Skip to main content

Safety, Design and Law: A New Interdisciplinary Approach to Bicycle Rider Road Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advancing a Design Approach to Enriching Public Mobility

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 198))

  • 550 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates a novel problem-solving approach to study the interaction at an intersection between a driver (turning left) and a cyclist (continuing straight ahead). According to the road rules in the Australian state of Victoria [RR141(2)], the bicycle rider must not ride on the left of a vehicle that is indicating and turning left at an intersection. However, road rules and the built environment were not designed in harmony and there is a high level of confusion about this road rule in the community. Further to these community concerns are professional ones. Previously, road safety and engineering pointed to the law (road rules), as being the source of collisions and injuries from this negotiation. From the position of the law, problems arose concerning how the road rules were applied in a road safety and engineering context. The road space and the road rules are two manifestations of controls and guidance. Safety science has identified that legal considerations are made externally to road engineering, if at all (Nicholls et al. in Cyclists and left turning drivers: a study of infrastructure and behaviour at intersections. Auckland, New Zealand, 2017 [1]). In order to develop solutions to the problem of left turn confusion and conflict, the research team hypothesised that a design approach (Lawson in How designers think—the design process demystified. Architectural Press, Oxford, 2006 [2]) could bring these fields together. The overarching method is the implementation of convivial design techniques [for example see Illich ( Illich in 197 Tools for conviviality. Harper and Row, New York, (1973) [3]), Sanders and Stappers (Sanders and Stappers in Convivial design toolbox: generative research for the front end of design. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam, 2016 [4])] to bring together safety science, legal investigation of road rules, and design. Three specific design techniques were used. First, two-dimensional drawing was tested by the research team. Next, two-dimensional drawings and photographs of key intersection types were combined with three-dimensional scale modelling using LEGO® elements in facilitated discussions with road safety practitioners and experts. The third technique brought road rule considerations to the foreground by encouraging road rule annotation on two-dimensional drawings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicholls, H., Rose, G., Johnson, M. and Carlisle, R.: Cyclists and left turning drivers: a study of infrastructure and behaviour at intersections. In: 39th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF). Auckland, New Zealand (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lawson, B.: How Designers Think—The Design Process Demystified, 4th edn. Architectural Press, Oxford (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Illich, I.: Tools for conviviality. In: Anshen, R.N. (eds.) World Perspectives, vol. 47. Harper and Row, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders, E.B.N., Stappers, P.J.: Convivial Design Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. BIS Publishers, Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woolley, J., Crozier, J.: Inquiry into the National Road Safety Strategy 2011–2020. https://www.roadsafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/201911/nrss_inquiry_final_report_september_2018_v2.pdf (2018)

  6. Johnson, M.: Cyclist safety: An Investigation of How Cyclists and Drivers Interact on the Roads. Monash University. Thesis (2011).https://doi.org/10.4225/03/5890198046314

  7. McCambridge, J., Witton, J., Elbourne, D.: Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 67, 267–277 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, M., Johnston, V., Nicholls, H., Stephan, K., Napper, R., Taylor, W.: Drivers turning left, cyclists going straight: an interdisciplinary study combining behaviour, design and the law to improve safety. In: International Cycling Safety Conference, Brisbane, 18–20 Nov 2019

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chancellor-Goddard, S., Johnson, M.: Cyclists and left turning drivers: the impact of road infrastructure on safety and efficiency. In: 41st Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Canberra, 30 Sept–2 Oct 2019

    Google Scholar 

  10. McMenamin, G., Johnson, M.: Left turn negotiations between cyclists and drivers: an investigation of safe and legal. In: 41st Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Canberra, 30 Sept–2 Oct 2019

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norman, D.: The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. Basic Books (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bureau of Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Economics. Yearbook 2019: Progress in Australian Regions, p. 262. Canberra (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bonham, J., Johnson, M., Haworth, N.: On constituting cyclists as ‘hazards.’ J. Transp. Geogr. 84, 102675 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dreyfuss, H.: Designing for people. Skyhorse Publishing Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tierney, P.: Review of Victorian Cycling Related Road Rules and Legislation. https://www.vicroads.vic.gov.au/-/media/files/documents/safety-and-road-rules/reviewofvictoriancyclingrelatedroadruleslegislationmarch2015.ashx?la=en&hash=E46A6BEE94671370F802D02D71630D62 (2015)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robbie Napper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Napper, R., Johnson, M., Johnston, V. (2021). Safety, Design and Law: A New Interdisciplinary Approach to Bicycle Rider Road Safety. In: Coxon, S., Napper, R. (eds) Advancing a Design Approach to Enriching Public Mobility. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 198. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64722-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics