Skip to main content

Between Kratos and Ethos: Thinking Through the Ritual in the Work of Friedrich Meinecke

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Realism

Part of the book series: Trends in European IR Theory ((TEIRT))

  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

Realism is often caricatured as a doctrine that gives license—the ends justify the means. Hence, realist work and realist writers are often depicted as immoral. Whilst existing work has excavated realism’s hidden ethics, and at the same time questioned the conflation of realism and political science, the ethical reflections of Friedrich Meinecke have been overlooked in this undertaking. This omission is puzzling because Meinecke’s work on raison d'état, historicism and nationalism left an indelible mark on what we routinely identify as the realist tradition. The following chapter retrieves aspect of Meinecke’s ethical reflections. It focuses specifically on the relationship between kratos and ethos in Meinecke’s mind and illustrates the influence that these reflections have had on thinkers often identified as principal authors in the realist tradition of International Relations. In closing, the chapter reflects on how Meinecke’s work can be aligned to contemporary debates under the realist umbrella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bevir, M. 2000. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bew, J. 2016. Realpolitik: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E.H. 1946 [1939]. The Twenty Years’ Crisis: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. 2006. Beyond Catastrophe: German Intellectuals and Cultural Renewal After World War II. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. 1995. Realist ‘Ethics, International Relations, and Post-modernism: Thinking beyond the Egoism-Anarchy Thematic. Millennium 24 (2): 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, S. 2004. The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. The European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 533–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, J. 2002. No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, J.H. 1951. Political Realism and Political Idealism: A Study in Theories and Realities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, K.E., A. Alejandro, A. Reichwein, F. Rösch, and H. Turton. 2017. Reappraising European IR Theoretical Traditions (Trends in European IR Theory, Vol. 1). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legro, J.W., and A. Moravcsik. 1999. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 24 (2): 5–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell, S.E., N.M. Ripsman, and J.W. Taliaferro (eds.). 2009. Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. 1915 [1914]. The Warfare of a Nation, trans. J.A. Spalding. Worcester: Davis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. 1950 [1946]. The German Catastrophe: Contemplations and Reflections, trans. S.B. Fay. New Haven: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. 1970 [1908]. Cosmopolitanism and the National State, trans. R. Kimber. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. 1972 [1936]. Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook, trans. J.E. Anderson. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. 1998 [1924]. Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’État and Its Place in Modern History, trans. W. Stark. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, S. 2006. The Hidden History of Realism: A Genealogy of Power Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. 1948. The Political Science of E.H. Carr. World Politics 1 (1): 127–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. 1952. American Foreign Policy: A Critical Introduction. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H.J. 1961. Review of Ethics in a World of Power. American Political Science Review 55 (1): 152–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narizny, K. 2017. On Systemic Paradigms and Domestic Politics: A Critique of the Newest Realism. International Security 42 (2): 155–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichwein, A. 2012. The Tradition of Neoclassical Realism. In Neoclassical Realism in European Politics: Bringing Power Back in, ed. A. Toje and B. Kunz, 30–60. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichwein, A. 2020. Neoclassical Realism and Statecraft: Toward a Normative Foreign Policy Theory. International Studies Review [Online First]. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa018.

  • Ritter, G.A. 2010. German Refugee Historians and Friedrich Meinecke: Letters and Documents, trans. Alex Skinner. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, R. 1958. Ethics in a World of Power: The Political Ideas of Friedrich Meinecke. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 1959. Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, M. 1960. Why Is There No International Theory? International Relations 2 (1): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Smith, K. (2021). Between Kratos and Ethos: Thinking Through the Ritual in the Work of Friedrich Meinecke. In: Reichwein, A., Rösch, F. (eds) Realism. Trends in European IR Theory. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58455-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics