Skip to main content

Justification as a Dynamic Concept

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Awareness in Logic and Epistemology

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 52))

Abstract

This chapter is focused on the concept of ‘justification’, which I will analyse taking into account various perspectives. Firstly, I will define the notion by itself and review its applications and uses in mainstream Epistemology. Afterwards, I will examine how the concept has been used in Justification Logics and some of its contemporary developments. Eventually, I will present a different logical understanding of the concept; and finally, introduce my interpretation of ‘justification’ as a process and embed it in the EAK-Schema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I disregard the considerations about its legal and theological meaning, for simplicity reasons.

  2. 2.

    In https://www.lexico.com/definition/justification, accessed 04/22/2020.

  3. 3.

    In https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/justification, accessed 04/22/2020.

  4. 4.

    The use of the adjective “checkable” by the authors refers here to its computational meaning, alluding to the verifiability of the justifications.

References

  • Artemov, S., & Fitting, M. (2016). Justification logic. In E. N. Zalta, (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2016 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artemov, S. N., & Nogina, E. (2005). Introducing justification into epistemic logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 15(6), 1059–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltag, A., Renne, B., & Smets, S. (2014). The logic of justified belief, explicit knowledge, and conclusive evidence. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 165(1), 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordani, A. (2013). A logic of justification and truthmaking. Review of Symbolic Logic, 6(2), 323–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, G. (2017). Internalist versus externalist conceptions of epistemic justification. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, fall 2017 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlár, I. (2013). Justifications, awareness and epistemic dynamics. In S. N. Artëmov, & A. Nerode, (Ed.), Logical Foundations of Computer Science, International Symposium, LFCS 2013, San Diego, CA, USA, January 6-8, 2013. Proceedings, volume 7734 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 307–318. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Fernández-Fernández .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fernández-Fernández, C. (2021). Justification as a Dynamic Concept. In: Awareness in Logic and Epistemology. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 52. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69606-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics