Skip to main content

Ontological Arguments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atheism Considered
  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

“Ontological Arguments” In this chapter, Lorkowski first delineates three families of arguments in natural theology based on common features. The author then shows that even the common features of the ontological argument have led many, including theists, to reject it. After this, Lorkowski uses a historical approach to generalize three types of ontological argument, two of which have been thoroughly refuted by Kantian objections. This lets the author isolate the contemporary modal version as the most significant before raising a decisive objection that shows the assumptions required for this version to run cannot be correct.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Robert Merrihew. Leibniz—Determinist, Theist, Idealist, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselm, St. “Proslogium,” in Anselm’s Basic Writings, Second Edition, translated by S. N. Deane, Open Court Publishing Company, La Salle Illinois, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. “Meditations on First Philosophy,” in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. “Critical Remarks Concerning the General Part of Descartes’ Principles,” in Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz—Philosophical Papers and Letters, translated and edited by Leroy E. Loemker, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millican, Peter. “Anselm,” in Ontological Arguments, edited by Graham Oppy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018, pages 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, Alvin. The Nature of Necessity, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, William. “An Exchange on the Problem of Evil,” in God and the Problem of Evil, edited by William Rowe, Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Malden, MA, 2001, pages 124–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, J. L. Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Lorkowski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lorkowski, C.M. (2021). Ontological Arguments. In: Atheism Considered. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56208-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics