Skip to main content
  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

Service delivery at the grassroots level is a basic function of the state. When the supply side becomes responsive and the demand-side stakeholders become active, service delivery becomes effective. Nepal, being an agricultural country, has been providing agricultural extension services to beneficiaries and has established institutional arrangements at the grassroots level in different regions. This chapter discusses to what extent the institutions created for the delivery of agricultural extension services are effective in fulfilling their given objectives, and to what extent those who are meant to benefit from these services actually do experience any benefit. The areas of Betrabati, Naubise, and Prasauni, which are in three different geographical zones, were selected purposively to generate primary information. This study applies a sequential explanatory research design that uses quantitative data, followed by qualitative interviews for explaining respondents’ perceptions, feelings, attitudes, and experiences. The findings reveal that proper institutional capacity, people’s participation, and organizational coordination are critical variables for effective service delivery and are more significant than the delegation of authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aminuzzaman, S. M. (2013). Governance at grassroots–rhetoric and reality: A study of the Union Parishad in Bangladesh. In I. Jamil, S. Askvik & T. N. Dhakal (Eds.), In search of better governance in South Asia and beyond. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, J. A., Gracia, T., Gurrero, M. P., Quiros, C. A., Roa, J. I., & Beltran, J. A. (1995). Institutionalizing farmer participation in adaptive technology testing with the ‘CIAL’. In Agricultural Research and Extension. Network Paper No. 57. Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baral, L. R. (1993). Problems of governance. Konark Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, H. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, S. (2002, May 21–23). What is institutional capacity and how can it help American Indian nations meet the welfare challenge? Paper for the symposium on Capacity building and sustainability of tribal governments: The development of social welfare systems through preferred futuring. Washington University, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahal, D. R. (1996). The challenges of good governance. Kathmandu: Center for Governance and Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahal, H. (2010, August 7–14). National agriculture extension system: A country report [on] Nepal. Presented in the workshop Rural development for high-level officers of AFACI member countries. Suwon, Republic of Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal, T. N. (2007). Challenges of civil society governance in Nepal. Journal of Administration & Governance, 2(1), 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal, T. N., & Jamil, I. (2008). Delivery of basic services. A key issue of governance in Nepal. Public Administration Journal, 12(13), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoA. (2005, December 13–14). Proceedings of national agriculture extension workshop. Department of Agriculture, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? CGD Working Paper 314. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (2002). Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 33(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G. (2011, June 29–30). Improving governance: Lesson learnt for future challenges. Keynote address delivered at the international conference In Search of better governance: Prospects and challenges. Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R. B. (2009). Towards good governance: A South Asian perspective. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 25(2), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil, I. (2014). Inter-organizational coordination in urban governance in Bangladesh: A tale of two cities. South Asian Journal of Policy and Governance (SJPG), 34(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • KC, G. K., Pradhan, D., Upadhayay, B. P., & Upadhyay, S. (2003, May 6). Nepal: Agricultural extension experiences, challenges and opportunities. Country paper presented at the Regional workshop on operationalizing agriculture extension reform in South Asia, New Delhi, India. https://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/51025/ZipAgExtension1/ag_extension1/Materials/Plenary/Nepal.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2015.

  • Kjaer, M. A. (2004). Governance. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koirala, P. (2005). Public service delivery mechanism and rural poverty in Nepal (Economic Review No. 17 Occasional Paper). Research Department, Nepal Rastra Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, R., Oatham, J., & Hammer, M. (2007, December). Global accountability report (Briefing paper no. 109). One World Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agricultural Development. (2015). Quaterly Bulletin. Kathmandu: MoAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture Development. (2020). Quarterly Bulletin. Kathmandu: MoAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Planning Commission, Government of Nepal (NPC, GoN). (2016). The Fourteenth Three Year Plan (20162019). Kathmandu: National Planning Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Policy Administration and Theory, 10(2), 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panday, D. R. (2006). Corruption, governance and international cooperation. Transparency International Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2006). Concepts and theories of horizontal policy management. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of public policy (pp. 115–138). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, G. (2000). Governance, politics and the state. St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. (1983). Projects as instruments of development administration: A qualified defense and suggestion for improvement. Public Administration and Development, 3(4), 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance, 1(1), 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, S. K. (2009). A baseline survey on perceptions (particularly disadvantaged group) on the quality of public service and goods. Kathmandu: SDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. (2009). Innovations in public service delivery for ordinary citizens. Nepalese Journal of Public Policy and Governance. Public Administration Campus, Kathmandu, 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P. B., & Colavito, L. A. (2005, December 13–14). Partnership and collaborative efforts in the delivery of agricultural services. In Proceedings of Agriculture Extension Workshop. Kathmandu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers, M. (2000). The dynamics of coordination. Thomas J. Watson Jr. Institute for International Studies, Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, T. B. (2010). Agriculture extension services delivery systems in Nepal. A report submitted to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, UN Complex, Pulchowk, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest K., & Bouckaert G. (2005). Machinery of government and policy capacity: The effects of specialization and coordination. In Painter M, & Pierre J. (Eds.), Challenges to state policy capacity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. A., & Weschler, L. F. (1999). Electronic governance on the internet. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Information technology and computer application in public administration: Issues and trends. Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafarullah, H. (1998). National administration in Bangladesh: An analysis of organizational arrangements and operating methods. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 20(1), 79–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laxmi Kanta Paudel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paudel, L.K. (2021). Governance of Agricultural Service Delivery at the Grassroots Level in Nepal. In: Jamil, I., Dhakal, T.N., Haque, S.T.M., Paudel, L.K., Baniamin, H.M. (eds) Policy Response, Local Service Delivery, and Governance in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66018-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics