Abstract
Data aggregators can leverage personal data for the benefit of their users in their role of mediators with enterprises that are willing to target qualified user segments with customized offerings. However, such type of transaction must comply with personal data protection regulation and provide a fair and auditable context for business partners. In this paper, the components of a solution for that problem in the context of a permissioned, private business network are described, along with an implementation using the Quorum enterprise derivative of Ethereum. The results of that design are expressed as a combination of schemas, protocols and smart contracts. The resulting model may serve as a blueprint for experimenting data market mechanisms that exploit the unique value of aggregators in a secure, transparent and auditable framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Note that this would require that the aggregator has a database that is immutable, i.e. an accrual of facts in time, as for example provided by Datomic.
- 7.
A better approach may be that of contacting users that have been surveyed and voluntarily disclosed they knew of the proposal via the aggregator.
References
Benchoufi, M., Porcher, R. Ravaud, P.: Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: transparency and traceability of consent. F1000Research, 6 (2017)
Ceri, S., Gottlob, G., Tanca, L.: What you always wanted to know about Datalog (and never dared to ask). IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1(1), 146–166 (1989)
Chen, H., Laine, K., Rindal, P.: Fast private set intersection from homomorphic encryption. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1243–1255 (2017)
Ertemel, A.V.: Implications of blockchain technology on marketing. J. Int. Trade Logist. Law 4(2), 35–44 (2018)
Fayyaz, N., Ullah, I., Khusro, S.: On the current state of linked open data: issues, challenges, and future directions. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS) 14(4), 110–128 (2018)
Finck, M.: Blockchains and data protection in the European Union. Eur. Data Prot. Law Rev. 4, 17 (2018)
García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M.A., Sánchez-Alonso, S.: The case for ontologies in expressing decisions in decentralized energy systems. In: Research Conference on Metadata and Semantics Research, pp. 365–376. Springer, Cham (2018)
Haikel-Elsabeh, M., Nouet, S., Nayaradou, M.: How personal finance management influences consumers’ motivations and behavior regarding online banking services. Commun. Strat. 103, 15 (2016)
Lagos, N., Mos, A., Cortes-Cornax, M.: Towards semantically-aided domain specific business process modeling. Data Technol. Appl. 52(4), 463–481 (2018)
Maestre, R., Duque, J., Rubio, A., Arévalo, J.: Reinforcement learning for fair dynamic pricing. In: Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, pp. 120–135. Springer, Cham (2018)
Munier, L., Kemball-Cook, A.: Blockchain and the general data protection regulation: reconciling protection and innovation. J. Secur. Oper. Custody 11(2), 145–157 (2019)
Sicilia, M.A., Visvizi, A.: Blockchain and OECD data repositories: opportunities and policymaking implications. Library Hi Tech 37(1), 30–42 (2019)
Tucker, C.E.: Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. J. Mark. Res. 51(5), 546–562 (2014)
Wessling, F., Ehmke, C., Hesenius, M., Gruhn, V.: How much blockchain do you need? towards a concept for building hybrid DAPP architectures. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Software Engineering for Blockchain (WETSEB), pp. 44–47 (2018)
Wu, Y.J., Chen, S.C., Pan, C.I.: Entrepreneurship in the internet age: internet, entrepreneurs, and capital resources. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. (IJSWIS) 15(4), 21–30 (2019)
Yuan, S., Wang, J., Zhao, X.: Real-time bidding for online advertising: measurement and analysis. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Data Mining for Online Advertising, pp. 1–8 (2013)
Zhou, T.: Examining users’ knowledge sharing behaviour in online health communities. Data Technol. Appl. 53(4), 442–455 (2019)
Acknowledgements
Project funded by (proyecto financiado por) FEDER/ Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades - Agencia Estatal de Investigación/ Proyecto RTC-2017-6779-7, “Uso de blockchain en una plataforma financiera basada en Big Data, Inteligencia Artificial, machine learning, algoritmos predictivos y herramientas de lenguaje natural para la contratación, gestión e intercambio de activos no financieros.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sicilia, MA. et al. (2020). Qualified Targeting Through Data Aggregators in Permissioned Blockchain Settings: A Model for Auditable Transactions. In: Prieto, J., Pinto, A., Das, A., Ferretti, S. (eds) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52535-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52535-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52534-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52535-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)