Abstract
Political representation in Latin America shows high levels of heterogeneity. In some countries we can see the weakening of the relationship between traditional political parties and social movements (Chile, Brazil, Colombia, Peru); meanwhile, in others the relationship is more stable (Uruguay and Argentina) and is even strengthened by the construction of parties built based on social movements (Bolivia and Ecuador). In this chapter we analyze the relationship between political parties and social movements in Latin America to identify the ruptures and continuities of Chile compared with the rest of the countries of the region. In the same way, it will set a general framework for analyzing the social outbreak and representation in Chile.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abal, M. H. J. (2004). Death and the resurrection of political representation. Buenos Aires: Fund for Economic Culture.
Acton, J. (2011). Essays on freedom and power. Madrid: Unión Editorial.
Alcántara, M. (1991). On the concept of countries in the process of democratic consolidation in Latin America. Journal of Political Studies, 74, 113–130.
Alcántara, M. (2013). Of politicians and politics: Professionalization and quality in public practice. Latin American Profiles, 21(41), 19–44.
Balandier, G. (1994). Power in scenes. From the representation of power to the power of representation. Barcelona: Paidos.
Bañón, R., & Carrillo, E. (1997). The new public administration. Barcelona: Alianza Editorial.
Bostdorff, D., & O’Rourke, D. (1997). The presidency and the promotion of domestic crisis: John Kennedy’s management of the 1962 steel crisis. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27(2), 343–361.
Brito, M. (2020). Silence in political theory and practice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1796328.
Camps, V. (Ed.). (2010). Democracy without citizens: The construction of citizenship in liberal democracies. Madrid: Trotta.
Castiglione, D., & Pollak, J. (Eds.). (2018). Creating political presence: The new politics of democratic representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chandhoke, N. (2005). Revisiting the crisis of representation thesis: The Indian context. Democratization, 12((3), 308–330.
Childs, S., & Lovenduski, J. (2013). Political representation. In The Oxford handbook of gender and politics.
Constant, B. (2019). The freedom of the moderns. Editorial Alliance, SA.
Corbett, J. (2016). Diagnosing the problem of anti-politicians: A review and an agenda. Political Studies Review, 14(4), 534–543.
Costello, R. (2013). The strain of representation: How parties representing diverse voters in Western and Eastern Europe, parliaments. Estates and Representation, 33(2), 207–209.
Cotta, M. (1988). Parliaments and representation, in Gianfranco Pasquino, Stefano Bartolini, Maurizio Cotta, Leonardo Morlino and Angelo Panebianco, Manual of political science (pp. 265–310). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Dahl, R. (1976). Modern political analysis. Barcelona: Editorial Fontanella.
Didier, R. (2012). Individual representation: A different approach to political representation. Representations, 48(1), 115–129.
Disch, L. (2015). Representation. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dovi, S. (2018). Political Representation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edn).
Durand, V. (2010). Social inequality and precarious citizenship: A permanent state of exception?. Institute of Social Research/Siglo XXI Editores.
Duso, G. (coordinator) (2005). Power: For a history of modern political philosophy. XXI century.
Escamilla, L. V. (2007). Parliamentary representation: A historical tour of political theory. Mexico: Miguel Angel Porrúa.
Escoffier, S. & Clemente, A. (2020). Will Chile’s constitutional process satisfy its citizens’ thirst for democracy?. Open Democracy.
Flisfisch, A. (1987). Politics as a democratic commitment. Santiago: Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences (FLACSO).
Forst, R., &, Günther, K. (2017). Normative crisis: Conceptual and diagnostic remarks (presentation of the conference, normative orders annual conference, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, 23 November.
Gargarella, R. (2002). Crisis of political representation. Mexico: Fontamara.
Giugni, M., & Grasso, M. T. (2016). How civil society actors responded to the economic crisis: The interaction of material deprivation and perceptions of political opportunity structures. Politics and Policy, 44, 447–472.
Habermas, J. (1999). Legitimacy problems in late capitalism. Madrid: Amorrortu.
Hall, P. A., Jacoby, W., Levy, J., & Meunier, S. (2014). The politics of representation in the global age: Identification, mobilization, and adjudication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herrera, M. (1997). Cultural plurality-political diversity. In political philosophy I: Political ideas and social movements (pp. 37–56). Madrid: Editorial Trotta, Higher Council for Scientific Research.
Innerarity, D. (2015). Politics in times of outrage. Barcelona: Gutenberg Galaxy.
Innerarity, D. (2017). Democracy in Europe. Barcelona: Gutenberg Galaxy.
Innerarity, D. (2020). A complex theory of democracy. Gutenberg Galaxy: Barcelona.
Judt, T. (2011). Something is wrong. Madrid: Taurus.
Katz, R. (2020). The model of party government. In R. Rohrschneider & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political representation in liberal democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keane, J. (2018). Life and death of democracy. Mexico: Fund of Economic Culture.
Kelsen, H. (1982). Pure theory of law. Mexico: National Autonomous University of Mexico.
Kelsen, H. (1988). Writings on democracy and socialism. Madrid: Debate.
Lechner, N. (2014). Works volume III: Democracy and utopia: Permanent tension. Mexico: Fund of Economic Culture.
Levitsky, S. (2018). Democratic survival and weakness. Journal of Democracy, 29(4), 102–113.
Levitsky, S., & Collier, D. (1998). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. Politics: Journal of studies on the State and society, 4, 137–160.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. Barcelona: Ariel.
Lodge, M. (2013). Crisis, resources and the state. Political Studies Review, 11, 378–390.
Luna, J. P. (2007). Political representation in Latin America: The state of the art and a proposed agenda. Politics and Government, 14(2), 391–435.
Luna, J. P. (2016). CHILE’S crisis of representation. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 129–138.
Mainwaring, S., Bejarano, AM., Pizarro, E. (Eds.). (2008). The crisis of democratic representation in the Andean countries. Editorial Norma.
Mair, P. (2015). The challenge to party government. In F, Casal, & G. Scherlis (Comps.). Parties, party systems and democracy: The essential work of Peter Mair (305–332). Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
Manin, B., Przeworski, A., & Stokes, S. (2002). Elections and representation. Open Zone, 101(102), 19–46.
Mansbridge, J. (2020). The evolution of political representation in liberal democracies: Concepts and practices. In R. Rohrschneider & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political representation in Liberal democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martínez, A. (Ed.). (2006). Political representation and quality of democracy. In A. Martínez (Ed.), Representation and quality of democracy in Spain. Technos.
Mayos, G. (2011). The society of ignorance. In A. Brey, D. Innerarity, & G. Mayos (Eds.), The society of ignorance and other essays (pp. 167–227). Barcelona: Peninsula.
Mihai, M. (2020). The hero’s silences: vulnerability, complicity, ambivalence, critical review of international social and political philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1796332
Mill, J. S. (1878). Of the representative government. Spain: Technos.
Milstein, B. (2020). Justification crisis: Brexit, trump, and deliberative breakdown. Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591720968596.
Montesquieu, C. (1906). The spirit of the laws, Volume I. Die. General Library of Victoriano Suárez.
Nohlen, D. (2013). Comparative political science. The historical-empirical approach. Granada: University of Granada.
Parekh, B. (1996). Some reflections on contemporary western political philosophy. Politics, 1, 5–64.
Phillips, A. (1998). The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, HF. (1985). The concept of representation. Madrid: Center for Constitutional Studies.
Posada Carbó, E. (2018). Digital dictatorships. The threats to democracy would come from the extraordinary advances in technology.
Przeworski, A., Bardhan, P., Bruszt, L., & Pereira, L. C. B. (1998). Sustainable democracy. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Rametta, G. (2005). Power and freedom in Kant’s political philosophy. In G. Duso (coordinator). Power: For a history of modern political philosophy. XXI century.
Reveles, F. (2017). Problems of political representation and direct participation in the democracy. Estudios Políticos, 42, 11–35.
Roiz, J. (2019). Distrust in humanity: A homeless couch. Foro Interno, 19, 1–3.
Rosenthal, U., Hart, P., & Kouzmin, A. (1991). The bureau-politics of crisis management. Public Administration, 69, 211–233.
Rustow, D. (1987). Transition to democracy. Elements for a dynamic model mico, In C. Huneeus (compiler), To live democracy (pp. 354–392). Santiago: CERC-Editorial Andante.
Sabine, H. (2009). Historia de la teoría política. México: FCE.
Sartori, G. (1974). La Democracia. In D. Sills (Ed.), Enciclopedia internacional de las ciencias sociales (Vol. 1). Madrid: Aguilar.
Sartori, G. (1999). En defensa de la representación política. Claves de razón práctica, 91, 2–6.
Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saward, M. (2010a). Remainders and opportunities: Recent theories of political representation. In The representative claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, R. (2017). Panel I – Conceptions of crisis. Crisis: Interdisciplinary perspectives – 9th international annual. Internationale Jahreskonferenz 2017.
Schmitter, P. C. (2019). Crisis and mutation in the institutions of representation in ‘real-existing’ democracies. Journal of Chinese Governance, 4(4), 323–338.
Schumpeter, J. (1963). Teoría del desenvolvimiento económico. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura.
Sen, A., & Foster, J. (2001). La desigualdad económica. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Skinner, Q. (2008). Maquiavelo. Barcelona: Alianza Editorial.
Subirats, J. (2001). Nuevos mecanismos participativos y democracia: promesas y amenazas. Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas. In J. Font (Ed.), Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas (pp. 33–42). Barcelona: Ariel.
Touraine, A. (2006). Crítica de la modernidad. Mexico: Fondo de cultura económica.
Traber, D., Giger, N., & Häusermann, S. (2018). How economic crises affect political representation: Declining party–voter congruence in times of constrained government. West European Politics, 41(5), 1100–1124.
Tuck, R. (2019). Tanner lecture: Active and passive citizens II: Active democracy. The University Center for Human Values. Princeton University.
Wlezien, C. (2020). Dynamic representation. In R. Rohrschneider & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political representation in liberal democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Navarrete, B., Tricot, V. (2021). Introduction: Social Outbreak and Political Representation in Latin America. In: Navarrete, B., Tricot, V. (eds) The Social Outburst and Political Representation in Chile. Latin American Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70320-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70320-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70319-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70320-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)