Skip to main content

The Downside of the U.S. Marginalizing Economics in Great Power Competition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Great Power Competition Volume 1

Abstract

A strategic shift has occurred in great power competition. The Pentagon says this strategic shift calls for an emphasis on U.S. grand strategy (linking economics and security) and geopolitics. Unfortunately, the U.S. keeps failing in its great power competition in the Greater Middle East. A militarized U.S. foreign policy marginalizes economics against Russia in Syria, against Iran in Iraq and against China in Afghanistan. Peaceful foreign policy opportunities are squandered. Therefore, the current U.S. administration’s economic nationalism is problematic. A better approach would be to turn enemies into friends by using shared prosperity in intra-state relations to reduce the demand for violence in the Syrian and Afghan civil wars. The French and Germans did much the same thing in inter-state relations after World War II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, the Syrian construction of the Tishrin Dam on the Euphrates River. While the dam brought benefits to a privileged few, families living in the area were driven off their land. They were forced to migrate into tents outside Damascus.

  2. 2.

    At this time, Michael Gfoeller was the Political Advisor at CENTCOM, his Deputy was Lewis Elbinger and I was Chief Economist. The three of us attended that frustrating and unsuccessful meeting with the Deputy Director of the Policy Planning Council at the US State Department.

  3. 3.

    For a graphic of these rural small business centers, see https://thinkrenewables.com/sbiz-centre/.

  4. 4.

    For more on C/RS, see https://2001-2009.state.gov/s/crs/c12936.htm.

  5. 5.

    For more on CSO see https://www.state.gov/j/cso/.

  6. 6.

    See www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1200/RR1243/RAND_RR1243.pdf.

  7. 7.

    The relationship between France and Germany, since 1871, according to Ulrich Krotz [1], has three grand periods: “hereditary enmity” (up to 1945), “reconciliation” (1945–63) and the “special relationship” embodied in a cooperation called Franco-German Friendship (since 1963). See Ulrich Krotz.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leif Rosenberger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rosenberger, L. (2021). The Downside of the U.S. Marginalizing Economics in Great Power Competition. In: Farhadi, A., Masys, A.J. (eds) The Great Power Competition Volume 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64473-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics