Skip to main content

A Short Note on Cost of Effort: Beneficial Effects in Complex Decision-Making Situations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Decision Economics: Minds, Machines, and their Society (DECON 2020)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 990))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

Cost of effort is widely reflected in economic modelling of managerial decision-making. As such, much of the literature in principal-agent theory captures effort as disutility reflecting personal costs of subordinate decision-makers which, in tendency, reduces the efficiency of delegation. Based on ideas of bounded rationality, in this short note, a view on cost of effort is advocated which emphasizes “horizontal” interactions among subordinate decision-makers. An agent-based model employing the framework of NK fitness landscapes capturing subordinate decision-makers which show some form of bounded rationality in the spirit of Herbert A. Simon is set up. The simulation results suggest that heterogeneity among decision-makers regarding cost of effort including even high cost levels may have beneficial effects when the complexity of decision problems is high. This could shed some new light on cost of effort suggesting for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In line with the NK-framework, organizational performance is the normalized sum of the performance contributions obtained from each of the N single, potentially interacting choices. For departmental performances, the similar holds apart from the fact, that only performance contributions of those choices assigned to the particular department are calculated.

References

  1. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(1), 57–74 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lambert, R.A.: Contracting theory and accounting. J. Account. Econ. 32(1–3), 3–87 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Holmström, B.: Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econ. 10(1), 74–91 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, G.P.: Incentive contracts and performance measurement. J. Polit. Econ. 100(3), 598–614 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feltham, G.A., Xie, J.: Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. Account. Rev. 69(3), 429–453 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simon, H.A.: A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly J. Econ. 69(September), 99–118 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon, H.A.: Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. Am. Econ. Rev. 49(3), 253–283 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bushman, R.M., Indjejikian, R.J., Smith, A.: Aggregate performance measures in business unit manager compensation: the role of intrafirm interdependencies. J. Account. Res. 33(Supplement), 101–129 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wall, F.: Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study. Rev. Manag. Sci. 10(1), 135–193 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirman, A.P.: Whom or what does the representative individual represent? J. Econ. Perspect. 6(2), 117–136 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levinthal, D.A.: Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Manage. Sci. 43(7), 934–950 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kauffman, S.A., Levin, S.: Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theoretical Biol. 128(1), 11–45 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauffman, S.A.: The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, R., Emmerich, M.M., Eggermont, J., Bovenkamp, E.P., Bäck, T., Dijkstra, J., Reiber, J.C.: Mixed-integer NK landscapes. In: Runarsson, T., Beyer, H.-G., Burke, E., Merelo-Guervós, J., Whitley, L.D., Yao, X. (eds.) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature - PPSN IX, vol 4193. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 42–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Csaszar, F.A.: A note on how NK landscapes work. J. Organ. Des. 7(1), 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, P., Li, Z.: Task complexity: a review and conceptualization framework. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics 42(6), 553–568 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wall, F.: Coordination and search for new solutions. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, S.-H., Corchado, J.M. (eds.) Decision Economics: Complexity of Decisions and Decisions for Complexity, pp. 10–17. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kölle, F.: Heterogeneity and cooperation: the role of capability and valuation on public goods provision. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 109, 120–134 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Albanese, R., Fleet, D.D.V.: Rational behavior in groups: the free-riding tendency. Acad. Manage. Rev. 10(2), 244–255 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Delton, A.W., Cosmides, L., Guemo, M., Robertson, T.E., Tooby, J.: The psychosemantics of free riding: dissecting the architecture of a moral concept. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102(6), 1252–1270 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friederike Wall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wall, F. (2021). A Short Note on Cost of Effort: Beneficial Effects in Complex Decision-Making Situations. In: Bucciarelli, E., Chen, SH., Corchado, J.M., Parra D., J. (eds) Decision Economics: Minds, Machines, and their Society. DECON 2020. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 990. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75583-6_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics