Abstract
If human activity has a major impact on the ecosystems and on the planet’s climate, one can wonder about the role played by the “population” itself. And which dimension of the population variable really matters? Population size? Rate of growth? Population density? This chapter reviews different ways of considering the relationships between population and environment at a macro level. Starting with the Malthusian principle of population, we present different ways in which the role of population dynamics in environmental change has been analyzed: not only are Earth’s carrying capacity, the IPAT equation (Impact = Population, Affluence, Technology) and the Ecological Footprint considered but also models built to integrate interactions and feedback loops. Some models are used for projections, others to specify the consequences of different policy options. A great advance in research, particularly with regard to climate change, is the bringing together of scientific communities that had little exchange between them before, which has allowed a renewal and enrichment of approaches, such as the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways combined in the Representative Concentration Pathways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
The first edition of World Dynamics was published in 1971.
- 5.
References
Biraben, J.-N. (1979). Essai sur l'évolution du nombre des hommes. Population, 34(1), 13–25.
Biraben, J.-N. (2003). The rising numbers of humankind. Population & Sociétés, 394. Ined.
Boserup, E. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth. The economics of agriculture under population pressure (124 pp.). London and New York.
Boserup, E. (1981). Population and technological change. A study of long-term trends (245 pp.). University of Chicago Press and Blackwell.
Boulding, K. (1955, September). The Malthusian model as a general system. Social and Economic Studies, 453–463.
Cipolla, C. M. (1962). The Economic History of World Population. Penguin Books.
Clark C. (1967, 1977). Population growth and land use, Macmillan.
Coale, A. J. (1970). Man and his environment. Science, 170, 132–136.
Cohen, J. E. (1995). How many people can the earth support? Norton.
Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle. In Nature, Man, and Technology, Alfred a. Knopf.
Commoner, B. (1972). The environmental cost of economic growth, population resources and the environment. In R. G. Ridker (Ed.), Commission on population growth and the american future, research reports (Vol. III, pp. 339–363).
Demeny, P. (1988). Demography and the limits to growth. In Population and development review (Supplement: Population and resources in western intellectual traditions) (Vol. 14, pp. 213–244).
Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1(2), 277–300.
Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1997). Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 175–179.
Dudal, R., Higgins, G. M., & Kassam, A. H. (1985). Land, food and population in the developing world. In T. J. Davis (Ed.), Population and food (pp. 5–28). Proceedings of the Fifth Agriculture Sector Symposium, The World Bank.
Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb. Ballantine Books.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171, 1212–1217.
Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1972). Impact of population growth. In R. G. Ridker (Ed.), Population resources and the environment (Vol. of commission research reports) (pp. 365–377). U.S. Government Printing Office.
Forrester, J. W. (1973). World dynamics, second edition (first edition in 1971). Wright-Allen Press.
Guillou, M., & Matheron, G. (2012). The World’s challenge: Feeding 9 billion people. Editions Quae.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of commons. Science, New Series, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
Higgins, G. M., Kassam, A. H., & Naiken, L. (1982). Potential population supporting capacities of lands in the developing world. Land and Water Development Division, FAO.
Hunter, L. M., & O’Neill, B. C. (2014). Enhancing engagement between the population, environment, and climate research communities: The shared socio-economic pathway process. Population and Environment, 35(3), 231–242. Published online 2014 Feb 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-014-0202-7
IIASA. (2013). PDE concept. https://iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/WorldPopulation/Research/PDE-Concept.en.html
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.
Johnson, I. (2014). Towards a contemporary understanding of the limits to growth. In I. Goldin (Ed.), Is the planet full? (pp. 79–103). Oxford University Press.
Kaya, Y. (1990). Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios, IPCC response strategies working group memorandum 1989. IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup.
Kc, S., & Lutz, W. (2017). The human core of the Shared Socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Global Environmental Change, 42, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004
Keyfitz, N. (1991a). Population and development within the ecosphere: One view on the literature. Population Index, 57(I), 5–22.
Keyfitz, N. (1991b, June). Interdisciplinary analysis in four fields. In Options. IIASA.
Keyfitz, N. (1993). Are there ecological limits to population. Proceedings of National Academy of Science USA, 90, 6895–6899.
Livi-Bacci, M. (1997). A Concise History of World Population (Second ed.). Blackwell.
Livi-Bacci, M. (2017). Our Shrinking Planet. Polity Press.
Lutz, W. (Ed.). (1994). Population-development-environment: Understanding their interactions in Mauritius. Springer Verlag.
Lutz, W. (2009). What can demographers contribute to understanding the link between Population and Climate Change (Popnet, No 41). IIASA.
Lutz, W., & Scherbov, S. (2000). Quantifying vicious circle dynamics: The PEDA model for population, environment, development and agriculture in African countries. In E. J. Dockner, R. F. Hartl, M. Luptačik, & G. Sorger (Eds.), Optimization, dynamics, and economic analysis, essays in honor of Gustav Feichtinger (pp. 311–322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57684-3_26
Lutz, W., & Striessnig, E. (2015). Demographic aspects of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Population Studies, 69(Sup 1), S69–S76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.969929
Lutz, W., Prskawetz, A., & Sanderson, W. C. (2002a). Introduction. In Population and environment: Methods of analysis (Population and development review a supplement to volume 28, 2002) (pp. 1–21). Population Council.
Lutz, W., Scherbov, S., Prskawetz, A., Dworak, M., & Feichtinger, G. (2002b). Population, natural Resources, and food security: Lessons from comparing full and reduced-form models. In Population and environment: Methods of analysis (Population and development review a supplement to volume 28, 2002) (pp. 199–224). Population Council.
Lutz, W., Sanderson, W. C., & Wils, A. (2002c). Conclusion: Toward comprehensive P-E studies. In Population and environment: Methods of analysis (Population and development review. a supplement to volume 28(2002)) (pp. 225–250). Population Council.
Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population, as it affects the future improvement of society. With remarks on the speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet and other writers. London, printed for J. Johnston.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. A Potomac Associates Book.
Meisenzahl, R., & Mokyr, J. (2011). The rate and direction of invention in the British industrial revolution: Incentives and institutions, NBER working paper series, working paper 16993. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16993.
Moreland, R. S. (1984). Population, development and income distribution, A modelling Approach. Gower-St. Martin's Press for ILO.
O’Neill, B. C., & Chen, B. S. (2002). Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States, in population and environment: Methods of analysis. Population Council. Population and Development Review. A Supplement, 28, 83–88.
O’Neil, B. C., MacKellar, F. L., & Lutz, W. (2001). Population and climate change. IIASA and Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of actions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Pebley, A. R. (1998, November). Demography and the environment. Demography, 35(4), 377–389.
Pingali, P. L. (2012). Green revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. PNAS, 109(31), 12302–12308. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0912953109.
Pingali, P. L., & Binswanger, H. P. (1988). Population density and farming systems. The changing locus of innovations and technical change. In R. Lee, W. B. Arthur, A. C. Kelley, G. Rodgers, & T. N. Srinivasan (Eds.), Population, food and rural development (pp. 51–76). Oxford Clarendon Press.
Ravenstein, E. G. (1891, Jan). Lands of the globe still available for European settlement. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society and Monthly Record of Geography, 13(1), 27–35.
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., Mahmoud, M. I., Laurance, W. F., 15, 364 scientist signatories from 184 countries. (2017, December 12). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience, 67, 1026–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125.
Shaw, R. (1989). Rapid population growth and environmental degradation: Ultimate versus proximate factors. Environmental Conservation, 16(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900009279
Shaw, R., Gallopín, G., Weaver, P., & Öberg, S. (1992). Sustainable development. In A systems approach, status report SR-92-6. Laxenburg.
Simon, J. L. (1981). The ultimate resource. Princeton University Press.
Van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., O’Neill, B. C., Ebi, K. L., Riahi, K., Carter, T. R., Edmonds, J., Hallegatte, S., Kram, T., Mathur, R., & Winkler, H. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: Scenario matrix architecture. Climatic Change, 122, 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0906-1
Véron, J. (2013). Démographie et écologie. La Découverte.
Wackernagel, M., & Lin, D. (2019, August 5). Ecological footprint accounting and its critics. https://www.greenbiz.com/article/ecological-footprint-accounting-and-its-critics.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J., Moran, D., Goldfinger, S., & Thomas, M. (2006). The ecological footprint of cities and regions: Comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environment & Urbanization, 18(1), 103–112. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956247806063978
Wils, A. (1996). PDE-Cape Verde: A systems study of population, development, and environment (WP 96–9). International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
Zagheni, E., & Billari, F. C. (2006). An IPAT-type model of environmental impact based on stochastic differential equations, presented at Population Association of America 2006 Annual Meeting. Los Angeles, CA. March 30 – April 1, 2006, 12 p.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Véron, J. (2022). Population and Environment Interactions: Macro Perspectives. In: Hunter, L.M., Gray, C., Véron, J. (eds) International Handbook of Population and Environment. International Handbooks of Population, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76433-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76433-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-76432-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-76433-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)