Skip to main content

Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Decentralized Control of a Robots Group to Search for the Maximum of an Unknown Scalar Physical Field

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Electromechanical Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 352))

Abstract

Problem formulation: An important class of group robotics tasks is the problem of spotting the extreme of an unknown scalar physical field using a robots group. For instance, the task of robotic detection of radioactive, chesmical, biological zones or other contamination of land, air or water can be set in the same mode. The methodological basis of the work is the bionic approach, the essence of which is to build a control system for a robots group through the usage algorithms inspired by nature and human society. Purpose: Development of a decentralized robots group control system, which feature small autonomous shooting satellite robots. Methods: An original meta-heuristic robots group decentralized control (RGDC) algorithm for solving the problem, based on the Intelligent Ice Fishing algorithm, which was proposed by the authors earlier, is offered. The main procedures of the algorithm are: the local optimization in the region of the current position of the robot; near relocation of the robot in the case where there is a stagnation of the local search process or when the advances of one of its closest neighbors “significantly” exceed the advances of the robot; far relocation, if there is a stagnation of the search process and the advances of its closest neighbors “do not significantly” exceed the advances of the robot. Results: A software that simulates a group of robots functioning has been developed. The software implements the proposed method of controlling the considering group of robots. A significant number of computational experiments were performed to estimate the effectiveness of the method on a number of test three-dimensional multi-extreme problems. The results of the study show a satisfactory, from a practical point of view, probability of the global extreme localization. Discussion: The results of the research are planned to be used in the development of the control system of the group robotic system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shan, S., Wang, G.G.: Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multi. Optim. 41(2), 219–241 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Laarhoven, P.J.M., Aarts, E.H.L.: Simulated annealing. In Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications, pp. 7–15. Springer, Dordrecht (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M.: Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems. Evol. Comput. 4(1), 1–32 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, A.H.: Genetic algorithms for real parameter optimization. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 205–218

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kennedy, J: Particle swarm optimization. In Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, pp. 760–766 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karaboga, D., Basturk, B.: Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems. In International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, pp. 789–798. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dorigo, M., Blum, C.: Ant colony optimization theory: a survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 344(2–3), 243–278 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Karpenko, A.P., Svianadze, Z.O.: Meta-optimization based on self-organizing map and genetic algorithm. Opt. Mem. Neural Netw. 20(4), 279–283 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Forrester, A.I.J., Keane, A.J.: Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 45(1–3), 50–79 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerschke, P., Trautmann, H.: Automated algorithm selection on continuous black-box problems by combining exploratory landscape analysis and machine learning. Evol. Comput. 27(1), 99–127 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. José Antonio Martín, H., de Lope, J., Maravall, D.: Adaptation, anticipation and rationality in natural and artificial systems: computational paradigms mimicking nature. Nat. Comput. 8(4), 757–775

    Google Scholar 

  12. Branke, J., Elomari, J.A.: Meta-optimization for parameter tuning with a flexible computing budget. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 1245–1252. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nobile, M.S., et al.: Fuzzy self-tuning PSO: a settings-free algorithm for global optimization. Swarm Evolu. Comput. 39, 70–85 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neumüller, C., et al.: Parameter meta-optimization of metaheuristic optimization algorithms. In International Conference on Computer Aided Systems Theory. Springer, Berlin, pp. 367–374 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mersmann, O., et al.: Exploratory landscape analysis. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 829–836. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Beiranvand, V., Hare, W., Lucet, Y.: Best practices for comparing optimization algorithms. Optim. Eng. 18(4), 815–848 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Dolan, E.D., Moré, J.J.: Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles. Math. Program. 91(2), 201–213 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen, N., Ostermeier, A.: Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies. Evol. Comput. 9(2), 159–195 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eiben, Á.E., Hinterding, R., Michalewicz, Z.: Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 3(2), 124–141 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gong, Y.-J., Li, J.-J., Zhou, Y., Li, Y., Chung, H.S.-H., Shi, Y.-H., Zhang, J.: Genetic learning particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 46(10), 2277–2290 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kavetha, J.: Coevolution evolutionary algorithm: a survey. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 4(4), 324–328 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inna A. Kuzmina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karpenko, A.P., Kuzmina, I.A. (2021). Meta-Heuristic Algorithm for Decentralized Control of a Robots Group to Search for the Maximum of an Unknown Scalar Physical Field. In: Gorodetskiy, A.E., Tarasova, I.L. (eds) Smart Electromechanical Systems. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 352. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68172-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics