Abstract
Bike-sharing systems are a popular and widespread mobility tool all over the world. The introduction of such system could bring a large amount of benefits for city or region: starting from the promotion of cycling as a mode of transport and finishing with the improvement of image of this city or region. Though there is a lot of advices as well as guidelines concerning the system introduction, unfortunately, there are less research works with the practical application concerning problems of their operations. In this chapter the performance of station-based bike-sharing systems and its evaluation are discussed by using quite basic parameters. Application of the proposed approach was demonstrated on the example of the system in Krakow, Poland.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klöckner CA, Nayum A, Mehmetoglu M (2013) Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 21:32–38
Sendek-Matysiak E (2019) Multi-criteria analysis and expert assessment of vehicles with different drive types regarding their functionality and environmental impact. Sci J Silesian Univ Technol Series Transp, vol 102, pp 185–195
Sándor Zs, Csiszár Cs (2015) Modelling and analysis methods of integrated information systems of transportation. In: 4th International conference on models and technologies for intelligent transportation systems (MT-ITS 2015), 3–5 June 2015, pp 348–355. Budapest, Hungary. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2015.7223278
Sierpiński G, Macioszek E (2020) Equalising the levels of electromobility implementation in cities. In: Mikulski J (ed) Research and the future of telematics, communications in computer and information science, vol 1289. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 165–176
Macioszek E, Sierpiński G (2020) Charging stations for electric vehicles—Current situation in Poland. In: Mikulski J (ed) Research and the future of telematics, communications in computer and information science, vol 1289. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 124–137
van Waes A, Farla J, Raven R (2020) Why do companies’ institutional strategies differ across cities? A cross-case analysis of bike sharing in Shanghai & Amsterdam. Environ Innov Societal Transit 36:151–163
Kłos MJ (2016) Estimation of effects caused by the implementation of Park&Ride system in the transport hub. Transp Probl 11:5–12
Chen F, Turoń K, Kłos M, Czech P, Pamuła W, Sierpiński G (2018) Fifth-generation bike-sharing systems: examples from Poland and China. Sci J Silesian Univ Technol Series Transp 99:05–13. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2018.99.1
Sierpiński G, Staniek M, Kłos MJ (2020) Decision making support for local authorities choosing the method for siting of in-city EV charging stations. Energies 13(18):4682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184682
Kabak M, Erbaş M, Çetinkaya C, Özceylan E (2018) A GIS-based MCDM approach for the evaluation of bike-share stations. J Clean Prod 201:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.033
Cheng P, OuYang Z, Liu Y (2019) Understanding bike sharing use over time by employing extended technology continuance theory. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 124:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.013
Mooney SJ, Hosford K, Howe B, Yan A, Winters M, Bassok A, Hirsch JA (2019) Freedom from the station: spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. J Transp Geogr 74:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009
Kazemzadeh K, Laureshyn A, Winslott Hiselius L, Ronchi E (2020) Expanding the scope of the bicycle level-of-service concept: a review of the literature. Sustainability 12(7):2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072944
Lazarus J, Pourquier JC, Feng F, Hammel H, Shaheen S (2020) Micromobility evolution and expansion: understanding how docked and dockless bikesharing models complement and compete–A case study of San Francisco. J Transp Geogr 84: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102620
Kieć M, Pogodzińska S (2018) Assessment of speed for various types of bicycle infrastructure based on GPS data [in Polish: Ocena prędkości rowerzystów na różnych typach infrastruktury rowerowej z wykorzystaniem danych GPS]. Transp Miejski i Regionalny 4:20–24
Pogodzińska S (2018) Assessment of speed for various types of bicycle infrastructure based on GPS data [in Polish: Szacowanie natężenia ruchu rowerowego na podstawie danych z systemu rowerów miejskich]. Transp Miejski i Regionalny 1:5–11
Kłos MJ, Sobota A, Żochowska R, Soczówka P (2019) Traffic measurements for development a transport model. In: Sierpiński G (eds) Smart and green solutions for transport systems TSTP 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 1091. Springer. Cham, pp 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35543-2_21
Rupi F, Poliziani C, Schweizer J (2020) Analysing the dynamic performances of a bicycle network with a temporal analysis of GPS traces. Case Stud Transp Policy 8(3):770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.05.007
Zhu R, Zhang X, Kondor D, Santi P, Ratti C (2020) Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Comput Environ Urban Syst 81: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483
Lin JR, Yang TH (2011) Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 47(2):284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2010.09.004
Romero JP, Ibeas A, Moura JL, Benavente J, Alonso B (2012) A simulation-optimization approach to design efficient systems of bike-sharing. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 54:646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.782
García-Palomares JC, Gutiérrez J, Latorre M (2012) Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: a GIS approach. Appl Geogr 35(1–2):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.002
Frade I, Ribeiro A (2015) Bike-sharing stations: A maximal covering location approach. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 82:216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.014
Böcker L, Anderson E, Uteng TP, Throndsen T (2020) Bike sharing use in conjunction to public transport: exploring spatiotemporal, age and gender dimensions in Oslo, Norway. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 138:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.009
Fitch DT, Handy SL (2018) The Relationship between experienced and imagined bicycling comfort and safety. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 2672:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118787635
Optimising Bike Sharing in European Cities—A Handbook. OBIS, June 2011, p 90. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/obis_handbook_en.pdf
The Bikeshare Planning Guide. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (2018) https://www.transformative-mobility.org/assets/publications/The-Bikeshare-Planning-Guide-ITDP-Datei.pdf
The Bikeshare Planning Guide. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (2014) https://itdpdotorg.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ITDP-Bike-Share-Planning-Guide-1.pdf
Bieliński T, Kwapisz A, Ważna A (2019) Bike-sharing systems in Poland. Sustainability 11(9):2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092458
Zhang Y, Huang Z (2012) Performance evaluation of bike sharing system in Wuchang area of Wuhan. China. In: 2012 6th International Association for China planning conference (IACP), 13135901. IEEE Press. Wuhan, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/IACP.2012.6342972
Borgnat P, Abry P, Flandrin P, Robardet C, Rouquier J-B, Fleury E (2011) Shared bicycles in a city: a signal processing and data analysis perspective. Adv Complex Syst 14(3):415–438. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525911002950
Albiński S, Fontaine P, Minner S (2018) Performance analysis of a hybrid bike sharing system: A service-level-based approach under censored demand observations. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 116:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.05.011
Bakogiannis E, Vassi A, Christodoulopoulou G, Siti M (2018) Bike sharing systems as a tool to increase sustainable coastal and maritime tourism. the case of Piraeus. Region Sci Inquiry 10(3):57–70
Pashkevich A (2014) Realization of OpenStreetMap project possibilities: special GIS software described by using case study of transport infrastructure. In: 14th International multidisciplinary scientific GeoConference SGEM 2014, www.sgem.org, SGEM2014 conference proceedings. SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, pp 799–806. https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2014/B23/S11.102
Pashkevich A, Karamshuk D (2014) Understanding and improving urban cycle networks with social sensing. In: 34th Conference on transportation systems with international participation Automation in transportation. KoREMA, Zagreb, Croatia, pp 45–49
Schweizer J, Meggs JN, Dehkordi NR, Rupi F, Pashkevich A (2012) Unified, low-cost analysis framework for the cycling situation in cities. Int J Civil Environ Eng 6(5):356−363
Schweizer J, Meggs JN, Dehkordi NR, Rupi F, Pashkevich A (2012) An analysis framework to assess automobile, public transport and bike usage in west and eastern Europe. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Transport Science ICTS 2012 – Maritime, transport and logistics science, 28 May 2012, Portorož, Slovenia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pashkevich, A., Kłos, M.J., Jaremski, R., Aristombayeva, M. (2021). Method to Evaluate a Bike-Sharing System Based on Performance Parameters. In: Sierpiński, G., Macioszek, E. (eds) Decision Support Methods in Modern Transportation Systems and Networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71771-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71771-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71770-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71771-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)