Skip to main content

Police Capacity Building in Dealing with Domestic Violence Cases in South Africa: An Entry Point to Women’s Access to Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Violence Against Women and Criminal Justice in Africa: Volume I

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

  • 360 Accesses

Abstract

Domestic violence remains rife in many African societies, South Africa included. Laws on redress of domestic violence are critical in responding to gender-based violence in the light of the fact that women remain the major victims of this scourge. Moreover, with the police being the first point of contact in criminal justice processes, their ability to interpret and apply relevant laws is critical to fostering access to justice for women. The Domestic Violence Act (DVA) is one of the key pieces of legislation addressing domestic violence in South Africa. It is almost 20 years since the promulgation of the DVA by the Parliament of Republic of South Africa. However, the South African Police Services’ (SAPS) compliance in this regard is still wanting. The lack of capacity by the SAPS is a barrier to access to justice for women. Reports from various institutions, both private and public sectors, indicate that capacity building in the form of training and workshops for the SAPS members can bring improvement, if done as per the Training Needs Analysis or Skills Audit. The National Instructions dictate that SAPS must be able to implement the DVA properly and accordingly, any failure by members to do so constitutes a misconduct and punishable offence (suspension or dismissal) in terms of Sect. 18(4)(a) of the DVA. Majority of police stations are still not complying 100% in the implementation of the DVA. This is largely attributable to lack of capacity in the SAPS. To address non-compliance, the Department of Community Safety usually conducts work session activities to equip SAPS members with the appropriate implementation of the DVA. Necessity for capacity building and the mechanisms adopted for capacitation are therefore underscored in this study. With South Africa’s dramatic increase in cases of domestic violence, poorly informed capacity building mechanisms not only amount to wasteful expenditure but undermine access to justice. This chapter proposes Dr. Bengt-Ake Lindval’s four knowledge taxonomy principles (Know-What; Know-how; Know-why; Know-who) as assessment tools to evaluate domestic violence training procedure as successful domestic violence training tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Institute of Security Services, Domestic Violence in South Africa (2014), https://www.saferspaces.org.za/uploads/files/PolBrief71.pdf.

  2. 2.

    United Nations Women, Violence Against Women and Girls: The Shadow Pandemic (April 6, 2020), https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2020/4/statement-ed-phumzile-violence-against-women-during-pandemic.

  3. 3.

    Retief Rita and Green Sulina, ‘Some Challenges of Policing Domestic Violence,’ Journal of Social Work (2015): 135–147.

  4. 4.

    Folami, Olakunle Michael, ‘Survey of Unreported Cases of Domestic Violence in Two Heterogeneous Communities in Nigeria’ 4 International Review of Law (2013): 4; Huecker Martin and Smock William, Domestic Violence (2019), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov books/NBK 499,891/.

  5. 5.

    Vetten Lisa, ‘The Ghost of Families Past: Domestic Violence Legislation and Policy in Post-Apartheid South Africa,’ 28 Journal of the Contemporary Women for Gender Equity (2014): 48–57.

  6. 6.

    Stone Kelly and Claudia Lopes, Policing Responses to Domestic Violence: Exploring Reactions by the Police to Women in Need of Shelter (2018), https://za.boell.org/sites/default/files/hbf_saps_research_paper_web_1.pdf.

  7. 7.

    Merten Marianne, Statistics SA: One in Five SA Women Experience Physical Violence, Young Women Hard-Hit by HIV/Aids, Daily Maevrick, May 15, 2017, https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-05-15-statistics-sa-one-in-five-sa-women-experience-physical-violence-young-women-hard-hit-by-hivaids/.

  8. 8.

    Macqueen Sarah and Norris Paul, ‘Police Awareness and Involvement in Cases of Domestic and Partner Abuse,’ Policing and Society (2016): 1–22.

  9. 9.

    Macleod Pat, Kinver Andrea, Page Leon, Iliasov Aibek and Williams Rachel, 2008–09 Scottish Crime and Justice Survey Partner Abuse (2009), https://www2.gov.scot/resource/doc/296149/0092065.pdf.

  10. 10.

    United Nations Office on Drugs and Abuse, South Africa: Are We Doing Enough to End Violence Against Women? (2020), https://www.unodc.org/southernafrica/en/vaw/index.html.

  11. 11.

    Ibid.

  12. 12.

    Artz Lillian, ‘Policing the Domestic Violence Act: Teething Troubles or System Failure,’ 16 Journal Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity (2001): 1–13.

  13. 13.

    Buzawa Eve, ‘Intimate Partner Violence,’ 32 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (2012): 139–141. See also Emma Charlene Lubaale, Bridging the justice gap in the prosecution of acquaintance child sexual abuse: a case of South Africa and Uganda (PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria 2015) 1–351 on the evidentiary challenges of prosecuting offences involving intimate partners.

  14. 14.

    Ibid.

  15. 15.

    Corcoran Jacquelin, Stephenson Margaret, Watkins Derrelyn Perryman and Shannon Allen, ‘Perceptions and Utilisation of a Police- Social Work Crisis: Intervention Approach to Domestic Violence,’ 82 Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services (2001): 393–398.

  16. 16.

    Eigenberg Helen, Kappeler Victor and McGuffee Karen, ‘Confronting the Complexities of Domestic Violence: A Social Prescription for Rethinking Police Training,’ 12 Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations (2012): 122–145.

  17. 17.

    Robinson Amanda, Gillian Pinchevsky and Guthrie Jennifer, ‘Under the Radar Policing Non-Violent Domestic Abuse in the US and UK,’ 40 International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice (2016): 195– 208.

  18. 18.

    Guthrie Jennifer and Adrianne Kunkel, ‘Problematising the Uniform Application of the Formula Story: Advocacy for Survivors in a Domestic Violence Support Group,’ 38 Women & Language (2015): 43–62.

  19. 19.

    Tuerkheimer Deborah, ‘Recognising and Remedy the Harm of Battering; A Call to Criminalise Domestic Violence,’ 94 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2014): 959–1024.

  20. 20.

    Bourlet Allan, Police Intervention in Marital Violence (1990).

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Rollè Luca, Shulamit Ramon and Piera Brustia, ‘New Perspectives on Domestic Violence: From Research to Intervention’ 10 Frontiers in psychology (2019): 641.

  24. 24.

    Retief Rita and Green Sulina, ‘Some Challenges of Policing Domestic Violence,’ 51 Journal of Social Work (2015).

  25. 25.

    South African Department of Community Safety, Concept Document on the Work Sessions of South African Police Service (2019).

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Ibid.

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    Lundvall Bengt-Ake, Knowledge Management in the Learning Economy (2000), http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20060006.pdf.

  31. 31.

    Mpani Patience and Nsibande Nondumiso, Understanding Gender Policy and Gender-Based Violence in South Africa; A Literature Review (2015); Soul City Institute for Justice: Safer Spaces, https://www.saferspaces.org.za/resources/entry/understanding-gender-policy-and-gender-based-violence-in-south-africa.

  32. 32.

    Stone Kelly and Claudia Lopes, Policing Responses to Domestic Violence: Exploring Reactions by the Police to Women in Need of Shelter (2018), https://za.boell.org/sites/default/files/hbf_saps_research_paper_web_1.pdf.

  33. 33.

    Bishop Charlotte, ‘Domestic Violence: The Limitations of a Legal Response’ in Sarah Hilder and Vanessa Bettinson (eds) Domestic Violence (2016) 59–79.

  34. 34.

    Ibid.

  35. 35.

    Ibid.

  36. 36.

    Mazars Celine, What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls, Evidence Review UK Aid, SaferSpaces (2015) 1–65, https://www.whatworks.co.za/documents/publications/35-global-evidence-reviews-paper-2-interventions-to-prevent-violence-against-women-and-girls-sep-2015/file.

  37. 37.

    Ibid.

  38. 38.

    Ibid.

  39. 39.

    Commission for Gender Equality, Annual report 2016–2017, https://nationalgovernment.co.za/entity_annual/1170/2017-commission-for-gender-equality-(cge)-annual-report.pdf.

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    Richards Laura, Getting Away With It; A Profile of the Domestic Violence Sexual Assault and ‘Serious’ Incident Analysis (2004), https://paladinservice.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Getting-Away-with-It.pdf.

  42. 42.

    Ibid.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    Mpani and Nsibande supra note 32.

  45. 45.

    Moosa Zohra, A Theory of Change for Tacking Violence Against Women and Girls (2012), https://www.actionaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/doc_lib/theory_of_change_on_vawg.pdf.

  46. 46.

    Vetten supra note 5.

  47. 47.

    Mpani and Nsibande supra note 32.

  48. 48.

    Ibid.

  49. 49.

    Mogstad Heidi, Dominique Dryding and Olivia Fiorotto, ‘Policing the Private Social Barriers to the Effective Policing of Domestic Violence,’ 56 South African crime quarterly (2016): 5–17.

  50. 50.

    Ibid.

  51. 51.

    Retief and Green supra note 3.

  52. 52.

    Mogstad et al. supra note 50.

  53. 53.

    Retief and Green supra note 3.

  54. 54.

    Lopes Massawe, and Mangwiro M, ‘Criminal Justice Responses: Assessing Implementation of the Domestic Violence Act in Gauteng’ Cape Town: Heinrich Böll Foundation and Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre to End Violence Against Women, (2013).

  55. 55.

    Retief and Green supra note 3.

  56. 56.

    Ibid.

  57. 57.

    Blumer Herbert, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (1969).

  58. 58.

    Mead Herbert, Mind, Self and Society (1934).

  59. 59.

    Howard Judith and Hollander Jocelyn, Gender Situations, Gendered Selves (2000).

  60. 60.

    Buzawa supra note 13.

  61. 61.

    Vetten supra note 5.

  62. 62.

    Summers Randal and Allan Michael Hoffman (eds) Domestic Violence: A Global View (2002).

  63. 63.

    Goode Erich, Deviant Behaviour (2015).

  64. 64.

    Mead Herbert, Mind, Self and Society (1934).

  65. 65.

    Ibid.

  66. 66.

    Retief and Green supra note 3.

  67. 67.

    Ibid.

  68. 68.

    Eigenberg Helen, Kappeler Victor and McGuffee Karen, ‘Confronting the Complexities of Domestic Violence: A Social Prescription for Rethinking Police Training,’ 12 Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations (2012): 122–145.

  69. 69.

    Ibid.

  70. 70.

    Stalnaker Sylvia, and Patricia Shields, ‘Perspectives of Violence by Attorneys, Police and Women’s Shelter Directors: Divisive Differences and Significant Similarities,’ 10 Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology (1994): 29–36.

  71. 71.

    McDaniel Jasmine, Police Training on Domestic Violence: Bengt-Ake Lundvall’s Taxonomy of Knowledge Principles (2017).

  72. 72.

    Schmidtchen David, ‘The Rise of the Strategic Private: Technology, Control and Change in a Network-Enabled Military,’ The Australian Army (2006): 146–160.

  73. 73.

    McKean Jerome and Hendricks James, ‘The Role of Crisis Intervention in the Police Response to Domestic Disturbances,’ 8 Criminal Justice Policy Review (1997): 269–294.

  74. 74.

    Blaney Elizabeth, ‘Victims of Intimate Partner violence assaults’ 33 An International Journal (2010): 354- 375.

  75. 75.

    Ibid.

  76. 76.

    Ibid.

  77. 77.

    McDaniel supra note 71.

References

  • Artz Lillian, ‘Policing the Domestic Violence Act: Teething Troubles or System Failure’ Journal Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity 16 (2001): 1‒13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop Charlotte, ‘Domestic Violence: The Limitations of a Legal Response’ in Sarah Hilder and Vanessa Bettinson (eds) Domestic Violence (2016) 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaney Elizabeth, ‘Victims of Intimate Partner violence assaults’ 33 An International Journal (2010): 354- 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer Herbert, Symbolic Interactionism; Perspective and method (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourlet Allan, Police Intervention in Marital Violence (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa Eve, ‘Intimate Partner Violence’ 32 Journal of policy Analysis and Management (2012): 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney Michelle Mohr and John Barner, ‘Prevalence of Partner Abuse: Rates of Emotional Abuse and Control’ 3 Partner Abuse (2012): 286–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Gender Equality, Annual report 2016–2017, https://nationalgovernment.co.za/entity_annual/1170/2017-commission-for-gender-equality-(cge)-annual-report.pdf, October 12, 2020.

  • Corcoran Jacquelin, Stephenson Margaret, Watkins Derrelyn Perryman and Shannon Allen, ‘Perceptions and Utilisation of a Police- Social Work Crisis: Intervention Approach to Domestic Violence’ 82 Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services (2001): 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenberg Helen, Kappeler Victor and McGuffee Karen, ‘Confronting the Complexities of Domestic Violence: A Social Prescription for Rethinking Police Training’ 12 Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations (2012): 122–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folami Olakunle Michael, ‘Survey of Unreported Cases of Domestic Violence in Two Heterogeneous Communities in Nigeria’ 4 International review of law (2013): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode Erich, Deviant Behavior (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie Jennifer A and Adrianne Kunkel, ‘Problematising the Uniform Application of the Formula Story: Advocacy for Survivors in a Domestic Violence Support Group’ 38 Women & Language (2015): 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard Judith and Hollander Jocelyn, Gender Situations, Gendered Selves (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huecker Martin and Smock William, Domestic Violence (2019), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govbooks/NBK499891/, June 20, 2020.

  • Kunkel Andrianne and Guthrie Jennifer, ‘Survivor: Women’s Stories of Navigation and Tensions in a Domestic Violence Shelter’ Western Journal of Communication (2015): 100–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubaale Emma Charlene, Bridging the justice gap in the prosecution of acquaintance child sexual abuse: a case of South Africa and Uganda (PhD Thesis, University of Pretoria 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall Bengt-Ake, Knowledge Management in the Learning Economy (2000), http://www3.druid.dk/wp/20060006.pdf, June 20, 2020.

  • Macleod Pat, Kinver Andrea, Page Leon, Iliasov Aibek and Williams Rachel, Partner Abuse. (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macqueen Sarah and Norris Paul, ‘Police Awareness and Involvement in Cases of Domestic and Partner Abuse’ 10 Policing and Society (2016): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazars Celine, What Works to Prevent Violence Against Women and Girls, Evidence Review UK Aid, Safer Spaces (2015) 1–65, https://www.whatworks.co.za/documents/publications/35-global-evidence-reviews-paper-2-interventions-to-prevent-violence-against-women-and-girls-sep-2015/file, June 20, 2020.

  • McDaniel Jasmine, Police Training on Domestic Violence: Bengt-Ake Lundvall’s Taxonomy of Knowledge Principles (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean Jerome and Hendricks James, ‘The Role of Crisis Intervention in the Police Response to Domestic Disturbances’ 8 Criminal Justice Policy Review (1997): 269–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead Herbert, Mind, Self and Society (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merten Marianne, Statistics SA: One in Five SA Women Experience Physical Violence, Young Women Hard-Hit by HIV/Aids, Daily Maevrick, May 15, 2017, https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2017-05-15-statistics-sa-one-in-five-sa-women-experience-physical-violence-young-women-hard-hit-by-hivaids/, June 20, 2020.

  • Moosa Zohra, A Theory of Change for Tacking Violence Against Women and Girls (2012), https://www.actionaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/doc_lib/theory_of_change_on_vawg.pdf, June 20, 2020.

  • Mpani Patience and Nsibande Nondumiso, Understanding Gender Policy and Gender-Based Violence in South Africa; A Literature Review (2015) https://www.saferspaces.org.za/resources/entry/understanding-gender-policy-and-gender-based-violence-in-south-africa, June 20, 2020.

  • Oehme Karen and Martin Annelise, ‘A Practical Plan for Prevention and Intervention: Florida’s New Model Policy on Officer-Involved Domestic Violence’ 24 Criminal Justice Studies (2011): 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retief Rita and Green Sulina, ‘Some Challenges of Policing Domestic Violence’ 51 Journal of Social Work (2015): 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards Laura, Getting Away With It; A profile of the Domestic Violence Sexual Assault and ‘Serious’ Incident Analysis (2004), https://paladinservice.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Getting-Away-with-It.pdf, June 20, 2020.

  • Robinson Amanda, Gillian Pinchevsky and Guthrie Jennifer, ‘Under the Radar Policing Non-Violent Domestic Abuse in the US and UK’ 40 International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice (2016): 195‒208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollè Luca, Shulamit Ramon and Piera Brustia, ‘New Perspectives on Domestic Violence: From Research to Intervention’ 10 Frontiers in Psychology (2019): 641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtchen David, ‘The Rise of the Strategic Private: Technology, Control and Change in a Network-Enabled Military’ The Australian Army (2006): 146–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • South African Department of Community Safety, Concept Document On The Work Sessions Of South African Police Service (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Kelly and Claudia Lopes, Policing Responses to Domestic Violence: Exploring Reactions by the Police to Women in Need of Shelter (2018), https://za.boell.org/sites/default/files/hbf_saps_research_paper_web_1.pdf, June 20, 2020.

  • Tuerkheimer Deborah, ‘Recognising and Remedy the Harm of Battering; A Cll to Criminalise Domestic Violence’ 94 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2004): 959–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Abuse, South Africa: Are We Doing Enough to End Violence Against Women? (2020), https://www.unodc.org/southernafrica/en/vaw/index.html, June 20, 2020.

  • Vetten Lisa, ‘The Ghost of Families Past; Domestic Violence Legislation and Policy in Post-Apartheid South Africa’ 28 Journal of the Contemporary Women for Gender Equity (2014): 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kholofelo, M.A., Tirivangasi, H.M. (2022). Police Capacity Building in Dealing with Domestic Violence Cases in South Africa: An Entry Point to Women’s Access to Justice. In: Lubaale, E.C., Budoo-Scholtz, A. (eds) Violence Against Women and Criminal Justice in Africa: Volume I. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75949-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75949-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75948-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75949-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics