Abstract
Contemporary young adults differ from those of previous generations in their heavy engagement with screen media, including increasingly sophisticated video gaming and social media. This change in lifestyle has significant implications for their mental health and its treatment, for good and ill. Young adults typically prioritize screen media habits, thus displacing risky behavior such as recreational drug and alcohol use, sexual intercourse, and violence. Yet this also displaces healthy habits including adequate sleep, reading books, and in-person socializing. Some young adults develop an impairing but treatable behavioral addiction to gaming and other screen media, although names and definitions regarding the phenomenon vary greatly. Digital media behaviors interact with depression, anxiety, ADHD, and autism spectrum disorders in distinct manners which must be assessed and addressed in treatment. Psychiatrists should incorporate aspects of digital media habits and experiences into their assessments and formulations of young adult patients, adapting practice to the highly digitized lives of this generation.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
FormalPara Key Points-
Today’s TAY are distinct from other generations in their habitual engagement with new media technology, decreased risk-taking, and increased rates of depression and anxiety.
-
New digital media for entertainment and communication is extensively interwoven into TAY’s lives.
-
Interactions with digital technologies can engender or exacerbate mental health problems.
-
Mental health disorders often drive excessive digital media use, creating a novel symptom profile.
-
Mental health providers must assess digital media use, identifying elements of potential risk and harm.
-
TAY often engage in social connections online in place of healthier face-to-face interactions.
-
Online activities are often preferred by TAY to other means of managing negative affective states.
-
TAY engaging excessively in online entertainment often experience worsening symptoms of ADHD, anxiety, or depression.
-
Negative and unhealthy sites, such as those endorsing eating-disordered behaviors, self-harm, or suicide, may be particularly appealing to depressed youth.
-
Solutions to common media-related problems can include mindful use and utilizing technology applications to track and limit unhealthy use.
-
Incorporating new technologies into treatment can augment interventions, improve communication and alliance, and integrate treatment into our patients’ lives.
Jared is a 19-year-old man who presents reluctantly with his parents to an initial outpatient psychiatry evaluation in relation to a suicidal threat he made after an argument with his parents over completing chores. He dropped out of college 3 months before presentation and has become progressively isolated and despondent. In high school, during which he played video games in moderation, Jared was a fair student, and he did well in his first semester of college. However, after the winter break of college, he returned to campus, bringing his powerful “gaming computer.” At a friend’s advice, Jared started playing Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO) – an online competitive first-person shooter game played in teams. In his second semester, his gaming habit quickly consumed over 8 hours per day, to the detriment of sleep, socialization, homework, and study. Ultimately, Jared stopped attending class in college. He experienced a major depressive episode, lost weight, and contemplated suicide. He dropped out, returned home, and made a plan with his mother to get a full-time job. In the ensuing months, he continued to spend most of his waking hours playing CS:GO. He has not pursued a job, has gained 20 lbs., and has left household chores undone. He reports increasing social anxiety, rarely leaves home, and relapsed into depression. On interview, he makes little eye contact and gives minimal answers. His gaze returns regularly to his phone, and when asked why, he states it is to see if a CS:GO teammate has yet responded to his text. Jared admits that this has been the worst year of his life, but notes that he has at least gotten joy from playing CS:GO, which he calls “my coping skill.”
Introduction
Tech is everywhere. Modern youth’s engagement with media represents, by many measures, the greatest generational divide in history. Today’s transitional age youth represent the first generation whose adolescence began in a world of smartphones and contemporary computers, windows to online entertainment and video games. Dubbed “iGen” [130], this cohort born between 1995 and 2012 is defined by their technology habits. Technology has had a transformative effect on how these youth experience the world on a daily basis. This poses new challenges to their health and maturation, with implications for the assessment and treatment of psychiatric disorders. Transitional age youth of today often possess new skill sets, but also lack abilities considered basic in previous generations. Disorders of mental health in youth are interwoven with the media habits and experiences which dominate their lives. Excessive online habits can themselves become pathological, causing dysfunction, representing a distinct mental disorder. Online activities and experiences such as cyberbullying, sexting, and fear of missing out (FOMO) can also have a dramatic impact on mental health. It is vital that mental health practitioners understand the new normal, as well as digital technology’s differential impact on psychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and disorders of the autism spectrum. As such, practitioners must adapt the clinical evaluation of transitional age youth to include effects of technology-related mental health issues and disorders and guide patients toward balanced, healthy lives in a world dominated by screens.
Problematic Internet Use
For many adolescents and young adults, regulating digital media use is challenging; smartphones, tablets, laptops, etc., are the gateway for commerce, education, employment, entertainment, information, and socialization [100].
Researchers use a variety of terms and methods when trying to understand digital media use and when it becomes problematic. To date, there are over 60 terms describing the latter. Problematic interactive media use (PIMU) describes when overuse or compulsive use of media (both online and offline) interfere with one’s daily life – having a negative impact on personal hygiene, grades, family interactions, emotional and psychological issues, and relationships [87]. PIMU often presents in one of four ways: gaming, social media, pornography, and information-bingeing.
TAY with PIMU may also have coexisting diagnoses of ADHD, ASD, anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and/or substance use [93] Physically, those who have PIMU may have sedentary lifestyles, weight gain, sleep issues [93], neck/back pain, wrist/hand pain, and eye strain.
Problematic Internet use (PIU) is described as the “use of the Internet that creates psychological, social, school and/or work difficulties in a person’s life” [9, p. 378]. PIU focuses upon two factors, time on the Internet and what is done on the Internet, and it includes additional ideas beyond addiction (e.g., Internet use that interferes with offline socialization).
Internet addiction focuses on an addiction specific to the Internet, describing core features of addiction such as loss of control while on the Internet or feelings of withdrawal when away from the Internet [120].
Internet gaming disorder is defined in the 2013 revision of Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM-5) as a condition requiring further study, not yet an official diagnosis. Gaming disorder is listed in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) as a diagnosis in the 2018 revision.
The figure below (Fig. 18.1) incorporates language from primary care and mental health practitioners to illustrate the relationship between Internet gaming disorder and related phenomena.
Table 18.1 compares the definitions of Internet gaming disorder and gaming disorder.
There are over 20 assessment tools that focus on different aspects of problematic use [66]. These tools may measure concepts of addictive behaviors, impulse-control disorders, or behaviors that use the Internet as a medium for other addictive behaviors. Others assess the impact of the use of existing apps [81], or devices like smartphones.
The impact of PIMU/addiction upon TAY may include physical and mental health concerns and decreased success in educational, employment, or social realms – regardless of culture. These behaviors may also have a significant impact upon the family system. For example, TAY who never leave their parents’ home may have had a “failure to launch”, or a “boomerang” effect may occur if the TAY returns to live at home as a result of PIMU or addiction. In both scenarios, family dynamics may be disrupted, financial stressors increased, and interpersonal conflicts intensified.
The following two tables (Tables 18.2 and 18.3) summarize the current state of research and treatment evidence in therapy and in pharmacological management to address problematic use of digital media. For pharmacological management, the medications listed can be beneficial in treating PIU, which may coexist with one or more comorbid psychiatric diagnoses.
Clinical Vignette
Suzie is a 19-year-old female who has come to see a college counselor, as she is experiencing poor mood and difficulty sleeping. She is studying biomedical sciences and had an argument with a friend about a joint assignment last week. The conflict has escalated, and several other people are involved. She is worried about her reputation and feels excluded, as she is no longer welcome in her former study group. This issue has kept her up at night, and she has tried to reason with several people to rejoin the group, to no avail. Her grades are slipping, and she nearly walked into a passing car while simultaneously texting her ex-friend. She has had near misses with traffic like this in the past while using social media on her phone.
Typical Screen Habits and Mental Health Impact
Young adults of this generation come of age with significantly distinct strengths and weaknesses due to individual experiences accumulated in childhood and adolescence. Cross-sectional studies done 15 years apart, in 2000 and in 2015, show a massive increase in daily screen entertainment consumption, to an average of over 6.5 hours per day for adolescents [100, 103]. The average amount of time spent online tripled during this time period, and the average amount of time spent playing video games quadrupled. Taken as a whole, the average transitional age American youth spends about twice as much time engaging in screen entertainment during their teenage years as they spend in school. The extensive time devoted to screens has displaced time traditionally spent in other activities. Generational research indicates that in 2015, adolescents spent significantly less time socializing in person with peers, going out on dates, reading books and magazines, driving, and even sleeping than at any other time in the prior 25 years [130]. However, this time period also saw a significant decrease in adolescent violent crime rates, teen pregnancy, and cigarette and alcohol use. Determining causality is difficult, but it appears that the increase in teen technology habits have displaced both healthy and risky behaviors. Current transitional age youth have less experience with socializing in person (including dating) than any generation before, which is expected to negatively impact their “offline” social skills [130]. Modern youth have also spent less time reading books and magazines for enjoyment, as well as driving, which may impact their education and options for employment as well as social life. Nighttime technology use displaces time spent sleeping, deconditions sleep habits, and increases sleep latency times following video games or other stimulating screen activities. Insufficient sleep is particularly vital to correctly identify and address in psychiatric care, because it strongly predicts depression, anxiety, and suicidality [83]. As a possible protective factor, today’s youth also come of age having engaged in fewer experiences with sexual intercourse, pregnancy, interpersonal violence, and drug and alcohol use [130], which may in turn decrease susceptibility to mental disorders such as posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders.
However, there are signs that the current generation is overall less mentally healthy than the last. When compared with young adults who were aged 18–25 years old in the mid-2000s, transitional age youth in the late 2010s are more likely to report specific psychological problems [131]. This relationship is illustrated in Fig. 18.2.
Changing screen habits seems to be the biggest difference between the current and previous generations. Even within the generation of young adults, increased screen habits have been associated with anxiety, depression, psychopathology symptoms, and poor sleep quality [141]. Large systematic reviews of research studies have associated time spent on screen media with depression, psychological distress, behavior problems, low self-esteem, and poor physical fitness, although one review found only a small effect [121].
The amount of screen time youth engage in may be less important than the choices they make regarding quantity and content of use. For example, scrolling social media while in a classroom may distract from learning, while doing so late at night may lead to insufficient sleep.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Experiences and Behaviors
Specific online screen habits and experiences have been associated with negative mental health outcomes and warrant particular concern: cyberbullying, sexting, social comparison, FOMO (fear of missing out), violent video game play, and viewing pornography. Cyberbullying is the use of electronic communication to bully another, typically by sending intimidating, humiliating, or threatening messages. Cyberbullying victimization is becoming more common in recent years, and it specifically predicts worsening of depression symptoms over time [67, 77]. Sexting involves sharing sexually explicit photographs or videos via electronic media and is also becoming more common. One survey of young adults found that a majority admitted to having engaged in sexting [122]. Although sexting is not always related to a negative outcome, at greatest risk are females who send a picture for the hopes of starting a new relationship [32]. Sexting has also been associated with depression, anxiety, substance use, and risky sexual behaviors [86, 119]. Social comparison refers to the human tendency to evaluate oneself based on observation of others. This concept can relate to use of various types of media, yet its effects appear particularly powerful via social media, where users often exaggerate or fabricate desirable characteristics in order to compete for “followers,” “friends,” and “likes.” Youth engaging in social comparison are more likely to feel inferior and are significantly more likely to experience depression in relation to social media use [76, 88, 133]. Similarly, FOMO is the feeling of being excluded from experiences one’s peers are enjoying. Youth who experience FOMO tend to feel inferior and self-conscious over time [59]. They are more likely to check social media accounts obsessively and to suffer negative consequences of social media use [90]. Similar to engagement with other forms of violent media, violent video game play has been found to increase aggressive thoughts and behaviors in dozens of research studies. Although the effect size is relatively small, it is significant, and may be proportional to the extent of exposure. The mental health implications of watching online pornography are largely unknown, but a significant proportion of young men endorse feeling addicted [43]. These online experiences should be assessed in psychiatric evaluations of youth and addressed in treatment when problematic.
Various habits of screen media engagement appear to confer specific skills and advantages. Regular video game play has been shown to benefit eye-hand coordination, aspects of vision such as detail resolution and contrast sensitivity, visual tracking, mental rotation, task switching, and multitasking.
Social media use may also confer specific benefits and risks to mental health. Social media engagement has been related to increased self-esteem and social support. Youth suffering from depression and anxiety often seek help and support online, typically preferring to socialize online rather than in person. Racial minority and LGBTQ youth, as well as those with niche interests, or learning disabilities, often use social media to connect with like-minded peers and as a result feel less lonely [63]. Some studies indicate that social media engagement in youth may be protective against depression, particularly for those who receive positive feedback and online support and who engage actively, e.g., posting, commenting, and “like-ing.” In contrast, other studies have found that social media use by youth who are unpopular, lack self-purpose, and are emotionally invested in their social media image is linked to negative mental health outcomes [12, 136]. Social media use may be riskier for depressed users, who are much more likely to have negative interactions on social media, to feel left out on social media, and to use social media to avoid real-world problems [101]. Youth often disclose suicidal thoughts online rather than in person. Doing so risks delaying needed help, and online discussion about suicide is related to worsening suicidality over time [31, 82].
When compared with previous generations, contemporary transitional age youth have more experience playing video games and engaging on social media. They have considerably less practice with in-person socializing and reading. They are more likely to suffer depression or mental distress, have poorer physical fitness, and have less healthy sleep habits than any time in living memory [130]. These generational differences exist, but generalizations are difficult, due to high variability in individual screen media habits and experiences. Psychiatrists who treat transitional age youth must be able to assess screen habits in patients and their effects on mental health and psychiatric disorders. Providers can guide our patients toward healthier media habits and make use of the unique opportunities computer technology offers for health and recovery.
Assessment and Formulation
Engagement with digital media is an almost universal behavior among TAY across class, sex, and culture. An unheralded level of access to media has shaped youth culture and is an aspect of daily life with multitasking of different media the new norm [95]. An expanding portfolio of evidence demonstrates an impact of digital media use on self-esteem, sleep quality, mood, risk-taking behaviors, and even propensity for accidents [3, 45, 61]. Thus, digital media use bears a role in mediating the risk of depression, anxiety, and self-injurious behavior. There is a need for mental health providers to become attuned to a rapidly shifting digital environment and for psychiatric assessments to reflect this change in youth culture [114]. However, over half of practicing psychiatrists are over 55 years of age and may have less experience with technology than the youth they are evaluating [48]. Professional organizations including the APA and AACAP work to address this practice gap via clinical updates and education about the relevance of digital media within a psychiatric assessment [1, 5].
Considering the type, extent, and impact of digital media use in their lives may be helpful as a broad framework when interviewing the patient. Being aware of the potential for media-related issues within the patient’s narrative can help garner pertinent clinical information that may otherwise not be offered.
-
What digital media does this person use? (number/type of devices, social media, video games)
-
When do they use digital media? (time of day (night time use, work hours), duration)
-
Why do they use these forms of media? (entertainment, distraction, boredom, information, communication, anonymity) [61]
-
Impact – Does the patient feel their media use offers positive, neutral, or negative effects on their functioning? (in addition to objective assessment from the provider including collateral as indicated)
The approach of tailoring questions relevant to each of the assessment domains may be the most intuitive and has been proposed [18]. Psychiatric providers can quickly establish rapport and begin to guide appropriate digital media use by inquiring about digital media use as part of a psychiatric history [18]. The domains can be adapted to consider the influence of digital media within it and be tailored to the patient’s presentation.
Screening tools have commonly been used for depression or anxiety, such as the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 [85, 94]. Validated, succinct tools assessing problematic media use are also available and may be a beneficial primer in assessing digital media use. The Problematic and Risky Internet Use Screening Scale (PRIUSS -3) is a three-question scale that, if positive, can be further evaluated assessing social impairment, emotional impairment, and risky/impulsive Internet use [52]. The Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale (BSMAS) is another self-report scale that has six items based on the diagnostic criteria of addiction as outlined in the DSM-5: mood modification, conflict, withdrawal, salience, and relapse [3].
Integrating the Clinical History of Media Use into Practice
History of Presenting Illness
This is the initial narrative as to why a patient is coming to seek psychiatric care. This may vary from insomnia to low mood to social problems. Curiosity and exploration as to whether media habits play a role in the chief complaint can be established here. For example, in a case of insomnia or interpersonal conflict, querying about the role of screen media and their perception of its impact may be helpful. Late evening or bedtime screen use can lead to untimely arousal, increased sleep latency, and poor-quality sleep along with suboptimal cognitive and athletic performance the next day [45, 54]. Asking how communication is conducted (e.g., Snapchats that disappear, text messaging, public posts on Facebook or Twitter) helps establish how individuals manage conflict, or if they are a victim and/or perpetrator of cyberbullying [18].
Past Psychiatric and Medical History
TAY access online resources for health-related information and may use mental health applications as their first foray into addressing mental health problems [4]. Asking about applications they utilize and whether they find them beneficial can offer an initial impression as to their treatment preferences [4]. Media use when driving increases risk for accidents and also should be discussed [41, 128].
Social History
TAY are unlikely to differentiate between “real-world” friends and friends they have only ever conversed with online – unless asked [95]. This differentiation offers an opportunity to reflect on the balance between offline and online influences and at times helps establish a diagnosis and illuminate potential risks. Asking about whether a patient uses their phone during work, class, or study is worthwhile as use of smartphones and social media during lectures has a detrimental effect on academic performance [106].
Developmental History
An exploration of how media use evolved, including at what age they started, and how their use was restricted or encouraged by their caregivers can help paint a picture of the nature of their home life and quality of caregiver relationships. Did caregivers provide adequate supervision? Were there arguments about appropriate media use? Did caregivers use screen media predominantly for play, or to soothe them as children? [140]
Safety Assessment
Research has indicated that exposure to NSSI (non-suicidal self-injury) imagery [15] and sexual predators can increase an individual’s risk for self-injury or exploitation [99]. Individuals with problematic use, especially with comorbid psychiatric symptoms, are at increased risk of being victim to or engaging in risky behavior such as cyberbullying [115]. A survey among psychiatrically hospitalized youth indicated a positive relationship between problematic Internet use and suicidality [36]. Young people are increasingly communicating distress digitally, particularly to peers [78]. Careful yet overt inquiry and education about exposure to risks and disclosure of suicidality on digital media is necessary here.
Mental Status Examination
A cross-sectional observation of what the patient does with their electronic device during the consultation is useful and can be compared with the narrative obtained [18]. This may vary from keeping it out of sight; setting it on the table; being distracted by it – replying to messages and calls; or using it to communicate with the provider by showing images or texts. This may offer a “teachable moment” whereby the provider can assess and target insight, or as a discussion point when assessing for problematic use.
Formulation
Considering the influence of digital media within each domain of a biopsychosocial framework assists in incorporating its relevance within a summary formulation. The impact of the digital environment youth exist in and have created should be considered within [35]:
-
Biological aspects including light exposure, sleep, sedentarism, physical activity, or eating habits [18]
-
Psychological aspects: mood including depression, anxiety and FOMO, general sense of well-being [139]
-
Social aspects: social supports and the connectedness and similarities between online and offline environments including risks taken
A digital media assessment can help to generate a more holistic and realistic view of the patient with an appropriate management plan tailored to their presentation. This may include intermittent periods of abstinence to reduce stress [129], increased engagement in sports, CBT, or another psychotherapy to target addictive Internet behaviors [87].
Clinical Vignette
Raquel, a freshman at a community college who lived at home, was spending increasing amounts of time alone in her bedroom. Worried about her isolation and moodiness, her mother encouraged her to see a therapist. During the initial meeting, Raquel slumped into a chair, her gaze fixed to the floor. She admitted to habitually coming home after class to confine herself to her bedroom and to spend hours online. Raquel lacked motivation to leave the house or spend time with her family or “offline” friends, preferring connection with her “online-only” friends. Raquel told her therapist that she frequently felt sad and bored but enjoyed watching videos on YouTube. Conflicts often arose with her mother over how much time she has spent online. Raquel dealt with loneliness by further scrolling through the feeds of social media sites, which was often followed by feelings of sadness and hopelessness. Raquel found herself in a cycle of depression and excessive time spent online. Raquel sacrificed sleep and in-person relationships for her activities online. She admitted to frequently updating her status on social media sites and checking responses to her posts, feeling frustrated and disappointed when she received too few “likes,” or responses.
Depression and Anxiety
Raquel’s story is not uncommon among transitional age youth (TAY). Many struggling with negative mood turn to the Internet for information, entertainment, social connection, and support, often with negative consequences. TAY with moderate to severe depression report a heightened affective response to social media experiences, both positive and negative [101]. Internet devices are immediately available sources of education and feedback. Today’s TAY are coming of age at the same time that new digital technologies are emerging as the preferred source of personal expression, entertainment, and information. TAY search online for information about their health conditions as well as to find support from others afflicted with similar issues; 87% of 14- to 22-year-olds access the Internet for health information [101]. However, those dealing with anxiety or depression are vulnerable to certain aspects of digital technology. Compared with peers, anxious and depressed youth prefer socializing online. Internalizing youth often use social media to combat loneliness, but are also more susceptible to cyberbullying and other negative online interactions [11, 96].
Like many of her peers, Raquel’s emergence into adulthood coincides with a period of increased autonomy, the emergence of mental illness, and poorly regulated digital technology habits. Major transitions mark this life stage, with TAY typically entering the workforce or college, often moving to a new community in the process. New onset, or exacerbation of existing mental illness, frequently occurs during this time period. Youth now progress through these milestones with the Internet as a constant companion. Although TAY typically seek support and relief from distress online, overdependence on digital technology may lead to ineffective coping skills, increased social isolation, addictive use of social media, and, ultimately, worsening distress.
Young adults who spend the most time online report the highest rates of depression and anxiety [49, 71, 117] as well as suicidal ideation and attempts [60, 78, 113]. Studies of various Internet activities (social media, gaming, blogs, shopping sites, and topic-specific platforms) have found that the highest utilizers of each endorse the most anxiety and depression [79, 89, 125].
TAY endorsing anxiety and depression report more negative interactions online than their peers, a pattern which often worsens the problem. These include:
-
Cyberbullying [53] – both perpetrators and victims are significantly more likely to engage in self-harm or suicidal behaviors [105, 132].
-
Problematic interactive media use – particularly social media, whether excessive use is intended to manage negative mood states or youth experiencing psychological distress experience greater emotional distress as a result of their use [51, 98, 116, 132, 137].
-
Problematic experiences on social media such as attention-seeking behaviors and suffering FOMO [117] – depressed youth spend more time on social media platforms, more frequently checking for reactions to their posts.
Determining causality in the association between Internet habits and psychiatric disorders is complex. The majority of currently published studies utilize cross-sectional designs and are unable to conclude the directionality of the association between Internet habits and psychopathology. However, individuals with excessive and inappropriate Internet use frequently endorse greater rates of depression or anxiety. Youth with internalizing disorders appear to be uniquely vulnerable to the effects of excessive or inappropriate Internet use.
Many TAY prefer to seek information and support for their psychological issues online. A 2018 Hope lab survey found that adolescents and TAY with depression use the Internet for several purposes [101]. TAY often conduct online research as their first step in better understanding their mental health concerns. Websites, blogs, apps, and social networking groups dedicated to mental health issues appeal to many youth with a variety of psychiatric diagnoses. These resources are readily available and can be used anonymously. However, many online resources are not affiliated with a recognized academic or treatment organization and may contain misleading information. Globally accessible platforms allow for youth to connect with individuals experiencing similar problems, who may be better able to understand shared experiences. Used appropriately, the Internet is a powerful tool for TAY to understand and manage their psychiatric symptoms. Supportive family or friends can use similar online tools to engage TAY dealing with such problems.
In planning interventions for TAY dealing with anxiety and depression, special consideration should be given to the role of their online activities. Formal assessment of Internet habits in TAY presenting with depression or anxiety should be part of all initial evaluations. Intensity and frequency of use, platforms used, and other patterns of use can affect anxiety and depression. Understanding patients’ online lives will help providers create better-informed treatment interventions. Treatment should include helping TAY identify problematic behaviors and emotional responses related to digital technology, thus reducing or removing unhelpful online behaviors and increasing positive use of technology and other healthy behaviors. The Internet is a powerful educational tool, a source of peer support, and many TAY are receptive to using technology as a component of mental health treatment [38]. The Internet can enable providers who work with TAY to better understand, treat, and support patients.
Clinical Vignette
Aaron, a college freshman, presents to his first appointment with a psychiatrist during his winter break. His parents had insisted that he see a psychiatrist after learning that he had received C’s and D’s in his first semester. He had been diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in third grade by his family doctor, but with treatment had become an A and B letter grade student who was also active in sports. Aaron stares at the floor as the psychiatrist asks about his semester. Aaron insists that he is taking his stimulant daily, but complains of often missing deadlines for assignments, feeling unprepared for tests, and struggling with insomnia. Aaron admits to spending hours, both during and outside of class time, playing a popular multiplayer game. He subscribes to several YouTube channels featuring others playing the game and finds it difficult to turn off his devices to attend to his schoolwork.
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
It is no surprise that newly-independent Aaron struggled with self-monitoring his Internet habits. TAY with ADHD are particularly susceptible to excessive Internet use and addiction. In such cases, inappropriate and excessive Internet habits further exacerbate physical, psychological, and biological disability. Childhood associations between ADHD and excessive technology use (e.g., causing difficulties with social relationships, sleep, and behavior) persist in transitional years [2, 10]. TAY with insomnia have higher rates of both ADHD and Internet addiction [34]. Those with greater ADHD severity typically have increased social impairment as well as higher levels of state and trait anger, leading to social isolation [107]. Social isolation, in turn, contributes to excessive Internet use, which perpetuates isolation in a vicious cycle. Online activities incorporating high risk or reward, such as gambling and gaming, are particularly habit-forming for those susceptible to addiction. Digital technology is emerging as an important factor in how symptoms of ADHD manifest in TAY.
ADHD, comorbid symptoms, and poorly regulated Internet habits can profoundly impact functioning. TAY and adults with ADHD have higher levels of Internet addiction, a construct recognized worldwide but not yet defined in DSM 5 [49, 69, 124, 135]. Internet use disorders are associated with maladaptive behaviors and negative mood states. Impulsiveness, loneliness, and impaired behavioral inhibition are predictors of Internet addiction among adults with ADHD [70]. Internet gaming disorder is associated with impulsivity and hostility in TAY [142]. Severity of ADHD symptoms is associated with severity of Internet addiction in TAY, particularly so when the Internet is used to help regulate negative emotions [33]. The immediate gratification, fast-paced interfaces, and constantly moving screens may alleviate immediate feelings of boredom [33]. Left unchecked, excessive online behaviors interfere with offline functioning.
Achieving autonomy and independence, key developmental tasks for this age group, are threatened by factors that impair executive functioning skills. A significant proportion of ADHD cases diagnosed in adulthood report an absence of symptoms in childhood, calling into question whether an alternative etiology is responsible for their symptoms [20]. Adults with recent-onset ADHD symptoms are more likely to endorse symptoms of Internet addiction compared to controls [69]. Engagement with video games and other screen media has been linked to deteriorating attention over time [123]. Similarly, gaming disorder has been linked with the development of ADHD symptoms [80]. Although causality is impossible to prove from this data, excessive Internet habits may cause or worsen symptoms of ADHD. When evaluating ADHD, especially for adults with new-onset symptoms, care must be taken to also assess technology habits.
When working with TAY in clinical settings, priorities should include strengthening self-monitoring and self-regulation skills including challenges uniquely impacted by ADHD symptoms and Internet use (e.g., time management, limit setting, need for immediate feedback, problems with sleep and interpersonal relationships). These TAY require strategies to manage these issues to improve their overall functioning. Recognition of the interrelationships between these varied problems will help patients gain insight into their vulnerability to problematic Internet use.
Clinical Vignette
Tony is a 20-year-old male with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) who lives with his family. He was “too high functioning” for vocational rehabilitation services but has not been successful in keeping a job. He doesn’t have “real-life” friends; he has “virtual” friends online. When his parents tell him to stop gaming, he throws things; his tablet and controller broke. He learns about sexuality and relationships from online forums, mainstream media, and pornography. He has tried to meet romantic partners via social media but has been unsuccessful.
After Tony and his parents contacted the Office of Vocational Rehabilitation about his employment challenges, he met with a job coach who explained professional interactions in the workplace and via email. He and his family began co-watching movies and programs, and his family taught him which observed behaviors were unreasonable. Tony also joined a social skills group where he made some acquaintances and learned “rules” about appropriate and inappropriate behavior online and offline. They talked about topics like independence, safety, relationships, sexuality, courtship behaviors, consent, pornography, and the law. His therapist also referred him to reliable online resources.
Autism Spectrum Disorder
TAY with autism often find that interactions online are less threatening to navigate [25]. They also have patterns of Internet use that differ from their peers, listed in Table 18.4.
Data demonstrates that TAY with ASD have greater compulsive Internet and video game use, which can lead to fewer opportunities to develop social, academic, and occupational skills and negative impacts for their families. Technology can help initiate social interactions with like-minded others, but maintenance of connections with desired friends and romantic partners, knowledge of who is trustworthy, and assessment of appropriate disclosure can be challenging [16]. Benefits and limitations of various low- and high-tech social outlets for this population are listed in Fig. 18.3.
Integrating Technology into Treatment
Digital media and related technology are incrementally becoming a part of mental healthcare delivery – from booking appointments online; text messaging services to deliver information and support (e.g., Caring Contacts) [23]; or enabling access to emergent help such as crisis text line, or HIPAA-compliant telepsychiatry services (e.g., VSee) [40, 73]. As mental health burden outstrips current psychiatric resources, digital therapeutic options could play a crucial role in addressing the gap in services [127].
A growing area of interest is mental health applications (“apps”) , of which there are over 10,000 claiming to benefit mental health [127]. Patients may already be using these applications in lieu of or to supplement traditional treatment options [91, 97]. Potential advantages include affordability, wide-ranging geographical reach, immediate accessibility in a crisis, improving engagement, and lowering the stigma of seeking psychiatric help [4]. Yet optimism needs to be tempered with caution. The vast majority of apps lack robust evidence of efficacy [68], and many of the exceptions are apps specifically designed for a trial and not commercially available [4, 30, 97]. However, where RCT evidence is available, the results are encouraging [29, 111]. Unfortunately, the rapid development of apps means that their rigorous study is impractical. Practitioners ought to be aware that many apps may be evidence informed (rather than evidence based), unhelpful, or even harmful, and most do not fall under the remit of FDA regulations [4, 68, 127].
The APA does not endorse or supply ratings for specific apps. However, an APA app evaluation model has been published providing guidance to clinicians as to how to examine the utility, suitability, risks (including privacy issues), and benefit of a particular app before recommending it to patients in clinical practice [5, 22]. This model is illustrated in Fig. 18.4 and includes using the app to gauge whether it may add value to specific aspects of clinical care, e.g., stress management, strengthening adaptive coping skills (e.g., the meditation app Headspace) [22], or medication reminders (e.g., MediSafe [108]). Chan et al. also provide questions relevant to these domains to consider before recommending an app [21]. Behavioral activation and physical exercise can be encouraged using apps that utilize “gamification” methods such as Zombies, Run! and SuperBetter [7, 104]. The gamelike interface and rewards system have been shown to increase motivation for individuals to reach their goals [22, 84].
Apps engaging in real time or ecological momentary assessment of mood, thoughts, or behavior (e.g., MoodPrism, T2 Mood Tracker) lend themselves well to outpatient care [30, 91]. These may be useful for diagnostic clarification. Apps are perceived positively by youth and can improve patient engagement in treatment [91]. Additional benefits include increasing emotional awareness, reduced subjective experience of depression, a positive “digital placebo effect,” and, importantly, limited potential for adverse effects [4, 6, 7, 30]. However, a barrier to clinical use is the inability to incorporate and store app data with current EMR systems [127].
AACAP suggests a few applications, e.g., MY3, which assists users with a readily available safety plan and contact information of supports that they have pre-created for use in times of crisis [1, 72, 127]. However, they are recommended with the proviso that all are utilized in conjunction with a provider [1, 127]. A recent meta-analysis of CBT treatment formats indicated that guided digital self-help was as effective as individual or group based ones for treatment of depression [24]. A burgeoning area is virtual reality exposure therapy via apps such as ZeroPhobia [29]. RCTs have indicated these helpful for an array of anxiety disorders including phobias [17, 29, 58]. CBT-i Coach for insomnia and PTSD Coach, developed by the US Veteran Affairs, have also demonstrated some efficacy [50, 62, 64].
Digital therapeutics are becoming a credible option for treatment, and some app creators are seeking FDA approval as a legitimate treatment option for psychiatric disorders. Recently the FDA approved the app “reSET” for the treatment of substance use disorder (in conjunction with face-to-face treatment) [134]. Other apps that are undergoing FDA approval include Headspace and Akili Interactive Labs’ video game for ADHD treatment, for which initial trials yielded positive results [102].
Clinical Vignette
Maria is a 19-year-old female who was living at home while taking classes at the local community college. She had difficulty with making new friends but stayed connected to her high school friends on social media. She did play a couple video games, watch videos, and looked up facts about her favorite topics, but she spent hours on social media instead of doing her schoolwork. After late nights online, she often slept through morning classes. By the time the semester ended, she had regular complaints of neck pain, day and night reversal, and poor grades (C’s, D’s, and an F).
Maria connected with a therapist and psychiatrist through her college mental health center. She was diagnosed with social anxiety, started on escitalopram, and began the spring semester. She was motivated to see peers in her afternoon classes. With her therapist, she improved her time management – building in time for assignments, physical exercise, eating, and sleeping. Any remaining time before bedtime, she spent at her discretion online. She ended the semester with A’s and B’s and some acquaintances that she might socialize with over the summer.
Solutions
Higher work- and school-related demands, greater freedom, more opportunities for socializing, and reduced family-related structure and support create increased autonomy and difficult choices for TAY. “On-the-fly” decision-making regarding media engagement is a poor strategy due to its high cognitive demands, poor prioritization, susceptibility to impulsive decisions, and the ever-present digital distractions.
For healthy functioning, TAY should adopt a time management approach which prioritizes productive work and essential responsibilities, captures goals, lists important tasks, and schedules events. Tasks requiring sustained attention must often be “chunked,” broken up into manageable portions. TAY should cultivate healthy habits incorporating exercise, in-person socializing, creative activities, and routine chores. A consistent work routine is preferable to sporadic expenditures of effort. Creating calendars, setting timers, and making lists help to organize activities.
Many TAY must be taught about the costs of multitasking. Multitasking has not been shown to cause permanent cognitive deficits [8, 118], but it reduces productivity and increases fatigue [57]. The brain’s data processing systems truly only focus on one thing at a time, so what appears to be multitasking is actually rapid shifting of attention back and forth. Cognitive energy and efficiency are lost each time the attentional filter changes from one task to another, the costs of which quickly accumulate.
Frequent distractions and interruptions (such as those created by screen media) reduce productivity in much the same way. Each time sustained attention is turned away from active work, efficiency is sacrificed. The extra effort required to shift attention frequently may give “multitasking” TAY the mistaken impression they are working efficiently. Even the mere availability of an inert smartphone within reach creates a distraction significant enough to hinder cognitive performance [138].
Addressing problems of multitasking and frequent interruption are most important for TAY already suffering disorders which interfere with cognitive control and attention, such as depression, anxiety, and ADHD.
Finally, getting sufficient sleep is an essential activity, not a waste of time as many youth believe. TAY are easily caught up in subcultures which discount the benefits of sleep and normalize insufficient sleep habits. Sleep researcher Lauren Hale has suggested the approach of desist, dampen, and dim. This can be understood as (1) desist by stopping digital media at least 1 hour prior to bed, (2) dampen by avoiding arousing material just prior to sleep, and (3) dim by reducing screen light intensity to minimize sleep-disrupting blue light exposure after sunset [44].
Problematic technology use habits are common in TAY, and professionals should assess these problems as well as motivation for change, coping skills, and psychosocial supports before setting treatment goals. Depending on this assessment, either a harm reduction or abstinence-based approach may be appropriate. It may be helpful to reframe unhealthy or problematic digital behaviors as misguided methods to meet one’s basic needs such as receiving attention, stimulation, self-expression, affiliation, or control. Matching these needs with alternative, enjoyable, healthy non-digital activities is often the key to an optimal outcome [39]. A lack of mindfulness often plays a role in excessive online engagement [14]. Transitional age youth should be encouraged to notice and tolerate impulses to use their devices. Creating self-awareness represents a good start while other interventions are initiated. Regular media “fasts” (i.e., periods of abstinence), along with scheduling screen-free elements of daily routine, will help prevent relapse and reduce incidents of overuse. A detailed list of dilemmas associated with technology habits and their solutions can be found in Table 18.5.
Conclusion
Today’s TAY appear different than previous generations, in part due to the technologies interwoven into their lives. They are required to use smartphones, computers , and other digital devices to function in their school, work, family, and social lives. TAY have ready access to unlimited digitally mediated leisure activities and diversions. They lack role models for media habits and must pave a new path navigating complex and tempting digital environments.
A successful launch into adulthood will require effective strategies, including setting realistic limits on digital media use, effectively prioritizing activities, and honoring the importance of sleep, in-person contact, and physical activity. In clinical populations, unhealthy habits are common, including PIU – problematic Internet use. Changing harmful patterns is often difficult, especially in TAY whose habits are engrained over a substantial portion of their lives. A valid assessment of digital activities is complicated because many intermix benefits (e.g., socialization, learning, and stimulation) with unhealthy patterns that compromise other aspects of life.
Mental health providers working with transitional age youth must assess the quantity, quality, and impact of their digital media habits. Asking the right questions regarding Internet use is vital to gathering the essential information. Thankfully, screening tools can help simplify and standardize such assessments, as can digital devices themselves.
For example, a quick smartphone assessment notes frequently used apps, notification settings, total screen time, and daily steps walked. With little effort and expense, such important data can be gathered, as well as time spent on apps or games. Smart devices can track physiological measures such as blood pressure, medication adherence, or sleep. In the near future, digital devices could routinely and automatically download directly into electronic medical records, easing the identification and tracking of relevant health patterns and simplifying treatment plans.
For TAY, digital media-related issues are often important enough to warrant a substantial component of the biopsychosocial formulation. An ever-expanding range of apps, online treatment, and emerging uses for virtual reality efficiently augment traditional care. Digital technologies can enable patients to learn clinically relevant information and track mood states and could prompt patients, thereby increasing medication compliance, or completion of psychotherapy “homework” assignments.
Thus the paradox of growing up digital is constantly evolving, creating new challenges and opportunities. Youth benefit from virtually unlimited information, the ability to track one’s own habits and enhance personal relationships with improved communication. Yet, simultaneously, they suffer far more distractions; receive less trustworthy information, with online acquaintances replacing friendships; and have powerful enticements to establish unhealthy or self-destructive digital behaviors.
To quote Dickens: “it was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness” [28]. Today’s digitally native TAY enjoy many positive trends with regard to safety, health, and quality of life. However their generation must contend with an epidemic of depression, anxiety, and suicidality. TAY face unprecedented challenges related to their digital media devices, yet they wield powerful new tools capable of enhancing their lives. Mental health providers who have stood witness to these trends and are well-informed are capable of providing practical solutions to new versions of timeless challenges inherent in emerging into adulthood during extraordinary times.
References
AACAP. Resources for Youth. 2019. https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Resource_Centers/Depression_Resource_Center/Resources_for_Youth_Depression.aspx.
Agnew-Blais JC, Polanczyk GV, Danese A, Wertz J, Moffitt TE, Arseneault L. Evaluation of the persistence, remission, and emergence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Young adulthood. JAMA Psychiat. 2016;73(7):713–20.
Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, Griffiths MD. The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey. Addict Behav. 2017;64:287–93.
Anthes E. Mental health: There’s an app for that. Nature. 2016;532(7597):20–3.
APA. App evaluation model. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/mental-health-apps/app-evaluation-model. Accessed 15 Jul 2019.
Bakker D, Rickard N. Engagement in mobile phone app for self-monitoring of emotional wellbeing predicts changes in mental health: MoodPrism. J Affect Disord. 2018;227:432–42.
Bakker D, Kazantzis N, Rickwood D, Rickard N. Mental health smartphone apps: review and evidence-based recommendations for future developments. JMIR Men Health. 2016;3(1):e7.
Baumgartner SE, van der Schuur WA, Lemmens JS, te Poel F. The relationship between media multitasking and attention problems in adolescents: results of two longitudinal studies. Hum Commun Res. 2018;44(1):3–30.
Beard KW, Wolf EM. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2001;4(3):377–83.
Becker SP, Lienesch JA. Nighttime media use in adolescents with ADHD: links to sleep problems and internalizing symptoms. Sleep Med. 2018;51:171–8.
Bonetti I, Campbell M, Gilmore L. The relationship of loneliness and social anxiety with Children’s and Adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2009;13(3):279–85.
Booker C, Kelly Y, Sacker A. Gender differences in the associations between age trends of social media interaction and well-being among 10-15 year olds in the UK. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):321.
Bostwick JM, Bucci JA. Internet sex addiction treated with naltrexone. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83(2):226–30.
Brewer J. Mindfulness training for addictions: has neuroscience revealed a brain hack by which awareness subverts the addictive process? Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;28:198–203.
Brown RC, Fischer T, Goldwich AD, Keller F, Young R, Plener PL. Cutting: non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) on Instagram. Psychol Med. 2018;48(2):337–46.
Burke M, Kraut R, Williams D. Social use of computer-mediated communication by adults on the autism spectrum. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. ACM. 2010. pp. 425–434.
Carl E, Stein AT, Levihn-Coon A, et al. Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;61:27–36.
Carson NJ, Gansner M, Khang J. Assessment of digital media use in the adolescent psychiatric evaluation. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018;27(2):133–43.
Carta MG, Zairo F, Mellino G, Hardoy MC. Add-on quetiapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2007;3:28.
Caye A, Rocha TB, Anselmi L, Murray J, Menezes AM, Barros FC, Gonçalves H, Wehrmeister F, Jensen CM, Steinhausen HC, Swanson JM, Kieling C, Rohde LA. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder trajectories from childhood to Young adulthood: evidence from a birth cohort supporting a late-onset syndrome. JAMA Psychiat. 2016;73(7):705–12.
Chan S, Torous J, Hinton L, Yellowlees P. Towards a framework for evaluating Mobile mental health apps. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(12):1038–41.
Chandrashekar P. Do mental health mobile apps work: evidence and recommendations for designing high-efficacy mental health mobile apps. mHealth. 2018;4:6.
Comtois KA, Kerbrat AH, DeCou CR, et al. Effect of augmenting standard care for military personnel with brief caring text messages for suicide prevention: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 2019;76(5):474–83.
Cuijpers P, Noma H, Karyotaki E, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA. Effectiveness and acceptability of cognitive behavior therapy delivery formats in adults with depression: a network meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 2019; 76(7): 700–7.
Davidson J. Autistic culture online: virtual communication and cultural expression on the spectrum. Soc Cult Georg. 2008;9(7):791–806.
De Sousa A. Fluoxetine in the management of pornography addiction. Indian J Ment Health. 2016;3(3):372–4.
Dell’Osso B, Hadley S, Allen A, Baker B, Chaplin WF, Hollander E. Escitalopram in the treatment of impulsive-compulsive internet usage disorder: an open-label trial followed by a double-blind discontinuation phase. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(3):452–6.
Dickens C, Simon S. A tale of two cities. New York: Vintage Books; 1990.
Donker T, Cornelisz I, van Klaveren C, et al. Effectiveness of self-guided app-based virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy for acrophobia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiat. 2019;76(7):682–90.
Dubad M, Winsper C, Meyer C, Livanou M, Marwaha S. A systematic review of the psychometric properties, usability and clinical impacts of mobile mood-monitoring applications in young people. Psychol Med. 2018;48(2):208–28.
Dunlop S, More E, Romer D. Where do youth learn about suicides on the internet, and what influence does this have on suicidal ideation? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52(10):1073–80.
Englander E. Risky business: talking with your patients about Cyberbullying and sex. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018;27(2):287–305.
Evren B, Evren C, Dalbudak E, Topcu M, Kutlu N. Relationship of internet addiction severity with probable ADHD and difficulties in emotion regulation among young adults. Psychiatry Res. 2018;269:494–500.
Evren B, Evren C, Dalbudak E, Topcu M, Kutlu N. The impact of depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and severity of internet addiction symptoms on the relationship between probable ADHD and severity of insomnia among young adults. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:726–31.
Finkelhor D. Commentary: cause for alarm? Youth and internet risk research--a commentary on Livingstone and Smith (2014). J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;55(6):655–8.
Gansner M, Belfort E, Cook B, et al. Problematic internet use and associated high-risk behavior in an adolescent clinical sample: results from a survey of psychiatrically hospitalized youth. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(5):349–54.
Gillespie-Lynch K, Kapp SK, Shane-Simpson C, Smith DS, Hutman T. Intersections between the autism Spectrum and the internet: perceived benefits and preferred functions of computer-mediated communication. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014;52(6):456–69. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-52.6.456.
Gitlow L, Janney B, Lemery C, McDonald J, McGinley B, Rabideau K. How college students diagnosed with anxiety disorders and/or depression use everyday technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;14:1–8.
Godley MD, Godley SH, Dennis ML, Funk RR, Pasetti LL, Petry NM. A randomized trial of assertive continuing care and contingency management for adolescents with substance use disorders. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014;82(1):40–51.
Gonzales R, Douglas Anglin M, Glik DC. Exploring the feasibility of text messaging to support substance abuse recovery among youth in treatment. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(1):13–22.
Gorucu S, Murphy D, Foster D, Hanagriff R, Ewing J. Technology use among youth while operating farm equipment. J Agromedicine. 2018;23(4):305–14.
Grant JE, Chamberlain SR, Odlaug BL, Potenza MN, Kim SW. Memantine shows promise in reducing gambling severity and cognitive inflexibility in pathological gambling: a pilot study. Psychopharmacology. 2010;212(4):603–12.
Grubbs J, Kraus S, Perry S. Self-reported addiction to pornography in a nationally representative sample: the roles of use habits, religiousness, and moral incongruence. J Behav Addict. 2019;8(1):88–93.
Hale LE. Digital media and sleep health among adolescents: Does sleep mediate the association between screen time and depressive symptoms? Poster presented at: the 66th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2019 October 14–19; Chicago, IL.
Hale L, Kirschen GW, LeBourgeois MK, et al. Youth screen media habits and sleep: sleep-friendly screen behavior recommendations for clinicians, educators, and parents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018;27(2):229–45.
Han DH, Lee YS, Na C, Ahn JY, Chung US, Daniels MA, Haws CA, Renshaw PF. The effect of methylphenidate on Internet video game play in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2009;50(3):251–6.
Han DH, Hwang JW, Renshaw PF. Bupropion sustained release treatment decreases craving for video games and cue-induced brain activity in patients with Internet video game addiction. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010;18(4):297–304.
Hawryluk. Bulletin HMT. Supply of psychiatrists shrinks. 2016. Accessed 18 Jul 2019.
Ho R, Zhang M, Tsang T, Toh A, Pan F, Lu Y, Cheng C, Yip P, Lam L, Lai C-M, Watanabe H, Mak K-K. The association between internet addiction and psychiatric co-morbidity: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:183.
Horsch CH, Lancee J, Griffioen-Both F, et al. Mobile phone-delivered cognitive Behavioral therapy for insomnia: a randomized waitlist controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e70.
Hussain Z, Griffiths MD. Problematic social networking site use and comorbid psychiatric disorders: a systematic review of recent large-scale studies. Front Psych. 2018;9:686.
Jelenchick LA, Eickhoff J, Christakis DA, et al. The problematic and risky internet use screening scale (PRIUSS) for adolescents and Young adults: scale development and refinement. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;35:171–8.
John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, Montgomery P, Stewart A, Wood S, Lloyd K, Hawton K. Self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and Young people: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;19;20(4):129.
Jones JJ, Kirschen GW, Kancharla S, Hale L. Association between late-night tweeting and next-day game performance among professional basketball players. Sleep Health. 2019;5(1):68–71.
Jordan CJ, Caldwell-Harris CL. Understanding differences in Neurotypical and autism spectrum special interests through internet forums. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012a;50(5):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-50.5.391.
Jordan CJ, Caldwell-Harris CL. Understanding differences in neurotypical and autism spectrum special interests through internet forums. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012b;50(5):391–402. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-50.5.391.
Junco R, Cotten SR. No a 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput Educ. 2012;59(2):505–14.
Kampmann IL, Emmelkamp PM, Hartanto D, Brinkman WP, Zijlstra BJ, Morina N. Exposure to virtual social interactions in the treatment of social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2016;77:147–56.
Keracher M. #StatusofMind [Internet]. Rsph.org.uk. 2019 [cited 19 July 2019]. Available from: https://www.rsph.org.uk/our-work/campaigns/status-of-mind.html.
Kim HJ. Exercise rehabilitation for smartphone addiction. J Exerc Rehabil. 2013;9(6):500–5.
Kim HJ, Min JY, Kim HJ, Min KB. Accident risk associated with smartphone addiction: a study on university students in Korea. J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):699–707.
Koffel E, Kuhn E, Petsoulis N, et al. A randomized controlled pilot study of CBT-I coach: feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact of a mobile phone application for patients in cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia. Health Informatics J. 2018;24(1):3–13.
Korchmaros J, Ybarra M, Mitchell K. Adolescent online romantic relationship initiation: differences by sexual and gender identification. J Adolesc. 2015;40:54–64.
Kuhn E, van der Meer C, Owen JE, et al. PTSD coach around the world. mHealth. 2018;4:15.
Kuo MH, Orsmond GI, Coster WJ, Cohn ES. Media use among adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism. 2014;18(8):914–23.
Kuss DJ, Lopez-Fernandez O. Internet addiction and problematic internet use: a systematic review of clinical research. World J Psychiatry. 2016;6(1):143–76. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v6.i1.143. eCollection 2016 Mar 22.
Landoll R, La Greca A, Lai B, Chan S, Herge W. Cyber victimization by peers: prospective associations with adolescent social anxiety and depressive symptoms. J Adolesc. 2015;42:77–86.
Larsen ME, Huckvale K, Nicholas J, et al. Using science to sell apps: evaluation of mental health app store quality claims. NPJ Dig Med. 2019;2:18.
Leménager T, Hoffmann S, Dieter J, Reinhard I, Mann K, Kiefer F. The links between healthy, problematic, and addicted internet use regarding comorbidities and self-concept-related characteristics. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(1):31–43.
Li W, Zhang W, Xiao L, Nie J. The association of internet addiction symptoms with impulsiveness, loneliness, novelty seeking and behavioral inhibition system among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Psychiatry Res. 2016;243:357–64.
Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A, Radovic A, Miller E, Colditz JB, Hoffman BL, Giles LM, Primack BA. Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Dep Anx. 2016;33(4):784–94.
Link2 Health Solutions I. https://my3app.org/. Accessed 15 Jul 2019.
Lopez WM, Lustig SL. Telepsychiatry: watching your back while staying in the black. Psychiatr Times. 2015;32(8):41–4.
Lorenz T, Frischling C, Cuadros R, Heinitz K. Autism and overcoming job barriers: comparing job-related barriers and possible solutions in and outside of autism-specific employment. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147040.
Lui J, Nie J, Wang Y. Effects of group Counseling programs, cognitive Behavioral therapy, and sports intervention on internet addiction in East Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1470.
Lup K, Trub L, Rosenthal L. Instagram #Instasad?: exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18(5):247–52.
Machmutow K, Perren S, Sticca F, Alsaker F. Peer victimisation and depressive symptoms: can specific coping strategies buffer the negative impact of cybervictimisation? Emot Behav Diffic. 2012;17(3–4):403–20.
Marchant A, Hawton K, Stewart A, Montgomery P, Singaravelu V, Lloyd K, Purdy N, Daine K, John A. A systematic review of the relationship between internet use, self-harm and suicidal behaviour in young people: the good, the bad and the unknown. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181722. Erratum in: PLoS One. 2018;13(3)
Marino C, Gini G, Vieno A, Spada MM. The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;226:274–81.
Marmet S, Studer J, Grazioli VS, Gmel G. Bidirectional associations between self-reported gaming disorder and adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: evidence from a sample of Young Swiss men. Front Psych. 2018;11(9):649.
Martinez-Pecino R, Garcia-Gavilan M. Likes and problematic Instagram use: the moderating role of self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(6):412–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0701. Epub 2019 May 20
Masuda N, Kurahashi I, Onari H. Suicide ideation of individuals in online social networks. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62262.
Matamura M, Tochigi M, Usami S, Yonehara H, Fukushima M, Nishida A, Togo F, Sasaki T. Associations between sleep habits and mental health status and suicidality in a longitudinal survey of monozygotic twin adolescents. J Sleep Res. 2014;23(3):292–6.
Moran MJ, Coons JM. Effects of a smart-phone application on psychological, physiological, and performance variables in college-aged individuals while running. Int J Exerc Sci. 2015;8(2):1.
Moreno MA, Arseniev-Koehler A, Selkie E. Development and testing of a 3-item screening tool for problematic internet use. J Pediatr. 2016;176:167–72.e161
Mori C, Temple J, Browne D, Madigan S. Association of Sexting with Sexual Behaviors and Mental Health among Adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;73(8):770–9.
Nereim C, Bickham D, Rich M. A primary care pediatrician’s guide to assessing problematic interactive media use. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31(4):435–41.
Nesi J, Prinstein M. Using social Media for Social Comparison and Feedback-Seeking: gender and popularity moderate associations with depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015;43(8):1427–38.
Nie J, Zhang W, Liu Y. Exploring depression, self-esteem and verbal fluency with different degrees of internet addiction among Chinese college students. Compr Psychiatry. 2017;72:114–20.
Oberst U, Wegmann E, Stodt B, Brand M, Chamarro A. Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: the mediating role of fear of missing out. J Adolesc. 2017;55:51–60.
Palmier-Claus JE, Rogers A, Ainsworth J, et al. Integrating mobile-phone based assessment for psychosis into people’s everyday lives and clinical care: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:34.
Park JH, Lee YS, Sohn JH, Han DH. Effectiveness of atomoxetine and methylphenidate for problematic online gaming in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2016;31(6):427–32.
Pluhar E, Kavanaugh JR, Levinson JA, Rich M. Problematic interactive media use in teens: comorbidities, assessment, and treatment. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:447–55.
Plummer F, Manea L, Trepel D, McMillan D. Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: a systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016;39:24–31.
Poyntz SR, Pedri J. Youth and media culture. Oxford University Press; 2018. Available at https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.75
Prizant-Passal S, Shechner T, Aderka I. Social anxiety and internet use - a meta-analysis: what do we know? What are we missing? Comput Hum Behav. 2016;62:221–9.
Radovic A, Vona PL, Santostefano AM, Ciaravino S, Miller E, Stein BD. Smartphone applications for mental health. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(7):465–70.
Raudsepp L, Kais K. Longitudinal associations between problematic social media use and depressive symptoms in adolescent girls. Prev Med Rep. 2019;21:15.
Reid D, Weigle P. Social media use among adolescents: benefits and risks. Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;4(2):73–80.
Rideout V. The common sense census: media use by tweens and teens | common sense media [Internet]. Commonsensemedia.org. 2019 [cited 19 July 2019]. Available from: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/the-common-sense-census-media-use-by-tweens-and-teens.
Rideout V, Fox S, Well Being Trust. Digital health practices, social media use, and mental well-being among teens and young adults in the U.S. articles, Abstracts, and Reports. 2018; 1093.
Rijcken C. Chapter 15 - digital therapeutic mangroves. In: Rijcken C, editor. Pharmaceutical care in digital revolution. Academic Press; 2019:169–179.
Roberts D. Kids & media @ the new millennium. Menlo Park CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 1999. Available at https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/kids-media-the-new-millennium-report.pdf.
Roepke AM, Jaffee SR, Riffle OM, McGonigal J, Broome R, Maxwell B. Randomized controlled trial of SuperBetter, a smartphone-based/internet-based self-help tool to reduce depressive symptoms. Games Health J. 2015;4(3):235–46.
Rosenthal S, Buka S, Marshall B, Carey K, Clark M. Negative experiences on Facebook and depressive symptoms among Young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(5):510–6.
Rozgonjuk D, Saal K, Taht K. Problematic smartphone use, deep and surface approaches to learning, and social media use in lectures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(1):92.
Sacchetti GM, Lefler EK. ADHD symptomology and social functioning in college students. J Atten Disord. 2017;21(12):1009–19.
Santo K, Richtering SS, Chalmers J, Thiagalingam A, Chow CK, Redfern J. Mobile phone apps to improve medication adherence: a systematic stepwise process to identify high-quality apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(4):341–4.
Santos V, Nardi AE, King AL. Treatment of internet addiction in patient with panic disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder: a case report. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2015;14(3):341–4.
Sattar P, Ramaswamy S. Internet gaming addiction. Can J Psychiatr. 2004;49(12):869–70.
Schlosser DA, Campellone TR, Truong B, et al. Efficacy of PRIME, a Mobile app intervention designed to improve motivation in Young people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44(5):1010–20.
Schupak C. Case report: lamotrigine/fluoxetine combination in the treatment of compulsive sexual behavior. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007;31(6):1337–8. Epub 2007 Apr 25
Sedgwick R, Epstein S, Dutta R, Ougrin D. Social media, internet use and suicide attempts in adolescents. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2019;32(6):534–41.
Shafi RMA, Romanowicz M, Croarkin PE. SwitchedOn: a call for assessing social media use of adolescents. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(11):e27.
Shah J, Das P, Muthiah N, Milanaik R. New age technology and social media: adolescent psychosocial implications and the need for protective measures. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2019;31(1):148–56.
Shensa A, Escobar-Viera CG, Sidani JE, Bowman ND, Marshal MP, Primack BA. Problematic social media use and depressive symptoms among U.S. young adults: a nationally-representative study. Soc Sci Med. 2017;182:150–7.
Shensa A, Sidani J, Dew M, Escobar-Viera C, Primack B. Social media use and depression and anxiety symptoms: a cluster analysis. Am J Health Behav. 2018;42(2):116–28.
Shih S-I. A null relationship between media multitasking and Well-being. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64508.
Smith L, Liu B, Degenhardt L, Richters J, Patton G, Wand H, et al. Is sexual content in new media linked to sexual risk behaviour in young people? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Health. 2016;13(6):501.
Spada MS. An overview of problematic internet use. Addict Behav. 2014;39(1):3–6.
Stiglic N, Viner R. Effects of screentime on the health and Well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023191.
Strohmaier H, Murphy M, DeMatteo D. Youth sexting: prevalence rates, driving motivations, and the deterrent effect of legal consequences. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2014;11(3):245–55.
Swing E, Gentile D, Anderson C, Walsh D. Television and video game exposure and the development of attention problems. Pediatrics. 2010;126(2):214–21.
Tateno M, Teo AR, Shirasaka T, Tayama M, Watabe M, Kato TA. Internet addiction and self-evaluated attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder traits among Japanese college students. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;70(12):567–72.
Thorisdottir I, Sigurvinsdottir R, Asgeirsdottir B, Allegrante J, Sigfusdottir I. Active and passive social media use and symptoms of anxiety and depressed mood among Icelandic adolescents. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019;22(8):535–42.
Torous J. Evaluating smartphone health apps: 5 key step. 2017. https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/telepsychiatry/evaluating-smartphone-health-apps-5-key-steps.
Torous J, Luo J. Mental health apps: what to tell patients. Curr Psychiatr Ther. 2018;17:21–5.
Truelove V, Freeman J, Davey J. “I Snapchat and drive!” a mixed methods approach examining snapchat use while driving and deterrent perceptions among young adults. Accid Anal Prev. 2019;131:146–56.
Turel O, Cavagnaro DR, Meshi D. Short abstinence from online social networking sites reduces perceived stress, especially in excessive users. Psychiatry Res. 2018;270:947–53.
Twenge JM. iGen: why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy— and completely unprepared for adulthood (and what this means for the rest of us). New York: Atria Books; 2017.
Twenge J, Cooper A, Joiner T, Duffy M, Binau S. Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005–2017. J Abnorm Psychol. 2019;128(3):185–99.
Vannucci A, Flannery K, Ohannessian C. Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. J Affect Disord. 2017;207:163–6.
Vogel E, Rose J, Okdie B, Eckles K, Franz B. Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes. Personal Individ Differ. 2015;86:249–56.
Waltz E. Pear approval signals FDA readiness for digital treatments. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(6):481–2.
Wang BQ, Yao NQ, Zhou X, Liu J, Lv ZT. The association between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and internet addiction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:260.
Wardeiner A, Palaganas C, Londrico D, Candow L. The relationship between social media use and negative mental health outcomes. [conference presentation] 2017 Cleveland State Univerity, Cleveland; United States. http://www.gupiaozenmewan.net/sites/default/files/20%20B.pdf.
Weinstein A, Dorani D, Elhadif R, Bukovza Y, Yarmulnik A, Dannon P. Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults. Ann Clin Psych. 2015;27(1):4–9.
Wilmer HH, Sherman LE, Chein JM. Smartphones and cognition: a review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Front Psychol. 2017;8:605.
Wolniewicz CA, Tiamiyu MF, Weeks JW, Elhai JD. Problematic smartphone use and relations with negative affect, fear of missing out, and fear of negative and positive evaluation. Psychiatry Res. 2018;262:618–23.
Wooldridge MB, Shapka J. Playing with technology: mother–toddler interaction scores lower during play with electronic toys. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2012;33(5):211–8.
Wu X, Tao S, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Tao F. Low physical activity and high screen time can increase the risks of mental health problems and poor sleep quality among Chinese college students. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119607.
Yen JY, Liu TL, Wang PW, Chen CS, Yen CF, Ko CH. Association between internet gaming disorder and adult attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and their correlates: impulsivity and hostility. Addict Behav. 2017;64:308–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weigle, P., Kaliebe, K., Dalope, K., Asamoah, T., Shafi, R.M.A. (2021). Digital Media Use in Transitional-Age Youth: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Chan, V., Derenne, J. (eds) Transition-Age Youth Mental Health Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62113-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62113-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62112-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62113-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)