Abstract
In Canada, the Constitution Act, 1867 does not formally assign jurisdiction over foreign affairs to the federal government and there is no section of the constitution that specifies who may enter into international treaties. Since 1945, and even before for certain issues, international negotiations, particularly in the areas of human rights, education, public health, labour, trade, the environment and climate change, have increasingly affected the provinces’ areas of jurisdiction. With these transformations, it becomes difficult for provinces to accept the federal government’s claim to a monopoly on foreign affairs, as this would mean that the Canadian government would be doing indirectly what it cannot do directly. In response to this phenomenon, many provinces have been seeking for over 60 years now to influence the federal government’s international negotiations of agreements that affect them. International negotiations in Canada have thus made the creation of multi-level governance mechanisms between the federal government and the Canadian provinces in this area inevitable. Little is known about the fact that while all attempts at constitutional reform in this area have failed, intergovernmental agreements have been reached in several areas (Human Rights, Hague Conferences on Private International Law, Education, UNESCO). In other areas, such as trade negotiations and climate change, the provinces are often involved in the negotiations even though federal arbitrariness remains an important issue and the question of the place of the provinces in international negotiations remains unresolved.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broschek, Jorg, and Patricia Goff. 2018. Federalism and international trade policy: The Canadian provinces in comparative perspective. IRPP Insight 23: 1–22.
Canada. 1948. Canada and the United Nations. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Canada. 1968a. Fédéralisme et conférences internationales sur l’éducation. Ottawa: Gouvernement du Canada.
Canada. 1968b. Fédéralisme et relations internationales. Ottawa: Gouvernement du Canada.
Canada. 2019. Participation in international environmental agreements and instruments. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/corporate/international-affairs/partnerships-organizations/participation-international-environmental-agreements.html. Accessed 13 May 2019.
Chaloux, Annie, Hugo Séguin, and Stéphane Paquin. 2015. Canada’s multiple voices diplomacy in climate change negotiations: A focus on Québec. International Negotiation 20: 291–318.
de Mestral, Armand, and Evan Fox-Decent. 2008. Rethinking the relationship between international and domestic law. McGill Law Journal 53: 573–648.
Dehousse, Renaud. 1991. Fédéralisme et relations internationales. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
Doern, G.Bruce, and Brian W. Tomlin. 1991. Faith and fear: The free trade story. Toronto: Stoddart.
Dussault, Yvan. 2004. Les négociations interaméricaines en matière d’éducation: le rôle des acteurs fédérés canadiens. Document inédit, février 4.
Fairley, H.Scott. 1988. Jurisdictional limits on national purpose: Ottawa, the provinces and free trade with the United States. In Trade-offs on free trade: The Canada–US free trade agreement, ed. Marc Gold and David Leyton-Brown, 107–116. Toronto: Carswell.
Gagnon-Tremblay, Monique. 2005. L’action internationale du Québec et des droits de la personne: des efforts réels. Le Devoir, août 31.
Gotlieb, Allan. 1970. The changing Canadian attitude to the United Nations role in protecting and developing human rights. In Human rights, federalism and minorities, ed. Alan Gotlieb. Toronto: Canadian Institute of International Affairs.
Harrington, Joanna. 2005. Redressing the democratic deficit in treaty law making: (Re-) Establishing a role for parliament. McGill Law Journal 465: 467–508.
Hart, Michael, Bill Dymond, and Colin Robertson. 1994. Decision at midnight: Inside the Canada–US free-trade negotiations. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Johnson, Pierre-Marc, Patrick Muzzi, et Véronique Bastien. 2015. Le Québec et l’aecg. Dans Un nouveau pont sur l’Atlantique: L’Accord économique et commercial global entre l’Union européenne et le Canada, eds. Christian Deblock, Joel Lebulanger, et Stéphane Paquin, 27–39. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Kukucha, Christopher J. 2008. The provinces and Canadian foreign trade policy. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Michelmann, Hans. 2009. Foreign relations in federal countries. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Paquin, Stéphane. 2006a. Le fédéralisme et les relations internationales du Canada depuis le jugement de 1937 sur les conventions de travail. Dans Les relations internationales du Québec depuis la Doctrine Gérin-Lajoie (1965–2005): le prolongement externe des compétences internes, ed. Stéphane Paquin, 7–24. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Paquin, Stéphane. 2006b. Quelle place pour les provinces canadiennes dans les organisations et les négociations internationales du Canada à la lumière des pratiques au sein d’autres fédérations? Administration Publique Du Canada 48: 447–505.
Paquin, Stéphane. 2010. Federalism and compliance with international agreements: Belgium and Canada compared. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 5: 173–197.
Paquin, Stéphane. 2013. Federalism and the governance of international trade negotiations in Canada: Comparing CUSFTA with CETA. International Journal 68: 545–552.
Paquin, Stéphane. 2014. Le fédéralisme d’ouverture et la place du Québec (et des autres provinces) dans les négociations internationales: rupture dans la continuité? Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 20: 28–37.
Patry, André. 1980. Le Québec dans le monde. Montréal: Lem.
Patry, André. 2003. La compétence internationale des provinces canadiennes. Montréal: André R. Dorais éditeur.
Stéphane‚ Paquin. 2017. Fédéralisme et négociations commerciales au Canada: l’ALE, l’AECG et le PTP comparés, Études internationales, volume XLVIII,Nos 3-4, 347–369.
VanDuzer, Anthony. 2013. Could an intergovernmental agreement make Canadian treaty commitments in areas within provincial jurisdiction more credible? International Journal 68: 536–544.
World trade organisation database. 2019. Regional trade agreements. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/region_e.htm. Accessed 13 May 2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paquin, S. (2021). The Role of Canada’s Provinces in Canadian Foreign Policy: Multi-level Governance in the Making. In: Murray, R.W., Gecelovsky, P. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Canada in International Affairs. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67770-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67770-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67769-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67770-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)