Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are one of the most common forms of infection in children. Bronchoscopy has become an invaluable tool for the diagnosis and treatment of children with complicated or recalcitrant infections. It allows for both visualization of airway and mucosal surfaces and local sampling that can facilitate identification of pathogens and histopathological changes that are indicative of an infectious process. The results of bronchoscopy can help simplify an antimicrobial regimen, limiting unnecessary antibiotic use and all of the attendant risks such as organ toxicities, allergic reactions, and the fostering of antibiotic resistance. Bronchoscopic evaluation with sampling by either bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or biopsy may be considered in critically ill patients, high-risk patients (i.e., cystic fibrosis and immunocompromised), any child with high clinical suspicion for mycobacterial or fungal disease, and children who have failed to respond, worsened, or relapsed after empiric therapy. Although the diagnostic yield varies highly across patient populations, BAL with culture has become the gold standard for microbiological diagnosis of bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal pneumonia, with specificity approaching 100% in some studies. Meanwhile, the use of molecular diagnostic techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nucleic acid amplification tests, enables detection of rare and difficult-to-culture organisms, such as viruses, atypical bacteria, and fungi. Despite major advancements in these identification/detection techniques, limitations persist in the ability to differentiate between colonization and infection. This chapter summarizes the pros and cons of available diagnostic techniques for various infectious causes of LRTI in children.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction: Overall Diagnosis of Infection by Bronchoscopic Techniques
Flexible bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) or intraluminal (transbronchial) biopsy can be an invaluable tool in diagnosing pulmonary infectious disease, and in many cases, it may guide treatment. Bronchoscopy allows for both visualization of airway and mucosal surfaces and sampling that can reveal local inflammatory, immunological, or pathogenic processes.
Direct visualization may reveal signs of infection (mucus production, erythema, and edema) in the trachea, mainstem bronchi, and subsegmental bronchi. While more distal airways are more difficult to visualize, especially in smaller children and infants, mucus plugging may direct the bronchoscopist to particular lobes that appear to harbor infection. Even with localized disease, mucus and edema may be present throughout the larger airways due to local immune responses and a functional mucociliary elevator.
Local sampling can be accomplished through BAL or biopsy. The retrieved specimens can then be subjected to standard techniques in microbial culture, cytology, histopathology, along with other molecular tests. Because of higher rates of adverse complications in biopsy, BAL is generally preferred as the initial diagnostic tool [1,2,3,4,5], but biopsy may be necessary in cases where the infection is mostly intraparenchymal, and it may have a higher diagnostic yield [5, 6]. Standard culture techniques still represent the gold standard for identifying potential pathogens, but it should be noted that overall diagnostic yield is limited with many studies reporting rates of less than 50% [7, 8]. Multiple new molecular and culture-independent approaches are being developed, which may improve this yield.
While bronchoscopy is generally considered to be a safe procedure, risks and benefits of the procedure should always be weighed, particularly in the unstable or immunocompromised patient [2, 9,10,11]. Bronchoscopic evaluation with sampling by either BAL or biopsy may be considered in the following specific situations: (1) critically ill patients who warrant bronchoscopy for broad microbiologic testing and rapid diagnosis; (2) high-risk patients (i.e., CF, immunocompromised state, history of lung transplant, and concern for or diagnosis of interstitial lung disease) with radiographic findings consistent with an infectious etiology; (3) any child with high clinical suspicion for mycobacterial or fungal disease and who is unable to expectorate sputum; and (4) children who have failed to respond, worsened, or relapsed after empiric therapy. Young children are often not able to produce sputum or cough forcefully enough to expectorate, and bronchoscopy may represent the only way to obtain diagnostic samples from the lower respiratory tract, although induced sputum can be attempted following hypertonic saline nebulization to assist with mucus production.
The nonspecific findings (e.g., nodules, tree-in-bud, or ground-glass opacities) seen on chest imaging prior to bronchoscopy often constitute the major motivation for pursuing an infectious workup with bronchoscopy, and the imaging can often help direct the bronchoscopist to a lobe of particular disease. However, imaging is not an absolute prerequisite to bronchoscopy, and in cases where imaging is not available or in cases of diffuse disease, bronchoalveolar lavage may have a higher yield in the right middle lobe and/or lingula.
The ultimate goal of bronchoscopy in the infectious disease context is to garner information that will lead to changes or refinements in therapy. Table 9.1 displays an approach to the diagnostic evaluation for infection using bronchoscopy. Despite low definitive diagnostic yields, several studies have shown that bronchoscopy has an impact on treatment decisions [5, 8, 12, 13]. In addition to identifying a pathogen that can be specifically targeted over a defined duration, the results of bronchoscopy, even if they are not completely definitive, can help simplify the antimicrobial regimen, limiting unnecessary exposure to antibiotics and all of the attendant risks such as organ toxicities, allergic reactions, microbial dysbiosis, and the fostering of antibiotic resistance.
This chapter discusses the diagnosis of infections using bronchoscopy with an emphasis on microbiology. We also discuss relevant histopathologic, immunologic, molecular, and culture-independent diagnostic techniques.
Bacteriology
Bacterial Etiologies and Sampling
The most common bacterial causes of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) are familiar respiratory pathogens that cause community-associated pneumonia (CAP), such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. However, the relative importance of each of these organisms is difficult to determine because most disease is treated empirically and most infections go uncultured because the site of infection is difficult to access. Staphylococcus aureus is an unusual cause of CAP (approximately 1% overall), but the severity of infection is high, with patients frequently requiring mechanical ventilation and often presenting with parapneumonic effusion [14,15,16]. Therefore, S. aureus should always be considered in serious cases of pneumonia. In addition, over the past 15 years, there has been heightened concern in the United States, based on increased rates of S. aureus CAP associated with the community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) epidemic lineage USA300 [14], that anti-MRSA treatment may need to be considered in severe pneumonia.
Bronchoscopy with BAL or biopsy for culture is rarely performed in uncomplicated CAP, but it presents a diagnostic option for more complicated bacterial pneumonia or pneumonia that fails to respond to empiric antibiotic treatment. De Shutter et al reported high rates of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) in BAL cultures from patients with nonresponding or recurrent CAP [17]. This study also identified M. catarrhalis and S. pneumoniae as common pathogens. Tsai et al (2017) reported “viridans” group streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Staphylococcus aureus as the most common pathogens in BALs from patients with nonresponding CAP. Rates of detection of a pathogen in nonresponding or recurring CAP have been reported to be as high as 76% when the lower respiratory tract is sampled [17].
Other diagnostic sampling techniques for LRTI have even poorer yields. When blood cultures are done in the setting of LRTI, they are positive in less than 3% of cases [18,19,20,21], although some studies have reported rates as high as 7% [22] or 11% [23] in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It is important to note that severity of pneumonia is positively associated with the likelihood of obtaining a positive blood culture with rates of 13–26% in the setting of an empyema or parapneumonic effusion [18, 24,25,26,27]. Sputum cultures can be difficult to obtain in younger children who cannot expectorate and may be reflective of commensal colonization with potential pathogens rather than the etiology of a LRTI [28]. Thoracentesis and transthoracic needle aspiration may have higher culture yields, but they are also significantly more invasive and are uncommon especially in less severe disease [28].
The so-called “atypical” causes of LRTI such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae are more common in children >5 years [29,30,31]. These bacteria can be detected in BAL fluid [32, 33], but swabs of the upper respiratory tract (nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal) as well as throat and nasal washes are often used to rule out LRTI [28]. If children can produce sputum, it may be the preferred sample for diagnosis of these organisms [28].
Legionella pneumophila is also a cause of LRTI that has been associated with infections both in hospitals and in the community [34]. L. pneumophila can be detected from BAL fluid using culture, which requires specific media (BYCE) and can take 3–5 days to grow, or by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques, which produce results much more quickly but with less sensitivity [35, 36]. In practice, most disease is diagnosed by the urine antigen test, a monoclonal antibody test that specifically targets L. pneumophila serogroup 1. Because serogroup 1 causes anywhere from 50% to 80% of Legionnaire’s disease, it is possible that cases are missed when this single modality is used [35].
Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae are the most prevalent causes of LRTI in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP); other common causes include gram-negative pathogens such as Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Serratia spp., and occasionally Acinetobacter spp. [37,38,39]. The role of anaerobic bacteria in VAP is not well understood, but it is likely that there are high levels of exposure and possibly colonization with commensal anaerobes during intubation and ventilation [40]. The gold standard for diagnosis of VAP is direct observation of the infected tissue and culture, and thus requires bronchoscopy [41]. However, the diagnosis is often made through clinical and radiographic findings because of the risks associated with more invasive procedures [42, 43]. Comparison between different methods for obtaining cultures in VAP, including BAL, nonbronchoscopic (NB) BAL, transbronchial biopsy, tracheal aspiration (TA), protected specimen brush, and postmortem autopsy, has shown enormous heterogeneity and incongruence [37, 42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. BAL is a generally accepted reference sampling method, but in clinical practice, TA is more often performed because of feasibility and safety [48, 54, 55]. However, TA is likely to be contaminated with upper respiratory microbiota or may simply represent colonization of the endotracheal tube, and therefore, it has low specificity [49, 52, 56].
Common bacterial causes of LRTI in immunocompromised hosts encompass both the common causes of CAP (e.g., S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae) and more opportunistic pathogens associated with VAP (P. aeruginosa and S. aureus) [57, 58]. Despite the appropriate emphasis on diagnosis of fungi and some viruses in these patients, potentially pathogenic bacteria are identified in about a third of positive BAL samples [8, 57]. It is, however, important to reiterate that overall yields in immunocompromised pediatric patients vary widely from 28% to 68% [8].
Bronchoscopy with BAL is often used in cystic fibrosis (CF) to determine the presence of LRTI with common bacterial CF pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, H. influenzae, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Burkholderia cepacia complex as well as nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) and fungi, which will be discussed below. Anaerobic bacteria such as Prevotella spp. have recently been appreciated to be important microorganisms in CF, though their role as pathogens is not firmly established [59,60,61]. In CF, the prevalence of pathogens is linked to the age of the patient, with S. aureus and H. influenzae being more prevalent in young children, and gram negatives such as P. aeruginosa becoming dominant in the adolescent years [62]. In addition, the distribution of pathogens throughout the lung can be variable with both phenotypic variation within a species [63,64,65,66] (e.g., antibiotic resistance, metabolic status, and mucoidy), as well as species composition [67,68,69] (e.g., relative abundance, presence/absence). Noninvasive upper respiratory tract sampling (oropharyngeal, nasopharyngeal, and cough swabs) and expectorated sputum are commonly used for surveillance of pathogens in CF, and studies have reported conflicting negative and positive predictive values for LRTI compared to BAL [70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. One study showed that in adults, BAL and protected brushing samples were not superior to sputum samples in P. aeruginosa yield and may have given a more representative picture of the entire infecting population [78]. Other studies showed no clinical or cost benefit, and higher rates of adverse events with treatment based on BAL culture (reviewed in [79]). BAL may be especially useful in children who cannot expectorate [70, 80, 81], but induced sputum (using hypertonic saline) is an emerging alternative that appears to be safe and has potentially higher microbiological yields than other noninvasive sampling techniques [82,83,84,85,86]. Indeed, some studies have shown that induced sputum may have the same or better microbiological yield than BAL [87,88,89,90]. Although there is considerable doubt about the overall utility of BAL in CF microbiological diagnosis, it remains the gold standard for pathogen detection at the site of infection, and may be useful on a case-by-case basis, or if there are unexplained clinical changes without changes in surveillance microbiology.
Methods for Detecting Bacterial Infection in Bronchoscopic Samples
Culture
After gram staining for standard bacterial pathogens, which can give an initial diagnostic indication of the possible, but clearly not definitive, disease etiology [91], BAL fluid is subjected to standard bacterial cultures. While there is heterogeneity in clinical laboratory practice, most laboratories use an array of different culture media (e.g., blood, chocolate, and MacConkey and colistin–nalidixic acid agars) with additional media used for specific diseases (e.g., B. cepacia media used in CF cultures). While certain organisms may be reported by laboratories at any abundance (e.g., MRSA, Nocardia spp., P. aeruginosa), quantitative culture techniques have been shown to enhance the interpretation of BAL culture [28, 92,93,94,95]. A cutoff of >103 colony forming units (CFUs) has been shown to be significant with sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 97% [28, 96], but many studies and laboratories use >104 CFUs, which yield specificities as high as 100% [94, 97, 98]. The standard respiratory pathogens such as S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis as well as common bacterial VAP and CF pathogens have relatively high yields with standard culture, though published yields vary greatly [28]. M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae are rarely cultured in clinical practice because of their fastidious growth requirements. As noted above, culture may be helpful for detection of Legionella pneumophila, but this requires special culture techniques and a longer culture time [35]. It is also worthwhile noting that samples are rarely grown anaerobically, and therefore will not detect obligate anaerobes.
One important limitation of culture is that it relies on the retrieval of living bacteria. Indeed, prior exposure to antibiotics has been shown to affect accuracy and yields [7, 45, 99,100,101]. One study reported that yields were 63% when the BAL was done within 3 days of starting treatment, whereas this dropped to 58% between 3 and 14 days after starting treatment and 34% after 14 days of treatment [7].
PCR/Nucleic Acids
Culture remains the primary diagnostic modality for most bacterial causes of LRTI, but PCR-based techniques may increase yield especially after the initiation of antibiotics [102]. Targeted PCR-based techniques are available for S. pneumoniae [103,104,105,106,107,108], and these tests are easiest to interpret when used on pleural fluid samples, for which one study showed to have 78% sensitivity and 93% specificity [103]. Directed PCR-based strategies have been developed for H. influenzae, S. aureus, and M. catarrhalis as well [109,110,111,112]. Only a few studies address targeted PCR for respiratory pathogens in BAL [113, 114], but new multiplex PCR systems may offer high sensitivity and specificity [115]. The diagnostic utility of PCR for S. pneumoniae in other samples such as sputum and throat swabs is unclear, and they are plagued by the problem of differentiating between colonization and infection [112, 116,117,118,119], a problem that might be partially remedied by considering absolute bacterial burden [107, 120,121,122]. Conflicting results have been seen with PCR for S. pneumoniae blood and serum samples [116, 120, 123,124,125,126]. The test for S. pneumoniae urine antigen may be a more sensitive and cost effective [127]. Broad range 16S rRNA amplicon approaches that can detect multiple pathogens form pleural fluid have only marginally better yields compared to culture [128].
PCR and nucleic acid techniques are favored for detection of M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae, and they are often included in PCR respiratory viral panels. As noted above, these are often obtained from upper respiratory tract samples of the nasopharynx or oropharynx. However, the available data suggest that yields may be better from sputum [28] probably due to the overall abundance of the organism in the sample. There are only very limited available data on the yields from BAL specimens. PCR-based tests are commercially available for detection of L. pneumophila, but they have limited sensitivity [35].
Mycobacteriology
Mycobacteria are gram-positive, aerobic, acid-fast bacilli that cause significant disease worldwide, primarily affecting vulnerable populations [129,130,131,132,133]. Categorization of these organisms is classically defined by the Runyon classification, which relies on observation of phenotypic traits (growth rate and photochromogenicity) [134]. Further, mycobacteria may be defined by their parasitism (facultative versus obligate) and ecologic predilection (saprophytic, zoonotic, and human pathogens). For clinical purposes, these organisms are most deductively classified by the disease as they manifest in humans: Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (i.e., M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. africanum) causing pulmonary or extrapulmonary tuberculosis; Mycobacterium leprae causing leprosy; and nontuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM) causing pulmonary, disseminated, and soft-tissue infections. In this subsection, we focus on pulmonary manifestations of tuberculous and nontuberculous disease with regard to diagnostic challenges, the role of bronchoscopy, and available microbiologic diagnostic techniques.
Tuberculosis
As the oldest documented human pathogen, tuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of death by an infectious agent worldwide with an estimated 1.7 billion people infected and nearly two million deaths per year [135]. Multidrug resistant TB (MDR-TB) harboring resistance to two of the first-line antimicrobial agents (isoniazid and rifampin) affects over 500,000 new patients per year [135]. The World Health Organization and United Nations have developed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as part of the End TB Strategy by 2035, which is threatened mostly by increasing drug resistance and sociopolitical challenges [135]. Despite these global initiatives, socioeconomic factors (e.g., extreme poverty, overcrowding, malnutrition, and living in a developing country) are still the major determinants of clinical outcomes [136].
TB does not have an environmental or zoonotic reservoir and is instead transmitted from person-to-person by the inhalation of droplet nuclei (1–5 μm) filled with acid-fast bacilli that have been expelled into the air by a patient with active TB. While exposure does not imply infection, over 95% of infected individuals will advance to latent TB infection (LTBI), a state of clinical quiescence and slow bacterial replication held at bay by an intact adaptive immune system. Progressive primary tuberculosis is rare and occurs in patients with deficiencies in adaptive immunity, young children, and the elderly. However, most infections in children and adolescents are asymptomatic. Reactivated TB, prompted by the development of a risk factor (e.g., solid organ transplant, immunosuppression, HIV/AIDS), classically presents with productive cough, fever, weight loss, growth delay, chills, and night sweats. Active pulmonary TB in adults is distinguished by cavitary lung disease with caseous, necrotizing granulomas favoring the upper lobes. However, children rarely have cavitary disease, but rather present with nonspecific radiographic findings (atelectasis, pleural infiltration or effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, lower lung abnormalities, or a military pattern). Congenital TB presents with a sepsis-like picture, bronchopneumonia, and hepatosplenomegaly. In all ages, TB disease can span the entire airway, including laryngeal, tracheal, and endobronchial involvement [137, 138].
Diagnosis of active pulmonary TB requires positive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction by positive tuberculin skin test (TST) with respiratory symptoms and radiographic evidence of disease. In the absence active TB, LTBI is diagnosed by positive TST or interferon-γ (INF-γ) assay (IGRA). Traditionally, diagnosis of active disease is confirmed by three positive acid-fast bacilli (AFB) cultures at least 8 hours apart [138]. Childhood tuberculosis can be challenging diagnostically because of their inability to produce sufficient sputum and the wide range of possible radiographic findings and presentations. The Red Book currently recommends all children with suspicion for TB who cannot produce sputum to have three consecutive early morning gastric aspirates for AFB smear and culture [138]. While not established as the first line of specimen collection in children, obtaining a radiographic-directed BAL sample for smear and culture can be extremely useful diagnostically. Furthermore, as TB affects the larger airways in children with rates of 41–63%, endobronchial disease can be directly observed, classified, and sampled via bronchoscopy [139]. In addition, endobronchial disease can result in severe airway obstruction or strictures that require bronchoscopic intervention (Fig. 9.1).
Treatment should be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing and directed by an infectious disease specialist.
Nontuberculous Mycobacteria
NTMs are present ubiquitously in the environment, living in biofilms in water and soil, and cause opportunistic disease in at-risk populations [140,141,142,143,144,145]. Immunocompromised hosts, the elderly, patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease, and non-CF bronchiectasis are at increased risk due to decreased mucociliary clearance, inflamed or bronchiectatic airways, and structural lung damage. Susceptibility is also increased in patients with immune deficiencies affecting INF-γ, interlukin-12 (IL-12), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) signaling pathways, as in the case of HIV infection or treatment with a TNF-α inhibitor [146]. Patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) are at higher risk for NTM infection, as well [146].
In the United States, the largest studies estimate prevalence in the general population at about 5.3 per 100,000 persons with highest rates in elderly over 80 years old and those living in southeastern states and in Hawaii [129, 130, 132, 147, 148]. Increases in prevalence are estimated to be rising at rates of 2.6–11.8% per year [130,131,132, 148, 149]. A global collaboration headed by the NTM-Network European Trials Group (NTM-NET) reviewed over 20,000 patient samples from 30 countries and 6 continents and identified Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) as the predominant species complex worldwide at 47%, followed by M. gordonae (11%), M. xenopi (8%), M. fortuitum complex (7%), M. kansasii (4%), and M. abscessus (3%) [150]. M. gordonae, M. terrae, and M. fortuitum complex are often environmental contaminants and are unlikely to cause disease [151, 152]. The major causes of pulmonary disease in humans include MAC, Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC), and Mycobacterium kansasii [130, 143, 146, 153,154,155,156,157].
Transmission typically occurs due to environmental exposure by inhalation route of aerosolized mycobacteria. Clinical manifestations of pulmonary NTM infection range from silent, chronic colonization to severe, progressive lung disease. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) and Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) 2007 diagnostic criteria require pulmonary symptoms, specific radiographic findings (nodular or cavitary opacities or multifocal bronchiectasis) with exclusion of other diagnoses, and microbiologic evidence of disease by either: two positive AFB cultures or one positive culture from bronchial washing, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), transbronchial biopsy (TBB), or endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) biopsy with histopathologic features consistent with mycobacterial disease [151].
In the CF population, average NTM prevalence in the United States has climbed from 1.3% in 1984 to an average of 14% in 2014, with some states as high as 28% [129, 147, 154, 157,158,159]. Possible causes for the rise of recognized NTM disease in CF are manyfold and include longer patient life-expectancy, development of NTM-adapted niches due to use of broad-spectrum antibiotic usage, and increased awareness and testing as per the 2013 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) update on infection prevention and control guidelines [160]. Risk factors for NTM disease in CF are widely debated. The largest cross-sectional studies of CF patients to date suggest associations between NTM disease and better lung function, higher rates of coinfection with Staphylococcus aureus and lower rates of coinfection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a history of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) or coinfection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and the chronic use of azithromycin or systemic steroids. However, smaller, less robust studies have not successfully replicated all of these associations and in some cases have demonstrated contradictory results [156, 157, 161,162,163,164,165,166,167]. Universally in CF, increased age is the most predictive risk factor for acquisition of NTM infection, which is likely secondary to repeated and prolonged exposure to the pathogen as well as host factors [140, 145, 166, 167]. Environmental studies have shown increased prevalence of NTM in areas associated with higher levels of atmospheric water and closer living proximity to water, although these associations tend to be region-specific [129, 156, 157, 162, 164,165,166, 168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178]. Widely debated is the potential for human transmissibility, which has been reported in the literature [176, 179] and is generally accepted to be a possible albeit rare modality for transmission.
Diagnosis of NTM in CF is problematic because (1) lung disease caused by mycobacterial infection resembles findings of the chronic progression of severe CF lung disease (tree-in-bud nodularity, bronchiectasis, and cavitation), and (2) NTM disease manifestations range from silent, chronic colonization to severe, progressive lung disease [161, 166, 167, 180,181,182]. In 2016, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) published a statement to assist clinicians with NTM diagnosis and treatment in CF [183]. The guidelines agree with the ATS/IDSA statement and additionally recommend chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) to characterize disease and guide BAL sampling when indicated. When diagnostic criteria are met and clinical decline is appreciated despite standard CF care, treatment should be pursued and managed by an infectious disease specialist.
Similar to TB, antimicrobial regimens for NTM should be guided by susceptibility testing. Initial therapies for susceptible MAC pulmonary infection include a macrolide (clarithromycin or azithromycin), ethambutol, and either rifampin or rifabutin. Severe or cavitary MAC disease may warrant initiation with an IV aminoglycoside (amikacin or streptomycin). Typically, susceptible MABSC requires a more aggressive approach including initiation with IV amikacin, IV cefoxitin, IV imipenem or meropenem, and clarithromycin. For both complexes, other antimicrobial agents (fluoroquinolones, doxycycline or minocycline, linezolid, clofazimine, cycloserine, ethionamide, and capreomycin) or novel therapies (inhaled GM-CSF) are sometimes necessary [184]. Despite susceptibility-guided, multidrug regimens, NTM often acquires antibiotic resistance and is unable to be eradicated [151, 155, 159, 183, 185, 186]
Methods for Detecting Mycobacterial Infection in Bronchoscopic Samples
Many children are not able to produce sputum at a sufficient quantity for mycobacterial microbiologic testing, thus bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage can be an indispensable component in the diagnosis of mycobacterial disease. In the critically ill patient, bronchoscopy for BAL, transbronchial biopsy (TBB), or endobronchial ultrasound-guided (EBUS) biopsy may be the only way to identify the etiology of pulmonary infiltrates or endobronchial disease. Furthermore, patients with cystic fibrosis and suspicion for NTM disease who are smear negative by sputum should undergo HRCT-guided bronchoscopic sampling as recommended by the CFF/ECFS [183].
Culture
The “gold standard” for diagnosis of mycobacterial infection is the AFB culture. The ATS/IDSA and CFF/ECFS recommend that both solid (Lowenstein–Jenson or Middlebrook 7H11) and liquid culture (Middlebrook 7H9) techniques be performed following standard decontamination measures (0.5% N-acetyl L-cysteine, 2% NaOH). Due to increased sensitivity and more rapid detection, liquid culture is recommended to be performed by the BD BACTEC™ MGIT™ Automated Mycobacterial Detection System which utilizes Middlebrook 7H9 liquid broth supplemented with 0.2% glycerol, 10% OADC (Oleic Albumin Dextrose Catalase), and PANTA antibiotic mixture (polymyxin B, amphotericin B, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, azlocillin). Growth in liquid culture is faster than solid culture, and thus, positivity may be revealed sooner. For the clinician to be comfortable with negative results, both liquid and solid cultures must be finalized, with solid cultures requiring up to 8–12 weeks for appreciable growth to occur.
Molecular-Based Testing
All mycobacteria isolated by culture should be identified to the species level, primarily to distinguish between TB and NTM disease and secondarily because species classification dictates both treatment and anticipated outcomes [152, 187]. Current molecular techniques include nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) such as polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis, real-time PCR (RT-PCR), and line probe assays (LPA), chemiluminescent DNA probes, DNA sequencing, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) [138, 152, 188, 189]. Mycobacterial gene targets for NAAT include rpoB [190, 191], hsp65 [192, 193], 16S rRNA genes [194,195,196], the 16S–23S gene spacer [197, 198], and groES [199]. Many clinical microbiology laboratories utilize MALDI-TOF for species identification due to its ability to speciate mycobacteria (63.8–98.6%) at a low cost [200,201,202,203,204]. Despite the advent of new technologies, few of the above modalities are able to classify organisms to the subspecies level, as is possible with whole-genome sequencing (WGS). As sequencing costs continue to decline, WGS will likely be utilized more in basic clinical diagnosis of mycobacterial infection.
For suspicion of TB disease, rapid NAATs can be useful for culture-independent diagnosis, though a negative test does not exclude disease and cannot replace standard culture. The first molecular test endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2010 was the Xpert® MTB/RIF (Cepheid, USA), an assay that employs RT-PCR of the rpoB gene [135, 190]. By a large review (Cochrane review with expansion per the WHO 2013 Updated Report), the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay had a pooled sensitivity of 88% and pooled specificity of 99% for all specimens tested (expectorated and induced sputum, BAL, tissue samples, gastric aspirates, nasopharyngeal aspirates, and extrapulmonary samples) [205]. In children, sensitivities were 55–90%, 40–100%, and 40–100% for expectorated sputum, induced sputum, and gastric lavage, respectively, with specificities for all sites between 93% and 100%. One study has evaluated the efficacy of this test on BAL fluid in children with suspected TB and found 53% sensitivity and 100% specificity [206].
Pathology/Cytology
Staining and direct microscopy should always accompany AFB culture. The current recommendation for AFB staining is the fluorochrome technique, though Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) and auramine–rhodamine (AR) staining methods may also be employed [151]. In the case of M. tuberculosis, and as is generalized to NTM pulmonary disease, smear positivity is associated with increased infectivity, higher bacterial loads, and worse disease burden. However, AFB smears can be negative in close to 50% of culture-positive patients [207]. During active TB infection, BAL cell counts will reveal a lymphocytic alveolitis with “foamy” (AFB-laden) macrophages and may have high percentages of immature macrophages (monocytes) thought to influx from the blood [137]. Biopsy specimens taken during bronchoscopy or by wedge resection will show granulomatous inflammation and should also be directly stained to identify AFB [146].
Virology
Introduction
Viruses are the most frequent cause of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients [208]. The challenges in diagnosing viruses as the cause of pneumonia are severalfold: (a) some viruses demonstrate prolonged shedding from the oropharynx or upper respiratory tract and detection in the upper respiratory tract may not reflect active lower respiratory tract infection [209, 210], (b) culture- and molecular-based detection methods do not distinguish infection from shedding or colonization [211], and (c) bacterial–viral and viral–viral coinfections are common [208]. Bronchoscopic approaches may help clinicians identify viral pathogens but do not necessarily solve the issue of distinguishing infection from shedding.
Respiratory Viruses
Several viruses fall into a group commonly referred to as “respiratory viruses.” These viruses are from different families and have varying pathogenicity, but all have a predilection for causing respiratory tract infections. The most common viruses in this group are respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza A and B, parainfluenza 1–3, human metapneumovirus (hMPV), adenovirus, human coronavirus (HCoV), and rhinovirus [208, 212], although numerous other viruses have been associated with pneumonia in children. Respiratory viruses are all more common in younger children [208, 213,214,215], likely due to a combination of social factors/exposures and immune naivety to these pathogens. Viral respiratory tract infections are typically self-limited, but can be life threatening in infants [216], immunocompromised children [217, 218], and children with underlying medical conditions such as asthma, heart disease, or cystic fibrosis [219].
The frequency of viral–bacterial and viral–viral coinfections makes estimation of the incidence of viral LRTIs due to specific pathogens challenging. In a recent study of 2219 children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) at one of three US hospitals, viruses were detected in two-thirds [208]. Coinfections were present in 26% of all children with CAP, including 19% that had multiple viruses detected [208]. Thus, while studies report the incidence of detection of respiratory viruses in children with pneumonia, the proportion of pediatric pneumonia specifically caused by each organism is not known.
Viral pneumonia from respiratory viruses almost always develops as a result of progression from a preceding upper respiratory tract infection. Therefore, the diagnosis of viral LRTIs in children generally occurs via molecular detection of virus (i.e., PCR) or viral antigens in nasopharyngeal (NP) samples [208, 215]. Detection of these pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens via bronchoscopy can represent pneumonia, but may also occur in cases of viral shedding, colonization, or contamination from upper respiratory tract secretions. In general, there is good concordance between PCR testing from nasopharyngeal swab and BAL samples for the detection of respiratory viruses [220, 221], limiting the need for more invasive procedures such as bronchoscopy. In fact, studies in children have demonstrated higher yield for detection of respiratory viruses from NP samples compared with BAL [222], although this may reflect the location of viral replication among various viral pathogens. Therefore, bronchoscopic procedures are reserved for those children with negative testing from upper respiratory tract samples or for whom other nonviral processes are being considered.
Herpesviruses
Herpesviruses are common viral infections that establish life-long latency in human hosts. Herpes simplex virus (HSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesvirus-6 and -7 (HHV-6 and HHV-7), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV) all have capacity to cause lower respiratory tract infections in the setting of primary infection or reactivation, particularly in severely immunocompromised individuals [223,224,225,226]. However, viral shedding is common in both immunocompromised and nonimmunocompromised individuals, and detection of these viruses in the respiratory tract does not confirm disease [209, 210]. Therefore, clinicians utilize bronchoscopic and BAL findings, along with imaging characteristics, to establish herpesviruses as the cause of pulmonary symptoms [223].
Cytomegalovirus
Cytomegalovirus is the most common herpesvirus to cause LRTI and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children, most notably solid organ transplant (SOT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients [223], as well as patients with HIV/AIDS [224, 225]. Detection of CMV in the blood is common in these patients [227, 228] and does not necessarily indicate CMV disease. Histopathology has been the gold standard for the diagnosis of tissue-invasive CMV disease, demonstrating characteristic nuclear inclusions on biopsied tissue samples [211]. Immunohistochemistry can supplement histopathology, staining for CMV antigens in infected tissue cells and facilitating identification of nuclear enlargement and intranuclear inclusions [211, 229]. Although culture of a lower respiratory tract sample has good specificity for CMV pneumonia, culture does not distinguish between viral shedding and invasive respiratory tract disease [211]. Thus, histopathologic evidence of end-organ damage is preferred for definitive diagnosis of CMV pneumonitis/pneumonia [211].
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing has replaced the use of culture for detection of CMV in clinical specimens. The exquisite sensitivity and negative predictive value of PCR from BAL samples make it a reliable test for ruling out CMV pneumonia [230]. In the correct clinical context, detection of CMV from BAL specimens supports the diagnosis of CMV pneumonia or pneumonitis. Yet, as with culture, mere detection of CMV by PCR cannot distinguish infection from viral shedding in the respiratory tract. Quantification of CMV viral load in BAL specimens, however, may facilitate the distinction between infection and viral shedding [231]. Unlike in blood, higher viral loads correlate with findings on immunohistochemistry staining from lung biopsy samples [229]. CMV quantification from BAL specimens has been predictive of CMV pneumonitis in lung transplant [232, 233] and HSCT recipients [231], as well as in infants [234]. In a seminal study from Boeckh et al., a viral load of 500 IU/mL reliably differentiated CMV pneumonia from asymptomatic shedding in adult HSCT patients [231]. However, the specific viral load associated with CMV pneumonia in pediatric populations has not been established and should not be assumed to be the same as that found in adults. Although the optimal cut-off to distinguish pulmonary infection from respiratory tract shedding varies across studies and patient populations [231,232,233,234,235], quantification of CMV viral load is more specific for CMV infection than detection of CMV by qualitative PCR from respiratory tract specimens.
Herpes Simplex Virus
The incidence of HSV pneumonia in children is not well known. Hypoxemia is the most striking clinical feature of HSV pneumonia, which can be profound [236]. Patients at highest risk include transplant recipients and other immunocompromised patients [236,237,238], most often from reactivation of latent infection, and mechanically ventilated patients, who may develop disease as a result of inoculation of contaminated oral secretions [236]. As with CMV, detection of HSV from respiratory tract samples is not diagnostic. In critically ill adults, HSV has been detected by PCR of BAL samples from 30% to 50% of patients [239,240,241]; the presence of HSV in the respiratory tract of critically ill adults most often represents viral shedding during reactivation and not invasive infection [241]. Histopathology can detect characteristic viral inclusions in cases of HSV pneumonia [236], when biopsies are performed, and more reliably distinguishes tissue-invasive infection from shedding than PCR. The clinical significance of detection of HSV in critically ill children, who have a much lower seroprevalence of HSV than adults, is not known.
In neonates with disseminated HSV, pneumonia may be present in up to 50% of cases [242]. While pneumonia can rarely be the presenting feature [243], the diagnosis of disseminated neonatal infection is made via detection of virus in the blood in combination with systemic symptoms. Bronchoscopy with BAL provides limited added information in these cases and should never delay the initiation of antiviral therapy.
Varicella Zoster Virus
Varicella zoster virus (VZV) can cause severe, life-threatening pneumonia, most often in adults, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals [244, 245]. Varicella pneumonia develops almost exclusively in the context of disseminated infection, and tracheal and bronchial ulcers can be visualized on bronchoscopy shortly after the development of skin rash [244, 246]. Because varicella pneumonia is a complication of disseminated disease, and skin lesions are generally present, PCR from skin lesions or blood is likely to diagnose the majority of cases. Respiratory tract specimens are rarely required.
Other Herpesviruses
Epstein–Barr virus, as well as HHV-6 and HHV-7, can be detected on lower respiratory tract samples among immunocompromised and critically ill patients in the setting of viral reactivation [209, 247]. Because the respiratory tract is a common site of EBV latency, viral DNA can be detected in up to 50% of both immune-competent and immune-compromised patients. Given the frequency of EBV, HHV-6, and HHV-7 detection in BAL specimens in both immunocompromised and immunocompetent hosts, the role of these viruses in causing or contributing to lower respiratory tract disease is unknown.
EBV is the causative agent of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), which can affect any organ system including the airway. Laryngoscopy and/or bronchoscopy with biopsies can help identify EBV-positive B cells within affected tissues that are characteristic of PTLD [248,249,250]. Although the airway is a rare site of PTLD, endoscopic procedures may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis.
Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
There are more than 60 serotypes of HPV, which vary in their propensity for human infections. Certain serotypes of HPV can cause recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, a disease consisting of the development of persistent or recurrent epithelial nodules in the airway, most commonly affecting young children and young adults [251]. Clinical symptoms consistent with airway irritation (cough, hoarseness, and voice change) or obstruction (stridor and respiratory distress) may be suggestive of this process. But, definitive diagnosis is made via direct visualization of the lesions via laryngoscopy and/or bronchoscopy [251]; biopsies demonstrate the characteristic papillomas. Medical treatment options are limited (cryotherapy, laser therapy, and intralesional therapies) and surgical approaches may be needed to alleviate obstruction and more debilitating symptoms.
Histopathology/Direct Microscopy
Histopathology is the traditional technique for confirmation of tissue-invasive viral infection. Direct microscopy of respiratory tract specimens is of minimal utility for diagnosing viral infections because viruses cannot be visualized by traditional microscopic techniques. Histopathology and immunohistochemical staining methods facilitate identification of infiltration of tissues by viral pathogens, including respiratory viruses and herpesviruses [215], by demonstrating characteristic patterns of cellular damage. Respiratory viruses are most often associated with diffuse alveolar damage or interstitial pneumonia [252]; more severe cases may cause necrotizing bronchitis and intra-alveolar hemorrhage. Meanwhile, herpesviruses and adenoviruses cause necrotizing bronchiolitis, as well as the formation of characteristic intranuclear or intracytoplasmic inclusions, which are collections of nucleoproteins and virions [252, 253]. Because the patterns of injury are nonspecific, immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques are used to confirm the presence of specific viruses within cells using virus-specific antibodies [252]. Measles virus is characterized by intranuclear and intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusions and the presence of multinucleated giant cells [252].
Culture
Viral culture techniques have been utilized traditionally to detect the presence of viruses in clinical samples, including respiratory secretions. Tube culture, which facilitates detection of cytopathic effects in infected cells, and shell-vial culture, which utilizes immunofluorescent techniques to detect viral growth [211, 254], are the approaches most often used for detection of viral pathogens. Shell-vial culture is much faster than tube culture, taking 1–2 days instead of weeks [211]. But, viral cultures are being replaced clinically by the use of molecular detection methods, such as PCR, which are much more sensitive, specific, and cost-effective, and significantly less time-consuming. Because many viruses infect upper airways, while others shed from the oral mucosa or upper respiratory tract, cultures from transbronchial biopsies (i.e., tissue cultures) are more suggestive of viral infection than those performed on BAL fluid.
PCR/Nucleic Acid Testing
Nucleic acid amplification, most often via PCR, has become the diagnostic modality of choice for most viral infections. Multiplex PCR panels can detect the presence of numerous viruses in respiratory tract samples, such as nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, NP aspirates, induced sputum, or BAL fluid [255]. PCR testing is severalfold more sensitive than culture- and antigen-based methods for detecting viral pathogens in respiratory samples [215]. There is good concordance between PCR testing from NP swabs and BAL samples for the detection of respiratory viruses [220, 221], making NP samples the preferred diagnostic specimens in children when these common viral pathogens are being considered. Because of the potential for prolonged viral shedding following an infection, and because viruses can colonize airways, as well, detection of viral DNA by PCR needs to be interpreted in the appropriate clinical and epidemiologic contexts to support a diagnosis of viral pneumonia.
Antigen-Based Testing
Immunofluorescent techniques (immunochromatographic testing) or enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests can rapidly detect viral antigens in respiratory specimens, most often NP samples. Test results are available in minutes, making them highly valuable point-of-care tests. Rapid antigen testing for influenza and RSV (target: RSV fusion surface protein) are commercially available and the most common rapid viral tests used in children [256]. Antigen detection is influenced by the viral load present in the sample, so rapid antigen detection tests tend to be less sensitive than PCR [215, 257]. A 2015 meta-analysis by Chartrand and colleagues reported a pooled sensitivity and specificity of RSV rapid antigen tests of 80% (95% CI: 76–83%) and 97% (95% CI: 96–98%), respectively [257]. These authors performed a separate meta-analysis evaluating the performance of rapid influenza testing [258], reporting a pooled sensitivity of 62.3% (95% CI: 57.9–66.6%) and specificity of 98.2% (95% CI: 97.5–98.7%). Thus, rapid antigen tests perform well for ruling in RSV and influenza infections, but less well for ruling them out.
Mycology
Introduction
Infection of the respiratory tract is the most common form of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in children. Yeasts, molds, and dimorphic fungi (organisms that can grow as either a yeast or mold) are ubiquitous in the environment and cause infection of the paranasal sinuses and/or lungs following inhalation of fungal spores [259], although fungi can also disseminate hematogenously, leading to secondary pulmonary infections. Immune-compromised individuals and those with impaired airway clearance, such as with cystic fibrosis, are most prone to pulmonary IFD.
In order to facilitate the use of consistent terminology in clinical and epidemiologic research, consensus guidelines from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group (EORTC) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (MSG) categorize the diagnosis of IFD into proven (Fig. 9.2), probable (Fig. 9.3), or possible cases [260]. Proven cases require histologic evidence or positive microbiologic culture from sterile site body fluids or tissue specimens [260]. This does not include BAL fluid or sputum. Meanwhile, the diagnosis of probable or possible IFD, which are terms used only in immune-compromised individuals, requires a combination of host factors and clinical features with (for probable) or without (for possible) mycological evidence of infection [260]. The EORTC/MSG definitions are commonly employed in research; however, it is important to recognize that they are generally not employed in clinical practice. Failure to meet these definitions does not exclude a diagnosis of IFD, and the definitions have variable sensitivity and specificity compared to histopathology in children [261]. So, while these terms promote the use of consistent terminology in the research setting, they should not be employed clinically or relied upon to guide treatment decisions. They nevertheless form the basis for many studies referred to in the following sections.
Fungi That Cause Pulmonary Infections
Aspergillus
Aspergillus species cause a myriad of clinical pulmonary presentations ranging from asymptomatic colonization to ABPA and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Following inhalation, Aspergillus species colonize the upper and lower airways. Colonization of a preexisting pulmonary cavity may lead to the formation of a fungus ball, which could remain asymptomatic for prolonged periods or cause symptoms such as cough or hemoptysis. ABPA is an allergic response to Aspergillus fumigatus antigens that primarily affects patients with asthma or cystic fibrosis [262, 263]. Characterized by recurrent episodes of wheezing, cough, transient pulmonary opacities, and bronchiectasis, the diagnostic criteria for ABPA are based on cutaneous hypersensitivity to A. fumigatus antigens, serum IgE levels (>1000 IU/mL), and two out of three of the following: presence of precipitating or IgG antibodies against A. fumigatus in serum, radiographic pulmonary opacities consistent with ABPA, and a total eosinophil count >500 cells/μL [264].
Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is the most common manifestation of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality [265, 266]. IPA may manifest as nodular pulmonary infiltrates, pleural-based infiltrates, or cavitary lesions, and dissemination secondary to vascular invasion also occurs. Tracheobronchitis is a relatively rare form of IA that most often affects lung transplant recipients and severely immunocompromised individuals [267]. Infiltration of the bronchial or tracheal mucosa leads to ulceration, necrosis, and/or the formation of pseudomembranes, which can be visualized on bronchoscopy and confirmed by biopsy and culture [267].
The diagnosis of aspergillosis is based on clinical signs and symptoms, including imaging findings, combined with diagnostic testing. Aspergillus species do not grow efficiently in culture and can be morphologically similar to other molds on histologic examination [268]. Thus, confirmation of aspergillosis can be challenging. Culture remains the gold standard for confirmation of IPA, but the use of biomarkers (serum or BAL galactomannan; see below) and molecular testing (PCR, florescent in situ hybridization [FISH]) can support its diagnosis and provide more rapid information than culture.
Pneumocystis jirovecii
Pneumocystis jirovecii is a leading cause of opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients worldwide [269]. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is a rare diagnosis in children but remains an important consideration in neonates and immune-compromised or immune-suppressed pediatric populations [270]. Airway colonization is transient early in life: in a longitudinal study of 46 mother–infant pairs, 91% of infants had Pneumocystis identified by PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs within the first 6 months of life [271]. While colonization precedes the development of infection, it is unclear how often colonization progresses to infection versus infection which develops following new acquisition.
Clinical symptoms of PJP are highly variable and often nonspecific. In patients with HIV, PJP typically presents with subacute symptoms consisting of nonproductive cough, low-grade fever, and progressive dyspnea [269, 272], while symptoms can be more acute in non-HIV patients. Hypoxia is the most frequent sign of PJP, and the magnitude of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient often signals the severity of disease [269]. Chest radiographs are normal early, but frequently show symmetric, perihilar interstitial infiltrates later in the course [273]. Figure 9.4 displays the characteristic chest x-ray of an 8-month-old boy with PJP. Chest CT is the imaging modality of choice, most often showing patchy, ground-glass infiltrates [269, 273].
Pneumocystis cannot be grown in standard culture; therefore, diagnosis relies on direct microscopy, histologic evaluation, or DNA detection. Silver stain (Grocott-Gomori methenamine silver stain) is the conventional method for identifying organisms, but other staining methods are also useful [269, 272]. Immunofluorescent techniques have been used to identify Pneumocystis [269, 274], but are labor intensive and do not outperform direct microscopy [275]. PCR from BAL is becoming the test of choice for PJP as numerous studies have demonstrated excellent sensitivity [276, 277]. (1 → 3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) is a cell wall component of many fungi, including Pneumocystis. BDG detection in serum or plasma has excellent sensitivity (94.8%) and good specificity (86.3%) in the diagnosis of PJP [278], but its specificity from BAL samples is low.
Candida
Candida lung disease most often develops secondary to hematogenous dissemination. This form of candidiasis typically has a diffuse, nodular pattern on imaging, consistent with hematogenous spread of infection [279]. Meanwhile, Candida species rarely cause primary LRTI. Colonization of the airways occurs quickly following endotracheal intubation [280]. Therefore, Candida are frequently recovered on culture from tracheal aspirate or BAL samples of critically ill patients, but seldom are the cause of pneumonia [281, 282]. Similarly, Candida are commonly recovered from sputum samples in patients with cystic fibrosis [283], yet the precise role of Candida in the lung disease of these patients has not been established.
Cryptococcus
Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii are budding yeasts found in soil worldwide and are particularly important pathogens in immunocompromised hosts, most notably those with HIV. Cryptococcal lung disease occurs in both immune-compromised and immune-competent individuals [284, 285], but is rare in children. In a population-based study of cryptococcosis in the United States from 2000 to 2007, the rate of hospitalization in children was less than 0.25 per 100,000 population [286]; the specific rate of respiratory cryptococcosis was not reported. At Beijing Children’s Hospital, there were 53 children hospitalized with cryptococcal disease from 2002 to 2014, half of whom had pulmonary involvement [287].
Cryptococcal species can be grown readily on bacterial or fungal culture media, and isolation from respiratory tract samples may support a diagnosis of cryptococcosis since these fungi are not typical respiratory tract flora [288]. Latex agglutination and EIA tests are available that can detect the capsular polysaccharide of both C. neoformans and C. gattii [289]. Cryptococcal antigen testing from serum and cerebrospinal fluid is sensitive for the detection of cryptococcal meningitis and disseminated cryptococcosis, but has lower sensitivity in non-CNS infections [290, 291]. Cryptococcal antigen testing from BAL fluid has limited sensitivity and positive predictive value, which does not support its use clinically [292,293,294].
Mucorales Species
Fungi of the subphylum Mucormycotina, the vast majority of which are in the order Mucorales, are ubiquitous, filamentous fungi found in soil and decaying matter throughout the world [295]. Invasive infections, known as mucormycosis (formerly zygomycosis), are predominantly acquired through inhalation, but also can develop following direct inoculation of skin or mucosal surfaces [295]. Pulmonary mucormycosis develops most often as a result of inhalation of fungal spores, but can occur as an extension of sinus disease or secondary to disseminated disease. Clinically, pulmonary mucormycosis is similar to other mold infections, such as aspergillosis. Due to angioinvasive nature of Mucorales, dissemination is common (>50%), although blood cultures are rarely positive.
Diagnosis of pulmonary mucormycosis is challenging. Abnormal chest imaging in the correct host (neutropenia, transplant recipient, and diabetes with ketoacidosis) should key clinicians to the possibility of this infection. The imaging findings are nonspecific, varying from discrete solitary nodules to larger areas of confluent infection to cavitary lesions with pulmonary effusion [296]. Bronchoalveolar lavage is an important diagnostic tool in high-risk patients with imaging findings consistent with mucormycosis, facilitating identification by histopathology and culture. Mucorales have broad, thin-walled, irregular, pauci-septate hyphae with wide-angled (90°) branching on microscopic examination, which distinguishes them from other molds, such as Aspergillus or Fusarium species [275, 296]. Definitive diagnosis is made by culture, although the sensitivity of culture is poor [296]. Molecular tests, such as PCR, are not routinely clinically available for Mucorales species, and antigen tests, such as β-D-glucan and galactomannan, are not clinically useful.
Dimorphic Fungi
Dimorphic fungi are comprised of a group of fungi that can exist in either yeast or mycelial (mold) forms, depending on temperature and environmental conditions: Blastomyces species (B. dermatitidis, B. gilchristii), Coccidioides species (C. immitis, C. posadasii), Histoplasma capsulatum, Paracoccidioides species (P. brasiliensis, P. lutzii), Sporothrix schenckii, and Talaromyces marneffei (formerly Penicillium marneffei). The mold phase allows these organisms to survive in the environment, while the yeast phase promotes virulence, immune evasion, and development of human infections [297, 298]. These organisms, often referred to as endemic mycoses, are geographically limited and found in specific ecologic niches within their endemic areas. Histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, and blastomycosis are the most likely to manifest as pulmonary infections [298]. In the United States, histoplasmosis occurs predominantly in the Midwest and Southeast, as does blastomycosis, while coccidioidomycosis occurs in the Southwest [299]. Paracoccidioidomycosis is a cause of CAP in Central and South America [300].
Pulmonary infection by endemic mycoses follows inhalation of aerosolized mycelial forms of the fungi. The majority of infections are self-limited, but more severe manifestations, including death, can occur in the setting of a large inoculum of infection or in an immune-compromised individual [301, 302]. Acute pulmonary infections typically present as focal, consolidative processes, similar to CAP in their symptomatology and radiographic appearance [297, 301, 303]. Additional nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue, arthralgias/myalgias, and chills commonly accompany this stage of infection. Mediastinal and hilar adenopathy are often seen on radiographs in patients with acute histoplasmosis and to a lesser degree in patients with coccidioidomycosis [304].
For all endemic mycoses, the definite diagnosis is made by identifying fungi on histopathology, cytopathology, or culture. Histoplasmosis is associated with the formation of caseating and noncaseating granulomas [302, 305]. Serologic tests (complement fixation, immunodiffusion) are available to aid in the diagnosis of blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and histoplasmosis, but have variable sensitivity depending on the form of disease and duration of infection. Histoplasma antigen testing by EIA can be performed on urine, blood, and BAL fluid, but it is positive not only in cases of histoplasmosis but also infections caused by Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, and Talaromyces marneffei [306]. Antigenuria and antigenemia are more often detected in cases of disseminated infection than in patients with isolated pulmonary infections [304, 307].
Methods to Diagnose Fungal Pulmonary Infections
Histopathology/Direct Microscopy
Direct microscopy of BAL or lung tissue specimens is often the first test performed when pulmonary fungal infection is suspected [275]. Although less sensitive than culture, positive direct microscopy is helpful since growth of fungi in culture can take days to weeks. Many fungi can be identified based on their morphologic characteristics (Table 9.2), although not to the species level [289]. Use of 10–20% potassium hydroxide (KOH) facilitates identification of fungi by degrading proteins within specimens with the exception of fungal cell walls, promoting visualization of hyphae and conidia [275]. The addition of other stains, such as Calcofluor white, can further augment identification of fungi. The most sensitive stain used to identify fungi in tissue and BAL fluid specimens is Grocott-Gomori methenamine silver (GMS), which stains almost all fungal cell walls [259]. GMS (aka “silver”) stain is the conventional method for identifying Pneumocystis organisms from sputum or BAL fluid samples [269, 272], as well as Mucorales, Aspergillus, and other fungi that cause invasive disease [275, 296]. Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stains are also useful for detecting fungal hyphae [289].
Culture
Culture is the primary method for diagnosing pulmonary IFD, supporting speciation of organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, when possible [289]. Culture is more sensitive than direct microscopy [275] and should be routinely performed on all BAL specimens when fungal infection is considered. Special fungal media are often utilized, which contain antibiotics to inhibit growth of bacteria. Several fungi, particularly molds, do not readily grow in culture and yield may be as low as 30–50% even when visualized by histologic and cytologic examination [308]. Pneumocystis jirovecii cannot be grown in routine culture; therefore, diagnosis relies on direct microscopy, histologic evaluation, or DNA detection in respiratory samples [269].
Bronchoalveolar lavage is an important diagnostic tool in patients at high risk for pulmonary IFD. Because the pathogenesis of primary pulmonary IFD involves inhalation of fungal spores, colonization of the airway necessarily precedes infection. Therefore, culture in itself is insufficient to establish the diagnosis of pulmonary IFD with any fungal organism. Culture must be combined with the clinical features (symptoms, imaging findings) and host factors to make a definitive diagnosis [260].
PCR/Nucleic Acid Testing
PCR testing is clinically available for select fungi: Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis jirovecii. Distinguishing between colonization and invasive infection is a major limitation of use of PCR from BAL for each of these fungi, however. In the appropriate clinical context, identification of Aspergillus or Pneumocystis by PCR from BAL fluid increases the posttest probability of invasive infection and may assist clinicians when other diagnostic tests (i.e., culture) are negative.
PCR has become a valuable tool in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA), most often when performed on serum or whole-blood samples. Unfortunately, data in pediatric patients are limited. A 2016 meta-analysis in pediatric cancer and HSCT patients reported a pooled diagnostic performance of PCR for screening of IA: specificity 43–85%, sensitivity 11–80%, positive predictive value (PPV) 20–50%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 60–96% [309]. Meanwhile, the performance of PCR for the diagnosis of IA during febrile periods was highly variable across studies: specificity 36–83%, sensitivity 0–100%, PPV 0–71%, and NPV 88–100% [309]. The sensitivity of Aspergillus PCR is negatively affected by the administration of antifungal therapy [310], which is relevant considering that many patients with suspected IPA are receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time.
In patients undergoing bronchoscopy, pathogen-specific PCR testing may be valuable. In a systematic review by Avni, the diagnostic performance of PCR in BAL fluid for diagnosing proven/probable IPA was similar to that of galactomannan (sensitivity 82–86%, specificity 95%), while the sensitivity of either test being positive increased to 97% (95% CI 83–99.5) [311]. Numerous studies have reported excellent performance of PCR from BAL samples for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia – pooled sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 91–93% – making it a highly useful test [21, 22]. Although several authors have suggested that quantitative PCR can help differentiate active infection from colonization [23,24,25], the fungal load varies among different patient populations (i.e., HIV- vs non-HIV-infected patients, adults vs children) and threshold values that distinguish infection from colonization have not been clearly established, especially in children.
Panfungal PCR, which uses primers targeting the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) 1 and/or 2 region, can identify the presence of fungi within clinical samples. This approach is particularly useful in instances when fungi are visualized microscopically within specimens, but cultures are nondiagnostic. Because of the presence of colonizing flora within respiratory tract samples, panfungal PCR may have higher accuracy from tissue specimens, as opposed to BAL samples [312]. Next-generation sequencing also has the potential to identify fungi within culture-negative specimens, but it is best served from a sterile-site rather than respiratory tract samples.
Antigen-Based Testing
Histoplasma capsulatum antigen can be detected by EIA in serum, urine, and BAL fluid specimens in patients with histoplasmosis [305]. Antigen detection is both a rapid and sensitive adjunctive testing method for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis, although cross-reactivity occurs with other endemic mycoses including Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, and Talaromyces marneffei [306]. Urine antigen detection is more sensitive in disseminated histoplasmosis than in primary pulmonary infection. In a multicenter study of patients with histoplasmosis, antigen was detected in the urine of 145 of 158 (91.8%) patients with disseminated histoplasmosis, but only 19 of 50 (38.0%) cases with acute or subacute pulmonary infections [307]. Antigen detection from BAL is more sensitive than blood or urine testing in patients with pulmonary histoplasmosis. In a study by Hage et al. that included 31 patients with pulmonary histoplasmosis, the diagnostic performance of Histoplasma antigen detection in BAL fluid for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis was as follows: sensitivity 93.5%, specificity 97.8%, PPV 69.1%, and NPV 99.7% [313].
Several commercially available latex agglutination and EIA tests have been developed for detection of cryptococcal polysaccharide capsule antigen, both of C. neoformans and C. gattii [289]. These tests are predominantly performed in serum and cerebrospinal fluid samples. The sensitivity of serum cryptococcal antigen is higher in individuals with disseminated and central nervous system (CNS) infection than in those with isolated lung disease [290, 291]. In a report of HIV-negative adult patients with cryptococcal disease, only 56% of 71 patients with pulmonary disease had a positive serum cryptococcal antigen test compared to 87% of those with CNS infection [290]. Cryptococcal antigen testing from BAL fluid has demonstrated variable sensitivity (71–100%) and poor positive predictive value (36–67%) in adults [292,293,294]. The performance of cryptococcal antigen on BAL fluid in children is unknown, but its usefulness is likely narrow considering the rarity of cryptococcal pneumonia in children.
Galactomannan
Galactomannan (GM) is a cell-wall component of Aspergillus species [289]. Detection of GM in serum or BAL fluid samples using ELISA is an indirect test that can support the diagnosis of IPA [260]. While GM is generally specific to aspergillosis, it can also be detected in serum of patients with penicilliosis [314]. Additionally, false-positive results have been reported in patients treated with aminopenicillin/β-lactamase combination agents [315].
In adults, serum and BAL GM correlate significantly in patients with IPA [316, 317]. An optical density index of ≥0.5 from either serum or BAL fluid is most often used as the cut-off for a diagnosis of IPA. However, BAL GM has been reported to have a higher sensitivity but lower specificity than serum GM [318,319,320,321]; therefore, some authors have suggested using a higher GM cut point from BAL fluid should to limit false-positive results [321, 322].
Data on GM from BAL fluid in pediatric patients are limited. de Mol et al. retrospectively evaluated the performance of GM from BAL fluid among 41 cases of proven/probable IA and found that a GM ≥0.5 had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 82%, 88%, 82%, and 87%, respectively [316]. Similarly, Mohammadi and colleagues found that a BAL fluid GM ≥0.5 had a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 87.5% and 93.3% [323]. Meanwhile, Desai et al. reported that a cut-off value of ≥0.5 had a sensitivity for proven/probable IA of 78% and a specificity of 84% among their pediatric cohort, while a cut-off value of 0.87 had sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 100% among a subset of immunocompromised children [317]. Additional studies are needed to establish the optimal cut-off of GM from BAL fluid in pediatric patients, but GM appears to be a valuable adjunctive test to support a diagnosis of IPA in children.
β-D-glucan
(1 → 3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) is a cell wall component of many fungi and is considered an indirect test of probable IFD with these fungi [260]. BDG is a cell component of Candida, P. jirovecii, Aspergillus, Fusarium species, Trichosporon, Coccidioides, Histoplasma, and others, but not of Cryptococcus or Mucorales [289]. There are several different available assays, but only Fungitell® (Associates of Cape Cod, Inc., East Falmouth, MA) is FDA approved for use in serum; no assays are FDA approved for testing of BAL samples. A threshold of ≥80 pg/mL is considered positive on the Fungitell® assay (product label), although other thresholds have been reported to have better diagnostic accuracy [324]. False-positive BDG results can occur in patients receiving albumin, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and other blood products [325,326,327].
Unfortunately , there are limited data regarding the diagnostic performance of serum BDG in children. With a high NPV, serum BDG is most valuable in excluding IFD in high-risk patients, including neonates, rather than identifying patients with true fungal infections [309, 328, 329]. A recent meta-analysis identified three studies in pediatric cancer or HSCT patients [309]. Among 226 children, 38 were diagnosed with proven/probable IFD and the diagnostic performance of BDG across these studies was as follows: sensitivity 50–83%, specificity 29–82%, PPV 17–49%, and NPV 84–96% [309].
BDG testing from BAL specimens is a potentially appealing approach to the diagnosis of pulmonary IFD. However, since airway colonization with fungi is common, results of studies have been poor. A meta-analysis of six adult studies that included 838 patients, 138 of whom had proven or probable IFD, found that BDG from BAL specimens had marginal diagnostic value [330]: pooled sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 58%. Salerno et al. reported that BAL BDG was inferior to serum BDG for the diagnosis of PJP in a cohort of 119 patients with HIV [331]. Based on available data, performance of BDG from BAL specimens does not appear to add value to serum BDG testing.
Parasitology
Introduction
Parasitic infections are extremely common in children around the world, especially in warm, low-income countries where sanitation is poor and housing is crowded [332]. Parasites can be classified as either protozoa (unicellular organisms) or helminths (multicellular worms), which are further categorized as nematodes (roundworms), cestodes (tapeworms), or trematodes (flukes). Most parasitic infections are acquired through the fecal–oral route, but several are vector borne, such as Plasmodium spp. (malaria) and Trypanosoma spp. (Chagas disease, African sleeping sickness) [333]. The frequency with which parasitic infections manifest pulmonary symptoms, and would be amenable to diagnosis via bronchoscopy, is highly variable across the myriad of organisms that cause human infections.
Many protozoan infections have pulmonary manifestations as the result of the disseminated forms of the disease: Plasmodium spp. [334], Toxoplasma gondii [335,336,337,338], Leishmania spp. [339], Entamoeba histolytica [340, 341], Babesia spp. [342], and Trypanosoma spp. [343]. In most cases, the pulmonary signs/symptoms are the indirect result of tissue damage (pneumonitis, pulmonary edema, pulmonary effusion, and acute respiratory distress syndrome) rather than primary pulmonary disease [343]. However, some protozoa have been associated with bronchopulmonary infections directly. Toxoplasma gondii and other protozoa, such as Balantidium coli, Cryptosporidium spp., and Microsporidium species, have been reported as causes of pneumonia in immune-compromised individuals [336,337,338, 344,345,346,347,348]. Entamoeba histolytica has a predilection to form extra-intestinal abscesses, which can involve the lung [340], most often from extension of an amebic liver abscess [341]. Extremely rare cases of bronchopulmonary infections have also been reported with Lophomonas blattarum [349,350,351], a protozoa uncommonly associated with human disease. In very rare instances, ingestion and/or aspiration of free-living amoeba (Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris) can result in invasive respiratory tract infection [352].
All helminths have life cycles that include an egg, larval (one or more), and adult stages [332]. Entry into the human body occurs in one of three ways: ingestion of eggs or larvae, direct inoculation of skin either by larvae, or through an arthropod vector [332]. When direct or arthropod inoculation occurs, larvae enter the systemic circulation eliciting eosinophilic inflammation in various tissues, including the lung [343, 353, 354]. Similarly, after acquisition via ingestion, larvae can penetrate intestinal mucosa and enter the bloodstream, or they can migrate directly to the lung or pleura [343, 353, 354]. An example of the helminthic life cycle is shown for Necator americanus in Fig. 9.5 [355]. As the larvae migrate through the lung, eosinophilic pneumonia or pneumonitis may develop, a condition called Loeffler syndrome [356]. Accompanying symptoms include cough, wheezing, and fever, and peripheral eosinophilia is common [356].
Several helminthic infections are associated with pulmonary manifestations (Table 9.3). Schistosoma mansoni [357, 358], Ancylostoma duodenale [354], Necator americanus [354], Dirofilaria immitis [359, 360], Toxocara species [361, 362], Paragonimus spp. [363], Ascaris lumbricoides [364], and the agents that cause filariasis (Wuchereria bancrofti, Brugia malayi) [353, 365] can induce diffuse, eosinophilic inflammatory responses that manifest as pulmonary symptoms (wheezing, cough). Echinococcus species form cysts, which are most often asymptomatic when present in the lung. However, cysts can manifest pulmonary symptoms as a result of airway compression or due to hypersensitivity reactions when they rupture [366,367,368]. Ascaris lumbricoides [369] rarely causes direct pulmonary infections following aspiration, although ascension of adult intestinal Ascaris roundworms from the esophagus can lead to tracheal obstruction and respiratory distress [370, 371]. Strongyloides stercoralis infections are generally limited to the intestinal lumen in immune competent individuals, but may cause a mild, transient respiratory illness secondary to Loeffler syndrome [356]. In immune-compromised patients, particularly those receiving steroids, a life-threatening hyperinfection syndrome can develop in individuals with Strongyloides intestinal infection/colonization in which the organisms penetrate the intestinal lining and migrate to numerous tissues including the lungs [372]. In this setting, larvae and adult parasites may be detected on BAL fluid [373, 374]. Trichinella spiralis, acquired from ingestion of undercooked pork, can form diaphragm and accessory muscle abscesses/infection leading to respiratory effort weakness and pulmonary symptoms, but does not directly cause lung infection [375].
While most parasitic infections are confined to the gastrointestinal lumen, many species invade the bloodstream as part of their life cycle [332, 333]. These infections can induce eosinophilic inflammation either systemically or locally after migrating to the lungs [354]. Protozoa can also cause disseminated infections that are associated with pulmonary manifestations, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and pulmonary edema [343]. As a result, pulmonary symptoms accompany parasitic infections at varying frequency. Because few parasites cause solely pulmonary disease, bronchoscopy is a relatively limited tool in the diagnosis of parasitic infections. Diagnosis of parasitic infections is most often made via direct examination of stool or blood, or via serology [332]. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria (DPDM) serves as a national reference laboratory for diagnosis of parasitic infection in the United States. A list of diagnostic procedures and specimen handling requirements can be found on their website (https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/diagnosticprocedures/index.html).
For patients with severe, persistent, or atypical respiratory symptoms, or in immune-compromised individuals, bronchoscopy may be useful. Demonstration of peripheral or pulmonary eosinophilia, or elevated IgE, in the right epidemiological context, can be suggestive of parasitic infection. The following sections highlight the utility of various laboratory methods for diagnosing parasitic infections of the lung via bronchoscopy.
Culture
Very few parasites are diagnosed clinically using culture systems. For a number of reasons (low organism burden, varying life cycle, long replication half-life), it is difficult to grow parasites from human specimens in the laboratory. Thus, for the most part, parasite cultures are limited to research settings. While certain techniques have been developed to isolate organisms for antimicrobial susceptibility testing purposes [376], these are not used routinely in the clinical setting. As a result, parasite cultures are not generally performed on specimens obtained bronchoscopically.
PCR/Nucleic Acid Testing
Molecular diagnostic techniques are useful for the diagnosis of many parasitic infections and may be replacing conventional, microscopic approaches, especially for protozoa. Although sensitivity is variable, PCR tests are highly specific, often to the species level [377], and serve as good confirmatory tests [377,378,379]. PCR can also be performed on a variety of clinical specimens. Most often, parasitic infections are diagnosed via testing on blood/serum [378,379,380,381] and stool [382, 383]. In patients with suspected pulmonary infections, however, PCR can detect localized infection when performed on lung tissue or abscess fluid, such as for Entamoeba histolytica [383,384,385], Echinococcus spp. [386], and dirofilaria [387]. PCR also can detect the presence of various pathogens on BAL fluid, including schistosomiasis [388], Toxoplasma gondii [338, 389], and microsporidia [390]. However, due to the low organism burden associated with most parasitic infections involving the lung and lack of validation of many parasite PCRs from respiratory tract specimens, some experts debate PCR’s utility over conventional staining techniques [391].
PCR from sputum holds potential to be a noninvasive method of detection of malaria, even though DNA in sputum may be several hundredfold lower than that in blood [380]. In a study of 327 febrile individuals from India, 187 were diagnosed with malaria via microscopic evaluation [380]. The investigators found that a nested PCR assay of sputum identified more than 87% of microscopically confirmed cases [380].
Antigen-Based Testing
Direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA), enzyme immunoassays (EIA), and immunofluorescence assays (IFA) have been used for diagnosis of a limited number of protozoa including Cryptosporidium and Giardia species [382] and Entamoeba histolytica [383]. Commercially available assays are available, are more sensitive than direct microscopy, and have been incorporated into many clinical laboratories [383]. However, their use from BAL fluid or lung tissue is limited.
Pathology/Cytology
Light microscopy is the primary means of diagnosing the majority of parasitic infections [332, 364, 383]. Although sensitivity and specificity of microscopy is highly dependent on the technical skill of the microscopist, it is gold standard diagnostic method in parasitology. For parasitic gastrointestinal infections, direct wet-mount preparation is used for microscopic examination of stool ova and parasite (O & P) samples, while concentration and staining techniques increase the visualization of eggs, larvae, and cysts in samples [382, 383]. Direct visualization of eggs or adult worms from stool is specific, but sensitivity varies based on organism burden in intestinal lumen. Sampling of multiple stool specimens increases the likelihood of detection [364]. Kato-Katz thick smear is recommended by the World Health Organization for identification of soil-transmitted helminth infections such as Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and hookworms, as well as Schistosoma species [392]. Microscopic examination of Giemsa-stained blood films is the conventional approach for diagnosis of bloodstream parasites such as in malaria and babesiosis. Indirect fluorescent antibody techniques are also available for a variety of parasitic species from tissue specimens.
Histopathology is particularly useful for diagnosing parasitic infections of the lung. Depending on the life cycle and migratory pattern of the parasite, eggs, larvae, or adult organisms may be detected in sputum samples, BAL fluid, or lung biopsy specimens [384]. Microscopic examination of sputum can be used to identify eggs of Paragonimus westermani [393] or larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis [394,395,396]; more rarely, larvae of Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworms, and Entamoeba histolytica can be detected in sputum. Paragonimus eggs can also be identified in pleural fluid on H&E stain, while adult flukes can be visualized within cystic cavities [384]. Entamoeba histolytica lung abscesses and empyemas may contain trophozoites that can be visualized on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stains [384, 397]. Schistosoma spp. eggs and Dirofilaria immitis worms elicit granulomatous inflammation and necrosis, respectively, and can be directly visualized within biopsied lung tissue [384, 398]. Echinococcal cysts also have characteristic pathologic features that can be amenable to diagnosis via fiberoptic bronchoscopy [368, 384, 399, 400]. In rare cases of filariasis, microfilariae can be visualized on examination of bronchial lavage fluid [401, 402].
Airway Microbiome
In the past 15 years, molecular strategies have emerged for diagnosing bacterial and fungal infections that are less targeted. Whereas the molecular strategies discussed above target specific pathogens, new culture-independent techniques take an approach more akin to culture, in that they cast a wide net for many potential microorganisms, and then use modern DNA sequencing techniques to identify potential pathogens. Culture-independent techniques have so far mostly relied on the specific amplification of bacterial or fungal genes from BAL samples. In order to cast a wide net, the target genes need to be conserved across multiple species, such that they can be amplified with a common set of PCR primers, but they must be distinctive enough to allow identification (classification) to the species level. The most commonly used target for bacteria is the gene that encodes the small subunit of the ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA gene). For fungi, the corresponding small subunit, 18S, does not have enough discriminatory power, and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) between the small and large subunit ribosomal RNA genes is often used.
Direct amplification and sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes from BAL fluid offers the potential for more sensitive detection of potential pathogens as compared to conventional bacterial cultures, but it also offers the possibility of collecting information on multiple microbial species and their relative abundances at once, opening up the prospect of understanding the ecology of infection and colonization [58, 403,404,405,406]. This new capability has led to two kinds of diagnostic goals: (1) finding the pathogen or pathogens without culture, and (2) illuminating properties of the full microbial community that may be biomarkers or even the root cause of disease. This second goal has taken microbiology out of the field of infectious diseases and placed it in allergy/immunology, rheumatology, and other pulmonary diseases.
Only a handful studies have used BAL to examine the pediatric microbiota in disease states such as protracted bacterial bronchitis [407], cystic fibrosis [58, 80, 408, 409], and patients with other chronic lung disease or immunocompromise [58, 406]. In general, these studies have demonstrated a diverse microbiota and, similar to studies done in adults [405], a high sensitivity for detecting bacteria in the lower respiratory tract [58]. Several studies [406, 410,411,412], but not all [58], have identified specific microbial community profiles associated with certain diseases or disease categories. However, the increased sensitivity of this technique also comes with a new diagnostic challenge. Samples often yield lists of more than 15 bacteria, and the most abundant bacteria are not always the pathogens recovered on standard culture from the same samples [58]. A detailed understanding of the relationship between relative abundance, overall abundance, and microbial composition will be needed to make this technique clinically viable.
Another important question is whether or not invasive bronchoscopy with lavage is required to obtain the necessary information about the lower respiratory microbiota. Several studies have compared the microbiota of the upper and lower respiratory tract and reported varying levels of congruence and overlap in these microbial assemblages [67, 406, 413,414,415,416,417,418,419,420]. More work on paired upper and lower respiratory samples, in different age groups and types of disease, will be needed to resolve this issue.
Most respiratory microbiota (or microbiome) studies have been done targeting the 16S rRNA gene, and therefore, they can only detect bacteria and archaea. Several studies have used BAL other studies targeting fungi [421,422,423,424,425,426,427,428,429,430].
Fewer studies have analyzed BAL fluid for viruses [422, 431,432,433,434], but several studies aimed at viruses have been done on other respiratory samples (reviewed in [435]), some from pediatric populations [436,437,438,439,440]. Because viruses can have either RNA or DNA as their genetic material and do not have a single conserved gene among them, shot-gun metagenomic techniques, in which all nucleic acids in a sample are sequenced, remain the only option. Thus, studying the virome usually requires isolating viral sequences from a sea of human and microbial sequence data. However, studies that use a metagenomic approach also hold the promise of a complete picture of the respiratory microbiome. Such techniques are still costly and remain untested in the clinical setting.
References
Chellapandian D, Lehrnbecher T, Phillips B, Fisher BT, Zaoutis TE, Steinbach WJ, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage and lung biopsy in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(5):501–9.
Efrati O, Sadeh-Gornik U, Modan-Moses D, Barak A, Szeinberg A, Vardi A, et al. Flexible bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage in pediatric patients with lung disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009;10(1):80–4.
Marchetti O, Lamoth F, Mikulska M, Viscoli C, Verweij P, Bretagne S, et al. ECIL recommendations for the use of biological markers for the diagnosis of invasive fungal diseases in leukemic patients and hematopoietic SCT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012;47(6):846–54.
Lehrnbecher T, Robinson P, Fisher B, Alexander S, Ammann RA, Beauchemin M, et al. Guideline for the management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: 2017 update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(18):2082–94.
Batra S, Li B, Underhill N, Maloney R, Katz BZ, Hijiya N. Clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage and respiratory tract biopsies in diagnosis and management of suspected invasive respiratory fungal infections in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015;62(9):1579–86.
Qualter E, Satwani P, Ricci A, Jin Z, Geyer MB, Alobeid B, et al. A comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage versus lung biopsy in pediatric recipients after stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(8):1229–37.
Kottmann RM, Kelly J, Lyda E, Gurell M, Stalica J, Ormsby W, et al. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage: determinants of yield and impact on management in immunosuppressed patients. Thorax. 2011;66(9):823.
Nadimpalli S, Foca M, Satwani P, Sulis ML, Constantinescu A, Saiman L. Diagnostic yield of bronchoalveolar lavage in immunocompromised children with malignant and non-malignant disorders. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(6):820–6.
Peikert T, Rana S, Edell ES. Safety, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic implications of flexible bronchoscopy in patients with febrile neutropenia and pulmonary infiltrates. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80(11):1414–20.
Pagano L, Pagliari G, Basso A, Marra R, Sica S, Frigieri L, et al. The role of bronchoalveolar lavage in the microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia in patients with haematological malignancies. Ann Med. 1997;29(6):535–40.
Stokes DC, Shenep JL, Parham D, Bozeman PM, Marienchek W, Mackert PW. Role of flexible bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in pediatric patients with cancer. J Pediatr. 1989;115(4):561–7.
Park JR, Fogarty S, Brogan TV. Clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage in pediatric cancer patients. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002;39(3):175–80.
Rao U, Piccin A, Malone A, O’Hanlon K, Breatnach F, O’Meara A, et al. Utility of bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of pulmonary infection in children with haematological malignancies. Ir J Med Sci. 2013;182(2):177–83.
Carrillo-Marquez MA, Hulten KG, Hammerman W, Lamberth L, Mason EO, Kaplan SL. Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia in children in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistance at Texas Children’s Hospital. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(7):545–50.
Frush JM, Zhu Y, Edwards KM, Grijalva CG, Thomsen IP, Self WH, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Use of Antistaphylococcal Therapy in Children Hospitalized with Pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(12):848–52.
Jain S, Williams DJ, Arnold SR, Ampofo K, Bramley AM, Reed C, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):835–45.
De Schutter I, De Wachter E, Crokaert F, Verhaegen J, Soetens O, Pierard D, et al. Microbiology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in children with acute nonresponding or recurrent community-acquired pneumonia: identification of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae as a major pathogen. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(12):1437–44.
Shah SS, Dugan MH, Bell LM, Grundmeier RW, Florin TA, Hines EM, et al. Blood cultures in the emergency department evaluation of childhood pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(6):475–9.
Neuman MI, Hall M, Lipsett SC, Hersh AL, Williams DJ, Gerber JS, et al. Utility of Blood Culture Among Children Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20171013.
Hickey RW, Bowman MJ, Smith GA. Utility of blood cultures in pediatric patients found to have pneumonia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27(6):721–5.
Bonadio WA. Bacteremia in febrile children with lobar pneumonia and leukocytosis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1988;4(4):241–2.
Myers AL, Hall M, Williams DJ, Auger K, Tieder JS, Statile A, et al. Prevalence of bacteremia in hospitalized pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(7):736–40.
Byington CL, Spencer LY, Johnson TA, Pavia AT, Allen D, Mason EO, et al. An epidemiological investigation of a sustained high rate of pediatric parapneumonic empyema: risk factors and microbiological associations. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(4):434–40.
Waterer GW, Wunderink RG. The influence of the severity of community-acquired pneumonia on the usefulness of blood cultures. Respir Med. 2001;95(1):78–82.
Picard E, Joseph L, Goldberg S, Mimouni FB, Deeb M, Kleid D, et al. Predictive factors of morbidity in childhood parapneumonic effusion-associated pneumonia: a retrospective study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2010;29(9):840–3.
Freij BJ, Kusmiesz H, Nelson JD, McCracken GH Jr. Parapneumonic effusions and empyema in hospitalized children: a retrospective review of 227 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis. 1984;3(6):578–91.
Hoff SJ, Neblett WW, Edwards KM, Heller RM, Pietsch JB, Holcomb GW Jr, et al. Parapneumonic empyema in children: decortication hastens recovery in patients with severe pleural infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10(3):194–9.
Loens K, Van Heirstraeten L, Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H, Ieven M. Optimal sampling sites and methods for detection of pathogens possibly causing community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(1):21–31.
Heiskanen-Kosma T, Korppi M, Jokinen C, Kurki S, Heiskanen L, Juvonen H, et al. Etiology of childhood pneumonia: serologic results of a prospective, population-based study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17(11):986–91.
McCracken GH Jr. Etiology and treatment of pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(4):373–7.
Tsolia MN, Psarras S, Bossios A, Audi H, Paldanius M, Gourgiotis D, et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized school-age children: evidence for high prevalence of viral infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(5):681–6.
Xu D, Li S, Chen Z, Du L. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in different respiratory specimens. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170(7):851–8.
Parides GC, Bloom JW, Ampel NM, Ray CG. Mycoplasma and ureaplasma in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from immunocompromised hosts. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988;9(1):55–7.
Phin N, Parry-Ford F, Harrison T, Stagg HR, Zhang N, Kumar K, et al. Epidemiology and clinical management of Legionnaires’ disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(10):1011–21.
Pierre DM, Baron J, Yu VL, Stout JE. Diagnostic testing for Legionnaires’ disease. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2017;16(1):59.
Mercante JW, Winchell JM. Current and emerging Legionella diagnostics for laboratory and outbreak investigations. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(1):95–133.
Venkatachalam V, Hendley JO, Willson DF. The diagnostic dilemma of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):286–96.
Srinivasan R, Asselin J, Gildengorin G, Wiener-Kronish J, Flori HR. A prospective study of ventilator-associated pneumonia in children. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):1108–15.
Charles MP, Kali A, Easow JM, Joseph NM, Ravishankar M, Srinivasan S, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Australas Med J. 2014;7(8):334–44.
Robert R, Grollier G, Frat JP, Godet C, Adoun M, Fauchere JL, et al. Colonization of lower respiratory tract with anaerobic bacteria in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1062–8.
Klompas M. Does this patient have ventilator-associated pneumonia? JAMA. 2007;297(14):1583–93.
Gauvin F, Dassa C, Chaibou M, Proulx F, Farrell CA, Lacroix J. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in intubated children: comparison of different diagnostic methods. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003;4(4):437–43.
Chastre J, Fagon JY, Bornet-Lecso M, Calvat S, Dombret MC, al Khani R, et al. Evaluation of bronchoscopic techniques for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(1):231–40.
Fabregas N, Ewig S, Torres A, El-Ebiary M, Ramirez J, de La Bellacasa JP, et al. Clinical diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia revisited: comparative validation using immediate post-mortem lung biopsies. Thorax. 1999;54(10):867–73.
Torres A, Fabregas N, Ewig S, de la Bellacasa JP, Bauer TT, Ramirez J. Sampling methods for ventilator-associated pneumonia: validation using different histologic and microbiological references. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):2799–804.
Fagon JY, Chastre J, Wolff M, Gervais C, Parer-Aubas S, Stephan F, et al. Invasive and noninvasive strategies for management of suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(8):621–30.
Shorr AF, Sherner JH, Jackson WL, Kollef MH. Invasive approaches to the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(1):46–53.
Canadian Critical Care Trials G. A randomized trial of diagnostic techniques for ventilator-associated pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(25):2619–30.
Wood AY, Davit AJ 2nd, Ciraulo DL, Arp NW, Richart CM, Maxwell RA, et al. A prospective assessment of diagnostic efficacy of blind protective bronchial brushings compared to bronchoscope-assisted lavage, bronchoscope-directed brushings, and blind endotracheal aspirates in ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Trauma. 2003;55(5):825–34.
Labenne M, Poyart C, Rambaud C, Goldfarb B, Pron B, Jouvet P, et al. Blind protected specimen brush and bronchoalveolar lavage in ventilated children. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(11):2537–43.
Gauvin F, Lacroix J, Guertin MC, Proulx F, Farrell CA, Moghrabi A, et al. Reproducibility of blind protected bronchoalveolar lavage in mechanically ventilated children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(12):1618–23.
Zucker A, Pollack M, Katz R. Blind use of the double-lumen plugged catheter for diagnosis of respiratory tract infections in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 1984;12(10):867–70.
Sachdev A, Chugh K, Raghunathan V, Gupta D, Wattal C, Menon GR. Diagnosis of bacterial ventilator-associated pneumonia in children: reproducibility of blind bronchial sampling. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(1):e1–7.
Muscedere J, Dodek P, Keenan S, Fowler R, Cook D, Heyland D, et al. Comprehensive evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis and treatment. J Crit Care. 2008;23(1):138–47.
Sachdev A, Chugh K, Sethi M, Gupta D, Wattal C, Menon G. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia in children in resource-limited setting: a comparative study of bronchoscopic and nonbronchoscopic methods. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010;11(2):258–66.
Morrow BM, Argent AC, Jeena PM, Green RJ. Guideline for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of paediatric ventilator-associated pneumonia. S Afr Med J. 2009;99(4 Pt 2):255–67.
Rizik S, Hakim F, Bentur L, Arad-Cohen N, Kassis I. Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary infections in immunocompromised children. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2018;40(7):532–5.
Zachariah P, Ryan C, Nadimpalli S, Coscia G, Kolb M, Smith H, et al. Culture-independent analysis of pediatric bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(9):1047–56.
Muhlebach MS, Hatch JE, Einarsson GG, McGrath SJ, Gilipin DF, Lavelle G, et al. Anaerobic bacteria cultured from cystic fibrosis airways correlate to milder disease: a multisite study. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(1):1800242.
Sherrard LJ, Bell SC, Tunney MM. The role of anaerobic bacteria in the cystic fibrosis airway. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2016;22(6):637–43.
Tunney MM, Field TR, Moriarty TF, Patrick S, Doering G, Muhlebach MS, et al. Detection of anaerobic bacteria in high numbers in sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(9):995–1001.
Foundation CF. Patient registry annual report. Bethesda, Maryland; 2017.
Chung JC, Becq J, Fraser L, Schulz-Trieglaff O, Bond NJ, Foweraker J, et al. Genomic variation among contemporary Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from chronically infected cystic fibrosis patients. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(18):4857–66.
Foweraker JE, Laughton CR, Brown DF, Bilton D. Phenotypic variability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputa from patients with acute infective exacerbation of cystic fibrosis and its impact on the validity of antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(6):921–7.
Winstanley C, O’Brien S, Brockhurst MA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa evolutionary adaptation and diversification in cystic fibrosis chronic lung infections. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(5):327–37.
Jorth P, Staudinger BJ, Wu X, Hisert KB, Hayden H, Garudathri J, et al. Regional isolation drives bacterial diversification within cystic fibrosis lungs. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(3):307–19.
Goddard AF, Staudinger BJ, Dowd SE, Joshi-Datar A, Wolcott RD, Aitken ML, et al. Direct sampling of cystic fibrosis lungs indicates that DNA-based analyses of upper-airway specimens can misrepresent lung microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(34):13769–74.
Willner D, Haynes MR, Furlan M, Hanson N, Kirby B, Lim YW, et al. Case studies of the spatial heterogeneity of DNA viruses in the cystic fibrosis lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;46(2):127–31.
Willner D, Haynes MR, Furlan M, Schmieder R, Lim YW, Rainey PB, et al. Spatial distribution of microbial communities in the cystic fibrosis lung. ISME J. 2012;6(2):471–4.
Eyns H, Pierard D, De Wachter E, Eeckhout L, Vaes P, Malfroot A. Respiratory bacterial culture sampling in expectorating and non-expectorating patients with cystic fibrosis. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:403.
Ramsey BW, Wentz KR, Smith AL, Richardson M, Williams-Warren J, Hedges DL, et al. Predictive value of oropharyngeal cultures for identifying lower airway bacteria in cystic fibrosis patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144(2):331–7.
Armstrong DS, Grimwood K, Carlin JB, Carzino R, Olinsky A, Phelan PD. Bronchoalveolar lavage or oropharyngeal cultures to identify lower respiratory pathogens in infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1996;21(5):267–75.
Burns JL, Gibson RL, McNamara S, Yim D, Emerson J, Rosenfeld M, et al. Longitudinal assessment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in young children with cystic fibrosis. J Infect Dis. 2001;183(3):444–52.
Equi AC, Pike SE, Davies J, Bush A. Use of cough swabs in a cystic fibrosis clinic. Arch Dis Child. 2001;85(5):438–9.
Rosenfeld M, Emerson J, Accurso F, Armstrong D, Castile R, Grimwood K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of oropharyngeal cultures in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1999;28(5):321–8.
Jung A, Kleinau I, Schonian G, Bauernfeind A, Chen C, Griese M, et al. Sequential genotyping of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from upper and lower airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(6):1457–63.
Doumit M, Belessis Y, Stelzer-Braid S, Mallitt KA, Rawlinson W, Jaffe A. Diagnostic accuracy and distress associated with oropharyngeal suction in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2016;15(4):473–8.
Aaron SD, Kottachchi D, Ferris WJ, Vandemheen KL, St Denis ML, Plouffe A, et al. Sputum versus bronchoscopy for diagnosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2004;24(4):631–7.
Jain K, Wainwright C, Smyth AR. Bronchoscopy-guided antimicrobial therapy for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:CD009530.
Laguna TA, Wagner BD, Williams CB, Stevens MJ, Robertson CE, Welchlin CW, et al. Airway microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from clinically well infants with cystic fibrosis. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0167649.
Hogan DA, Willger SD, Dolben EL, Hampton TH, Stanton BA, Morrison HG, et al. Analysis of lung microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage, protected brush and sputum samples from subjects with mild-to-moderate cystic fibrosis lung disease. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0149998.
Hoppe JE, Towler E, Wagner BD, Accurso FJ, Sagel SD, Zemanick ET. Sputum induction improves detection of pathogens in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(7):638–46.
Suri R, Marshall LJ, Wallis C, Metcalfe C, Shute JK, Bush A. Safety and use of sputum induction in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;35(4):309–13.
Al-Saleh S, Dell SD, Grasemann H, Yau YC, Waters V, Martin S, et al. Sputum induction in routine clinical care of children with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr. 2010;157(6):1006–11 e1.
Ho SA, Ball R, Morrison LJ, Brownlee KG, Conway SP. Clinical value of obtaining sputum and cough swab samples following inhaled hypertonic saline in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;38(1):82–7.
Mussaffi H, Fireman EM, Mei-Zahav M, Prais D, Blau H. Induced sputum in the very young: a new key to infection and inflammation. Chest. 2008;133(1):176–82.
Henig NR, Tonelli MR, Pier MV, Burns JL, Aitken ML. Sputum induction as a research tool for sampling the airways of subjects with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2001;56(4):306–11.
Angrill J, Agusti C, de Celis R, Rano A, Gonzalez J, Sole T, et al. Bacterial colonisation in patients with bronchiectasis: microbiological pattern and risk factors. Thorax. 2002;57(1):15–9.
Ronchetti K, Tame JD, Paisey C, Thia LP, Doull I, Howe R, et al. The CF-Sputum Induction Trial (CF-SpIT) to assess lower airway bacterial sampling in young children with cystic fibrosis: a prospective internally controlled interventional trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(6):461–71.
Blau H, Linnane B, Carzino R, Tannenbaum EL, Skoric B, Robinson PJ, et al. Induced sputum compared to bronchoalveolar lavage in young, non-expectorating cystic fibrosis children. J Cyst Fibros. 2014;13(1):106–10.
O’Horo JC, Thompson D, Safdar N. Is the gram stain useful in the microbiologic diagnosis of VAP? A meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(4):551–61.
Meduri GU, Baselski V. The role of bronchoalveolar lavage in diagnosing nonopportunistic bacterial pneumonia. Chest. 1991;100(1):179–90.
de Blic J, Midulla F, Barbato A, Clement A, Dab I, Eber E, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage in children. ERS Task Force on bronchoalveolar lavage in children. European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J. 2000;15(1):217–31.
Jourdain B, Joly-Guillou ML, Dombret MC, Calvat S, Trouillet JL, Gibert C, et al. Usefulness of quantitative cultures of BAL fluid for diagnosing nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated patients. Chest. 1997;111(2):411–8.
Kirkpatrick MB, Bass JB Jr. Quantitative bacterial cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage fluids and protected brush catheter specimens from normal subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139(2):546–8.
Cantral DE, Tape TG, Reed EC, Spurzem JR, Rennard SI, Thompson AB. Quantitative culture of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia. Am J Med. 1993;95(6):601–7.
Rasmussen TR, Korsgaard J, Moller JK, Sommer T, Kilian M. Quantitative culture of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Respir Med. 2001;95(11):885–90.
Thorpe JE, Baughman RP, Frame PT, Wesseler TA, Staneck JL. Bronchoalveolar lavage for diagnosing acute bacterial pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 1987;155(5):855–61.
Prats E, Dorca J, Pujol M, Garcia L, Barreiro B, Verdaguer R, et al. Effects of antibiotics on protected specimen brush sampling in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(5):944–51.
Torres A, el-Ebiary M, Padro L, Gonzalez J, de la Bellacasa JP, Ramirez J, et al. Validation of different techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Comparison with immediate postmortem pulmonary biopsy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149(2 Pt 1):324–31.
Kim ES, Kim EC, Lee SM, Yang SC, Yoo CG, Kim YW, et al. Bacterial yield from quantitative cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in patients with pneumonia on antimicrobial therapy. Korean J Intern Med. 2012;27(2):156–62.
Torres A, Lee N, Cilloniz C, Vila J, Van der Eerden M. Laboratory diagnosis of pneumonia in the molecular age. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(6):1764–78.
Falguera M, Lopez A, Nogues A, Porcel JM, Rubio-Caballero M. Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction method for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA in pleural fluid samples. Chest. 2002;122(6):2212–6.
Lahti E, Mertsola J, Kontiokari T, Eerola E, Ruuskanen O, Jalava J. Pneumolysin polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia and empyema in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25(12):783–9.
Krenke K, Sadowy E, Podsiadly E, Hryniewicz W, Demkow U, Kulus M. Etiology of parapneumonic effusion and pleural empyema in children. The role of conventional and molecular microbiological tests. Respir Med. 2016;116:28–33.
Le Monnier A, Carbonnelle E, Zahar JR, Le Bourgeois M, Abachin E, Quesne G, et al. Microbiological diagnosis of empyema in children: comparative evaluations by culture, polymerase chain reaction, and pneumococcal antigen detection in pleural fluids. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(8):1135–40.
Abdeldaim GM, Stralin K, Olcen P, Blomberg J, Herrmann B. Toward a quantitative DNA-based definition of pneumococcal pneumonia: a comparison of Streptococcus pneumoniae target genes, with special reference to the Spn9802 fragment. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;60(2):143–50.
Johansson N, Kalin M, Giske CG, Hedlund J. Quantitative detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae from sputum samples with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for etiologic diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;60(3):255–61.
Menezes-Martins LF, Menezes-Martins JJ, Michaelsen VS, Aguiar BB, Ermel T, Machado DC. Diagnosis of parapneumonic pleural effusion by polymerase chain reaction in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(7):1106–10.
Abdeldaim GM, Stralin K, Olcen P, Blomberg J, Molling P, Herrmann B. Quantitative fucK gene polymerase chain reaction on sputum and nasopharyngeal secretions to detect Haemophilus influenzae pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76(2):141–6.
Abdeldaim GM, Herrmann B. PCR detection of Haemophilus influenzae from respiratory specimens. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;943:115–23.
Johansson N, Kalin M, Tiveljung-Lindell A, Giske CG, Hedlund J. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia: increased microbiological yield with new diagnostic methods. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(2):202–9.
Stralin K, Korsgaard J, Olcen P. Evaluation of a multiplex PCR for bacterial pathogens applied to bronchoalveolar lavage. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(3):568–75.
Xirogianni A, Tsolia M, Voyiatzi A, Sioumala M, Makri A, Argyropoulou A, et al. Diagnosis of upper and lower respiratory tract bacterial infections with the use of multiplex PCR assays. Diagnostics (Basel). 2013;3(2):222–31.
Sansot M, Fradin E, Chenouard R, Kempf M, Kouatchet A, Lasocki S, et al. Performance of the extended use of the FilmArray((R)) BCID panel kit for bronchoalveolar lavage analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46(3):2685–92.
Murdoch DR, Anderson TP, Beynon KA, Chua A, Fleming AM, Laing RT, et al. Evaluation of a PCR assay for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in respiratory and nonrespiratory samples from adults with community-acquired pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(1):63–6.
Stralin K, Tornqvist E, Kaltoft MS, Olcen P, Holmberg H. Etiologic diagnosis of adult bacterial pneumonia by culture and PCR applied to respiratory tract samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(2):643–5.
Stralin K, Herrmann B, Abdeldaim G, Olcen P, Holmberg H, Molling P. Comparison of sputum and nasopharyngeal aspirate samples and of the PCR gene targets lytA and Spn9802 for quantitative PCR for rapid detection of pneumococcal pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(1):83–9.
Carvalho Mda G, Tondella ML, McCaustland K, Weidlich L, McGee L, Mayer LW, et al. Evaluation and improvement of real-time PCR assays targeting lytA, ply, and psaA genes for detection of pneumococcal DNA. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2460–6.
Abdeldaim G, Herrmann B, Molling P, Holmberg H, Blomberg J, Olcen P, et al. Usefulness of real-time PCR for lytA, ply, and Spn9802 on plasma samples for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(8):1135–41.
Albrich WC, Madhi SA, Adrian PV, Telles JN, Paranhos-Baccala G, Klugman KP. Genomic load from sputum samples and nasopharyngeal swabs for diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia in HIV-infected adults. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(12):4224–9.
Albrich WC, Madhi SA, Adrian PV, van Niekerk N, Mareletsi T, Cutland C, et al. Use of a rapid test of pneumococcal colonization density to diagnose pneumococcal pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(5):601–9.
Lorente ML, Falguera M, Nogues A, Gonzalez AR, Merino MT, Caballero MR. Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in whole blood: a prospective clinical study. Thorax. 2000;55(2):133–7.
Sheppard CL, Harrison TG, Kearns AM, Guiver M, Creek M, Evans R, et al. Diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal infection by PCR amplification of Streptococcus pneumoniae genomic fragments in blood: a multi-centre comparative study. Commun Dis Public Health. 2003;6(3):221–7.
Yang S, Lin S, Khalil A, Gaydos C, Nuemberger E, Juan G, et al. Quantitative PCR assay using sputum samples for rapid diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia in adult emergency department patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(7):3221–6.
Peters RP, de Boer RF, Schuurman T, Gierveld S, Kooistra-Smid M, van Agtmael MA, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA load in blood as a marker of infection in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(10):3308–12.
Smith MD, Sheppard CL, Hogan A, Harrison TG, Dance DA, Derrington P, et al. Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae infections in adults with bacteremia and community-acquired pneumonia: clinical comparison of pneumococcal PCR and urinary antigen detection. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(4):1046–9.
Gollomp K, Rankin SC, White C, Mattei P, Harris MC, Kilpatrick LE, et al. Broad-range bacterial polymerase chain reaction in the microbiologic diagnosis of complicated pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2012;7(1):8–13.
Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Seitz AE, Falkinham JO, Holland SM, Prevots DR. Spatial clusters of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(6):553–8.
Prevots DR, Shaw PA, Strickland D, Jackson LA, Raebel MA, Blosky MA, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease prevalence at four integrated health care delivery systems. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(7):970–6.
Brode SK, Daley CL, Marras TK. The epidemiologic relationship between tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(11):1370–7.
Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Seitz AE, Holland SM, Prevots DR. Prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in U.S. Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(8):881–6.
Henkle E, Hedberg K, Schafer S, Novosad S, Winthrop KL. Population-based incidence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in Oregon 2007 to 2012. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(5):642–7.
Runyon EH. Anonymous mycobacteria in pulmonary disease. Med Clin North Am. 1959;43(1):273–90.
WHO. Global tuberculosis report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
Keshavjee S, Farmer PE. Tuberculosis, drug resistance, and the history of modern medicine. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(10):931–6.
Ellner J. Tuberculosis. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, editors. Goldman’s cecil medicine. 24th ed. New York: Elsevier; 2012. p. 1939–48.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Tuberculosis. In: Kimberlin D, Brady M, Jackson MA, Long S, editors. Red book. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018. p. 829–53.
Goussard P, Gie R. The role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2014;8(1):101–9.
Martiniano SL, Nick JA, Daley CL. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in cystic fibrosis. Clin Chest Med. 2016;37(1):83–96.
Faro A. Pulmonary disease in cystic fibrosis. In: Bush A, Wilmott R, Chernick V, Boat T, Ratjen F, Deterding R, editors. Kendig & Chernick’s disorders of the respiratory tract in children. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2012. p. 770–80.
Ashbolt NJ. Environmental (Saprozoic) pathogens of engineered water systems: understanding their ecology for risk assessment and management. Pathogens. 2015;4(2):390–405.
Parkins MD, Floto RA. Emerging bacterial pathogens and changing concepts of bacterial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2015;14(3):293–304.
Ramsay KA, Stockwell RE, Bell SC, Kidd TJ. Infection in cystic fibrosis: impact of the environment and climate. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(5):505–19.
Whittaker LA, Teneback C. Atypical mycobacterial and fungal infections in cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;30(5):539–46.
Holland SM. The nontuberculous mycobacteria. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, editors. Goldman’s cecil medicine. New York: Elsevier; 2012. p. 1948–50.
Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Prevots DR. Nontuberculous mycobacteria among patients with cystic fibrosis in the United States: screening practices and environmental risk. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(5):581–6.
Adjemian J, Daniel-Wayman S, Ricotta E, Prevots DR. Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteriosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;39(3):325–35.
Donohue MJ, Wymer L. Increasing prevalence rate of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections in five states, 2008-2013. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(12):2143–50.
Hoefsloot W, van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Angeby K, Bauriaud R, Bemer P, et al. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(6):1604–13.
Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175(4):367–416.
Koh WJ. Nontuberculous mycobacteria-overview. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(1) https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0024-2016.
Adjemian J, Alison MB, Kenneth NO, Prevots DR. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease among cystic fibrosis patients in the United States: Environmental Risk and NTM Screening Practices. C17 CYSTIC FIBROSIS LUNG INFECTIONS. American Thoracic Society International Conference Abstracts: American Thoracic Society; 2014. p. A3955-A.
Bar-On O, Mussaffi H, Mei-Zahav M, Prais D, Steuer G, Stafler P, et al. Increasing nontuberculous mycobacteria infection in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2015;14(1):53–62.
Martiniano SL, Davidson RM, Nick JA. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis: updates and the path forward. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(S48):S29–36.
Binder AM, Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Prevots DR. Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections and associated chronic macrolide use among persons with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(7):807–12.
Olivier KN, Weber DJ, Wallace RJ, Faiz AR, Lee JH, Zhang Y, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria. I: multicenter prevalence study in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(6):828–34.
Smith MJ, Efthimiou J, Hodson ME, Batten JC. Mycobacterial isolations in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 1984;39(5):369–75.
Raidt L, Idelevich EA, Dübbers A, Küster P, Drevinek P, Peters G, et al. Increased prevalence and resistance of important pathogens recovered from respiratory specimens of cystic fibrosis patients during a decade. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015;34(7):700–5.
Saiman L, Siegel JD, LiPuma JJ, Brown RF, Bryson EA, Chambers MJ, et al. Infection prevention and control guideline for cystic fibrosis: 2013 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35(Suppl 1):S1–S67.
Olivier KN, Weber DJ, Lee JH, Handler A, Tudor G, Molina PL, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria. II: nested-cohort study of impact on cystic fibrosis lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(6):835–40.
Catherinot E, Roux AL, Vibet MA, Bellis G, Lemonnier L, Le Roux E, et al. Inhaled therapies, azithromycin and Mycobacterium abscessus in cystic fibrosis patients. Eur Respir J. 2013;41(5):1101–6.
Catherinot E, Roux AL, Vibet MA, Bellis G, Ravilly S, Lemonnier L, et al. Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium abscessus complex target distinct cystic fibrosis patient subpopulations. J Cyst Fibros. 2013;12(1):74–80.
Coolen N, Morand P, Martin C, Hubert D, Kanaan R, Chapron J, et al. Reduced risk of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis adults receiving long-term azithromycin. J Cyst Fibros. 2015;14(5):594–9.
Leung JM, Olivier KN. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;34(1):124–34.
Verregghen M, Heijerman HG, Reijers M, van Ingen J, van der Ent CK. Risk factors for Mycobacterium abscessus infection in cystic fibrosis patients; a case-control study. J Cyst Fibros. 2012;11(4):340–3.
Viviani L, Harrison MJ, Zolin A, Haworth CS, Floto RA. Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) amongst individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). J Cyst Fibros. 2016;15(5):619–23.
Girón RM, Máiz L, Barrio I, Martínez MT, Salcedo A, Prados C. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in patients with cystic fibrosis: a multicenter prevalence study. Arch Bronconeumol. 2008;44(12):679–84.
Levy I, Grisaru-Soen G, Lerner-Geva L, Kerem E, Blau H, Bentur L, et al. Multicenter cross-sectional study of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections among cystic fibrosis patients, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(3):378–84.
Radhakrishnan DK, Yau Y, Corey M, Richardson S, Chedore P, Jamieson F, et al. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in children with cystic fibrosis: isolation, prevalence, and predictors. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009;44(11):1100–6.
Jennifer A, Alison MB, Kenneth NO, Prevots DR. Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease among cystic fibrosis patients in the United States: Environmental Risk and NTM Screening Practices. C17 Cystic Fibrosis Lung Infections. American Thoracic Society International Conference Abstracts: American Thoracic Society; 2014. p. A3955-A.
Jennifer A, Kenneth NO, Prevots DR. Predictors of prolonged nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. C105 Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Epidemiology. American Thoracic Society International Conference Abstracts: American Thoracic Society; 2015. p. A5255-A.
Mussaffi H, Rivlin J, Shalit I, Ephros M, Blau H. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis associated with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and steroid therapy. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(2):324–8.
Sermet-Gaudelus I, Le Bourgeois M, Pierre-Audigier C, Offredo C, Guillemot D, Halley S, et al. Mycobacterium abscessus and children with cystic fibrosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(12):1587–91.
Bouso JM, Burns JJ, Amin R, Livingston FR, Elidemir O. Household proximity to water and nontuberculous mycobacteria in children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(3):324–30.
Bryant JM, Grogono DM, Greaves D, Foweraker J, Roddick I, Inns T, et al. Whole-genome sequencing to identify transmission of Mycobacterium abscessus between patients with cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2013;381(9877):1551–60.
Harris KA, Underwood A, Kenna DT, Brooks A, Kavaliunaite E, Kapatai G, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analysis do not provide evidence for cross-transmission of mycobacterium abscessus in a cohort of pediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(7):1007–16.
Prevots DR, Adjemian J, Fernandez AG, Knowles MR, Olivier KN. Environmental risks for nontuberculous mycobacteria. Individual exposures and climatic factors in the cystic fibrosis population. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(7):1032–8.
Bryant JM, Grogono DM, Rodriguez-Rincon D, Everall I, Brown KP, Moreno P, et al. Emergence and spread of a human-transmissible multidrug-resistant nontuberculous mycobacterium. Science (New York). 2016;354(6313):751–7.
Esther CR, Henry MM, Molina PL, Leigh MW. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;40(1):39–44.
Esther CR, Esserman DA, Gilligan P, Kerr A, Noone PG. Chronic Mycobacterium abscessus infection and lung function decline in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2010;9(2):117–23.
Park IK, Olivier KN. Nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(2):217–24.
Floto RA, Olivier KN, Saiman L, Daley CL, Herrmann JL, Nick JA, et al. US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis: executive summary. Thorax. 2016;71(1):88–90.
Scott JP, Ji Y, Kannan M, Wylam ME. Inhaled granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for Mycobacterium abscessus in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(4):1702127.
Floto RA, Olivier KN, Saiman L, Daley CL, Herrmann JL, Nick JA, et al. US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and European Cystic Fibrosis Society consensus recommendations for the management of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in individuals with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2016;71(Suppl 1):i1–22.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Nontuberculous mycobacteria. In: Kimberlin D, Brady M, Jackson MA, Long S, editors. Red book. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2018. p. 854–61.
Brown-Elliott BA, Nash KA, Wallace RJ Jr. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25(3):545–82.
Cowman SA, Loebinger MR. Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacteria lung disease. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;39(3):343–50.
Ichiyama S, Iinuma Y, Yamori S, Hasegawa Y, Shimokata K, Nakashima N. Mycobacterium growth indicator tube testing in conjunction with the AccuProbe or the AMPLICOR-PCR assay for detecting and identifying mycobacteria from sputum samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(8):2022–5.
Blakemore R, Story E, Helb D, Kop J, Banada P, Owens MR, et al. Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(7):2495–501.
Lee H, Park HJ, Cho SN, Bai GH, Kim SJ. Species identification of mycobacteria by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the rpoB gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(8):2966–71.
Bannalikar AS, Verma R. Detection of Mycobacterium avium & M. tuberculosis from human sputum cultures by PCR-RFLP analysis of hsp65 gene & pncA PCR. Indian J Med Res. 2006;123(2):165–72.
Devallois A, Goh KS, Rastogi N. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene and proposition of an algorithm to differentiate 34 mycobacterial species. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(11):2969–73.
Devallois A, Picardeau M, Paramasivan CN, Vincent V, Rastogi N. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates giving discordant results in AccuProbe tests by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and DT1-DT6 PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(11):2767–72.
Dobner P, Feldmann K, Rifai M, Loscher T, Rinder H. Rapid identification of mycobacterial species by PCR amplification of hypervariable 16S rRNA gene promoter region. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34(4):866–9.
Patel JB, Leonard DG, Pan X, Musser JM, Berman RE, Nachamkin I. Sequence-based identification of Mycobacterium species using the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(1):246–51.
Roth A, Reischl U, Streubel A, Naumann L, Kroppenstedt RM, Habicht M, et al. Novel diagnostic algorithm for identification of mycobacteria using genus-specific amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer and restriction endonucleases. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(3):1094–104.
Suffys PN, da Silva Rocha A, de Oliveira M, Campos CE, Barreto AM, Portaels F, et al. Rapid identification of Mycobacteria to the species level using INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria, a reverse hybridization assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(12):4477–82.
Aravindhan V, Sulochana S, Narayanan S, Paramasivam CN, Narayanan PR. Identification & differentiation of Mycobacterium avium & M. intracellulare by PCR- RFLP assay using the groES gene. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(6):575–9.
Alcaide F, Amlerova J, Bou G, Ceyssens PJ, Coll P, Corcoran D, et al. How to: identify non-tuberculous Mycobacterium species using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(6):599–603.
Ceyssens PJ, Soetaert K, Timke M, Van den Bossche A, Sparbier K, De Cremer K, et al. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for combined species identification and drug sensitivity testing in mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(2):624–34.
Kodana M, Tarumoto N, Kawamura T, Saito T, Ohno H, Maesaki S, et al. Utility of the MALDI-TOF MS method to identify nontuberculous mycobacteria. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22(1):32–5.
Buckwalter SP, Olson SL, Connelly BJ, Lucas BC, Rodning AA, Walchak RC, et al. Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of mycobacterium species, Nocardia species, and other aerobic Actinomycetes. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(2):376–84.
Tudo G, Monte MR, Vergara A, Lopez A, Hurtado JC, Ferrer-Navarro M, et al. Implementation of MALDI-TOF MS technology for the identification of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium spp. in mycobacterial diagnosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(8):1527–32.
Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB in adults and children: policy update. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva; 2013.
Yin QQ, Jiao WW, Han R, Jiao AX, Sun L, Tian JL, et al. Rapid diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis by Xpert MTB/RIF assay using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:310194.
Mathew P, Kuo YH, Vazirani B, Eng RH, Weinstein MP. Are three sputum acid-fast bacillus smears necessary for discontinuing tuberculosis isolation? J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(9):3482–4.
Nolan VG, Arnold SR, Bramley AM, Ampofo K, Williams DJ, Grijalva CG, et al. Etiology and impact of coinfections in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(2):179–88.
Costa C, Elia M, Astegiano S, Sidoti F, Terlizzi ME, Solidoro P, et al. Quantitative detection of Epstein-Barr virus in bronchoalveolar lavage from transplant and nontransplant patients. Transplantation. 2008;86(10):1389–94.
Costa C, Delsedime L, Solidoro P, Curtoni A, Bergallo M, Libertucci D, et al. Herpesviruses detection by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy in lung transplant: viral infections and histopathological correlation. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(4):1270–4.
Dioverti MV, Razonable RR. Cytomegalovirus. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4(4) https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0022-2015.
Liu P, Xu M, He L, Su L, Wang A, Fu P, et al. Epidemiology of respiratory pathogens in children with lower respiratory tract infections in Shanghai, China, from 2013 to 2015. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2018;71(1):39–44.
Esther CR Jr, Lin FC, Kerr A, Miller MB, Gilligan PH. Respiratory viruses are associated with common respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(9):926–31.
Michelow IC, Olsen K, Lozano J, Rollins NK, Duffy LB, Ziegler T, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children. Pediatrics. 2004;113(4):701–7.
Ruuskanen O, Lahti E, Jennings LC, Murdoch DR. Viral pneumonia. Lancet. 2011;377(9773):1264–75.
Reeves RM, Hardelid P, Gilbert R, Warburton F, Ellis J, Pebody RG. Estimating the burden of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) on respiratory hospital admissions in children less than five years of age in England, 2007-2012. Influenza Other Respi Viruses. 2017;11(2):122–9.
Ogimi C, Waghmare AA, Kuypers JM, Xie H, Yeung CC, Leisenring WM, et al. Clinical significance of human coronavirus in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(11):1532–9.
Chatzis O, Darbre S, Pasquier J, Meylan P, Manuel O, Aubert JD, et al. Burden of severe RSV disease among immunocompromised children and adults: a 10 year retrospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):111.
Scheltema NM, Gentile A, Lucion F, Nokes DJ, Munywoki PK, Madhi SA, et al. Global respiratory syncytial virus-associated mortality in young children (RSV GOLD): a retrospective case series. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(10):e984–e91.
Azadeh N, Sakata KK, Saeed A, Mullon JJ, Grys TE, Limper AH, et al. Comparison of respiratory pathogen detection in upper versus lower respiratory tract samples using the BioFire FilmArray respiratory panel in the immunocompromised host. Can Respir J. 2018;2018:2685723.
Lachant DJ, Croft DP, McGrane Minton H, Prasad P, Kottmann RM. Nasopharyngeal viral PCR in immunosuppressed patients and its association with virus detection in bronchoalveolar lavage by PCR. Respirology. 2017;22(6):1205–11.
Wurzel DF, Marchant JM, Clark JE, Mackay IM, Wang CY, Sloots TP, et al. Respiratory virus detection in nasopharyngeal aspirate versus bronchoalveolar lavage is dependent on virus type in children with chronic respiratory symptoms. J Clin Virol. 2013;58(4):683–8.
Restrepo-Gualteros SM, Jaramillo-Barberi LE, Gonzalez-Santos M, Rodriguez-Martinez CE, Perez GF, Gutierrez MJ, et al. Characterization of cytomegalovirus lung infection in non-HIV infected children. Viruses. 2014;6(5):2038–51.
Goussard P, Kling S, Gie RP, Nel ED, Heyns L, Rossouw GJ, et al. CMV pneumonia in HIV-infected ventilated infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010;45(7):650–5.
Zampoli M, Morrow B, Hsiao NY, Whitelaw A, Zar HJ. Prevalence and outcome of cytomegalovirus-associated pneumonia in relation to human immunodeficiency virus infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011;30(5):413–7.
Gooskens J, Templeton KE, Claas EC, van Bussel MJ, Smit VT, Kroes AC. Quantitative detection of herpes simplex virus DNA in the lower respiratory tract. J Med Virol. 2007;79(5):597–604.
Wu JL, Ma HY, Lu CY, Chen JM, Lee PI, Jou ST, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of cytomegalovirus viremia in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50(3):307–13.
Rowe RG, Guo D, Lee M, Margossian S, London WB, Lehmann L. Cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors for primary infection and cases of recurrent and late infection at a single center. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(7):1275–83.
Chemaly RF, Yen-Lieberman B, Castilla EA, Reilly A, Arrigain S, Farver C, et al. Correlation between viral loads of cytomegalovirus in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage specimens from lung transplant recipients determined by histology and immunohistochemistry. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(5):2168–72.
Tan SK, Burgener EB, Waggoner JJ, Gajurel K, Gonzalez S, Chen SF, et al. Molecular and culture-based bronchoalveolar lavage fluid testing for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3(1):ofv212.
Boeckh M, Stevens-Ayers T, Travi G, Huang ML, Cheng GS, Xie H, et al. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantitation in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients with CMV pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(10):1514–22.
Lodding IP, Schultz HH, Jensen JU, Kirkby N, Perch M, Andersen C, et al. Cytomegalovirus viral load in bronchoalveolar lavage to diagnose lung transplant associated CMV pneumonia. Transplantation. 2018;102(2):326–32.
Chemaly RF, Yen-Lieberman B, Chapman J, Reilly A, Bekele BN, Gordon SM, et al. Clinical utility of cytomegalovirus viral load in bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(3):544–8.
Govender K, Jeena P, Parboosing R. Clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cytomegalovirus viral loads in the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus pneumonitis in infants. J Med Virol. 2017;89(6):1080–7.
Beam E, Germer JJ, Lahr B, Yao JDC, Limper AH, Binnicker MJ, et al. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA quantification in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of immunocompromised patients with CMV pneumonia. Clin Transplant. 2018;32(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13149.
Cunha BA, Eisenstein LE, Dillard T, Krol V. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) pneumonia in a heart transplant: diagnosis and therapy. Heart Lung. 2007;36(1):72–8.
Frangoul H, Wills M, Crossno C, Engel M, Domm J. Acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus pneumonia post-unrelated stem cell transplantation: a word of caution. Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11(8):942–4.
Gasparetto EL, Escuissato DL, Inoue C, Marchiori E, Müller NL. Herpes simplex virus type 2 pneumonia after bone marrow transplantation: high-resolution CT findings in 3 patients. J Thorac Imaging. 2005;20(2):71–3.
Linssen CF, Jacobs JA, Stelma FF, van Mook WN, Terporten P, Vink C, et al. Herpes simplex virus load in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is related to poor outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2202–9.
Saugel B, Jakobus J, Huber W, Hoffmann D, Holzapfel K, Protzer U, et al. Herpes simplex virus in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of medical intensive care unit patients: association with lung injury and outcome. J Crit Care. 2016;32:138–44.
Assink-de Jong E, Groeneveld AB, Pettersson AM, Koek A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Beishuizen A, et al. Clinical correlates of herpes simplex virus type 1 loads in the lower respiratory tract of critically ill patients. J Clin Virol. 2013;58(1):79–83.
Kotzbauer D, Frank G, Dong W, Shore S. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of disseminated herpes simplex virus infection in neonates. Hosp Pediatr. 2014;4(3):167–71.
Capretti MG, Marsico C, Lazzarotto T, Gabrielli L, Bagni A, De Angelis M, et al. Herpes Simplex Virus 1 infection: misleading findings in an infant with disseminated disease. New Microbiol. 2013;36(3):307–13.
Inokuchi R, Nakamura K, Sato H, Shinohara K, Aoki Y, Doi K, et al. Bronchial ulceration as a prognostic indicator for varicella pneumonia: case report and systematic literature review. J Clin Virol. 2013;56(4):360–4.
Chiner E, Ballester I, Betlloch I, Blanquer J, Aguar MC, Blanquer R, et al. Varicella-zoster virus pneumonia in an adult population: has mortality decreased? Scand J Infect Dis. 2010;42(3):215–21.
Richaud C, Ngo MT, Agbessi CA, Boru B, Elkharrat D, Chinet T. Bronchial involvement in an immunocompetent adult with varicella pneumonia. Rev Mal Respir. 2008;25(1):59–62.
Libert N, Bigaillon C, Chargari C, Bensalah M, Muller V, Merat S, et al. Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in critically ill immunocompetent patients. Biomed J. 2015;38(1):70–6.
Banks CA, Meier JD, Stallworth CR, White DR. Recurrent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder involving the larynx and trachea: case report and review of the literature. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121(5):291–5.
O’Neill AF, Adil EA, Irace AL, Neff L, Davis IJ, Perez-Atayde AR, et al. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder of the pediatric airway: Presentation and management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;86:218–23.
Feuillet S, Meignin V, Briere J, Brice P, Rocha V, Socie G, et al. Endobronchial Epstein-Barr Virus associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Med Case Rep. 2009;2:11–5.
Fortes HR, von Ranke FM, Escuissato DL, Araujo Neto CA, Zanetti G, Hochhegger B, et al. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a state-of-the-art review. Respir Med. 2017;126:116–21.
Pritt BS, Aubry MC. Histopathology of viral infections of the lung. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2017;34(6):510–7.
Smyth RL, Higenbottam TW, Scott JP, Wreghitt TG, Stewart S, Clelland CA, et al. Herpes simplex virus infection in heart-lung transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1990;49(4):735–9.
Costa C, Libertucci D, Solidoro P, Sinesi F, Bergallo M, Margio S, et al. Rapid shell vial culture for the detection of respiratory viruses from bronchoalveolar lavage in immunocompromised patients. Panminerva Med. 2007;49(1):1–6.
Marcos MA, Esperatti M, Torres A. Viral pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009;22(2):143–7.
Prendergast C, Papenburg J. Rapid antigen-based testing for respiratory syncytial virus: moving diagnostics from bench to bedside? Future Microbiol. 2013;8(4):435–44.
Chartrand C, Tremblay N, Renaud C, Papenburg J. Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen detection tests for respiratory syncytial virus infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(12):3738–49.
Chartrand C, Leeflang MM, Minion J, Brewer T, Pai M. Accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):500–11.
Bennett JE. Introduction to Mycoses. In: Bennett J, Dolin R, Blaser M, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016.
De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21.
Anantasit N, Nuntacharruksa N, Incharoen P, Preutthipan A. Clinical and pathological correlation in pediatric invasive pulmonary Aspergillosis. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:31.
Maturu VN, Agarwal R. Prevalence of Aspergillus sensitization and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in cystic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(12):1765–78.
Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13(8):936–44.
Agarwal R, Chakrabarti A, Shah A, Gupta D, Meis JF, Guleria R, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(8):850–73.
Neofytos D, Fishman JA, Horn D, Anaissie E, Chang CH, Olyaei A, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2010;12(3):220–9.
Neofytos D, Horn D, Anaissie E, Steinbach W, Olyaei A, Fishman J, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of invasive fungal infection in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: analysis of Multicenter Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) Alliance registry. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(3):265–73.
Krenke R, Grabczak EM. Tracheobronchial manifestations of Aspergillus infections. Scientific World Journal. 2011;11:2310–29.
Moura S, Cerqueira L, Almeida A. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: current diagnostic methodologies and a new molecular approach. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(8):1393–403.
Walzer P, Smulian A, Miller R. Pneumocystis species. In: Bennett J, Dolin R, Blaser M, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2016.
Inagaki K, Blackshear C, Hobbs CV. Pneumocystis infection in children: national trends and characteristics in the United States, 1997-2012. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(3):241–7.
Vera C, Aguilar YA, Velez LA, Rueda ZV. High transient colonization by Pneumocystis jirovecii between mothers and newborn. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(12):1619–27.
Oladele RO, Otu AA, Richardson MD, Denning DW. Diagnosis and management of Pneumocystis pneumonia in resource-poor settings. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):107–58.
Toma P, Bertaina A, Castagnola E, Colafati GS, D’Andrea ML, Finocchi A, et al. Fungal infections of the lung in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(13):1856–65.
Fillaux J, Malvy S, Alvarez M, Fabre R, Cassaing S, Marchou B, et al. Accuracy of a routine real-time PCR assay for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. J Microbiol Methods. 2008;75(2):258–61.
Lease ED, Alexander BD. Fungal diagnostics in pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(6):663–72.
Summah H, Zhu YG, Falagas ME, Vouloumanou EK, Qu JM. Use of real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in immunocompromised patients: a meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(10):1965–73.
Fan LC, Lu HW, Cheng KB, Li HP, Xu JF. Evaluation of PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a bivariate meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73099.
Karageorgopoulos DE, Qu JM, Korbila IP, Zhu YG, Vasileiou VA, Falagas ME. Accuracy of beta-D-glucan for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: a meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(1):39–49.
Katragkou A, Fisher BT, Groll AH, Roilides E, Walsh TJ. Diagnostic imaging and invasive fungal diseases in children. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017;6(suppl_1):S22–31.
Durairaj L, Mohamad Z, Launspach JL, Ashare A, Choi JY, Rajagopal S, et al. Patterns and density of early tracheal colonization in intensive care unit patients. J Crit Care. 2009;24(1):114–21.
Meersseman W, Lagrou K, Spriet I, Maertens J, Verbeken E, Peetermans WE, et al. Significance of the isolation of Candida species from airway samples in critically ill patients: a prospective, autopsy study. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(9):1526–31.
Terraneo S, Ferrer M, Martin-Loeches I, Esperatti M, Di Pasquale M, Giunta V, et al. Impact of Candida spp. isolation in the respiratory tract in patients with intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(1):94.e1–8.
AbdulWahab A, Salah H, Chandra P, Taj-Aldeen SJ. Persistence of Candida dubliniensis and lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):326.
Shirley RM, Baddley JW. Cryptococcal lung disease. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009;15(3):254–60.
Fyfe M, MacDougall L, Romney M, Starr M, Pearce M, Mak S, et al. Cryptococcus gattii infections on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada: emergence of a tropical fungus in a temperate environment. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2008;34(6):1–12.
Shaheen AA, Somayaji R, Myers R, Mody CH. Epidemiology and trends of cryptococcosis in the United States from 2000 to 2007: A population-based study. Int J STD AIDS. 2018;29(5):453–60.
Liu L, Guo L, Liu Y, Chen T, Li S, Yang Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of pediatric cryptococcosis in Beijing Children’s Hospital, 2002-2014. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(9):1235–44.
Lamoth F, Alexander BD. Nonmolecular methods for the diagnosis of respiratory fungal infections. Clin Lab Med. 2014;34(2):315–36.
Lass-Florl C. Current challenges in the diagnosis of fungal infections. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2017;1508:3–15.
Pappas PG, Perfect JR, Cloud GA, Larsen RA, Pankey GA, Lancaster DJ, et al. Cryptococcosis in human immunodeficiency virus-negative patients in the era of effective azole therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(5):690–9.
Xie X, Xu B, Yu C, Chen M, Yao D, Xu X, et al. Clinical analysis of pulmonary cryptococcosis in non-HIV patients in south China. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(3):3114–9.
Kralovic SM, Rhodes JC. Utility of routine testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for cryptococcal antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36(10):3088–9.
Baughman RP, Rhodes JC, Dohn MN, Henderson H, Frame PT. Detection of cryptococcal antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: a prospective study of diagnostic utility. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(5):1226–9.
Senghor Y, Guitard J, Angoulvant A, Hennequin C. Cryptococcal antigen detection in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid. Med Mycol. 2018;56(6):774–7.
Kontoyiannis DP, Lewis RE. Agents of mucormycosis and entomophthoramycosis. In: Bennett J, Dolin R, Blaser M, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015.
Walsh TJ, Gamaletsou MN, McGinnis MR, Hayden RT, Kontoyiannis DP. Early clinical and laboratory diagnosis of invasive pulmonary, extrapulmonary, and disseminated mucormycosis (zygomycosis). Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S55–60.
McBride JA, Gauthier GM, Klein BS. Clinical manifestations and treatment of blastomycosis. Clin Chest Med. 2017;38(3):435–49.
Goughenour KD, Rappleye CA. Antifungal therapeutics for dimorphic fungal pathogens. Virulence. 2017;8(2):211–21.
Baddley JW, Winthrop KL, Patkar NM, Delzell E, Beukelman T, Xie F, et al. Geographic distribution of endemic fungal infections among older persons, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(9):1664–9.
Martinez R. New trends in paracoccidioidomycosis epidemiology. J Fungi (Basel). 2017;3(1):1.
Hage CA, Knox KS, Wheat LJ. Endemic mycoses: overlooked causes of community acquired pneumonia. Respir Med. 2012;106(6):769–76.
McKinsey DS, McKinsey JP. Pulmonary histoplasmosis. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;32(6):735–44.
Denning DW, Chakrabarti A. Pulmonary and sinus fungal diseases in non-immunocompromised patients. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(11):e357–e66.
Wheat LJ. Approach to the diagnosis of the endemic mycoses. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30(2):379–89. viii.
Hage CA, Azar MM, Bahr N, Loyd J, Wheat LJ. Histoplasmosis: up-to-date evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(5):729–45.
Hage CA, Wheat LJ. Diagnosis of pulmonary histoplasmosis using antigen detection in the bronchoalveolar lavage. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2010;4(4):427–9.
Hage CA, Ribes JA, Wengenack NL, Baddour LM, Assi M, McKinsey DS, et al. A multicenter evaluation of tests for diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(5):448–54.
Tarrand JJ, Lichterfeld M, Warraich I, Luna M, Han XY, May GS, et al. Diagnosis of invasive septate mold infections. A correlation of microbiological culture and histologic or cytologic examination. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(6):854–8.
Lehrnbecher T, Robinson PD, Fisher BT, Castagnola E, Groll AH, Steinbach WJ, et al. Galactomannan, beta-D-glucan, and polymerase chain reaction-based assays for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease in pediatric cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(10):1340–8.
Loeffler J, Hafner J, Mengoli C, Wirth C, Heussel CP, Loffler C, et al. Prospective biomarker screening for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in high-risk pediatric patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(1):101–9.
Avni T, Levy I, Sprecher H, Yahav D, Leibovici L, Paul M. Diagnostic accuracy of PCR alone compared to galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a systematic review. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(11):3652–8.
Trubiano JA, Dennison AM, Morrissey CO, Chua KY, Halliday CL, Chen SC, et al. Clinical utility of panfungal polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease: a single center experience. Med Mycol. 2016;54(2):138–46.
Hage CA, Davis TE, Fuller D, Egan L, Witt JR 3rd, Wheat LJ, et al. Diagnosis of histoplasmosis by antigen detection in BAL fluid. Chest. 2010;137(3):623–8.
Huang YT, Hung CC, Liao CH, Sun HY, Chang SC, Chen YC. Detection of circulating galactomannan in serum samples for diagnosis of Penicillium marneffei infection and cryptococcosis among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(9):2858–62.
Park SY, Lee SO, Choi SH, Sung H, Kim MN, Choi CM, et al. Aspergillus galactomannan antigen assay in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Infect. 2010;61(6):492–8.
de Mol M, de Jongste JC, van Westreenen M, Merkus PJ, de Vries AH, Hop WC, et al. Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in children with bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48(8):789–96.
Desai R, Ross LA, Hoffman JA. The role of bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan in the diagnosis of pediatric invasive aspergillosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(4):283–6.
Zhang S, Wang S, Wan Z, Li R, Yu J. The diagnosis of invasive and noninvasive pulmonary aspergillosis by serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan assay. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:943691.
Zhou W, Li H, Zhang Y, Huang M, He Q, Li P, et al. Diagnostic value of galactomannan antigen test in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients with nonneutropenic invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(7):2153–61.
Nguyen MH, Leather H, Clancy CJ, Cline C, Jantz MA, Kulkarni V, et al. Galactomannan testing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid facilitates the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with hematologic malignancies and stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17(7):1043–50.
Zhang XB, Chen GP, Lin QC, Lin X, Zhang HY, Wang JH. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid galactomannan detection for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Mycol. 2013;51(7):688–95.
Pasqualotto AC, Xavier MO, Sanchez LB, de Oliveira Costa CD, Schio SM, Camargo SM, et al. Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients by detection of galactomannan in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Transplantation. 2010;90(3):306–11.
Mohammadi S, Khalilzadeh S, Goudarzipour K, Hassanzad M, Mahdaviani A, Aarabi N, et al. Bronchoalveolar galactomannan in invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a prospective study in pediatric patients. Med Mycol. 2015;53(7):709–16.
He S, Hang JP, Zhang L, Wang F, Zhang DC, Gong FH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of serum 1,3-beta-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection: focus on cutoff levels. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015;48(4):351–61.
Egger M, Pruller F, Raggam R, Divjak MK, Kurath-Koller S, Lackner H, et al. False positive serum levels of (1-3)-ss-D-Glucan after infusion of intravenous immunoglobulins and time to normalisation. J Infect. 2018;76(2):206–10.
Liss B, Cornely OA, Hoffmann D, Dimitriou V, Wisplinghoff H. 1,3-ss-D-glucan concentrations in blood products predict false positive post-transfusion results. Mycoses. 2016;59(1):39–42.
Goudjil S, Chazal C, Moreau F, Leke A, Kongolo G, Chouaki T. Blood product transfusions are associated with an increase in serum (1-3)-beta-d-glucan in infants during the initial hospitalization in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(8):933–7.
Calitri C, Caviglia I, Cangemi G, Furfaro E, Bandettini R, Fioredda F, et al. Performance of 1,3-beta-D-glucan for diagnosing invasive fungal diseases in children. Mycoses. 2017;60(12):789–95.
Shabaan AE, Elbaz LM, El-Emshaty WM, Shouman B. Role of serum 1,3beta-d-glucan assay in early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2018;94(5):559–65.
Shi XY, Liu Y, Gu XM, Hao SY, Wang YH, Yan D, et al. Diagnostic value of (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for invasive fungal disease: a meta-analysis. Respir Med. 2016;117:48–53.
Salerno D, Mushatt D, Myers L, Zhuang Y, de la Rua N, Calderon EJ, et al. Serum and bal beta-D-glucan for the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia in HIV positive patients. Respir Med. 2014;108(11):1688–95.
Maguire JH. Introduction to helminth infections. In: Bennett J, Dolin R, Blaser M, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015.
Korpe PS, Ravdin JI, Petri WA. Introduction to protozoal diseases. In: Bennett J, Dolin R, Blaser M, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2015.
Taylor WRJ, Hanson J, Turner GDH, White NJ, Dondorp AM. Respiratory manifestations of malaria. Chest. 2012;142(2):492–505.
de Souza GK, Costa AN, Apanavicius A, Teixeira FB, Fernandes CJ, Helito AS, et al. Tomographic findings of acute pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:185.
Rey MF, Mary C, Sanguinetti D, Ranque S, Bartoli C, L’Ollivier C. Successful treatment of pulmonary and cerebral toxoplasmosis associated with pneumocystis pneumonia in an HIV patient. Diseases (Basel). 2017;5(4):35.
Sumi M, Norose K, Hikosaka K, Kaiume H, Takeda W, Kirihara T, et al. Clinical characteristics and computed tomography findings of pulmonary toxoplasmosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2016;104(6):729–40.
Roth A, Roth B, Hoffken G, Steuber S, Khalifa KI, Janitschke K. Application of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992;11(12):1177–81.
Diehl AR, Dos Santos RP, Zimmerman R, Luz PL, Weiss T, Jacobson P, et al. Microscopy and polymerase chain reaction detection of Leishmania chagasi in the pleural and ascitic fluid of a patient with AIDS: case report and review of diagnosis and therapy of visceral leishmaniasis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2004;15(4):231–4.
Zakaria A, Al-Share B, Al Asad K. Primary pulmonary amebiasis complicated with multicystic empyema. Case Rep Pulmonol. 2016;2016:8709347.
Shamsuzzaman SM, Hashiguchi Y. Thoracic amebiasis. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23(2):479–92.
Cunha BA, Nausheen S, Szalda D. Pulmonary complications of babesiosis: case report and literature review. Euro J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;26(7):505–8.
Cheepsattayakorn A, Cheepsattayakorn R. Parasitic pneumonia and lung involvement. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:874021.
Vasilakopoulou A, Dimarongona K, Samakovli A, Papadimitris K, Avlami A. Balantidium coli pneumonia in an immunocompromised patient. Scand J Infect Dis. 2003;35(2):144–6.
Anargyrou K, Petrikkos GL, Suller MT, Skiada A, Siakantaris MP, Osuntoyinbo RT, et al. Pulmonary Balantidium coli infection in a leukemic patient. Am J Hematol. 2003;73(3):180–3.
Reina FT, Ribeiro CA, Araujo RS, Matte MH, Castanho RE, Tanaka II, et al. Intestinal and pulmonary infection by Cryptosporidium parvum in two patients with HIV/AIDS. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:21.
Poirot JL, Deluol AM, Antoine M, Heyer F, Cadranel J, Meynard JL, et al. Broncho-pulmonary cryptosporidiosis in four HIV-infected patients. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996;43(5):78s–9s.
Lanzafame M, Bonora S, Di Perri G, Allegranzi B, Guasparri I, Cazzadori A, et al. Microsporidium species in pulmonary cavitary lesions of AIDS patients infected with Rhodococcus equi. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(4):926–7.
Yao G, Zhou B, Zeng L. Imaging characteristics of bronchopulmonary Lophomonas blattarum infection: case report and literature review. J Thorac Imaging. 2009;24(1):49–51.
Saldana NG, Mendoza FJO, Larrauri FR, Trujillo DMG, Montoya EV, De La Garza EA, et al. Bronchopulmonary infection by Lophomonas blattarum in a pediatric patient after hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation: first report in Mexico. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(10):E899–e902.
Zhang X, Xu L, Wang LL, Liu S, Li J, Wang X. Bronchopulmonary infection with Lophomonas blattarum: a case report and literature review. J Int Med Res. 2011;39(3):944–9.
Barratt JL, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D. Importance of nonenteric protozoan infections in immunocompromised people. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(4):795–836.
Schwartz C, Hams E, Fallon PG. Helminth modulation of lung inflammation. Trends Parasitol. 2018;34(5):388–403.
Craig JM, Scott AL. Helminths in the lungs. Parasite Immunol. 2014;36(9):463–74.
Loukas A, Hotez PJ, Diemert D, Yazdanbakhsh M, McCarthy JS, Correa-Oliveira R, et al. Hookworm infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16088.
Allen J, Wert M. Eosinophilic Pneumonias. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(5):1455–61.
Pavlin BI, Kozarsky P, Cetron MS. Acute pulmonary schistosomiasis in travelers: case report and review of the literature. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2012;10(5–6):209–19.
Schwartz E. Pulmonary schistosomiasis. Clin Chest Med. 2002;23(2):433–43.
Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Dirofilariosis in the Americas: a more virulent Dirofilaria immitis? Parasit Vectors. 2013;6(1):288.
Li CY, Chang YL, Lee YC. Human pulmonary dirofilariasis coexisting with intercostal neurilemmoma: a case report and literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2013;112(10):644–7.
Park KH, Kim YS, Kim SK, Choi NC, Kwon OY, Lim B, et al. Toxocara canis-associated myelitis with eosinophilic pneumonia. Exp Neurobiol. 2016;25(3):139–42.
Mazur-Melewska K, Jonczyk-Potoczna K, Kemnitz P, Mania A, Figlerowicz M, Sluzewski W. Pulmonary presentation of Toxocara sp. infection in children. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015;83(4):250–5.
Blair D. Paragonimiasis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;766:115–52.
Lamberton PH, Jourdan PM. Human ascariasis: diagnostics update. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2015;2(4):189–200.
Gupta N, Ray A, Ghosh S, Malla S, Vyas S. First things first: Importance of eosinophil count in diagnosing occult parasites. Drug Discov Ther. 2018;12(1):55–7.
Kilic D, Tercan F, Sahin E, Bilen A, Hatipoglu A. Unusual radiologic manifestations of the echinococcus infection in the thorax. J Thorac Imaging. 2006;21(1):32–6.
Vaideeswar P, Agnihotri MA, Hira P. Unusual manifestations of pleuro-pulmonary hydatidosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2012;55(1):111–2.
Sarkar M, Pathania R, Jhobta A, Thakur BR, Chopra R. Cystic pulmonary hydatidosis. Lung India. 2016;33(2):179–91.
Ali SR, Mehta AC. Alive in the airways: live endobronchial foreign bodies. Chest. 2017;151(2):481–91.
Gan RW, Gohil R, Belfield K, Davies P, Daniel M. Acute airway obstruction by Ascaris lumbricoides in a 14-month-old boy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(10):1795–8.
Bailey JK, Warner P. Respiratory arrest from Ascaris lumbricoides. Pediatrics. 2010;126(3):e712–5.
Nabeya D, Haranaga S, Parrott GL, Kinjo T, Nahar S, Tanaka T, et al. Pulmonary strongyloidiasis: assessment between manifestation and radiological findings in 16 severe strongyloidiasis cases. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):320.
Alsharif A, Sodhi A, Murillo LC, Headley AS, Kadaria D. Wait!!! no steroids for this asthma. Am J Case Rep. 2015;16:398–400.
Rajapurkar M, Hegde U, Rokhade M, Gang S, Gohel K. Respiratory hyperinfection with Strongyloides stercoralis in a patient with renal failure. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2007;3(10):573–7.
Pozio E, Gomez Morales MA, Dupouy-Camet J. Clinical aspects, diagnosis and treatment of trichinellosis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2003;1(3):471–82.
Genetu Bayih A, Debnath A, Mitre E, Huston CD, Laleu B, Leroy D, et al. Susceptibility testing of medically important parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30(3):647–69.
Buonfrate D, Requena-Mendez A, Angheben A, Cinquini M, Cruciani M, Fittipaldo A, et al. Accuracy of molecular biology techniques for the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection-a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(2):e0006229.
Schijman AG. Molecular diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi. Acta Trop. 2018;184:59–66.
Amir A, Cheong FW, De Silva JR, Lau YL. Diagnostic tools in childhood malaria. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):53.
Singh R, Singh DP, Gupta R, Savargaonkar D, Singh OP, Nanda N, et al. Comparison of three PCR-based assays for the non-invasive diagnosis of malaria: detection of Plasmodium parasites in blood and saliva. Euro J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(9):1631–9.
Murat JB, Hidalgo HF, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Pelloux H. Human toxoplasmosis: which biological diagnostic tests are best suited to which clinical situations? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013;11(9):943–56.
Adeyemo FE, Singh G, Reddy P, Stenstrom TA. Methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium and Giardia: from microscopy to nucleic acid based tools in clinical and environmental regimes. Acta Trop. 2018;184:15–28.
Garcia LS, Arrowood M, Kokoskin E, Paltridge GP, Pillai DR, Procop GW, et al. Laboratory diagnosis of parasites from the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(1):e00025–17.
Boland JM, Pritt BS. Histopathology of parasitic infections of the lung. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2017;34(6):550–9.
Zhu H, Min X, Li S, Feng M, Zhang G, Yi X. Amebic lung abscess with coexisting lung adenocarcinoma: a unusual case of amebiasis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(11):8251–4.
Hizem A, M’rad S, Oudni-M’rad M, Mestiri S, Hammedi F, Mezhoud H, et al. Molecular genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded preparations from human isolates in unusual tissue sites. J Helminthol. 2016;90(4):417–21.
Rivasi F, Boldorini R, Criante P, Leutner M, Pampiglione S. Detection of Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens DNA by polymerase chain reaction in embedded paraffin tissues from two human pulmonary locations. APMIS. 2006;114(7–8):567–74.
Gobbi F, Formenti F, Perandin F, Buonfrate D, Angheben A, Paiano S, et al. Real-time polymerase chain reaction assay on bronchoalveolar lavage: an alternative method for diagnosing chronic pulmonary schistosomiasis? Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(6):1808–9.
Izadi M, Jonaidi Jafari N, Mahmoodzadeh Poornaki A, Sadraei J, Rezavand B, Mirzaei HR, et al. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii from clinical specimens of patients receiving renal transplant using ELISA and PCR. Nephrourol Mon. 2013;5(5):983–7.
Özkoç S, Bayram Delibaş S, Akısü Ç. Evaluation of pulmonary microsporidiosis in iatrogenically immunosuppressed patients. Tuberk Toraks. 2016;64(1):9–16.
Desoubeaux G, Cabanne E, Franck-Martel C, Gombert M, Gyan E, Lissandre S, et al. Pulmonary toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients with interstitial pneumonia: a single-centre prospective study assessing PCR-based diagnosis. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69(8):726–30.
Montresor A, Crompton DWT, Hall A, Bundy DAP, Savioli L. Guidelines for the evaluation of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and schistosomiasis at community level: a guide for managers of control programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
Itoh N, Tsukahara M, Yamasaki H, Morishima Y, Sugiyama H, Kurai H. Paragonimus westermani infection mimicking recurrent lung cancer: a case report. J Infect Chemother. 2016;22(12):815–8.
Guerrero-Wooley R, Aranda-Aguirre E, Li W, Wilkin A, Palavecino E. Case report: Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(5):1629–31.
Wang LF, Xu L, Luo SQ, Xie H, Chen W, Wu ZD, et al. Diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis by morphological characteristics combine with molecular biological methods. Parasitol Res. 2017;116(4):1159–63.
Kinjo T, Tsuhako K, Nakazato I, Ito E, Sato Y, Koyanagi Y, et al. Extensive intra-alveolar haemorrhage caused by disseminated strongyloidiasis. Int J Parasitol. 1998;28(2):323–30.
Tanyuksel M, Petri WA Jr. Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(4):713–29.
Chaudhry IU, Manah W, Alghamdi M, Mutairi H. A rare cause of asymptomatic solitary pulmonary nodule: adult Schistosoma worm. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2013202840.
Yasar Z, Acat M, Turgut E, Onaran H, Dincer HE, Arda N, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary hydatid cyst by bronchoscopy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2015;22(4):343–6.
Komurcuoglu B, Ozkaya S, Cirak AK, Yalniz E, Polat G. Pulmonary hydatid cyst: the characteristics of patients and diagnostic efficacy of bronchoscopy. Exp Lung Res. 2012;38(6):277–80.
Prasad R, Goel MK, Mukerji PK, Agarwal PK. Microfilaria in bronchial aspirate. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1994;36(4):223–5.
Anupindi L, Sahoo R, Rao RV, Verghese G, Rao PV. Microfilariae in bronchial brushing cytology of symptomatic pulmonary lesions. A report of two cases. Acta Cytol. 1993;37(3):397–9.
Cui L, Morris A, Huang L, Beck JM, Twigg HL 3rd, von Mutius E, et al. The microbiome and the lung. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(Suppl 4):S227–32.
Pendleton KM, Erb-Downward JR, Bao Y, Branton WR, Falkowski NR, Newton DW, et al. Rapid pathogen identification in bacterial pneumonia using real-time metagenomics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(12):1610–2.
Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Prescott HC, Martinez FJ, Curtis JL, Lama VN, et al. Analysis of culture-dependent versus culture-independent techniques for identification of bacteria in clinically obtained bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(10):3605–13.
Marsh RL, Kaestli M, Chang AB, Binks MJ, Pope CE, Hoffman LR, et al. The microbiota in bronchoalveolar lavage from young children with chronic lung disease includes taxa present in both the oropharynx and nasopharynx. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):37.
Marsh RL, Smith-Vaughan HC, Chen ACH, Marchant JM, Yerkovich ST, Gibson PG, et al. Multiple respiratory microbiota profiles are associated with lower airway inflammation in children with protracted bacterial bronchitis. Chest. 2019;155(4):778–86.
Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Ahrens RC, Chmiel JF, Clancy JP, et al. Airway microbiota across age and disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(5):1700832.
Harris JK, De Groote MA, Sagel SD, Zemanick ET, Kapsner R, Penvari C, et al. Molecular identification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(51):20529–33.
Prevaes SM, de Winter-de Groot KM, Janssens HM, de Steenhuijsen Piters WA, Tramper-Stranders GA, Wyllie AL, et al. Development of the nasopharyngeal microbiota in infants with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(5):504–15.
Renwick J, McNally P, John B, DeSantis T, Linnane B, Murphy P, et al. The microbial community of the cystic fibrosis airway is disrupted in early life. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e109798.
Blainey PC, Milla CE, Cornfield DN, Quake SR. Quantitative analysis of the human airway microbial ecology reveals a pervasive signature for cystic fibrosis. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(153):153ra30.
Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Stevens MJ, Szefler SJ, Accurso FJ, et al. Assessment of airway microbiota and inflammation in cystic fibrosis using multiple sampling methods. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(2):221–9.
Boutin S, Graeber SY, Weitnauer M, Panitz J, Stahl M, Clausznitzer D, et al. Comparison of microbiomes from different niches of upper and lower airways in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116029.
Rogers GB, Carroll MP, Serisier DJ, Hockey PM, Jones G, Kehagia V, et al. Use of 16S rRNA gene profiling by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis to compare bacterial communities in sputum and mouthwash samples from patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(7):2601–4.
Brown PS, Pope CE, Marsh RL, Qin X, McNamara S, Gibson R, et al. Directly sampling the lung of a young child with cystic fibrosis reveals diverse microbiota. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11(7):1049–55.
Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Freeman CM, McCloskey L, Falkowski NR, Huffnagle GB, et al. Bacterial topography of the healthy human lower respiratory tract. MBio. 2017;8(1):e02287–16.
Bassis CM, Erb-Downward JR, Dickson RP, Freeman CM, Schmidt TM, Young VB, et al. Analysis of the upper respiratory tract microbiotas as the source of the lung and gastric microbiotas in healthy individuals. MBio. 2015;6(2):e00037.
Charlson ES, Bittinger K, Haas AR, Fitzgerald AS, Frank I, Yadav A, et al. Topographical continuity of bacterial populations in the healthy human respiratory tract. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(8):957–63.
Charlson ES, Bittinger K, Chen J, Diamond JM, Li H, Collman RG, et al. Assessing bacterial populations in the lung by replicate analysis of samples from the upper and lower respiratory tracts. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e42786.
Nguyen LD, Viscogliosi E, Delhaes L. The lung mycobiome: an emerging field of the human respiratory microbiome. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:89.
Bousbia S, Papazian L, Saux P, Forel JM, Auffray JP, Martin C, et al. Repertoire of intensive care unit pneumonia microbiota. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32486.
McTaggart LR, Copeland JK, Surendra A, Wang PW, Husain S, Coburn B, et al. Mycobiome sequencing and analysis applied to fungal community profiling of the lower respiratory tract during fungal pathogenesis. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:512.
Bittinger K, Charlson ES, Loy E, Shirley DJ, Haas AR, Laughlin A, et al. Improved characterization of medically relevant fungi in the human respiratory tract using next-generation sequencing. Genome Biol. 2014;15(10):487.
Charlson ES, Diamond JM, Bittinger K, Fitzgerald AS, Yadav A, Haas AR, et al. Lung-enriched organisms and aberrant bacterial and fungal respiratory microbiota after lung transplant. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(6):536–45.
Cui L, Lucht L, Tipton L, Rogers MB, Fitch A, Kessinger C, et al. Topographic diversity of the respiratory tract mycobiome and alteration in HIV and lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(8):932–42.
Halwachs B, Madhusudhan N, Krause R, Nilsson RH, Moissl-Eichinger C, Hogenauer C, et al. Critical issues in mycobiota analysis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:180.
Krause R, Halwachs B, Thallinger GG, Klymiuk I, Gorkiewicz G, Hoenigl M, et al. Characterisation of candida within the mycobiome/microbiome of the lower respiratory tract of ICU patients. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155033.
Krause R, Moissl-Eichinger C, Halwachs B, Gorkiewicz G, Berg G, Valentin T, et al. Mycobiome in the lower respiratory tract - a clinical perspective. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2169.
Fraczek MG, Chishimba L, Niven RM, Bromley M, Simpson A, Smyth L, et al. Corticosteroid treatment is associated with increased filamentous fungal burden in allergic fungal disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(2):407–14.
Young JC, Chehoud C, Bittinger K, Bailey A, Diamond JM, Cantu E, et al. Viral metagenomics reveal blooms of anelloviruses in the respiratory tract of lung transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(1):200–9.
Lewandowska DW, Schreiber PW, Schuurmans MM, Ruehe B, Zagordi O, Bayard C, et al. Metagenomic sequencing complements routine diagnostics in identifying viral pathogens in lung transplant recipients with unknown etiology of respiratory infection. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177340.
Langelier C, Zinter MS, Kalantar K, Yanik GA, Christenson S, O’Donovan B, et al. Metagenomic sequencing detects respiratory pathogens in hematopoietic cellular transplant patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(4):524–8.
Zinter MS, Dvorak CC, Mayday MY, Iwanaga K, Ly NP, McGarry ME, et al. Pulmonary metagenomic sequencing suggests missed infections in immunocompromised children. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(11):1847–55.
Mitchell AB, Oliver BG, Glanville AR. Translational aspects of the human respiratory virome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(12):1458–64.
Yang J, Yang F, Ren L, Xiong Z, Wu Z, Dong J, et al. Unbiased parallel detection of viral pathogens in clinical samples by use of a metagenomic approach. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(10):3463–9.
Wylie KM, Mihindukulasuriya KA, Sodergren E, Weinstock GM, Storch GA. Sequence analysis of the human virome in febrile and afebrile children. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e27735.
Zoll J, Rahamat-Langendoen J, Ahout I, de Jonge MI, Jans J, Huijnen MA, et al. Direct multiplexed whole genome sequencing of respiratory tract samples reveals full viral genomic information. J Clin Virol. 2015;66:6–11.
Wang Y, Zhu N, Li Y, Lu R, Wang H, Liu G, et al. Metagenomic analysis of viral genetic diversity in respiratory samples from children with severe acute respiratory infection in China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(5):458 e1–9.
Zhou Y, Fernandez S, Yoon IK, Simasathien S, Watanaveeradej V, Yang Y, et al. Metagenomics study of viral pathogens in undiagnosed respiratory specimens and identification of human enteroviruses at a Thailand Hospital. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;95(3):663–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Downes, K.J., Bouso, J.M., Planet, P.J. (2021). Bronchoalveolar Lavage: Microbial Evaluation. In: Goldfarb, S., Piccione, J. (eds) Diagnostic and Interventional Bronchoscopy in Children. Respiratory Medicine. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54924-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54924-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54923-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54924-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)