Skip to main content

Co-work and Compromises: The Birth of the CRC

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moral Change
  • 231 Accesses

Abstract

The narrative of why and how the UN developed and passed the Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC) in 1989.

During the 1970s, there was a growing dissatisfaction in the UN with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It did not sufficiently protect children against harm, and it did not sufficiently respect the autonomy of children. Therefore, Poland suggested the creation of a convention for children. What followed was a unique political process characterised by dialogue and broad co-work, commitment to consensus and willingness to compromises. The result was that today, the Convention of the Rights of the Child is the most widely and rapidly ratified convention in the history of the UN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Inspiration: https://culture.pl/en/article/maly-przeglad-a-little-review-with-a-big-impact (accessed 10.5.2019).

  2. 2.

    Within the UN system the term ‘convention’ means ‘formal multilateral treaties with a broad number of parties’. ‘Declarations’, on the other hand, are not formal agreements; but rather statements of ‘understanding of some matter or as to the interpretation of a particular provision’. A ‘treaty’ is defined by the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties as ‘an international agreement concluded between States in written form and governed by international law’ (Grahn-Farley 2013: 244). Accordingly, a convention is a legally binding agreement (Nickel 2007: 15–16), while a declaration is an expression of an intention, with some moral weight. For further descriptions of the international legal human rights system, see Moeckli et al. (eds.) (2014); Krause and Scheinen (2012); Marks and Clapham (2005); For works with particular focus on children’s rights, see Van Buren (1995); Freeman (2012); Freeman (ed.) (2004); Archard (2014); and Koren (1996). The Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC) had international legal predecessors in the form of declarations, like the League of Nations’ The Geneva Declaration of the Rights of the Child from 1924 and the UN Declaration of the Rights of the Child adopted in 1959 (CRC: Preamble).

  3. 3.

    Landmark cases were Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District 393 U.S. 503 (1969); Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbeck Area Health Authority [1986] AC 112 House of Lords.

  4. 4.

    Some scholars claim that there are only four guiding principles (Freeman 2012: 6; Koren 1996: 172; Van Buren 1995: 15). Archard says there are only three: “It is standard now to categorize the rights that are given to the child within the CRC in terms of the three P’s: provision, protection, and participation” (Archard 2015: 110). Other researchers operate with only two (Koren 1996: 173).

  5. 5.

    There are dissenting voices to the idea of human rights as moral progress, see, for instance, Zigon (2013) and Freeman (2012). Attempts at addressing these worries can be found in Nickel (2014, 2007: 168–178), Tumulty (2009), Bates (2014: 27–28), Ishay (2008), Hunt (2008), and Archard (2015: 107–109).

Bibliography

  • Alston, P. 2004. ‘The Best Interests Principle’: Towards A Reconciliation of Culture and Human Rights. In Children’s Rights, ed. M.D.A. Freeman, vol. 2, 183–208. Hants: Ashgate/Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archard, D. 2014. Children’s Rights. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Winter 2014 ed. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/rights-children/. Accessed 23 June 2017.

  • Archard, D. 2015. Children: Rights and Childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, E. 2014. History. In International Human Rights Law, ed. D. Moeckli, S. Shah, and S. Sivakumaran. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, R. 2012. Chapter 11: Rights of the Child. In International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook, ed. C. Krause and M. Scheinen. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dübeck, I. 2013. De elendige. Retshistoriske studier over samfundets marginaliserede. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M., ed. 2004. Children’s Rights, Volume 1 + 2. The International Library of Essays on Rights. Hants: Dartmouth Publishing Company, Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. 2012. Introduction. In Law and Childhood Studies: Current Legal Issues, ed. M. Freeman, vol. 14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahn-Farley, M. 2013. How Children Got Rights. Dissertation, Harvard University, Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. 2008. Inventing Human Rights: A History. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishay, M.R. 2008. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koren, M. 1996. Tell Me! The Right of the Child to Information. Den Haag: NBLC Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, C., and M. Scheinen, eds. 2012. International Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, S., and A. Clapham. 2005. Children. In International Human Rights Lexicon, ed. S. Marks and A. Clapham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, A. 2011. Children’s Rights, Paternal Power and Fiduciary Duty: From Roman Law to the Supreme Court of Canada. International Journal of Children’s Rights 19: 21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moeckli, D., S. Shah, and S. Sivakumaran, eds. 2014. International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, H., ed. 2012. The Global History of Childhood Reader. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, J.W. 2007. Making Sense of Human Right. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickel, J. W. 2014. Human Rights. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta, Spring 2014 ed. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/rights-human/. Accessed 10 June 2017.

  • Stephens, S. 2012. Children and the Politics of Culture in ‘Late Capitalism’. In The Global History of Childhood Reader, ed. H. Morrison, 375–393. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumulty, P. 2009. Recognizing Varieties of Objectivity in Promoting a Global Culture of Human Rights: Remarks on the Tradition of Plato, Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4): 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2007. Legislative History of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Vol. 1. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810 at 71. 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren, G. 1995. The International Law of the Rights of the Child. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigon, J. 2013. Human Rights as Moral Progress? A Critique. Cultural Anthropology 28 (4): 716–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cecilie Eriksen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eriksen, C. (2020). Co-work and Compromises: The Birth of the CRC. In: Moral Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61037-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics