Skip to main content

New Pathways to Sanctuary in New York City

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Migrant Protection and the City in the Americas

Part of the book series: Politics of Citizenship and Migration ((POCM))

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the protection of undocumented migrants in New York City during the Trump presidency, a period of heightened immigration enforcement that explicitly targeted cities with policies of withholding information about immigration status from the federal government. The increased threat of unpredictable raids by federal immigration officers, particularly outside courthouses, led municipal authorities to increase funding for services intended to protect immigrants with precarious legal status, including information sessions about individual rights and free legal services to regularize status and contest deportation orders. However, given that contact with the criminal justice system remains the primary means by which federal authorities locate deportable migrants, a recent policy shift outside the field of immigrant rights, involving the decriminalization of low-level offenses, has also indirectly offered a significant measure of protection. This analysis attempts to quantify the impact of migrant-specific policies versus criminal justice reform and explores the merits of various strategies available to cities attempting to shield residents lacking legal status from the effects of national immigration enforcement, beyond traditional methods of limiting cooperation with the federal government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act.

  2. 2.

    23% of residents were estimated to be Limited English Proficient in 2018 (MOIA, 2019, p. 13).

  3. 3.

    To avoid making the card a marker for undocumented status, city government broadened its appeal by allowing transgender residents to choose the gender indicated on the card, by offering discounts to the city’s network of museums, and by extending eligibility to residents as young as 10. Similar in many respects to the card launched in San Francisco in 2009, the New York program, launched in 2015, has succeeded in reaching a particularly large audience, having issued over 1 million cards by 2017.

  4. 4.

    ICE names these detainer requests Detention and removal order (DRO) holds.

  5. 5.

    However, these measures apply to undocumented residents who live in one of the five NYC burroughs, but not to undocumented workers who live in neighboring counties in New Jersey, where close collaboration with ICE was common during this period.

  6. 6.

    Although in March 2017 federal agents began to accompany detainers with “ICE warrants,” signed by an ICE officer; the intentional confusion around nomenclature did not have an effect on their legal argument. Neither based on criminal charges nor reviewed by a judge to determine the existence of probable cause, “ICE warrants” continue to be deemed insufficient to justify extending a period of detention. See for example Galarza v. Szalczyk, 745 F.3d 634, 645 (3d Cir. 2014) ou Morales v. Chadbourne, 996 F.Supp.2d 19.

  7. 7.

    Bill de Blasio was elected as mayor in 2013 and reelected to a second term in 2017.

  8. 8.

    This program replaced Secure Communities, which the Obama administration terminated in 2014.

  9. 9.

    Enforcement operations took place in Baltimore; Cook County, Illinois; Denver; Los Angeles; New York City; Philadelphia; Seattle; Santa Clara County, CA; Washington, DC; and the state of Massachusetts, leading to 498 arrests over four days (ICE News Release, 2017).

  10. 10.

    More precisely, total arrests in the New York area reached 2576 throughout 2017, of which 674 non-criminal (https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Document/2017/localStats2017b.pdf).

  11. 11.

    In 2017, 2006 individuals were deported in the New York area, of which 791 non-criminal (https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Document/2017/localStats2017b.pdf).

  12. 12.

    However, these numbers are still down compared to 2013–2014, when Secure Communities was fully effective nationally, using broad criteria for the detention and deportation of unauthorized immigrants who were identified through local jails.

  13. 13.

    Data provided upon request by the MOIA.

  14. 14.

    Data provided upon request by the MOIA.

  15. 15.

    Unlike the majority of immigrant legal services, funded through mayoral programs, these 3000 cases were funded through City Council programs, the New York Immigrant Family Unity Project (NYIFUP) and Immigrant Child Advocates’ Relief Effort (ICARE). NYIFUP represented approximately 1300 immigrants facing removal in FY2018, while ICARE represented 1700 unaccompanied immigrant children facing removal.

  16. 16.

    The program linked the FBI database of nation-wide criminal records and search warrants to that of ICE, both agencies being part of the Department of Homeland Security since 2004. As a result, fingerprint and other personal data that is transmitted during routine FBI background searches are now automatically shared with ICE agents.

  17. 17.

    Information about court appearances is available online through the website of the New York State Unified Court System, of which New York City Criminal Court is a part.

  18. 18.

    Given that one individual can commit multiple offenses (and receive multiple summonses), the number of civil summonses issued does not correspond to the number of individuals involved, which is most likely lower. Furthermore, based on widely corroborated data indicating that incarceration rates for the foreign-born are significantly lower than among the general population, it is highly possible that violation rates among undocumented immigrants are also lower (Rumbaut et al., 2006).

  19. 19.

    Similarly, one individual can possess multiple outstanding warrants.

  20. 20.

    Numbers of individuals deported with or without criminal convictions, or with pending criminal charge are available at https://www.ice.gov/removal-statistics/2016 and https://www.ice.gov/removal-statistics/2018.

  21. 21.

    The City of Los Angeles protested the conditions imposed by the Attorney General for access to Community Oriented Policing Services in City of Los Angeles v. William Barr (2019), and the Ninth Circuit has temporarily blocked the provisions.

  22. 22.

    Customs and Border Protection announced February 6, 2020 that New York residents would no longer be eligible to apply for or renew “Trusted Traveler Programs.”

References

  • Avila, K., Bello, K., Graber, L., & Marquez, N. (2018). The rise of sanctuary: Getting local officers out of the business of deportations in the Trump era. Immigrant Legal Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagelman, J. (2016). Sanctuary: A state of waiting. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvin, S., & Garcés-Mascareña, B. (2014). Becoming less illegal: Deservingness frames and undocumented migrant incorporation. Sociology Compass, 8(4), 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps, R., Chishti, M., Gelatt, J., Bolter, J., & Ruiz Soto, A. G. (2018). Revving up the deportation machinery: Immigration enforcement and pushback under Trump. Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham Warren, C. (2017). Sanctuary lost? Exposing the reality of the ‘sanctuary-city’ debate & liberal states-rights’ litigation. Wayne Law Review, 63, 155–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graauw, E. (2015). Rolling out the welcome mat: State and city immigrant affairs offices in the United States. IdeAs, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of City Planning. (2013). The newest New Yorkers: Characteristics of the city’s foreign-born population.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desiderio, M., & Mestres-Domenech, J. (2011). Migrant entrepreneurship in OECD countries. In International migration outlook: SOPEMI. OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrel, C., et al. (2006). Immigration committee recommendations for enforcement of immigration laws by local police agencies. Major Cities Chiefs Police Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filomeno, F. A. (2017). The migration-development nexus in local immigration policy: Baltimore City and the Hispanic diaspora. Urban Affairs Review, 53(1), 102–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funk, M. (2019, October 2). How ICE picks its targets in the surveillance age. New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. (2019). Legal passing: Navigating undocumented life and local immigration law. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulasekaram, P., & Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2015). The new immigration federalism. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Singer, A., De Jong, G., & Graefe, D. R. (2011). Geography of immigrant skills. The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2017, September 28). ICE arrests over 450 on federal immigration charges during Operation ‘Safe City’. Press Release. https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-over-450-federal-immigration-charges-during-operation-safe-city. Accessed 1 Dec 2020.

  • Immigrant Defense Project (IDP). (2019). The courthouse trap: How ICE operations impacted New York’s Courts in 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immigrant Defense Project (IDP). (2020). Denied, disappeared, and deported: The toll of ICE operations at New York’s Courts in 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immigrant Defense Project (IDP), Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC), & Fair Punishment Project. (2017). The promise of sanctuary cities and the need for criminal justice reforms in an era of mass deportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C., Chan, R. L., Eagly, I. V., Haynes, D. F., Lai, A., McCormick, E. M., & Stumpf, J. P. (2018). Understanding ‘sanctuary cities’. Boston College Law Review, 59(5), 1703–1774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs (MOIA). (2018). Fact sheet: ICE enforcement in New York City [2018].

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs (MOIA). (2019). State of our immigrant city: MOIA annual report for calendar year 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. (2017, August 9). District Attorney Vance dismisses 240,000 summons cases. Press Release. https://www.manhattanda.org/district-attorney-vance-dismisses-240000-summons-cases/. Accessed 2 Dec 2020.

  • Office of Civil Justice (OCJ). (2019). 2018 Annual Report. New York City: NYC Human Resources Administration, Department of Social Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. (2008). The significance of the local in immigration regulation. Michigan Law Review. NYU Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 08-22, 567–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaut, R., Gonzales, R., Komaie, G., & Morgan, C. (2006). Debunking the myth of immigrant criminality: Imprisonment among first- and second-generation young men. Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, H. (2018). Immigrant rights as an exercise in urban branding: The case of Philadelphia (2008-2015). In T. Lacroix & A. Desille (Eds.), International migrations and local governance: A global perspective (pp. 39–55). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sasken, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, J. (2006). The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, and sovereign power. American University Law Review, 56, 367–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomascak, S., Chauhan, P., & Meizlish, A. (2020). Trends in issuance of criminal summonses in New York City, 2003-2019. Data Collaborative for Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomascak, S., Grimsely, E., Mulligan, K., & Chauhan, P. (2020). Evaluating the impact of New York City’s Criminal Justice Reform Act: Summons issuance and outcomes in the 18 months after implementation. Data Collaborative for Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). Details on deportation proceedings in immigration court. https://www.trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/nta/. Accessed 1 Dec 2020.

  • Varsanyi, M. (Ed.). (2010). Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in U.S. cities and states. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varsanyi, M., Lewis, P. G., Provine, D. M., & Decker, S. (2011). A multilayered jurisdictional patchwork: Immigration federalism in the United States. Law and Policy, 34(2), 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K., & Leitner, H. (2011). The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography, 32(2), 156–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Case Law, Legislation, and Public Data

  • City of Los Angeles v. Barr, 2:17-cv-07215-R-JC (9th Cir. 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Philadelphia v. Sessions, 2:17-cv-03894-MMB (E.D. Pa.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 1-2019 (Rev. from Memo issued March 2019). (2019, April 17). Office of the Chief Administrative Judge, State of New York Unified Court System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive N. 11072.1. (2018, January 10). Civil Immigration Enforcement Inside Courthouses. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Order 41. (2003, September 17). City-wide Privacy Policy and Amendment of Executive Order No. 34 Relating to City Policy Concerning Immigrant Access to City Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Order 120. (2008, July 22). City-wide Policy on Language Access to Ensure the Effective Delivery of City Services. City of New York Office of the Mayor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Order 124. (1989, August 7). City Policy Concerning Aliens. City of New York Office of the Mayor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Executive Order 13768. (2017, January 30). Enhancing Public Security in the Interior of the United States. 82 Fed. Reg. 8799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd v. City of New York, 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 (S.D.N.Y. 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galarza v. Szalczyk, 745 F.3d 634, 645 (3d Cir. 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales v. Chadbourne, 996 F. Supp. 2d 19 (D.R.I. 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Council Law Number 30 (Local Law 30). (2017, February 15). In relation to the provision of language access services.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Council Law Number 58. (2014, November 14). Persons Not to Be Detained by the Department of Correction.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Council Law Number 59. (2014, November 14). Persons Not to Be Detained by the Police Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York City Council Law Number 73 (Local Law 73). (2003, December 22). In relation to the provision of language access services.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Police Department (NYPD). (2016). Civil Immigration Detainers Received July 1, 2015–June 30, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Police Department (NYPD). (2017). Civil Immigration Detainers Received July 1, 2016–June 30, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Police Department (NYPD). (2018). Civil Immigration Detainers Received July 1, 2017–June 30, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Police Department (NYPD). (2019). Civil Immigration Detainers Received July 1, 2018–June 30, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. State of California, 2:18-cv-00490 (E.D. Cal.).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary Sanders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sanders, H. (2021). New Pathways to Sanctuary in New York City. In: Faret, L., Sanders, H. (eds) Migrant Protection and the City in the Americas. Politics of Citizenship and Migration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74369-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics