Abstract
Denmark is a country characterized among others by high standards of transparency and human rights, a high level of trust, and having a welfare state financed through high taxes. In the business environment, Danish companies have largely adopted global responsibility standards and perform well on environmental, social and governance aspects. In this chapter, we examine whether these high social responsibility standards reflect in young job seekers’ preferences when choosing an employer. For this purpose, we survey 86 students in social sciences and management to assess the importance of 25 employer attributes. The results demonstrate a prevailing importance of firms’ responsibility towards employees and general workplace attractiveness, which both have direct influences on the individual. We discuss these findings in the context of Danish institutions and values.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 391–407.
Andersen, T. M., Bentzen, J., Jensen, S. E. H., Smith, V., & Westergård-Nielsen, N. (2016). The Danish economy in a global context. Copenhagen: Djøf Forlag.
Anguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.
Burck, J., Marten, F., & Bals, C. (2017). The climate change performance index 2017. Retrieved from https://germanwatch.org/en/13042
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). Democracy index 2016. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index
Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Hauff, S., & Richter, N. F. (2015). Power distance and its moderating role in the relationship between situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: An empirical analysis using different cultural measures. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 22(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-11-2013-0164.
Hauff, S., Richter, N. F., & Tressin, T. (2015). Situational job characteristics and job satisfaction: The moderating role of national culture. International Business Review, 24(4), 710–723.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jackson, G., & Bartosch, J. (2016). Corporate responsibility in different varieties of capitalism: Exploring the role of national institutions. Retrieved from https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/de/publikationen/publikation/did/corporate-responsibility-in-different-varieties-of-capitalism-exploring-the-role-of-national-instit/
Kirkelund, O. (2009). CSR i Danmark - Fra socialt engagement til forretningsdrevet samfundsansvar. Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved from http://ledelse.borsen.dk/article/view/866/csr-begrebsudvikling/artikel/csr_i_danmark.html
Laursen, F., Andersen, T., & Jahn, D. (2016). Sustainable governance indicators 2016 - Denmark report. Retrieved from www.sgi-network.org/docs/2016/country/SGI2016_Denmark.pdf
Marcuse, H. (2013). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge.
Ministry of Culture Denmark. (2016). Danmarkskanonen - 10 værdier for fremtidens samfund. Retrieved from https://www.danmarkskanon.dk/download-danmarkskanonen/
Ministry of Industry, B. a. F. A. (2016). Bekendtgørelse af årsregnskabsloven. Retrieved from https://www.retsinformation.dk/forms/r0710.aspx?id=175792
Nordic Co-operation. (n.d.). Facts about the Nordic Region. Retrieved from http://www.norden.org/en/fakta-om-norden-1
OECD. (2015). How’s life? 2015: Measuring well-being. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/how-s-life-2015_how_life-2015-en
OECD. (2016a). Income inequality update - Income inequality remains high in the face of weak recovery. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm
OECD. (2016b). Revenue statistics - OECD countries. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ctp/tax-policy/revenue-statistics-19963726.htm
OECD. (2017a). Gross domestic product (GDP) (indicator). Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/gdp/gross-domestic-product-gdp.htm
OECD. (2017b). Youth unemployment rate. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/unemp/youth-unemployment-rate.htm#indicator-chart
Parent-Thirion, A., Fernández Macías, E., Hurley, J., Vermeylen, G. (2007). Fourth European working conditions survey. Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2007/working-conditions/fourth-european-working-conditions-survey
Richter, N. F., Hauff, S., Schlägel, C., Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., & Gunkel, M. (2016). Advocating the use of cultural archetypes in cross-cultural management studies. Journal of International Management, 22(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2015.09.001.
RobecoSAM. (2017). Country sustainability ranking. Retrieved from http://www.robecosam.com/en/sustainability-insights/about-sustainability/country-sustainability-ranking/index.jsp
Rosdahl, A. (2001). The policy to promote social responsibility of enterprises in Denmark. Paper presented at the European Commission DG Employment Peer Review Program, Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research.
Rothstein, B. (2003). Social capital, economic growth and quality of government: The causal mechanism. New Political Economy, 8(1), 49–71.
Speerforck, A., & Richter, N. F. (2014). International differences in the importance of antecedents to job satisfaction and the role of socio-economic characteristics. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2411972
Svendsen, G. L. H., Svendsen, G. T., & Graeff, P. (2012). Explaining the emergence of social trust: Denmark and Germany. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 351–367.
The Danish Parliament. (2017, 04.05.2017). Democracy and monarchy. Retrieved from http://www.thedanishparliament.dk/Democracy/Democracy_and_monarchy.aspx
The Government. (2012). Responsible growth - Action plan for corporate social responsibility 2012-2015. Retrieved from http://csrgov.dk/danish_action_plan_2012
Transparency International. (2017). Corruption perceptions index 2016. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.
Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business and Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The global gender gap report 2016. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016/rankings/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsen, N.N., Richter, N.F. (2021). Denmark. In: Bustamante, S., Pizzutilo, F., Martinovic, M., Herrero Olarte, S. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Employer Attractiveness. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68861-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68861-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68860-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68861-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)