2015). Conceptus secretion of IFNT can also help regulate the endometrial transcriptome and possibly regulate immune function to prevent rejection of the semi-allograft fetus (Bazer et al. 2015, 2020).
4 Conceptus Attachment and Placental Formation
The initial attachment between bovine trophoblast and uterine surface epithelium is evident on days 18 to 21 (King et al. 1980). With continued development and differentiation of the chorion, firm attachment occurs through interdigitation of the microvilli with the epithelium of the caruncular and intercaruncular areas of the uterine lining. At this point in development, the tips of the chorion extend throughout both uterine horns (King et al. 1982).
During implantation in the mouse, attachment to the uterine luminal epithelial surface involves progesterone induced loss of the antiadhesive MUC1 which serves as a physical interference at the LE for attachment (Surveyor et al. 1995). Expression of MUC1 is not downregulated by progesterone in the LE of sheep during the midluteal stage of the estrous cycle but is reduced at the conceptus–endometrial surface interface in association with conceptus IFNT production (Raheem et al. 2016). Loss of MUC1 allows cell to cell interactions with adhesion factors such as integrins, which are needed to facilitate attachment (Kim et al. 2010; Johnson et al. 2001, 2014). Multiple molecules such as GlyCAM (Spencer et al. 1999a, b), cadherins, galectin-15 (LGALS15), and secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) are proposed to form complexes with integrins and glycoconjugates expressed on the aligned apical surfaces of the trophoblast and LE (Johnson et al. 2018; Spencer et al. 2004a, b).
The apical surfaces of the interface between the endometrial LE and placenta can express integrin receptors αvβ3, αvβ1, avb5, α4β1, and α5β1 during conceptus attachment and throughout gestation in sheep (Johnson et al. 2001; Burghardt et al. 2009). Endometrial expression of SPP1, also known as osteopontin, serves as a crosslinker to bind the cellular integrin receptors together (Fig. 7a). Seo et al. (2020) found that αvβ3, αvβ5, and α4β1 (Fig. 7b, c) serve as the integrin receptors for conceptus attachment during the peri-implantation period of pregnancy in sheep. Only β3 is exclusively limited to the apical surface of endometrial LE during the period of peri-attachment suggesting a specific role of β3 during attachment of conceptus. Interestingly, β5 expression is present in the LE and extends down into the openings of the GE. It is possible that β5 integrin associates with trophectoderm papillae that anchor the conceptus during elongation and help provide absorption of glandular secretions during early development.
Galectin-15 has a carbohydrate recognition domain that binds to beta-galactosides (Cooper 2002) and contains sequences that can interact with integrins (Spencer et al. 2004a, b). In sheep, the conceptus and placenta do not produce LGALS15 which is specifically expressed by endometrial LE and superficial GE (Gray et al. 2004). The endometrial LGALS15 is secreted into the uterine lumen throughout pregnancy where it is absorbed by trophoblasts and utilized in cell adhesion or internalized to regulate cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis (Fig. 7d). LGALS15 is absent in placentomes when the caruncular surface is devoid of LE during syncytial formation (Gray et al. 2004). However, LGALS15 is present in the intercaruncular area of the endometrium when the LE are reestablished.
During the peri-attachment period, the yolk sac develops from days 18 to 23 of gestation (Wrobel and Suess 1998) to provide the initial vascular system to transfer nutrients to the developing embryo (Assis Neto et al. 2010). The yolk sac provides the vascular transport of blood and nutrients to the developing embryo and it is also the source of primordial germ cells (Kritzenberger and Wrobel 2004). It also contributes specific proteins and metabolites to the developing embryo (Mançanares et al. 2013; Galdos-Riveros et al. 2015). Attachment of the chorion to the uterine surface is closely followed by a projection of extraembryonic splachnopleure from the embryo hindgut (Fig. 4a) which initiates allantois formation on day 21 of gestation (Maddox-Hyttel et al. 2003). The fluid-filled vascular allantois rapidly expands throughout the extraembryonic coelom (Fig. 8), while the yolk sac concurrently regresses becoming vestigial by day 55 although it is still present at term (Assis Neto et al. 2010). The chorion and allantois mesenchyme fuse to form the vascular chorioallantoic placenta from day 26 to 60 of gestation which will be present throughout the remainder of gestation (Fig. 8). The accumulation of fluid in the allantois serves to expand the chorioallantoic membranes forcing apposition into the intercaruncular and caruncular surface of the maternal endometrium. Fluid within the amnion is a different composition compared to the allantois (Fig. 8) where it functions to provide a protective environment for embryo/fetal development. Ligation of the urachus from the fetal kidney within the umbilical cord results in the loss of allantoic fluid during late pregnancy in sheep. The passage of fluid from the embryonic kidney through the urachus in the umbilical cord has led to the misconception that the allantois functions as a reservoir for fetal waste. However, the kidney only redistributes fluid as the maternal vasculature provides the water for the fetus and placenta (Bazer 1989). The allantois contains ions, carbohydrates (glucose, fructose), and amino acids as well as selective proteins and hormones (Bazer et al. 1981; Bazer and Johnson 2018). Therefore, the allantois provides a reserve of nutrients essential for the rapid demands of fetal growth throughout gestation in ungulates. Fluid in the amnion and allantois may also be transported directly through aquaporin water channels expressed in the chorioallantois (Zhu et al. 2015). Expression of transporters for ions, glucose, and amino acids in the chorioallantoic membranes contributes to maternal transfer of electrolytes, glucose, amnio acids, and nutrients (Bazer et al. 2012).
As the placental membranes continue to grow, fluid volumes of the amnion and allantois increase and change throughout gestation in cattle and sheep. In cattle, allantoic fluid volume increases from 50 mL on day 30 to 600 mL by day 100 while amnion fluid volume reaches 450 mL (Eley et al. 1978). In cattle, fluid volume is over 5 L within the allantois and 2 L in the amnion during late gestation (day 260) with total volumes reaching 9 L near term (Rasby et al. 1990). In sheep, there is a similar increase in allantoic fluid volume from day 25 to 40 (21 to 91 mL) as the allantois expands within the chorion, but the fluid volume declines by day 70 (32 mL) (Gresham et al. 1972). A second increase in allantoic fluid volume continues to near term on day 140 (438 mL). These dynamic changes in allantoic fluid volume likely impact development and growth of the placenta and fetus.
5 Placentome Development
The expansion of the chorioallantois brings the chorion into close contact with glandular intercaruncular regions and aglandular caruncular (consisting of connective tissue formations covered by columnar epithelium) areas of the ruminant endometrium (Fig. 9a). The firm attachment of the chorion involves interdigitation at the microvillar junctions between the LE and chorionic epithelium (Fig. 9b). The chorion overlaying the openings to the uterine glands differentiate into areolae (Fig. 9c), which are involved with uptake of secretions into the capillaries of the chorioallantosis (Johnson et al. 2018). In cattle, the chorion does not significantly infiltrate into the endometrial caruncles until after day 30 of gestation (King et al. 1979), and the cotyledonary attachments are not visible on the chorioallantois at this time (Fig. 8). From day 33 to 50 of gestation, the initial attachments between trophoblasts and caruncles are reinforced, and the surface area increases as the chorionic villi (cotyledons) penetrate into septa within the caruncular endometrium. The villi increase in length and undergo extensive branching (Figs. 8 and 9d–f). Simultaneously, development of an extensive blood supply in the villi produces mature “placentomes,” which serve as the main site of exchange for easily diffusible nutrients, waste disposal, and for meeting the oxygen demands of the developing fetus (King 1993; Leiser et al. 1998). The size of the placental cotyledons is largest near the amnion where cotyledon formation is first initiated and then spreads towards the tips of the chorion (Fig. 8). Since cotyledons represent the most visually apparent aspect of the mature ruminant placenta, it is also described as a “cotyledonary placenta.” The only animals in Ruminantia that do not have a cotyledonary placenta are in the Tragulidae family (e.g., the mouse deer); however, these animals do have giant binucleate trophoblast cells or BNC (described below) (Kimura et al. 2004). Potentially, the tragulid placenta represents an intermediate form between the epitheliochorial and the cotyledonary placentas of swine and most ruminants, respectively.
6 Trophobast BNC Differentiation and Syncytial Formation
Grosser initially described the ruminant placenta as “syndesmochorial” (Grosser 1909, 1927). He had concluded that the uterine epithelium was lost during ruminant placental establishment and that there was direct apposition of trophoblast with the maternal connective tissue. Subsequently, Wooding and others concluded that the uterine epithelium was altered, but appeared to have remained, albeit sometimes in altered form (Wooding 1982a, b, 1984). Instead of an erosion of uterine epithelium, these histological scientists suggested that there was a fetomaternal syncytial cell layer. Consequently, the term “syndesmochorial placenta” was revised to “synepitheliochorial placentation”; where “syn” stands for the syncytium and “epitheliochorial” signifies the persistence of recognizable fetal and maternal epithelia at the fetal–maternal interface (Wooding 1992).
During the peri-attachment period of conceptus development, a number of mononuclear cells within the trophoectoderm begin to differentiate into BNC (Fig. 10a) (Spencer and Hansen 2015). The BNCs appear around day 16 pc in sheep (Boshier 1969), day 18 pc in goat (Wango et al. 1990), and day 19 to 20 pc in cattle (Greenstein et al. 1958). The BNC arise from the mononuclear trophectoderm cells through karyokinesis without cytokinesis (endoreduplication) or from mitotic polyploidy (Wooding and Flint 1994; Wooding et al. 1997; Spencer et al. 2010).
After formation of a vascularized chorioallantois, the BNCs represent approximately 15–20% of the chorionic epithelium, and these numbers remain relatively constant throughout gestation (Wooding et al. 1986; Wooding 1992; Wooding and Flint 1994). The BNC is a terminally differentiated cell, but it does undergo additional maturation. Along with two nuclei, it has an extensive rough endoplasmic reticulum and large golgi bodies that give rise to large numbers of cytoplasmic granules that make up almost 50% of the cell volume. When fully matured, the BNC migrates through the microvillar junctions between the trophoblast and luminal epithelia (Fig. 10a, b and f). They fuse with an uterine epithelial cell (Fig. 10b, f) to create a fetomaternal trinucleate cell (TNC) (Wooding 1987) (Fig. 10c, f). After the fusion, the secretory granules of the BNC transit towards the maternal side of the nascent TNC (Wooding 1987) to be expelled toward the maternal stroma. Following fusion, the TNC reforms part of the apposition with the adjacent trophoblast cells, which maintains an intact barrier between the two interfacing epithelia (Wooding 1987).
After the formation of trinucleate cells, binucleate cell migration and fusion can continue, which leads to the establishment of syncytial plaques (Fig. 10c, d) (Wooding 1984). The extent of syncytium formation differs between species. In sheep, the syncytial plaques are quite extensive; these contain up to 20–24 nuclei and they persist throughout pregnancy (Morgan and Wooding 1983). In cattle, syncytial formation is actually limited (Fig. 10d). No extensive syncytium is present beyond approximately day 40 of gestation (King et al. 1979; Wathes and Wooding 1980; King et al. 1982). After that time, only short-lived TNCs are formed (Fig. 10e, f) and these are soon replaced by epithelial cells (Wooding and Wathes 1980). The situation differs somewhat in small ruminants, such as sheep and goats. In the intercotyledonary regions, syncytial plaques are found initially, but they are soon replaced by uterine epithelium (King et al. 1981; King and Atkinson 1987; Wooding and Flint 1994). Afterwards, migrations and fusion of BNCs with uterine epithelia result in the formation of TNCs, but not a syncytium. In the placentomal regions of sheep, the syncytia persist at the interface throughout the pregnancy (Fig. 10c). The origins of the syncytia continue to be studied, and recent work suggests that further refinements of our understanding of ruminant placentation may be warranted. There is some evidence that uterine epithelia in the caruncles may not be part of the syncytial plaques at the interface of sheep (Seo et al. 2019). Of note, colocalization studies provided some evidence that the LE are eliminated and the syncytium itself is comprised of multinucleated syncytiotrophoblast entirely of placental origin (Seo et al. 2019).
As was mentioned previously, the giant trophoblast BNCs represent a cell type that contributes to the unique aspects of the placental form of ruminants. Numerous studies have started to reveal some of the mechanisms underlying the origins and functions of the ruminant-specific BNCs. For example, endometrial and conceptus expression of endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are proposed to serve a role in placenta morphogenesis (Black et al. 2010) and the migration and fusion of BNC to the surface epithelium in the carunculuar and intercaruncular areas of the uterus (Dunlap et al. 2006a; Spencer et al. 2010). Syncytins, which are expressed by envelope genes of retroviruses and have fusogenic activity, may have a role in placentation. Syncytin-Rum1, for which expression is specific to BNC, is associated with the synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants and is not detected in other Cetartiodactyla or primates and rodents (Cornelis et al. 2013; Mi et al. 2000). Endogenous Jaagsiekte sheep retrovirus (enJSRVs) is expressed by both uterine luminal and glandular epithelia (Palmarini et al. 2001; Spencer et al. 2010) as well as in the conceptus trophectoderm (Dunlap et al. 2005). enJSRVs are abundantly expressed in the trophoblast giant BNC and the synytial plaques that arise from them. The receptor for both JSRV and enJSRVs Env, hyaluronoglucosaminidase 2 (HYAL2), is detectable in the BNC and the multinucleated syncytial plaques (Dunlap et al. 2005). Spencer et al. (2010) proposed that the formation of trinucleated fetomaternal hybrid cells arose when co-expressed enJSRVs env and HYAL2 initially fuse with endometrial luminal epithelial (LE) cells that are expressing enJSRVs env. It is worth noting that loss of enJSRVs env expression compromises conceptus growth and implantation in sheep (Dunlap et al. 2006b).
In addition to their contribution to the syncytia and formation of placentomes, it is important to note that BNCs produce steroid (progesterone), prostaglandin (PGI2, PGE2), and protein hormones [placental lactogens or chorionic somatomammotropin hormone one (CSH1)], as well as proteins without a clearly understood function (e.g., pregnancy-associated glycoproteins; PAGs) (Duello et al. 1986; Green et al. 2000; Reimers et al. 1985; Wallace et al. 2015; Wooding et al. 2005; Xie et al. 1991) (Fig. 10d–f). The latter are packaged in the BNC secretory granules. After fusion, the granules are released toward the uterine connective tissue. The PAGs can accumulate in the uterine stroma; they can also enter the maternal circulation (Wooding et al. 2005; Green et al. 2005). Their accumulation in the maternal blood within a few days after BNCs begin to appear in the chorion has made these proteins useful markers of pregnancy in ruminants (Green et al. 2005; Sasser et al. 1986; Zoli et al. 1992). Indeed, the circulating abundance of the PAGs appears to be correlated with placental function or viability of the pregnancy. The amount of certain PAGs at key stages in early pregnancy of cattle can serve to predict which cows are likely to spontaneously abort the pregnancy (Pohler et al. 2013, 2016a, b). Recent evidence supports a dual role for placental lactogen (CSH1) for paracrine effects to stimulate uterine gland secretions for embryonic and placental development (Spencer et al. 1999a, b, 2004a, b; Kelleher et al. 2019).
Thus, trophoblast BNCs have two principal functions: (1) primary contributors to the fetomaternal syncytium required for successful implantation and placentome formation and (2) production and delivery of protein and steroid hormones and numerous other proteins of unknown function to the maternal and fetal systems.
7 Summary
It is hoped that this chapter has provided the reader with an appreciation of the similarities and differences in embryo/conceptus development, attachment to the uterine endometrium, and subsequent placental development, between ruminant ungulates and the other mammals described in this book. Placentomes, BNCs, fetomaternal hybrid cells, and multinucleated syncytial plaques are distinguishing features of the cotyledonary placenta of Ruminantia. These modifications relative to other epitheliochorial forms within the Artiodactyla order likely reflect the rapid evolution of placental forms, even within the same phylogenetic order. The placenta is considered one of the most rapidly evolving mammalian organs (Roberts et al. 2016; Haig 1996). Among other things, these differences are probably driven by the selection of large, rapidly evolving gene families, the acquisition of endogenous retrovirus-derived genes, and the rapid evolution of placenta-specific enhancers (Roberts et al. 2016; Telugu and Green 2007). There are no structures comparable to placentomes in the placentas of other artiodactyls. Likewise, giant trophoblasts and the syncytial plaques they form are unique aspects of this placental form.
The fusion of BNCs with uterine epithelial cells or the establishment of syncytial plaques in place of an intact uterine epithelium is the extent of invasive implantation in ruminant ungulates. Even so, these alterations would change how the ruminant conceptus interacts with the maternal system. The nature of these interactions (immunological, endocrinological, etc.) is very different in many ways to that observed in pigs, whales, and camels, where erosion of the uterine epithelium does not occur (Roberts et al. 2016; Telugu and Green 2007).
References
Amoroso EC (1952) Placentation. In: Parkes AS (ed) Marshall’s physiology of reproduction, vol 2, 3rd edn. Longmans, London, pp 127–311
Assis Neto AC, Pereira FTV, Santos TC, Ambrosio CE, Leiser R, Miglino MA (2010) Morpho-physical recording of bovine conceptus (Bos indicus) and placenta from days 20 to 70 of pregnancy. Reprod Domest Anim 45:760–772
Bazer FW (1989) Allantoic fluid: regulation of volume and composition. In: Brace RA (ed) Fetal and neonatal body fluids. Perinatology Press, Cornell, NY, pp 135–157
Bazer FW, Johnson GA (2018) Allantois. In: Skinner MK (ed) Encyclopedia of reproduction, vol 2. Academic Press, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp 559–561
Bazer FW, Goldstein MH, Barron DH (1981) Water and electrolyte transport by pig chorioallantois. In: Mastroianni L, Biggers JD (eds) Fertilization and embryonic development in vitro. Plenum, New York, pp 299–321
Bazer FW, Wu G, Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bayless K (2010) Novel pathways for implantation and establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in mammals. Mol Hum Reprod 16:135–152
Bazer FW, Kim J, Ka H, Johnson GA, Wu G, Song G (2012) Select nutrients in the uterine lumen of sheep and pigs affect conceptus development. J Reprod Dev 58:180–188
Bazer FW, Ying W, Wang X, Dunlap KA, Zhou B, Johnson JA, Wu G (2015) The many faces of interferon tau. Amino Acids 47:449–460
Bazer FW, Seo H, Wu G, Johnson GA (2020) Interferon tau: influences on growth and development of the conceptus. Theriogenology 150:75–83
Berg DK, Smith CS, Pearton DJ, Wells DN, Broadhurst R, Donnison M, Pfeffer PL (2011) Trophectoderm lineage determination in cattle. Dev Cell 20:244–255
Betteridge KJ, Flechon JE (1988) The anatomy and physiology of the pre-attachment bovine embryos. Theriogenology 29:155–187
Betteridge KJ, Eaglesome MD, Randall GC, Mitchell DJ (1980) Collection, description and transfer of embryos from cattle 10-16 days after oestrus. Reprod Fertil 59:205–216
Black SG, Arnaud F, Palmarini M, Spencer TE (2010) Endogenous retroviruses in trophoblast differentiation and placental development. Am J Reprod Immunol 64:255–264
Boshier DP (1969) A histological and histochemical examination of implantation and early placentome formation in sheep. J Reprod Fertil 19:51–61
Brackett BG, Oh YK, Evans JF, Donawick WJ (1980) Fertilization and early development of cow ova. Biol Reprod 23:189–205
Brooks KE, Burns GW, Spencer TE (2015) Peroxisome proliferator activator receptor gamma (PPARG) regulates conceptus elongation in sheep. Biol Reprod 42:1–13
Burghardt RC, Burghardt JR, Taylor JD II, Reeder AT, Nguyen BT, Spencer TE, Johnson GA (2009) Enhanced focal adhesion assembly reflects increased mechanosensation and mechanotransduction along the maternal/conceptus interface during pregnancy in sheep. Reproduction 137:567–582
Carter AM, Enders AC (2013) The evolution of epitheliochorial placentation. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 1:443–467
Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Tamby JP, Creminon C, Guillomot M (1997a) Cyclooxygenase-2 unlike cyclooxygenase-1 is highly expressed in ovine embryos during the implantation period. Biol Reprod 57:1032–1040
Charpigny G, Reinaud P, Tamby JP, Creminon C, Martal J, Maclouf J, Guillomot M (1997b) Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in ovine endometrium during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Endocrinology 138:2163–2217
Chavatte-Palmer P, Guillomot M (2007) Comparative implantation and placentation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 64:166–174
Cockburn K, Rossant J (2010) Making the blastocyst: lessons from the mouse. J Clin Invest 120:995–1003
Cooper DN (2002) Galectinomics: finding themes in complexity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1572:209–231
Cornelis G, Heidmann O, Degrelle SA, Vernochet C, Lavialle C, Letzelter C, Bernard-Stoecklin S, Hassanin A, Mulot B, Guillomot M, Hue I, Heidmann T, Dupressoir A (2013) Captured retroviral envelope syncytin gene associated with the unique placental structure of higher ruminants. PNAS 110:E828–E837
Dorniak P, Bazer FW, Spencer TE (2011) Prostaglandins regulate conceptus elongation and mediate effects of interferon tau on the ovine uterine endometrium. Biol Reprod 84:1119–1127
Duello TM, Byatt JC, Bremel RD (1986) Immunohistochemical localization of placental lactogen in binucleate cells of bovine placentomes. Endocrinology 119:1351–1355
Dunlap KA, Palmarini M, Adelson DL, Spencer TE (2005) Sheep endogenous betaretroviruses (enJSRVs) and the hyaluronidase 2 (HYAL2) receptor in the ovine uterus and conceptus. Biol Reprod 73:271–279
Dunlap KA, Palmarini M, Spencer TE (2006a) Ovine endogenous betaretroviruses (enJSRVs) and placental morphogenesis. Placenta 27(Suppl a):S135–S140
Dunlap KA, Palmarini M, Varela M, Burghardt RC, Hayashi K, Farmer JL, Spencer TE (2006b) Endogenous retroviruses regulate periimplantation placental growth and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:14390–14395
Eley RM, Thatcher WW, Bazer FW, Wilcox CJ, Becker RB, Head HH, Adkinson RW (1978) Development of the conceptus in the bovine. J Dairy Sci 61:467–473
Forde N, Carter F, Spencer TE, Bazer FW, Sandra O, Mansouri-Attia N, Okumu LA, McGettigan PA, Mehta JP, McBride R, O'Gaora P, Roche JF, Lonergan P (2011) Conceptus-induced changes in the endometrial transcriptome: how soon does the cow know she is pregnant? Biol Reprod 85:144–156
Frank JW, Steinhauser CB, Wang X, Bughardt RC, Bazer FW, Johnson GA (2020) Loss of ITGB3 in ovine conceptuses decreases conceptus expression of NOS3 and SPP1: implications for the developing placental vasculature. Biol Reprod:ioaa212
Galdos-Riveros AC, Favaron PO, Seal W, Miglino MA, Maria DA (2015) Bovine yolk sac: from morphology to metabolomic and proteomic profiles. Genet Mol Res 14:6223–6238
Garrett JE, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Morgan GL (1988) Evidence for maternal regulation of early conceptus growth and development in beef cattle. J Reprod Fertil 84:437–446
Geisert RD, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC (2015) Implantation and establishment of pregnancy in the pig. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 216:137–163
Gray CA, Adelson DL, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Meeusen EN, Spencer TE (2004) Discovery and characterization of an epithelial-specific galectin in the endometrium that forms crystals in the trophectoderm. PNAS 101:7982–7987
Green JA, Xie S, Quan X, Bao B, Gan X, Mathialagan N, Beckers J-F, Roberts RM (2000) Pregnancy-associated bovine and ovine glycoproteins exhibit spatially and temporally distinct expression patterns during pregnancy. Biol Reprod 62:1624–1631
Green JA, Parks TE, Avalle MP, Telugu BP, McLain AL, Peterson AJ, McMillan W, Mathialagan N, Xie S, Hook RR, Roberts RM (2005) The establishment of an ELISA for the detection of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) in the serum of pregnant cows and heifers. Theriogenology 63:1481–1503
Greenstein JS, Murray RW, Foley RC (1958) Observations on the morphogenesis and histochemistry of the bovine pre-attachment placenta between 16 and 33 days of gestation. Anat Rec 132:321–341
Gresham EL, Rankin JHG, Makowski EL, Meschia G, Battaglia FC (1972) An evaluation of fetal renal function in a chronic sheep preparation. J Clin Invest 51:149–156
Grosser O (1909) Vergleichende Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Eihaute und der Placenta. W. Braumuller, Vienna and Leipzig
Grosser O (1927) Fruhentwicklung, Eihautbidung und Placentation des Menschen und der Saugetiere. J. F. Bergmann, Munchen
Guillomot M, Guay P (1982) Ultrastructural features of the cell surfaces of uterine and trophoblastic epithelia during embryo attachment in the cow. Anat Rec 204:315–322
Guillomot M, Fechon JE, Wintenberger-Torres S (1981) Conceptus attachment in the ewe: an ultrastructural study. Placenta 2:169–182
Guillomot M, Fléchon JE, Wintenberger-Torres S (1982) Cytochemical studies of uterine and trophoblastic surface coats during blastocyst attachment in the ewe. J Reprod Fertil 65:1–8
Guillomot M, Flechon JE, Leroy F (1993) Blastocyst development and implantation. In: Thibault C, Levasseur MC, Hunter RHF (eds) Reproduction in mammals and man. Ellipses, Paris, pp 387–411
Haig D (1996) Altercation of generations: genetic conflicts of pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol 35:226–232
Hradecky P (1983) Placental morphology in African antelopes and giraffes. Theriogenology 20:725–734
Hradecky P, Mossman HW, Stott GG (1988) Comparative development of the ruminant placentomes. Theriogenology 29:715–7129
Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Jaeger LA, Ka H, Garlow JE, Pfarrer C, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC (2001) Muc-1, integrin and osteopontin expression during the implantation cascade in sheep. Biol Reprod 65:820–828
Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW (2014) Osteopontin: a leading candidate adhesion molecule for implantation in pigs and sheep. J Anim Sci Biotech 5:56
Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Wu G, Seo H, Kramer AC, McLendon BA (2018) Cellular events during ovine implantation and impact for gestation. Anim Reprod 15:843–855
Kelleher AK, Demayo FJ, Spencer TE (2019) Uterine glands: developmental biology and functional roles in pregnancy. Endocr Rev 40:1424–1445
Kim J, Erikson DW, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, Wu G, Bayless KJ, Johnson GA, Bazer FW (2010) Secreted phosphoprotein 1 binds integrins to initiate multiple cell signaling pathways, including FRAP1/mTOR, to support attachment and force-generated migration of trophectoderm cells. Matrix Biol 29:369–382
Kimura J, Sasaki M, Endo H, Fukuta K (2004) Anatomical and histological characterization of the female reproductive organs of mouse deer (Tragulidae). Placenta 25:705–711
King GJ (1993) Comparative placentation in ungulates. J Exp Zool 266:588–602
King GJ, Atkinson BA (1987) The bovine intercaruncular placenta throughout gestation. Anim Reprod Sci 12:241–254
King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA (1979) Development of the bovine placentome during the second month of gestation. J Reprod Fertil 55:173–180
King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA (1980) Development of the bovine placentome from days 20 to 29 of gestation. J. Reprod Fertil 59:95–100
King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA (1981) Development of the intercaruncular area during early gestation and the establishment of the bovine placenta. J Reprod Fertil 61:469–474
King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA (1982) Implantation and early placentation in domestic ungulates. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 31:17–30
Kritzenberger M, Wrobel K-H (2004) Histochemical in situ identification of bovine embryonic blood cells reveals differences to the adult hematopoietic system and suggests a close relationships between hematopoietic stem cells and primordial germ cells. Histochem Cell Biol 121:273–289
Leiser R (1975) Development of contact between trophoblast and uterine epithelium during the early stages on implantation in the cow. Zentralbl Veterinarmed C 4:63–86
Leiser R, Pfarrer C, Abd-Elnaeim M, Dantzer V (1998) Feto-maternal anchorage in epitheliochorial and endotheliochorial placental types studied by histology and microvascular corrosion casts. Placenta 9:21–39
Llobat L (2020) Embryo gene expression in pig pregnancy. Reprod Domest Anim 55:523–529
Lonergan P, Forde N, Spencer T (2016) Role of progesterone in embryo development in cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev 28:66–74
Maddox-Hyttel P, Alexopoulos NI, Vajta G, Lewis I, Rogers P, Cann L, Callesen A, Tveden-Nyborg P, Trounson A (2003) Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterization of the initial post-hatching development of bovine embryos. Reproduction 125:607–623
Mançanares CAF, Leiser R, Favaron PO, Carvalho AF, Oliveira VC, De Santos JM et al (2013) A morphological analysis of the transition between the embryonic primitive intestine and yolk sac in bovine embryos and fetuses. Microsc Res Tech 76:756–766
Mi S, Lee X, X-p L, Veldman GM, Finnerty H, Racie L, LaVallie E, Tang X-Y, Edouard P, Howes S, Keith JC, McCoy JM (2000) Syncytin is a captive retroviral envelope protein involved in human placental morphogenesis. Nature 403:785–789
Moraes JGN, Behura SK, Geary TW, Hansen PJ, Neibergs HL, Spencer TE (2018) Uterine influences on conceptus development in fertility-classified animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:E1749–E1758
Morgan G, Wooding FBP (1983) Cell migration in the ruminant placenta, a freeze fracture study. J Ultrastruct Res 83:148–160
Mossman HW (1937) Comparative morphogenesis of the fetal membranes and accessory uterine structures. Contr Embryol Carnegie Instn 158:129–246
Mossman HW (1974) Structural changes in vertebrate fetal membranes associated with the adoption of viviparity. Obstet Gynecol Annu 3:7–32
Mossman HW (1987) Vertebrate fetal membranes. Rutgers University Press, München, p 383
Negrón-Pérez VM, Rodrigues LT, Mingoti GZ, Hansen PJ (2018) Role of ROCK signaling in formation of the trophectoderm of the bovine preimplantation embryo. Mol Reprod Dev 85:374–375
Palmarini M, Gray CA, Carpenter K, Fan H, Bazer FW, Spencer TE (2001) Expression of endogenous betaretroviruses in the ovine uterus: effects of neonatal age, estrous cycle, pregnancy, and progesterone. J Virol 75:11319–11327
Perry JS (1981) The mammalian fetal membranes. J Reprod Fertil 62:321–335
Pohler KG, Geary TW, Johnson CL, Atkins JA, Jinks EM, Busch DC, Green JA, MacNeil MD, Smith MF (2013) Circulating bovine pregnancy associated glycoproteins are associated with late embryonic/fetal survival but not ovulatory follicle size in suckled beef cows. J Anim Sci 91:4158–4167
Pohler KG, Pereira MHC, Lopes FR, Lawrence JC, Keisler DH, Smith MF, Vasconcelos JLM, Green JA (2016a) Circulating concentrations of bovine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins and late embryonic mortality in lactating dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 99:1584–1594
Pohler KG, Peres RFG, Green JA, Graff H, Martins T, Vasconcelos JLM, Smith MF (2016b) Use of bovine pregnancy-associated glycoproteins to predict late embryonic mortality in postpartum Nelore beef cows. Theriogenology 85:1652–1659
Raheem KA, Marei WFA, Campbell BK, Fouladi-Nashta AA (2016) In vivo and in vitro studies of MUC1 regulation in sheep endometrium. Theriogenology 85:1635–1643
Rasby RJ, Wettemann RP, Geisert RD, Rice LE, Wallace CR (1990) Nutrition, body condition and reproduction in beef cows: fetal and placental development, and estrogens and progesterone in plasma. J Anim Sci 68:4267–4276
Reimers T, Ullmann M, Hansel W (1985) Progesterone and prostanoid production by bovine binucleate trophoblastic cells. Biol Reprod 33:1227–1236
Roberts RM, Green JA, Schulz LC (2016) The evolution of the placenta. Reproduction 152:R179–R189
Rowson LEA, Moore RM (1966) Embryo transfer in sheep; the significance of synchronizing oestrus in the donor and recipient animal. J Reprod Fertil 11:207–212
Sasser RG, Ruder CA, Ivani KA, Butler JE, Hamilton WC (1986) Detection of pregnancy by radioimmunoassay of a novel pregnancy-specific protein in serum of cows and a profile of serum concentrations during gestation. Biol Reprod 35:936–942
Satterfield MC, Bazer FW, Spencer TE (2006) Progesterone regulation of preimplantation conceptus growth and galectin 15 (LGALS15) in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 75:289–296
Seo H, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA (2019) Immunohistochemical examination of trophoblast syncytialization during early placentation in sheep. Int J Mol Sci 20:4530–4543
Seo H, James W, Frank JW, Robert C, Burghardt RC, Fuller W, Bazer FW, Johnson GA (2020) Integrins and OPN localize to adhesion complexes during placentation in sheep. Reproduction 160:521–532
Simmons RM, Erikson DW, Kim J, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Spencer TE (2009) Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in the ruminant uterus: potential endometrial marker and regulator of conceptus elongation. Endocrinology 150:4295–4305
Skidmore JA, Wooding FBP, Allen WR (1996) Implantation and early placentation in the one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius). Placenta 17:253–262
Spencer TE, Hansen TR (2015) Implantation and establishment of pregnancy in ruminants. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 216:105–135
Spencer TE, Bartol FF, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Joyce MM (1999a) Identification and characterization of glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1-like protein expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 60:241–250
Spencer TE, Stagg AG, Taylor KM, Johnson GA, Gertler A, Gootwine E, Bazer FW (1999b) Effects of recombinant ovine interferon tau, placental lactogen and growth hormone on ovine endometrial function. Biol Reprod 61:1409–1418
Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Bazer FW, Burghardt RC (2004a) Implantation mechanisms: insights from the sheep. Reproduction 128:657–668
Spencer TE, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW (2004b) Progesterone and placental hormone actions on the uterus: insights from domestic animals. Biol Reprod 71:2–10
Spencer DS, Ross JW, Ashworth MD, Geisert RD, Rickords LF (2006) Porcine conceptus Oct-4 mRNA expression during peri-implantation development. Reprod Domest Anim 41:571–572
Spencer TE, Black SG, Arnaud F, Palmarini M (2010) Endogenous retroviruses of sheep: a model system for understanding physiological adaptation to an evolving ruminant genome. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 67:95–104
Spencer TE, Forde N, Lonergan P (2016) The role of progesterone and conceptus-derived factors in uterine biology during early pregnancy in ruminants. J Dairy Sci 99:5941–5950
Surveyor GA, Gendler SJ, Pemberton L, Das SK, Chakraborty I, Julian J, Pimental RA, Wegner CC, Dey SK, Carson DD (1995) Expression and steroid hormonal control of Muc-1 in the mouse uterus. Endocrinology 136:3639–3647
Telugu BP, Green JA (2007) Comparative placentation. In: Constantinescu G, Schatten H (eds) Veterinary reproductive biology. Chapter 12. Blackwell, Ames, IA
Wallace RM, Pohler KG, Smith MF, Green JA (2015) Placental PAGs: gene origins, expression patterns and use as markers of pregnancy. Reproduction 149:R115–R126
Wang J, Guillomot M, Hue I (2009) Cellular organization of the trophoblastic epithelium in elongating conceptuses of ruminants. C R Biol 332:986–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.09.004
Wango EO, Wooding FBP, Heap RB (1990) The role of trophoblastic cells in implantation in the goat: a quantitative study. Placenta 11:381–394
Wathes DC, Wooding FBP (1980) An electron microscopic study of implantation in the cow. Am J Anat 159:285–306
Wiley AA, Bartol FF, Barron DH (1987) Histogenesis of the ovine uterus. J Anim Sci 64:1262–1269
Wimsatt WA (1974) Some comparative aspects of implantation. Biol Reprod 12:1–40
Wooding FBP (1982a) Structure and function of placental binucleate (giant) cells. Bibl Anat 22:134–139
Wooding FBP (1982b) The role of binucleate cell in ruminant placental structure. Reprod Fertil Suppl 31:31–39
Wooding FBP (1984) Role of binucleate cells in fetomaternal cell fusion at implantation in the sheep. Am J Anat 170:233–250
Wooding FBP (1987) Ultrastructural evidence for placental lactogen transport and secretion in ruminants. J Physiol 386:26
Wooding FBP (1992) Current topic: the synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: binucleate cell fusions and hormone production. Placenta 13:101–113
Wooding FBP, Flint APF (1994) Placentation. In: Lamming GE (ed) Marshall’s physiology of reproduction. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 233–460
Wooding FBP, Wathes DC (1980) Binucleate cell migration in the bovine placentome. J Reprod Fertil 59:425–430
Wooding FBP, Flint APF, Heap RB, Morgan G, Buttle HL, Young IR (1986) Control of binucleate cell migration in the placenta of ruminants. J Reprod Fertil 76:499–512
Wooding FB (1992) Current topic: the synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: binucleate cell fusions and hormone production. 13:101–113
Wooding FBP, Morgan G, Adam CL (1997) Structure and function in the ruminant synepitheliochorial placenta: central role of the trophoblast binucleate cell in deer. Microsc Res Tech 38:88–99
Wooding FBP, Roberts RM, Green JA (2005) Light and electron microscope immunocytochemical studies of the distribution of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins (PAGs) throughout pregnancy in the cow: possible functional implications. Placenta 26:807–827
Wrobel K-H, Suess F (1998) Identification and temporospatial distribution of bovine primordial germ cells prior to gonadal sexual differentiation. Anat Embryol 197:451–467
Xie SC, Low BG, Nagel RJ, Kramer KK, Anthony RV, Zoli AP, Beckers JF, Roberts RM (1991) Identification of the major pregnancy-specific antigens of cattle and sheep as inactive members of the aspartic proteinase family. Proc Natl Acad Sci 88:10247–10251
Zhu C, Jiang Z, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Wu G (2015) Aquaporins in the female reproductive system of mammals. Front Biosci 20:838–871
Zoli AP, Guilbault LA, Delahaut P, Ortiz WB, Beckers JF (1992) Radioimmunoassay of a bovine pregnancy-associated glycoprotein in serum: its application for pregnancy diagnosis. Biol Reprod 46:83–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Green, J.A., Geisert, R.D., Johnson, G.A., Spencer, T.E. (2021). Implantation and Placentation in Ruminants. In: Geisert, R.D., Spencer, T. (eds) Placentation in Mammals. Advances in Anatomy, Embryology and Cell Biology, vol 234. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77360-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77360-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77359-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77360-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)