Skip to main content

Focus Groups in the Context of International Development: In Pursuit of the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Clinical Sociology

Part of the book series: Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice ((CSRP))

  • 277 Accesses

Abstract

The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs—2000–2015) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs—2015–2030) have been guiding our work as clinical sociologists for two decades. These guideposts are intended to reduce poverty and more equitably distribute resources in developing countries. In addition to infrastructure and energy projects, education, and health, the new SDGs stress climate change, clean air and water, and closing gender gaps in economic opportunities. Increasingly, the bilateral, multilateral, and international development agencies, national planning departments, and civil society organizations are turning to the voices of stakeholders to help assess needs and determine impacts in development. Focus groups and key informant interviews have become a regular part of international development monitoring and evaluation (M&E). Qualitative research methods are gaining respect for their powerful analytical powers in exploring systems—how things work and what needs to be done to improve outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Progress on Goal 8 is available in United Nations, 2015. Taking Stock of the Global Partnership for Development: MDG Gap Task Force Report, 2015. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/MDG_Gap_2015_E_web.pdf.

  2. 2.

    United Nations, 2015. MDG Gap Task Force Report 2015: Taking Stock of the Global Partnership for Development. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/taking-stock-of-the-global-partnership-for-development

  3. 3.

    United Nations (2015). Taking Stock of the Global Partnership for Development: MDG Gap Task Force Report, 2015. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/ MDG_Gap _2015_E_web.pdf; and United Nations (2019), Report of the Secretary-General, Special Edition: Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals . https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24978_Report_of_the_SG_on_SDG_Progress_2019.pdf.

  4. 4.

    J. M. Billson, “Sociology and the Sustainable Development Goals: Or, Do We Really Have a Role in Changing the World?” Journal of Applied Social Science (September 2020).

References

  • Abbott, E. A., Gouverniuk, K., Liamets, L., & Ukhanova, T. (2002, August). Using cross-cultural focus groups as a tool for communication campaign design: An example from Russia’s Forest Project. Paper presented to the Research Special Interest Group, Agricultural Communicators in Education (ACE), Savannah, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M. J., Lohs, J., Kuhagen, I., Kaufman, J., & Bhaidani, S. (2006). A promising method for identifying cross-cultural differences in patient perspective: The use of Internet-based focus groups for content validation of new patient reported outcome assessments. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 4, 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. (2000). Evaluating the impact of development projects on poverty: A handbook for practitioners—Directions in development. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, M. (2000). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research in development projects—Directions in development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barata, P. C., Gucciardi, E., Ahmad, F., & Stewart, D. E. (2006). Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent. Social Science Medicine, 62(2), 479–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1991). The progressive verification method (PVM): Toward a feminist methodology for studying women cross-culturally. Women’s Studies International Forum, 14(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1993). Complexities of involuntary resettlement policies in World Bank projects. The World Bank, Environment and Social Policy Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1995b). The research process in World Bank projects: The perspectives of task managers. The World Bank, Asia Technical Division. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1996a). Perceptions of evaluation methods, processes, and products—Washington, Colombia, Indonesia, and Zimbabwe. The World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1996b). Social development in World Bank work: Perspectives of task managers and economists. The World Bank, Task Group on Social Development. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1997). Evaluation of the EDI/FASID Joint Seminar-Study Tour Program (Development Effectiveness Program on the Urban Development and Environmental Management—Malaysia, Japan). The World Bank, Economic Development Institute, and the Foundation for Advanced Studies in International Development. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (1999). Participatory evaluation: Country assistance review—Uganda: focus groups for public and private sector stakeholders. The World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2006). Public sector and private sector perspectives on tourism in Savannakhet Province, Laos. Foundation for Advanced Study on International Development and the Japan International Cooperation Agency. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2007a). Conducting focus group research across cultures: Consistency and comparability. Bath, England (Online): University of Bath, Economic and Social Research Council, Research Group on Well-Being in Developing Countries, WeD Working Paper No. 27. http://www.bath.ac.uk/econ-dev/wellbeing/research/workingpaperpdf/wed27.pdf.

  • Billson, J. M. (2007b). The power of focus groups: A training manual for social and policy research (5th ed.). Barrington, RI: Skywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2007d). The power of focus groups: Focus on health. Barrington, RI: Skywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2007e). The power of focus groups: Focus on education. Barrington, RI: Skywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2012). The world bank institute guidelines for effective focus group research. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute Evaluation Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2013/2020). The power of focus groups: A training manual for social and policy research—Focus on international development (5th ed.). Barrington, RI: Skywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2015). El Poder de los Grupos Focales, un Manual de Entrenamiento para Investigación Social y de Políticas Públicas, e Investigación de Mercados [The Power of Focus Groups: A Manual for Social, Political, and Market Research] (2nd ed.). Barrington, RI: Skywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2019). Conducting systematic and dynamic key informant interviews. Hilton Head, SC: Skywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2020a). Conducting effective focus groups in the field: The GDI mini-manual. Barrington, RI: Skywood Press (English and French versions).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2020b). In focus: How systematic focus group research can inform your evaluation. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group (An Independent Evaluation Group Blue Book).

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2020c). “Qualitative analysis: Mid-term review of the World Bank Group’s Global Gender Strategy,” focus groups and key informant interviews across all Bank practices (sectors) and regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M. (2020d). Refugees in the Canadian Mosaic: Their journey to resettlement and hope. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & Fluehr-Lobban, C. (2005). Female well-being: Towards a global theory of social change. London: ZED Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & London, N. T. (1997a). Evaluation of the Asia Development Forum (Philippines). The World Bank, Economic Development Institute. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & London, N. T. (1997b). Evaluation of the Global Knowledge ‘97 Conference (Canada). The World Bank, Economic Development Institute. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & London, N. T. (1999a). Fulbright executive directors worldwide: Needs assessment, program structure, and final evaluation. Canada–U.S. Educational Foundation. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & London, N. T. (1999b). Perspectives of board members: A needs assessment, situation analysis, and strategic planning report. Canada–U.S. Fulbright Program. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & Mancini, K. (2007). Inuit women: Their powerful spirit in a century of change. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & Murray, B. (2011). Strengthening evaluation to improve development results. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & Steinmeyer, M. (2005). Evaluation of the UNESCAP flagship publication, Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & Steinmeyer, M. (2006). Perceptions of monitoring and evaluation among World Bank Staff, Management, and Board Members. The World Bank, Independent Evaluation Group. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., & Steinmeyer, M. (2007). Evaluation of the UN WFP Emergency School Feeding Program: performance, effectiveness, and lessons learned. United Nations World Food Program. Unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billson, J. M., et al. (2009). Review of the women’s rights and citizenship program research agenda—Latin America and the Caribbean, South/Southeast Asia, Middle East and North Africa. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cernea, M. M. (2004). Culture?… at the World Bank? Letter to a friend. Culture and Public Action. http://www.cultureandpublicaction.org/pdf/cernealet.pdf

  • Department for International Development (DFID). (2002). Increasing Levels of Understanding and Support for Development within the UK. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Network (ESSDN). (2003). Case study 5—Uganda: Participatory approaches in budgeting and public expenditure management. Social Development Notes, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, A., Davidson, N., Quinn, K., et al. (2006). Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: Implementation of an agreed international protocol designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults. Quality of Life Research, 15(7), 1257–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, A. I. (Ed.). (2003). The well-being of the elderly in Asia: A four-country comparative study. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, L., & Lucas, C. A. (2003). The wilder nonprofit field guide to conducting community forums: Engaging citizens, mobilizing communities. St. Paul, MN: A. H. Wilder Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Evaluation Group. (2006). Annual review of operations evaluation. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J. (1995). Conducting comparative focus group research: Cautionary comments from a coordinator. Health Transition Review, 4(1), 99–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Moderating focus groups: A practical guide for group facilitation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2001). Building a performance-based monitoring and evaluation system. Journal of the Australasian Evaluation Society, 1(2), 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kusek, J. Z., Rist, R. C., & White, E. M. (2004). How will we know the Millennium Development Goal results when we see them? Building a results-based monitoring and evaluation system to give us the answers. Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 66. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevre, P., Suremain, C., Rubin de Celis, E., & Sejas, E. (2004). Combining causal model and focus group discussions: Experiences learned from a socio-anthropological research on the differing perceptions of caretakers and health professionals on children’s health (Bolivia/Peru). The Qualitative Report, 9(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard-Tucker, G. (2000). Conducting focus groups in developing countries: Skill training for local bilingual facilitators. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., Gollin, A. E., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosavel, M., Simon, C., van Stade, D., & Buchbinder, M. (2005). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) in South Africa: Engaging multiple constituents to shape the research question. Social Science Medicine, 61(12), 2577–2587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D., Chambers, R., Shah, M. K., & Petesch, P. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sagasti, F. (2004). Agenda: PERÚ, personal communication. http://www.agendaperu.org.pe.

  • United Nations (UN). (2000). Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2002). The United Nations and the MDGs: A core strategy. http://www.undp.org/mdg/core_strategy.pdf

  • Ward, L. F. (1906). Applied sociology: A treatise on the conscious improvement of society by society. Boston: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Group. (2000/01). Participation in poverty diagnostics—methods. In consultations with the poor: Methodology guide for the 20–country study for the World Development Report 2000/01. http://www.worldbank.org/participation/web/webfiles/fgd.webfiles/fgd

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet Mancini Billson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Billson, J.M. (2021). Focus Groups in the Context of International Development: In Pursuit of the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals. In: Fritz, J.M. (eds) International Clinical Sociology. Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54584-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54584-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54583-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54584-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics