Abstract
Southeast Asia is home to a religiously diverse population. Malaysia and Brunei have a Muslim majority, Philippines has a large Christian population while Myanmar, Thailand, Cambodia and Laos have a large Buddhist population. In recent years, the region has seen an increase in faith-based tension with communal violence in Myanmar and insurgencies in southern Thailand and the Philippines, which conspicuously exemplifies the rising religious intolerance in the region. The social dynamics at play in these instances highlight the importance of trust and tolerance within the community for a harmonious existence. The current study is a comparative analysis to gauge the factors influencing religious tolerance in Southeast Asia. The study employed the tolerance conceptual framework with the identity economics and the social comparison as the overarching theoretical framework. The findings reveal that countries in Southeast Asia experiencing religious conflict were reporting higher level of religious tolerance. Interestingly, Malaysia a country without any faith-based conflicts, was recording higher religious intolerance. This indicates that a façade of tolerance might guise the actual reality on the ground. And incidents of faith-based conflicts might be wrongly perceived as an indication of rising religious intolerance within a society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Theory proposes that group discrimination and prejudice are the outcomes of social groups being locked in the logic of zero-sum competition over material or symbolic resources (Dima & Dima, 2016, p. 443).
- 2.
‘‘Strong reciprocity is the behavioral predisposition to cooperate conditionally on others’ cooperation and to punish violations of cooperative norms even at a net cost to the punisher’’(Dima & Dima, 2016, p. 443).
- 3.
For readers who are interested in the mathematical conceptual framework, please refer to Appendix 1.
References
Abdul Ghani, R., & Awang, J. (2017). A review on writings on religious tolerance in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 12(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.12.2017.007
Akerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2000). Economics and Identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300554881
Akerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2010). Identity economics: How identities shape our work, wages, and well-being. Princeton University Press.
Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
Anderson, G. M. (1988). Mr. Smith and the Preachers: The economics of religion in the wealth of nations. Journal of Political Economy, 96(5), 1066–1088. https://doi.org/10.1086/261576
Association of Religion Data Archives. (2018). Theories, concepts, and measurements|religiosity. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from http://wiki.thearda.com/tcm/concepts/religiosity/
Batson, C. D. (2013). Individual religion, tolerance, and universal compassion. In S. Clarke, R. Powell, & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation (pp. 88–106). Oxford University Press.
Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L. (1993). Religion and the individual: A social-psychological perspective. Oxford University Press.
Beck, R., & Miller, C. D. (2000). Religiosity and agency and communion: Their relationship to religious judgmentalism. The Journal of Psychology, 134(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980009600871
Beugelsdijk, S., & van Schaik, T. (2005). Social capital and growth in European regions: an empirical test. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 301–324.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.07.004
Bo, C. M., & Wahid, A. (2016, September 27). Rejecting religious intolerance in Southeast Asia: Four steps to preserving the diversity that distinguishes this region. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from www.wsj.com/articles/rejecting-religious-intolerance-in-southeast-asia-1474992874
Dima, B., & Dima, ŞM. (2016). Income distribution and social tolerance. Social Indicators Research, 128(1), 439–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1038-y
Ekici, T., & Yucel, D. (2015). What determines religious and racial prejudice in Europe? The effects of religiosity and trust. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0674-y
Farrell, J. E., Hook, J. N., Zhang, H., Mosher, D., Aten, J. D., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Davis, D. E. (2018). Religious attitudes and behaviors toward individuals who hold different religious beliefs and perspectives: An exploratory qualitative study. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000143
Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.31
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504114
Greer, T., Berman, M., Varan, V., Bobrycki, L., & Watson, S. (2005). We are a religious people; we are a vengeful people. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00264.x
Hall, D. L., Matz, D. C., & Wood, W. (2010). Why don’t we practice what we preach? A meta-analytic Review of religious racism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352179
Hanna, K. S., Dale, A., & Ling, C. (2009). Social capital and quality of place: Reflections on growth and change in a small town. Local Environment, 14(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830802522434
Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(3), 295–307.
International Panel of Parliamentarians for Freedom of Religion or Belief, & Asia Centre. (2017). Country briefing on freedom of religion or belief in the universal periodic review process—Thailand. Retrieved from http://ippforb.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/FORB-Thailand.pdf
Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C., Barnard-Brak, L. M., Patock-Peckham, J. A., LaBouff, J. P., & Carlisle, R. D. (2011). A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity–prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.010
Kossowska, M., & Sekerdej, M. (2015). Searching for certainty: Religious beliefs and intolerance toward value-violating groups. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.03.053
Liow, J. C. (2015). Malaysia’s ISIS conundrum. Retrieved August 1, 2018, from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/malaysias-isis-conundrum/
Lynch, R., Palestis, B., & Trivers, R. (2017). Religious devotion and extrinsic religiosity affect in-group altruism and out-group hostility oppositely in Rural Jamaica. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0103-y
Mohamad, T. M. (1970). The malay dilemma. Times Books International.
Norris, P., & Davis, J. (2007). A continental divide? Social capital in the US and Europe. In Measuring attitudes cross-nationally (pp. 238–264) SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209458.n11
Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2010). Religiosity and life satisfaction across nations. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670903273801
Petrocelli, J. V. (2003). Hierarchical multiple regression in counseling research: Common problems and possible remedies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 36, 9–22. Retrieved from http://www.datapsyc.com/petrocelli_2003.pdf
Pew Research Center. (2014). Global Religious Diversity: Half of the Most Religiously Diverse Countries are in Asia-Pacific Region. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
Pew Research Center. (2016). Global Restrictions on Religion 2007–2016 [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org.
Pilling, D. (2017). Southeast Asia’s religious tolerance is deceptive. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/6128d792-9fea-11e4-aa89-00144feab7de
Portes, A. (2014). Downsides of social capital. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52), 18407–18408. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421888112
Putnam, R. D. (1995a). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Putnam, R. D. (1995b). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(04), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500058856
Quinn, P. L. (2001). Religious diversity and religious toleration. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Issues in Contemporary Philosophy of Religion, 503(1), 57–80. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40020983
Rosenberg, N. (1960). Some institutional aspects of the wealth of nations. Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1086/258392
Rowatt, W. C., LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J.-A. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014989
Sedikides, C., & Gebauer, J. E. (2010). Religiosity as self-enhancement: A meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309351002
Smith, A. (2007). Adam Smith. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. In R. H. Campbell & A. S. Skinner (Eds.), (Fourth). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://eet.pixel-online.org/files/etranslation/original/TheWealthofNations.pdf
Strabac, Z., & Listhaug, O. (2008). Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries. Social Science Research, 37(1), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.02.004
Strickhouser, J. E., & Zell, E. (2015). Self-evaluative effects of dimensional and social comparison. JourNal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.001
Talib, A. T., & Gill, S. S. (2012). Socio-religious tolerance: Exploring the Malaysian experience. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research, 12(8), 1–7.
Taylor, S. E., & Lobel, M. (1989). Social comparison activity under threat: Downward evaluation and upward contacts. Psychological Review, 96(4), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.96.4.569
Yeung, J. W. K., Chan, Y.-C., & Lee, B. L. K. (2009). Youth religiosity and substance use: A meta-analysis from 1995 to 2007. Psychological Reports, 105(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.1.255-266
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
The utility estimation from the decision making process was expressed in the function below
The self-positioning in an income group is denoted by \( g_{i}\), while \(s_{i}\) is an evaluation of the quality of the social environment, the interaction term \(g_{i} s_{i}\) expresses the synergy between comparison in income and the perceived quality of the social relationship while \(\psi_{1}\) is a vector of other potential determinants of utility. The perceived quality of the social environment was expressed as:
The perceived quality of social environment is expressed as influenced by degree of tolerance (\(tol^{i} )\) and the predisposition towards tolerance or confrontation (\(c^{i}\)). Dima and Dima (2016) elaborates that Equation (4) captures the attitude of balance between tolerance and confrontation. Stating that an individual might be tolerant to one religious group but intolerant towards another or express preferences for certain behavior in public but intolerant in private life. Equation (4) was substituted in utility function (Equation 3). After having derived the new utility function, they proceeded to differentiate tolerance against utility to obtain the optimal level of tolerance that maximizes individual utility. Therefore, the optimal tolerance level was given as:
In order to enhance the explanatory power of this framework, Dima and Dima (2016) suggested incorporating subjective factors \(\left( \vartheta \right)\) into the framework. The present study incorporates two subjective factors; individual religiosity and social religiosity. The influence of these two subjective variables on predisposition towards tolerance and confrontation is expressed as follows:
Taking into consideration the impact of these two variables, the optimal level of tolerance for the present study is re-written as:
Equation (7) shows the optimal level of tolerance which maximizes individual utility after the inclusion of the two subjective variables.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Somasundram, S., Habibullah, M.S., Sambasivan, M., Rasiah, R. (2021). Antecedents of Religious Tolerance in Southeast Asia. In: Almakaeva, A., Moreno, A., Wilkes, R. (eds) Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75813-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75813-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75812-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75813-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)