Skip to main content

Robots and Bionic Systems as Experimental Platforms for the Study of Animal and Human Behaviour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Italian Philosophy of Technology

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 35))

Abstract

Since the early decades of the XX century, robots have been often used as experimental platforms for the study of animal and human behaviour. This article offers an overview of these epistemic uses with a special focus on contemporary biorobotics and bionics. Some experimental procedures for the study of the behaviour of animals and humans, involving fully artificial and hybrid bionic systems, are reconstructed on the basis of examples drawn from the scientific literature. Some conditions under which they can produce genuine knowledge about living systems are identified and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more thorough discussions of specific points raised here, see Craver (2010), Datteri (2009, 2017a), and Datteri and Schiaffonati (2019). For a specific discussion on the role of bionic systems in studying plasticity, see (Chirimuuta 2013) and (Datteri 2017b).

References

  • Achinstein, P. (1965). Theoretical models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, XVI(62), 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braitenberg, V. (1986). Vehicles. Experiments in synthetic psychology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (1999). Cambrian intelligence: The early history of the new AI. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, J. K., Moxon, K. A., Nicolelis, M. A., & Markowitz, R. S. (1999). Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nature Neuroscience, II(7), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirimuuta, M. (2013). Extending, changing, and explaining the brain. Biology and Philosophy, XXVIII(4), 613–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordeschi, R. (2002). The discovery of the artificial. Behavior, mind and machines before and beyond cybernetics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. F. (2010). Prosthetic models. Philosophy of Science, LXXVII(5), 840–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datteri, E. (2009). Simulation experiments in bionics: A regulative methodological perspective. Biology and Philosophy, XXIV(3), 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datteri, E. (2017a). Biorobotics. In L. Magnani & T. W. Bertolotti (Eds.), Springer handbook of model-based science (pp. 817–837). Heildelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Datteri, E. (2017b). The epistemic value of brain–machine Systems for the Study of the brain. Minds and Machines, XXIVV(2), 287–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datteri, E., & Schiaffonati, V. (2019). Robotic simulations, simulations of robots. Minds and Machines, XXIX(1), 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datteri, E., & Tamburrini, G. (2007). Biorobotic experiments for the discovery of biological mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, LXXIV(3), 409–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan, S., & Illari, P. (Eds.). (2018). The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey Walter, W. (1950). An imitation of life. Scientific American, CLXXXII(5), 42–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, F. W., Consi, T. R., Mountain, D. C., & Atema, J. (2000). Biomimetic robot lobster performs chemo-orientation in turbulence using a pair of spatially separated sensors: Progress and challenges. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, XXX(1–2), 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanzaki, R., Minegishi, R., Namiki, S., & Ando, N. (2013). Insect-machine hybrid system for understanding and evaluating sensory-motor control by sex pheromone in Bombyx mori. Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, CXCIX(11), 1037–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karniel, A., Kositsky, M., Fleming, K. M., Chiappalone, M., Sanguineti, V., Alford, S. T., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. (2005). Computational analysis in vitro: Dynamics and plasticity of a neuro-robotic system. Journal of Neural Engineering, II(3), S250–S265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Masson, G., Renaud-Le Masson, S., Debay, D., & Bal, T. (2002). Feedback inhibition controls spike transfer in hybrid thalamic circuits. Nature, CDXVII(6891), 854–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. (2012). Darwin’s devices. What evolving robots can teach us about the history of life and the future of technology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. H., Schumacher, J., Livingston, N., & Kemp, M. (2006). Four flippers or two? Tetrapodal swimming with an aquatic robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, I(1), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnani, L., & Bertolotti, T. (Eds.). (2017). Springer handbook of model-based science. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., Alford, S. T., Chiappalone, M., Fadiga, L., Karniel, A., Kositsky, M., & Vato, A. (2010). New perspectives on the dialogue between brains and machines. Frontiers in Neuroscience, IV(1), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2003). Brain-machine interfaces to restore motor function and probe neural circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, IV(May), 417–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J. (2006). How the body shapes the way we think. A new view of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, J. (2016). The restless clock: A history of the centuries-long argument over what makes living things tick. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A., & Newell, A. (1962). Computer simulation of human thinking and problem solving. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, XXVII(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamburrini, G., & Datteri, E. (2005). Machine experiments and theoretical modelling: From cybernetic methodology to neuro-robotics. Minds and Machines, XV(3–4), 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truitt, E. R. (2016). Medieval robots. Mechanism, magic, nature, and art. Philadelphia, PA: University or Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, B. (2001). Can robots make good models of biological behaviour? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, XXIV(6), 1033–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, B. (2008). Using Robots to Understand Animal Behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior, XXXVIII, 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity. Using models to understand the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg, E. B. (2010). Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenin, P., Deliagina, T., Grillner, S., & Orlovsky, G. (2000). Postural control in the lamprey: A study with a neuro-mechanical model. Journal of Neurophysiology, LXXXIV(6), 2880–2887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo Datteri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Datteri, E. (2021). Robots and Bionic Systems as Experimental Platforms for the Study of Animal and Human Behaviour. In: Chiodo, S., Schiaffonati, V. (eds) Italian Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54522-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics