Skip to main content

Method to Evaluate a Bike-Sharing System Based on Performance Parameters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Support Methods in Modern Transportation Systems and Networks

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 208))

Abstract

Bike-sharing systems are a popular and widespread mobility tool all over the world. The introduction of such system could bring a large amount of benefits for city or region: starting from the promotion of cycling as a mode of transport and finishing with the improvement of image of this city or region. Though there is a lot of advices as well as guidelines concerning the system introduction, unfortunately, there are less research works with the practical application concerning problems of their operations. In this chapter the performance of station-based bike-sharing systems and its evaluation are discussed by using quite basic parameters. Application of the proposed approach was demonstrated on the example of the system in Krakow, Poland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klöckner CA, Nayum A, Mehmetoglu M (2013) Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 21:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sendek-Matysiak E (2019) Multi-criteria analysis and expert assessment of vehicles with different drive types regarding their functionality and environmental impact. Sci J Silesian Univ Technol Series Transp, vol 102, pp 185–195

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sándor Zs, Csiszár Cs (2015) Modelling and analysis methods of integrated information systems of transportation. In: 4th International conference on models and technologies for intelligent transportation systems (MT-ITS 2015), 3–5 June 2015, pp 348–355. Budapest, Hungary. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2015.7223278

  4. Sierpiński G, Macioszek E (2020) Equalising the levels of electromobility implementation in cities. In: Mikulski J (ed) Research and the future of telematics, communications in computer and information science, vol 1289. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  5. Macioszek E, Sierpiński G (2020) Charging stations for electric vehicles—Current situation in Poland. In: Mikulski J (ed) Research and the future of telematics, communications in computer and information science, vol 1289. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 124–137

    Google Scholar 

  6. van Waes A, Farla J, Raven R (2020) Why do companies’ institutional strategies differ across cities? A cross-case analysis of bike sharing in Shanghai & Amsterdam. Environ Innov Societal Transit 36:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kłos MJ (2016) Estimation of effects caused by the implementation of Park&Ride system in the transport hub. Transp Probl 11:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen F, Turoń K, Kłos M, Czech P, Pamuła W, Sierpiński G (2018) Fifth-generation bike-sharing systems: examples from Poland and China. Sci J Silesian Univ Technol Series Transp 99:05–13. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2018.99.1

  9. Sierpiński G, Staniek M, Kłos MJ (2020) Decision making support for local authorities choosing the method for siting of in-city EV charging stations. Energies 13(18):4682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kabak M, Erbaş M, Çetinkaya C, Özceylan E (2018) A GIS-based MCDM approach for the evaluation of bike-share stations. J Clean Prod 201:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng P, OuYang Z, Liu Y (2019) Understanding bike sharing use over time by employing extended technology continuance theory. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 124:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooney SJ, Hosford K, Howe B, Yan A, Winters M, Bassok A, Hirsch JA (2019) Freedom from the station: spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. J Transp Geogr 74:91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazemzadeh K, Laureshyn A, Winslott Hiselius L, Ronchi E (2020) Expanding the scope of the bicycle level-of-service concept: a review of the literature. Sustainability 12(7):2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarus J, Pourquier JC, Feng F, Hammel H, Shaheen S (2020) Micromobility evolution and expansion: understanding how docked and dockless bikesharing models complement and compete–A case study of San Francisco. J Transp Geogr 84: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kieć M, Pogodzińska S (2018) Assessment of speed for various types of bicycle infrastructure based on GPS data [in Polish: Ocena prędkości rowerzystów na różnych typach infrastruktury rowerowej z wykorzystaniem danych GPS]. Transp Miejski i Regionalny 4:20–24

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pogodzińska S (2018) Assessment of speed for various types of bicycle infrastructure based on GPS data [in Polish: Szacowanie natężenia ruchu rowerowego na podstawie danych z systemu rowerów miejskich]. Transp Miejski i Regionalny 1:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kłos MJ, Sobota A, Żochowska R, Soczówka P (2019) Traffic measurements for development a transport model. In: Sierpiński G (eds) Smart and green solutions for transport systems TSTP 2019. Advances in intelligent systems and computing, vol 1091. Springer. Cham, pp 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35543-2_21

  18. Rupi F, Poliziani C, Schweizer J (2020) Analysing the dynamic performances of a bicycle network with a temporal analysis of GPS traces. Case Stud Transp Policy 8(3):770–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu R, Zhang X, Kondor D, Santi P, Ratti C (2020) Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Comput Environ Urban Syst 81: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin JR, Yang TH (2011) Strategic design of public bicycle sharing systems with service level constraints. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 47(2):284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2010.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Romero JP, Ibeas A, Moura JL, Benavente J, Alonso B (2012) A simulation-optimization approach to design efficient systems of bike-sharing. Procedia—Soc Behav Sci 54:646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. García-Palomares JC, Gutiérrez J, Latorre M (2012) Optimizing the location of stations in bike-sharing programs: a GIS approach. Appl Geogr 35(1–2):235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frade I, Ribeiro A (2015) Bike-sharing stations: A maximal covering location approach. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 82:216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Böcker L, Anderson E, Uteng TP, Throndsen T (2020) Bike sharing use in conjunction to public transport: exploring spatiotemporal, age and gender dimensions in Oslo, Norway. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 138:389–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fitch DT, Handy SL (2018) The Relationship between experienced and imagined bicycling comfort and safety. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board 2672:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118787635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Optimising Bike Sharing in European Cities—A Handbook. OBIS, June 2011, p 90. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/obis_handbook_en.pdf

  27. The Bikeshare Planning Guide. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (2018) https://www.transformative-mobility.org/assets/publications/The-Bikeshare-Planning-Guide-ITDP-Datei.pdf

  28. The Bikeshare Planning Guide. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (2014) https://itdpdotorg.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/ITDP-Bike-Share-Planning-Guide-1.pdf

  29. Bieliński T, Kwapisz A, Ważna A (2019) Bike-sharing systems in Poland. Sustainability 11(9):2458. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Huang Z (2012) Performance evaluation of bike sharing system in Wuchang area of Wuhan. China. In: 2012 6th International Association for China planning conference (IACP), 13135901. IEEE Press. Wuhan, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/IACP.2012.6342972

  31. Borgnat P, Abry P, Flandrin P, Robardet C, Rouquier J-B, Fleury E (2011) Shared bicycles in a city: a signal processing and data analysis perspective. Adv Complex Syst 14(3):415–438. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525911002950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Albiński S, Fontaine P, Minner S (2018) Performance analysis of a hybrid bike sharing system: A service-level-based approach under censored demand observations. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 116:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bakogiannis E, Vassi A, Christodoulopoulou G, Siti M (2018) Bike sharing systems as a tool to increase sustainable coastal and maritime tourism. the case of Piraeus. Region Sci Inquiry 10(3):57–70

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pashkevich A (2014) Realization of OpenStreetMap project possibilities: special GIS software described by using case study of transport infrastructure. In: 14th International multidisciplinary scientific GeoConference SGEM 2014, www.sgem.org, SGEM2014 conference proceedings. SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, pp 799–806. https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2014/B23/S11.102

  35. Pashkevich A, Karamshuk D (2014) Understanding and improving urban cycle networks with social sensing. In: 34th Conference on transportation systems with international participation Automation in transportation. KoREMA, Zagreb, Croatia, pp 45–49

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schweizer J, Meggs JN, Dehkordi NR, Rupi F, Pashkevich A (2012) Unified, low-cost analysis framework for the cycling situation in cities. Int J Civil Environ Eng 6(5):356−363

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schweizer J, Meggs JN, Dehkordi NR, Rupi F, Pashkevich A (2012) An analysis framework to assess automobile, public transport and bike usage in west and eastern Europe. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Transport Science ICTS 2012 – Maritime, transport and logistics science, 28 May 2012, Portorož, Slovenia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Pashkevich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pashkevich, A., Kłos, M.J., Jaremski, R., Aristombayeva, M. (2021). Method to Evaluate a Bike-Sharing System Based on Performance Parameters. In: Sierpiński, G., Macioszek, E. (eds) Decision Support Methods in Modern Transportation Systems and Networks. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71771-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics