Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common type of bone cancer in children and young adults with a peak incidence in adolescents. It has a propensity for lung metastases and is a prime example of a cancer where cure will only be achieved if many specialities closely cooperate within a dedicated multidisciplinary environment. Neither surgery nor chemotherapy alone will cure many patients, but their combination can lead to long-term, disease-free survival in 60–70%.
Primary tumor surgery should aim for wide resection margins. These can often be achieved by limb-salvage surgery rather than amputation. If staging detects primary metastases, these must also be resected. Radiotherapy has very limited indications.
Chemotherapy is usually started preoperatively. A combination of high-dose methotrexate with folinic acid (leucovorin) rescue, adriamycin (doxorubicin), and cisplatin (MAP) is often considered a standard, but other regimens, often incorporating ifosfamide, can achieve similar results. Other agents have not been universally accepted.
Poor prognostic factors include large primary tumors, presence of metastases, and a poor histologic response to preoperative chemotherapy. Efforts to reduce the recurrence risk of patients with poorly responding osteosarcomas by postoperative chemotherapy modifications have been unsuccessful. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment at recurrence; the contribution of second line systemic treatments is far less well defined.
Unfortunately, survival rates both in North America and in Europe have improved little over several decades. It is hoped that a more profound knowledge of the biological characteristics of this rare cancer will lead to novel treatment approaches which will finally overcome this stagnation.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
8.1 Introduction
Osteosarcoma demonstrates that treatment success will only be achieved through close interdisciplinary collaboration. The most common subtype, high-grade central osteosarcoma, carries a very high risk of systemic dissemination, so that surgery alone will rarely lead to cure (Casali et al. 2018; Fletcher et al. 2013; Jaffe 1972; Link et al. 1986; Marcove et al. 1970). Chemotherapy without sufficient local therapy will also result in failure (Bielack et al. 2002; Jaffe et al. 2002). Combined uses of both approaches together, however, will often result in cure (Bielack et al. 2004, 2008; Ferrari and Serra 2015).
Rare low-grade central, parosteal, and periosteal osteosarcoma variants are of lower malignant potential and treated by surgery alone (Casali et al. 2018; Cesari et al. 2011; Fletcher et al. 2013; Grimer et al. 2005; Laitinen et al. 2015). Craniofacial osteosarcomas also carry a lower risk of metastatic spread, but a high risk of local failure, and recent guidelines favor a multidisciplinary approach (Casali et al. 2018). This chapter will focus on treatment of young patients with high-grade osteosarcoma.
8.2 Clinical Presentation
The typical presentation of osteosarcoma is in a young mid-teenage male complaining of pain around the knee, gradually worsening over 2–3 months, and swelling, both impacting to an increasing degree on normal activities including broken sleep and reduced mobility. Systemic symptoms are unusual even if metastases are present. The male/female ratio of osteosarcoma patients aged <24 is 1.28, and median age at diagnosis is 15 years. Approximately 90% of primaries are located in the limbs (Mirabello et al. 2009; Whelan et al. 2012). Primary lung metastases are detected in 10–15% and metastases to other sites, most often bones, in a further 5% (Kager et al. 2003; Marko et al. 2016; Meyers et al. 1993). Osteosarcomas arising in non-extremity sites are uncommon in young persons. Both nonspecific symptoms and low levels of awareness of cancer among both professionals and public result in diagnostic delays (Brasme et al. 2012).
8.3 General Outline of Multidisciplinary Treatment
High-grade osteosarcoma is one of few pediatric tumors in which the value of systemic chemotherapy has been rigorously proven through a randomized clinical trial (Link et al. 1986). Even prior to this study, it was known that few patients with radiographically localized high-grade osteosarcoma would survive with surgery alone, suggesting microscopic metastatic disease was frequently present (Jaffe 1972; Marcove et al. 1970).
Local control of the primary tumor, typically by surgery, remains as critical as systemic chemotherapy. Until only a few decades ago, surgery usually meant amputation. This was subsequently replaced by limb-sparing resections followed by reconstruction, usually with an endoprosthesis. Initiating chemotherapy some months prior to surgery offers the advantages of allowing time for surgical planning, and the degree of necrosis of the resection specimen is prognostic (Bielack et al. 2002; Rosen et al. 1981), even if clinically exploiting that information has been challenging (Bielack et al. 2015; Marina et al. 2016; Whelan et al. 2015). The principles of managing metastatic high-grade osteosarcoma generally mirror those also used for localized disease with the addition of surgical clearance of all metastatic deposits.
8.4 Imaging at Diagnosis and During Systemic Treatment: Essentials
A plain radiograph is the first imaging study for a patient with suspected osteosarcoma. In cases of malignancy, the radiographic characteristics suggest an aggressive lesion (Meyer et al. 2008). Radiographs are followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to delineate the locoregional extent of disease as well as the tumor’s relationship to neurovascular structures.
Computed tomography (CT) of the chest is the preferred method to detect metastatic lung disease (Bielack et al. 2002). It is now common to identify subcentimeter pulmonary lesions on chest CT (Ginsberg and Panicek 2000; Meyer et al. 2008). There is evidence that lesions >5 mm are more likely to be malignant (Ginsberg and Panicek 2000; Picci et al. 2001). The presence of at least one lung lesion >1 cm or more than three lesions at least 5 mm in diameter is often accepted as evidence of metastatic disease. The presence of lesions <5 mm raises the possibility of metastases, but in these instances tissue confirmation is recommended.
Extrapulmonary metastases are searched for by either technetium bone scintigraphy, whole body MRI, or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Either modality provides information as long as the primary tumor is avid. The role of functional imaging remains controversial. In one study, PET/CT could not be consistently used to determine histological response of the tumor (Hawkins et al. 2009).
Imaging evaluation during systemic treatment should occur approximately every 3 months, its purpose being to confirm the absence of local or distant progression. Patients are followed with chest X-ray and/or CT and MRI.
8.5 Biopsy: Procedure
Nearly all masses that require surgical resection will have biopsies performed prior to excision. It is essential that representative tissue be delivered to the pathologist. Heterogeneous sarcomas may require biopsy from multiple locations to ensure a representative sample. The biopsy tract should be placed as to be incorporated and excised en bloc with the definitive resection. Longitudinal incisions are used, and for extremity lesions, a direct approach with minimal extension into adjacent tissue planes is usually possible.
MRI can prove invaluable in deciding where to biopsy. Tumor margins can be distinguished from surrounding muscle, fat, and neurovascular bundles. Areas of necrosis, liquefaction, myxoid degeneration, hemorrhage, and fibrosis are typically avoided. Abrupt signal changes within a mass could indicate dedifferentiation and should be sampled. For many bone sarcomas the most viable portions are near the periphery or within a soft tissue component. Specimens are typically sent fresh to pathology, which allows use of specific fixatives for immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic studies. Newer sequencing technologies may also allow use of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples in molecular testing (van de Rijn et al. 2014). Nearly all suspected osteosarcoma specimens require decalcification.
Core needle biopsies have been shown to be safe and less invasive than incisional biopsies and are accurate if adequate cores are obtained even in sclerotic bony lesions (Mitsuyoshi et al. 2006; Taupin et al. 2016). Core needle biopsies may not be as effective in telangiectatic osteosarcoma, misdiagnosing over one third of cases as aneurysmal bone cysts in one series (Gao et al. 2013). Frozen sections are often used to assess intramedullary marrow margins during definitive resection and should be interpreted in tandem with the gross specimen (Anderson et al. 2014).
8.6 What Can Be Learned from the Biopsy Specimen?
Osteosarcoma is defined as a malignant spindle cell tumor which produces osteoid (Fletcher et al. 2013). Despite being a genetically complex tumor, its diagnosis is not based on any molecular testing at present (Gorlick 2009), but on routine hematoxylin and eosin staining and conventional light microscopy. Beyond the histologic classification, all osteosarcomas can be categorized as low, intermediate, or high grade. Although most osteosarcomas in young patients are high grade, this distinction is of critical importance as it defines the need for systemic chemotherapy. Osteosarcoma can similarly be broken into histologic subtypes such as osteoblastic, chondroblastic, fibroblastic, and telangiectatic dependent on the predominant pattern of differentiation (Fletcher et al. 2013). Although these subtypes may be associated with characteristic radiographic appearances, they do not impact on treatment and in most studies have not been shown to influence prognosis.
Hampered by osteosarcoma’s genetic complexity, defining biological risk factors and molecular alterations which can be targeted remains elusive. That said an explosion in the available knowledge with regard to osteosarcomas biology has occurred with efforts such as whole tumor genome sequencing (Bishop et al. 2016). One could be nihilistic and suggest that in the absence of clinical relevance of osteosarcoma biology studies, the only purpose of a biopsy is making the diagnosis. On the other hand, many remain hopeful that additional clinical progress can be made through enhanced biological understanding, provided that additional osteosarcoma specimens are available for analyses. In both North America and Europe, coordinated research efforts exist putting forward biology and banking studies for the collection of biomaterials from patients with osteosarcoma (Glover et al. 2015). Success of these efforts will require obtaining adequate samples to permit biological analyses from osteosarcoma patients, with the consent of the patients/guardians. These efforts are strongly supported by the authors of this chapter.
8.7 Systemic Treatment
8.7.1 Choice of Drugs
For over 30 years, systemic treatment of osteosarcoma has relied on the same few cytotoxic agents. High-dose methotrexate with folinic acid rescue (HD-MTX) (Jaffe et al. 1973, 1974), doxorubicin (DOX, adriamycin) (Cortes et al. 1974), and cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II), CDDP) thereafter (Freeman et al. 1979; Ochs et al. 1978) were introduced in the 1970s. Soon, combination regimens were employed (Pagani et al. 1975; Rosen et al. 1974, 1975; Winkler et al. 1977). Starting in the early 1980s, several protocols also included ifosfamide (IFOS) (Bielack et al. 2013; Ferrari and Serra 2015). A recent meta-analysis concluded that combining any three of those four drugs led to better results than using only two, but that adding the fourth was not associated with further improvements (Anninga et al. 2011). A combination of HD-MTX, DOX, and CDDP (MAP) (Meyers et al. 2005, 2008; Whelan et al. 2015) is considered a standard (Table 8.1), but other regimens which include several of the mentioned drugs may achieve similar results (Daw et al. 2011; Fuchs et al. 1998; Le Deley et al. 2007; Smeland et al. 2011). Outside of specific trials, patients with primary metastases generally receive the same systemic treatment as those with localized disease (Carrle and Bielack 2009; Kager et al. 2003; Meyers et al. 1993).
8.7.2 High-Dose Methotrexate
HD-MTX, commonly at 12 g/m2, in combination with vigorous hydration and urinary alkalinization along with pharmacokinetically guided folinic acid “rescue” (FAR), is an essential component of osteosarcoma treatment (Jaffe et al. 1974). Methotrexate (MTX) is an analogue of folic acid which penetrates into cells via a specific membrane transport system used by physiological folates. Carrier-mediated transport limits the entry of MTX into cells until the extracellular concentration is as high as 20 μmol/L and passive diffusion occurs. Inside the cell MTX rapidly binds to and inhibits its target enzyme dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), leading to an inhibition of purine and pyrimidine synthesis. In addition to direct inhibition of DHFR, the intracellular formation of MTX polyglutamyl metabolites is also thought to (a) increase intracellular drug accumulation, (b) increase intracellular drug retention, and (c) inhibit folate-dependent nucleotide synthesis, by effects at loci other than DHFR (Adamson et al. 2011).
High-dose methotrexate regimens are designed to circumvent MTX resistance. Achieving and sustaining high plasma levels of the drug promotes passive diffusion of MTX, thus overcoming defective transmembrane transport systems (Guo et al. 1999). The doses of MTX required to achieve such high plasma concentrations must be followed by the antidote, folinic acid, to prevent excessive toxicity to normal tissues. Folinic acid replenishes the intracellular source of reduced active folates. Although this decreases the degree of MTX toxicity, patients will remain at risk as long as elevated MTX levels persist in their circulation. Moreover, if the extracellular MTX concentration is very high, folinic acid alone may prove inadequate.
Despite supportive measures, MTX-induced toxicity (myelosuppression, mucositis, hepatic and renal toxicity) still occurs and results in morbidity, patient discomfort, costs, and potentially reduced treatment efficacy, due to suboptimal chemotherapy doses and/or delays in chemotherapy administration (Widemann and Adamson 2006). Elevation of serum creatinine points out renal injury, which can result in delayed excretion of MTX, so close monitoring during administration is critical. In case of life-threatening MTX intoxication, administration of high-dose leucovorin or in selected cases glucarpidase may become necessary (Flombaum et al. 2018; Ramsey et al. 2018).
8.7.3 Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin in an anthracycline antibiotic isolated from cultures of Streptomyces peucetius. Doxorubicin intercalates to nucleotide base pairs and binds to the lipid membrane. Intercalation interferes with nucleotide replication and the action of DNA and RNA polymerases. Its interaction with topoisomerase II appears important for cytotoxic activity. Approximately 40% of the drug is excreted in the bile in 5 days. Only up to 12% of the drug is excreted in the urine (Adamson et al. 2011; Bedford Laboratories 2012).
The most common acute toxicities include nausea, vomiting, myelosuppression, and a pink or red color to the patient’s secretions. It can also produce mucositis and liver toxicity. The most serious complication of doxorubicin administration is cardiotoxicity [Krischer et al. 1997; Lipshultz 2006; Nysom et al. 1998, see below]. Pediatric patients are usually treated with doses ranging from 25 to 90 mg/m2 per dose. Cumulative doses >300 mg/m2 are associated with higher long-term toxicity. As doxorubicin is one of the most effective agents against osteosarcoma, affected patients often receive such high cumulative doses (Smith et al. 1991). Strategies to decrease doxorubicin cardiotoxicity include the use of continuous infusions (Hortobagyi et al. 1989; Legha et al. 1982) and of cardioprotective agents (Huh et al. 2010; Sanchez-Medina et al. 2010; Wexler et al. 1996). Continuous infusion has successfully reduced cardiotoxicity in adults but is associated with increased mucositis (Bielack et al. 1996; Hortobagyi et al. 1989; Legha et al. 1982) and has been reported as unsuccessful in children (Lipshultz et al. 2013). Dexrazoxane has been successfully used in pediatric patients (Asselin et al. 2016; Huh et al. 2010; Lipshultz et al. 2013; Sanchez-Medina et al. 2010; Wexler et al. 1996). While it has been claimed that it may increase the risk of second malignancies (Tebbi et al. 2007), recent reports suggest this is not the case (Chow et al. 2015; Seif et al. 2015).
8.7.4 Cisplatin
Cisplatin is a platinum-containing DNA-damaging agent, the intracellular presence of which leads to DNA cross-linking and consequent apoptosis. Initially reported active as a single agent at a dose of 100 mg/m2, it quickly came to be used in combination with doxorubicin (Gasparini et al. 1985; Pratt et al. 1985).
CDDP is highly emetogenic, a side effect which if uncontrolled can exacerbate renal impairment, the most challenging problem arising from its administration (Arany and Safirstein 2003). Acute glomerular toxicity can be ameliorated by hyperhydration, forced diuresis, and prolonged intravenous administration over 48–72 h rather than short infusions. Renal tubular damage may also occur, leading to electrolyte imbalance and the need for replacement particularly of magnesium, calcium, and potassium. Ototoxicity and peripheral neuropathy are also limiting factors. CDDP causes tinnitus, often reversible, and irreversible hearing loss especially affecting high tones. Avoidance of other nephro- or neurotoxic agents such as aminoglycoside antibiotics and furosemide is advised. CDDP is also significantly myelosuppressive.
8.7.5 Ifosfamide
IFOS is a cyclophosphamide analogue which requires hepatic activation to the reactive 4-hydroxyifosfamide, which exists in equilibrium with aldoifosfamide. Aldoifosfamide is then converted to acrolein and ifosfamide mustard, the active bifunctional alkylating agent. Acrolein is presumed to be the cause of hemorrhagic cystitis, a side effect of both cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide. The metabolism of IFOS is autoinducible resulting in increased clearance and decreased toxicity over time (Kerbusch et al. 2001). The amount of IFOS excreted in the urine is directly proportional to the dose administered. There is more oxidation of chloroethyl groups by IFOS, which produces more chloroacetaldehyde (thought to be responsible for neurotoxicity and renal toxicity).
Evaluation of this drug in an upfront window approach revealed clinical responses in patients with recurrent and metastatic osteosarcoma (Goorin et al. 2002; Harris et al. 1995; Harris et al. 1998). The drug is usually administered by short infusions lasting 1–4 h depending on the total doses used, which range from 6–9 g/m2 over 2–5 days (Fuchs et al. 1998; Meyers et al. 2005, 2008) to 14 g/m2 over 5 days (Schwartz et al. 2016; Whelan et al. 2015). Fractionation reduces urotoxicity (Kerbusch et al. 2001), as does the use of mesna, which helps to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. Patients receiving ifosfamide are monitored with urinalysis to make certain they do not develop hemorrhagic cystitis (Kerbusch et al. 2001) as well as with electrolyte measurements to evaluate for renal tubular dysfunction (Buttemer et al. 2011). Neurotoxicity can be managed by stopping the infusion and administration of methylene blue (Kerbusch et al. 2001). Other acute toxicities associated with IFOS include nausea, vomiting, hair loss, myelosuppression, and liver toxicity.
8.7.6 Other Agents
Addition of more cytotoxic chemotherapy to the standard treatment backbones has failed to further improve survival outcomes (Gatta et al. 2014; Mirabello et al. 2009; Stiller et al. 2018). This was most recently evident in the prospective, randomized European and American Osteosarcoma Study (EURAMOS)-1 which tested the addition of high-dose ifosfamide (14 g/m2) plus etoposide to preoperative MAP in poor responders to preoperative MAP (Marina et al. 2016; Whelan et al. 2015). Early protocols had included the BCD combination of bleomycin with cyclophosphamide and actinomycin D (Mosende et al. 1977; Rosen et al. 1981; Winkler et al. 1977, 1988); however, this was largely abandoned when a phase 2 study failed to demonstrate activity (Pratt et al. 1987).
The macrophage activator mifamurtide (liposomal muramyl-tripeptide-diphosphatidyl-ethanolamine, MTP) was investigated in a randomized trial, INT0133, which also tested ifosfamide in a randomized 2 × 2 factorial design (Meyers et al. 2005, 2008). A first report concluded that interaction between the two randomizations precluded definitive statements regarding MTP (Meyers et al. 2005). With three additional years of follow-up, the authors performed a second analysis of event-free and overall survival in the localized disease cohort of the trial. They reported that the addition of MTP to chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant improvement in overall survival and a trend toward better event-free survival (Meyers et al. 2008). Persisting statistical and interaction concerns, however, led others to caution that these results did not meet generally accepted standards for practice-changing conclusions and that confirmatory trials would be required before MTP should be considered for routine use (Bielack et al. 2008; Hunsberger et al. 2008). The US-FDA denied a license stating that the applicants had failed to demonstrate substantial evidence of efficacy (U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2007). The European Medicines Agency approved mifamurtide for use in the treatment of newly diagnosed osteosarcoma, and the agent is now licensed for that indication in many countries.
Interferon alpha-2b (IFN-α-2b), which can act as an immune modulator as well as exerting antiangiogenetic and direct antitumor effects (Whelan et al. 2010), was investigated in the good responder cohort of EURAMOS-1, where patients in the experimental arm received the agent as maintenance after concluding MAP chemotherapy (Bielack et al. 2015; Marina et al. 2009; Whelan et al. 2015). Compared to MAP alone, MAP plus IFN-α-2b was not statistically different. The interpretation of this finding is hampered by the fact that a considerable proportion of patients never started IFN-α-2b or stopped prematurely (Bielack et al. 2015).
In order to move things forward, effective drugs with novel mechanisms of action need to be identified. In the Children’s Oncology Group, the decision has been made to await identification of a novel agent with efficacy in osteosarcoma prior to embarking upon a phase 3 trial testing the value of its addition to standard chemotherapy (Gorlick et al. 2013). Instead, the group is focused on performing a series of phase 2 trials in patients with recurrent osteosarcoma attempting to identify novel agents with efficacy. The rationale for each of these studies is varied but includes encouraging data obtained from the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Consortium, transgenic mouse models, and tumor profiling. A phase 2 trial of eribulin in unresectable recurrent osteosarcoma was rapidly completed but unfortunately did not demonstrate activity (Isakoff et al. 2018). Trials of denosumab in resectable and unresectable recurrent osteosarcoma, ch14.18 antibody in resectable recurrent osteosarcoma, and glembatumumab vedotin in unresectable recurrent osteosarcoma are ongoing. Other agents are being incorporated into additional phase 2 trials in development (Bishop et al. 2016).
Numerous other novel agents are being tested by different groups. The anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab failed to show encouraging activity against osteosarcoma in the SARC028 phase 2 trial (Tawbi et al. 2017). Current European activities were most recently discussed in 2015 and 2017 during workshops of European Bone Sarcoma Research Networks (Kager et al. 2016; Strauss et al. 2018). Several trials are worth mentioning. While addition of zoledronate to standard osteosarcoma therapy was feasible, a French multicenter randomized trial failed to demonstrate it provided a survival advantage (Piperno-Neumann et al. 2016). The Italian Sarcoma Group has performed phase 2 trials of sorafenib and of sorafenib with everolimus (Grignani et al. 2012, 2015). Signals of activity were observed, as has been the case for regorafenib in a randomized French phase 2 trial (Duffaud et al. 2018). A group of investigators from Baylor have published results of CAR-T cells directed to HER-2 for the treatment of osteosarcoma (Ahmed et al. 2015). The US National Cancer Institute is investigating CAR-T cells directed to GD2 as a treatment for osteosarcoma (Bishop et al. 2016). It is hoped that some of the agents will prove to be effective driving phase 3 trials of these agents in the future.
8.8 Local Treatment of the Primary Tumor
Chemotherapy alone is insufficient to cure osteosarcoma (Bielack et al. 2002; Jaffe et al. 2002) and local therapy therefore remains an integral component of curative treatment. A successful osteosarcoma resection should have a wide surgical margin (DeLaney et al. 2005; Enneking 1986) while providing optimal functional status. Mutilating procedures are still indicated if this goal cannot be reached otherwise, but the role for amputation is dwindling (Fig. 8.1), and it does not confer significant survival benefit over limb salvage (Reddy et al. 2015; Schrager et al. 2011). Radiotherapy is reserved for situations where appropriate surgery cannot be performed (Schwarz et al. 2009).
Common limb salvage options include endoprosthetic reconstruction, allograft prosthetic composite (APC), massive bone allograft with soft tissue attachments, and rotationplasty. Reconstruction durability must be considered in children and adolescents, whose lifestyle expectations can vary tremendously.
In the pediatric or adolescent patient, endoprosthetic fixation is usually via a press-fit stem or a compress device. Screw and plate fixation is used with rotationplasty and massive bone allograft. Cement, while commonly used for prosthetic fixation in older patients, is used with caution in younger patients due to concerns of long-term aseptic loosening (Jeys et al. 2008).
General oncologic surgical principles should be adhered to during tumor resection, namely, meticulous hemostasis, careful identification and dissection of neurovascular structures, and maintenance of a soft tissue envelope around the osteosarcoma. Preoperative MRI is used for determining bony resection length (2 cm is recommended), and marrow margins should be sent as frozen sections after bone cuts are made and the canal plugged with bone wax (Loh et al. 2015). Once the tumor has been resected, gloves should be changed, fresh drapes placed over soiled portions of the surgical field, and separate instruments used during the reconstruction to avoid contamination. The tumor specimen should be oriented with a surgical pathologist, with mention of certain areas such as synovium or epineurium that may contain potentially close margins.
Proximal humerus tumors often necessitate resection of rotator cuff insertion(s). Unresected portions of anterior deltoid, supraspinatus, and subscapularis should be tagged as they are encountered to assist with reconstruction, and Gore-Tex or Alloderm can be used to reconstruct the joint capsule. In larger resections an APC with rotator cuff attachments may be favored over a traditional endoprosthesis. In younger children the biological alternative of clavicula pro humero should be considered (Calvert et al. 2015) as well as a vascularized free fibular transfer. In the proximal tibia, extensor mechanism involvement often dictates implant choice. The tibial insertion should be preserved when possible to promote bony ingrowth to the reconstruction. If the insertion is sacrificed with the articular surface, then an APC with patellar tendon can be used. If the joint and epiphysis are spared, then massive intercalary allograft can be considered. The gastrocnemius may be included with the resection as a soft tissue margin or used as a rotational flap to cover the reconstructed extensor mechanism. If the tumor involves the tibial tubercle with extensive soft tissue involvement of the calf musculature, then rotationplasty may be the only alternative to through-knee amputation. In fact, rotationplasty, because of its predictable durability, may actually be preferred. Distal femur resections usually incorporate the vastus intermedius as a margin, and the reconstruction is covered with remaining musculature and a robust quadriceps tendon repair. In the proximal femur, although rare in children, critical soft tissue reconstruction involves reattachment of the abductors (preferably with a portion of the greater trochanter) and purse-string reapproximation of the joint capsule when possible.
The most common locations for osteosarcoma in the growing child are the distal femur, proximal tibia, and proximal humerus (Mirabello et al. 2009). Coincidentally this is where the most proliferative physes reside. If the physis can be spared, an intercalary reconstruction with allograft or fibula autograft may be considered, with graft incorporation and hypertrophy possible in skeletally immature patients (Aponte-Tinao et al. 2015). Remaining limb growth will aid with reconstruction choice if the physis is resected. A rotationplasty will continue to lengthen from the distal tibial physis (albeit half the rate of the distal femoral physis), and modular implant design can facilitate future lengthening procedures without sacrificing a well-incorporated base. Reconstruction can be intentionally long to accommodate for remaining growth or contralateral epiphysiodesis performed. Growing prostheses are still associated with poor implant survival rates and continued need for eventual surgical revision to adult-sized implants (Cipriano et al. 2015; Schinhan et al. 2015; Staals et al. 2015).
While surgery with wide margins remains the gold standard for local therapy, not all osteosarcomas are suitable candidates. This is particularly true for primaries located in the axial skeleton. It was demonstrated decades ago that radiotherapy can achieve temporary local remissions and that doses in excess of 60 Gy will lead to better control than lower doses (Cade 1952). The rate of permanent local control may increase if radiotherapy is administered within a multimodal context which also includes chemotherapy (DeLaney et al. 2005; Machak et al. 2003; Schwarz et al. 2009), when employed as part of first-line treatment rather than used against recurrences (DeLaney et al. 2005; Schwarz et al. 2009), and when it is used against osteosarcomas which show an imaging response to chemotherapy (Machak et al. 2003). Unless very high doses in excess of 70 Gy are used, it seems advisable to combine radiotherapy with subtotal resection (Ciernik et al. 2011; Schwarz et al. 2009). Innovative techniques such as proton (Ciernik et al. 2011) or carbon ion (Combs et al. 2012; Matsunobu et al. 2012; Sugahara et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2016) radiotherapy have led to encouraging local control rates in some settings, but data on long-term effectiveness and side-effects are lacking (Leroy et al. 2016). A prospective trial of carbon ion radiotherapy in skeletally immature patients with unresectable osteosarcoma is currently ongoing (Blattmann et al. 2010).
8.9 Primary Metastases
Unless treated on specific trials, chemotherapy for patients with primary metastases usually reflects that used for those with localized disease. A good histological response to such therapy again confers a more favorable prognosis (Kager et al. 2003). All primary metastases should be resected if treatment is to be curative (Carrle and Bielack 2009; Kager et al. 2003). Owing to their matrix content, osteosarcoma metastases are often quite hard, and palpation may therefore detect more lesions than does CT (Kayton et al. 2006; Picci et al. 2001). Surgery for lung metastases is therefore generally performed by open thoracotomy (Carrle and Bielack 2009; Casali et al. 2018). Nonsurgical approaches such as percutaneous computed tomography-guided thermal ablation (Yevich et al. 2016), radiofrequency ablation (Saumet et al. 2015), or stereotactic radiosurgery (Yu et al. 2014) may offer alternatives for lung metastases not eligible for surgery, their non-inferiority remaining to be established. Unresolved issues include the merit of contralateral exploration in seemingly unilateral pulmonary disease and how to proceed with small, nonspecific pulmonary nodules (Bhattasali et al. 2015; Carrle and Bielack 2009). Given the dismal outcome of patients in whom definitive metastases remain after surgery (Kager et al. 2003) and the inability to reliably distinguish small benign lung lesions from small lung metastases (Picci et al. 2001), many advocate an aggressive approach even for such “possible” metastases, but the benefit of this approach remains to be proven.
8.10 Prognosis After Multimodal Treatment
Despite chemotherapy and surgical resection, 30–40% of patients who initially present with localized disease will develop a recurrence. Recurrences most often affect the lungs but can also involve the former primary tumor site, distant bones or, less frequently, other sites including the brain, skin, and intraabdominal organs (Ferrari et al. 2003; Kempf-Bielack et al. 2005). At present the strongest prognostic factors for newly diagnosed osteosarcoma patients are the presence or absence of radiographically detectable metastatic disease and whether or not the primary tumor is resectable (Bielack et al. 2002). A large size of the primary tumor, a tumor site in the axial skeleton, or the proximal extremities and increased serum levels of alkaline phosphatase or lactate dehydrogenase have all been linked to inferior outcomes (Anderson 2016; Bielack et al. 2002). The presence of primary metastases is associated with an unfavorable prognosis particularly if these are multiple, involve both lungs, or involve several organ systems (Kager et al. 2003). Metastases which involve the pleura, chest wall, pericardium, or diaphragm are associated with very poor long-term survival expectancies. The prognosis of osteosarcoma patients with bone metastases, more than three lung nodules, or bilateral lung nodules is generally less than a 20% 5-year disease-free survival (Bielack et al. 2002; Kager et al. 2003).
Predictors of local recurrence include poor histologic response and narrow resection margins (Picci et al. 1994). Poor histologic response of the primary tumor is also a powerful predictive factor for distant recurrence and reduced overall-survival expectancies (Bielack et al. 2002) (Fig. 8.2).
8.11 Physical Rehabilitation and Surveillance for Late Effects
Complete surgical tumor resection is required for long-term survival (Bielack et al. 2002) but associated with functional impairments even years after treatment. Compared to other survivors bone tumor survivors are at higher risk of physical limitations (Ness et al. 2008, 2009) and chronic health conditions (Oeffinger et al. 2006). The degree of impairment appears related to the surgical procedure performed with greater functional impairment and activity limitations in patients treated with amputations (Marina et al. 2013).
Postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapy can involve immediate passive range of motion, with partial weight-bearing recommended over the first 12 weeks for non-cemented implants to allow for bony ingrowth. Individual restrictions are made depending on the robustness of soft tissue reconstruction. Progressive weight-bearing as tolerated is possible with cemented components. It must be emphasized that function will likely not achieve preoperative levels, and activities of daily living are addressed and met first. Ensuring adequate time for rehabilitation before returning to sports and recreational activities can prove difficult with this age group.
Full-length standing films are taken for lower extremity resections to monitor for limb length inequality. The need for eventual revision should be emphasized given the young age of these patients, with common transgressors including infection, aseptic loosening, limb length discrepancy, soft tissue instability, implant failure, and allograft nonunion (Jeys and Grimer 2009; Schinhan et al. 2015).
Treatment with multi-agent chemotherapy and surgery improves long-term survival expectancies (Link et al. 1991) but can also result in medical and psychosocial complications (Nagarajan et al. 2011). Medical consequences include the possibility of anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction (Krischer et al. 1997; Lipshultz 2006; Nysom et al. 1998), gonadal dysfunction related to ifosfamide (Longhi et al. 2003; Williams et al. 2008), nephrotoxicity related to the use of cisplatin and/or ifosfamide (Buttemer et al. 2011; Rossi et al. 1999; Skinner 2003; Skinner et al. 1989), hearing loss related to treatment with cisplatin (Brock et al. 1991), and second malignant neoplasms most frequently associated with alkylating agents (Marina 1997; Smith et al. 2003; Tucker et al. 1987), etoposide (Le Deley et al. 2003; Stine et al. 1997), and anthracyclines (Le Deley et al. 2003).
Anthracycline cardiotoxicity ranges from subclinical to full-blown cardiomyopathy requiring chronic medical treatment (Lipshultz et al. 2008, 2013; Raj et al. 2014) and in some instances heart transplantation (Grande et al. 2003; Jenney and Jones 1992). The extent of cardiotoxicity is related to the total dose, cumulative dose, and the age at administration (Von Hoff et al. 1979). Since patients with osteosarcoma often receive high anthracycline doses, regular monitoring of cardiac function by echocardiography is recommended (Armenian et al. 2015; Lipshultz et al. 2008, 2013).
Late toxicities can include gonadal dysfunction, particularly if treatment included the alkylator ifosfamide (Longhi et al. 2003; Williams et al. 2008). Patients should be offered the option of pretreatment fertility preservation so that they become knowledgeable about their options (Hug et al. 2012; Loren et al. 2013).
Patients treated with either cisplatin and/or ifosfamide should be monitored for renal dysfunction with electrolytes and creatinine once treatment is completed. Though renal failure is rare, tubular dysfunction leading to renal tubular acidosis and hypophosphatemic rickets can happen and continue for many years (Marina et al. 1995; Rossi et al. 1999; Skinner 2003; Skinner et al. 1989). Peripheral CDDP-associated neuropathy is especially problematic when treating older patients and, in contrast to vincristine-related neuropathy, most often presents after completion of CDDP and is irreversible (Avan et al. 2015).
Second malignant neoplasms are among the most feared complications (Nagarajan et al. 2011), and evaluation with complete blood count and radiograph for persistent pain and swelling are what is currently recommended.
8.12 Surveillance for Recurrence
Surveillance for recurrences focuses on the areas most likely to be affected, namely, the lungs and the former primary tumor site. Clinical surveillance usually involves at least 3-month intervals for 2 years, 3- to 6-month intervals for years 3–5, and semi-annual to annual visits thereafter (Meyer et al. 2008). Radiographs of the surgical site and particularly the chest are often performed at each visit. Rare recurrences may only arise during the second decade of follow-up (Wasilewski-Masker et al. 2009) or even later (Halldorsson et al. 2009), so that there is no unanimously agreed time point at which surveillance should end.
While recommended by some guidelines (Meyer et al. 2008), the use of chest CT rather than chest X-ray during routine follow-up has been challenged because of its high radiation burden (Dauer et al. 2008; McHugh and Roebuck 2014). Results from a recent randomized Indian study of sarcomas in general suggest that imaging during the first years should be every 3 rather than every 6 months, but that chest CT adds no survival benefit over chest X-ray (Puri et al. 2014).
8.13 Treatment Options in Case of Recurrence
Most patients with recurrent osteosarcoma will ultimately then die of their disease, but around 20–25% can be cured (Ferrari et al. 2003; Kempf-Bielack et al. 2005), and some may even survive multiple recurrences (Bielack et al. 2009). Factors favoring this are resectable disease and a first remission of 18 months or more. The mainstay of treatment is surgical resection (Daw et al. 2015). Repeated thoracotomies may be indicated. Surgical remission of disease at other sites can also be effective though repeated resection is associated with ever-shortening remission (Bacci et al. 2005; Bielack et al. 2009; Ferrari et al. 2003; Gelderblom et al. 2011; Kempf-Bielack et al. 2005).
The role of second-line chemotherapy is poorly defined by prospective evaluation. Its use correlates with limited prolongation of survival when used against unresectable recurrences but is more controversial in the setting of resectable recurrences (Ferrari et al. 2003; Kempf-Bielack et al. 2005). Responses are certainly seen to the most commonly applied regimen, ifosfamide and etoposide. These responses may reduce the risk of further recurrence when combined with surgical resection of all disease or provide palliative benefit. Responses have been increasingly reported to the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel (Palmerini et al. 2016), but other effective new agents await to be identified. Radiotherapy can also improve symptoms and provide temporary disease control (Schwarz et al. 2009).
8.14 Conclusion
Successful treatment of osteosarcoma requires close collaboration between many diagnostic and therapeutic specialties. Multidisciplinary therapy consisting of surgery and chemotherapy leads to long-term, disease-free survival in 60–70% of patients. While the past decades have witnessed a major shift from amputation to limb-salvage surgery, chemotherapy still relies on the same few drugs as ever. Accordingly, despite dedicated multi-institutional and multinational efforts, survival expectancies stagnate. Efforts to better understand tumor biology are ongoing, and it is hoped that these will lead to the identification of suitable therapeutic targets for prospective trials and ultimately higher cure rates.
References
Adamson PC, Bagatell R, Balis F, Blaney SM (2011) Chapter 10. General principles of chemotherapy. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG (eds) Principles and practice of pediatric oncology, 6th edn. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Ahmed N, Brawley VS, Hegde M et al (2015) Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the immunotherapy of HER2-positive sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 33:1688–1696
Anderson ME (2016) Update on survival in osteosarcoma. Orthop Clin North Am 47:283–292
Anderson ME, Miller PE, van Nostrand K et al (2014) Frozen section versus gross examination for bone marrow margin assessment during sarcoma resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:836–841
Anninga JK, Gelderblom H, Fiocco M et al (2011) Chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatment for osteosarcoma: where do we stand? Eur J Cancer 47:2431–2445
Aponte-Tinao L, Ayerza MA, Muscolo DL et al (2015) Survival, recurrence, and function after epiphyseal preservation and allograft reconstruction in osteosarcoma of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:1789–1796
Arany I, Safirstein RL (2003) Cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Semin Nephrol 23:460–464
Armenian SH, Hudson MM, Mulder RL et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group. Lancet Oncol 16:e123–e136
Asselin BL, Devidas M, Chen L et al (2016) Cardioprotection and safety of dexrazoxane in patients treated for newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or advanced-stage lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report of the Children’s Oncology Group Randomized Trial Pediatric Oncology Group 9404. J Clin Oncol 34:854–862
Avan A, Postma TJ, Ceresa C et al (2015) Platinum-induced neurotoxicity and preventive strategies: past, present, and future. Oncologist 20:411–432
Bacci G, Briccoli A, Longhi A et al (2005) Treatment and outcome of recurrent osteosarcoma: experience at Rizzoli in 235 patients initially treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acta Oncol 44:748–755
Bedford Laboratories (2012) Doxorubicin FDA prescribing information. Adriamycin (doxorubicin) [prescribing information]. Bedford: Bedford Laboratories
Bhattasali O, Vo AT, Roth M et al (2015) Variability in the reported management of pulmonary metastases in osteosarcoma. Cancer Med 4:523–531
Bielack SS, Erttmann R, Kempf-Bielack B, Winkler K (1996) Impact of scheduling on toxicity and clinical efficacy of doxorubicin: what do we know in the mid-nineties? Eur J Cancer 32A:1652–1660
Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G et al (2002) Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol 20:776–790
Bielack SS, Machatschek JN, Flege S, Jürgens H (2004) Delaying surgery with chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities. Expert Opin Pharmacother 5:1243–1256
Bielack SS, Marina N, Ferrari S et al (2008) Osteosarcoma: the same old drugs or more? J Clin Oncol 26:3102–3103
Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Branscheid D et al (2009) Second and subsequent recurrences of osteosarcoma: presentation, treatment, and outcomes of 249 consecutive Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group patients. J Clin Oncol 27:557–565
Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Von Kalle T et al (2013) Controversies in childhood osteosarcoma. Minerva Pediatr 65:125–148
Bielack SS, Smeland S, Whelan JS et al (2015) Methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) plus maintenance pegylated interferon Alfa-2b versus MAP alone in patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma and good histologic response to preoperative MAP: first results of the EURAMOS-1 good response randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 33:2279–2287
Bishop MW, Janeway KA, Gorlick R (2016) Future directions in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Curr Opin Pediatr 28:26–33
Blattmann C, Oertel S, Schulz-Ertner D et al (2010) Non-randomized therapy trial to determine the safety and efficacy of heavy ion radiotherapy in patients with non-resectable osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer 10:96
Brasme JF, Morfouace M, Grill J et al (2012) Delays in diagnosis of paediatric cancers: a systematic review and comparison with expert testimony in lawsuits. Lancet Oncol 13(10):e445–e459
Brock PR, Bellman SC, Yeomans EC et al (1991) Cisplatin ototoxicity in children: a practical grading system. Med Pediatr Oncol 19:295–300
Buttemer S, Pai M, Lau KK (2011) Ifosfamide induced Fanconi syndrome. BMJ Case Rep 2011:bcr1020114950
Cade S (1952) Osteogenic sarcoma. Proc R Soc Med 45:265–267
Calvert GT, Wright J, Agarwal J, Jones KB, Randall RL (2015) Is claviculo pro humeri of value for limb salvage of pediatric proximal humerus sarcomas? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(3):877–882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3814-4
Carrle D, Bielack S (2009) Osteosarcoma lung metastases detection and principles of multimodal therapy. Cancer Treat Res 152:165–184
Casali PG, Bielack S, Abecassis N et al (2018) Bone sarcomas: ESMO-PaedCan-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 29(Supplement_4):iv79–iv95
Cesari M, Alberghini M, Vanel D et al (2011) Periosteal osteosarcoma: a single institution experience. Cancer 117:1731–1735
Chow EJ, Asselin BL, Schwartz CL et al (2015) Late mortality after dexrazoxane treatment: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 33:2639–2645
Ciernik IF, Niemierko A, Harmon DC et al (2011) Proton-based radiotherapy for unresectable or incompletely resected osteosarcoma. Cancer 117:4522–4530
Cipriano CA, Gruzinova IS, Frank RM et al (2015) Frequent complications and severe bone loss associated with the repiphysis expandable distal femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:831–838
Combs SE, Kessel KA, Herfarth K et al (2012) Treatment of pediatric patients and young adults with particle therapy at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center (HIT): establishment of workflow and initial clinical data. Radiat Oncol 7:170
Cortes EP, Holland JF, Wang JJ et al (1974) Amputation and adriamycin in primary osteosarcoma. N Engl J Med 291:998–1000
Dauer LT, St Germain J, Meyers PA (2008) Let’s image gently: reducing excessive reliance on CT scans. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:838; author reply 839-40
Daw NC, Neel MD, Rao BN et al (2011) Frontline treatment of localized osteosarcoma without methotrexate: results of the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital OS99 trial. Cancer 117:2770–2778
Daw NC, Chou AJ, Jaffe N et al (2015) Recurrent osteosarcoma with a single pulmonary metastasis: a multi-institutional review. Br J Cancer 112:278–282
DeLaney TF, Park L, Goldberg SI et al (2005) Radiotherapy for local control of osteosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:492–498
Duffaud F, Mir O, Boudou-Rouquette P, et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in adult patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 20. pii: S1470-2045(18)30742-30743. [Epub ahead of print]
Enneking WF (1986) A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 204:9–24
Ferrari S, Serra M (2015) An update on chemotherapy for osteosarcoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 29:1–10
Ferrari S, Briccoli A, Mercuri M et al (2003) Postrelapse survival in osteosarcoma of the extremities: prognostic factors for long-term survival. J Clin Oncol 21:710–715
Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F (2013) WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone, 4th edn. World Health Organization, WHO Press, Geneva
Flombaum CD, Liu D, Yan SQ, Chan A, Mathew S, Meyers PA, Glezerman IG, Muthukumar T (2018) Management of patients with acute methotrexate nephrotoxicity with high-dose leucovorin. Pharmacotherapy 38:714. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2145
Freeman AI, Ettinger LJ, Brecher ML (1979) Cis-Dichlorodiammineplatinum(II) in childhood cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 63:1615–1620
Fuchs N, Bielack SS, Epler D et al (1998) Long-term results of the co-operative German-Austrian-Swiss osteosarcoma study group's protocol COSS-86 of intensive multidrug chemotherapy and surgery for osteosarcoma of the limbs. Ann Oncol 9:893–899
Gao ZH, Yin JQ, Liu DW et al (2013) Preoperative easily misdiagnosed telangiectatic osteosarcoma: clinical-radiologic-pathologic correlations. Cancer Imaging 13:520–526
Gasparini M, Rouesse J, van Oosterom A et al (1985) Phase II study of cisplatin in advanced osteogenic sarcoma. European Organization for Research on treatment of cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Cancer Treat Rep 69:211–213
Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S et al (2014) Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5—a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:35–47
Gelderblom H, Jinks RC, Sydes M et al (2011) Survival after recurrent osteosarcoma: data from 3 European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cancer 47:895–902
Ginsberg MS, Panicek DM (2000) Subcentimeter pulmonary nodules detected in patients with sarcoma. Sarcoma 4(3):63–66
Glover J, Krailo M, Tello T et al (2015) A summary of the osteosarcoma banking efforts: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group and the QuadW Foundation. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:450–455
Goorin AM, Harris MB, Bernstein M et al (2002) Phase II/III trial of etoposide and high-dose ifosfamide in newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: a pediatric oncology group trial. J Clin Oncol 20:426–433
Gorlick R (2009) Current concepts on the molecular biology of osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res 152:467–478
Gorlick R, Janeway K, Lessnick S, Randall RL, Marina N (2013) Children’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: bone tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60:1009–1015
Grande AM, Rinaldi M, Sinelli S et al (2003) Heart transplantation in chemotherapeutic dilated cardiomyopathy. Transplant Proc 35:1516–1518
Grignani G, Palmerini E, Dileo P et al (2012) A phase II trial of sorafenib in relapsed and unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma after failure of standard multimodal therapy: an Italian Sarcoma Group study. Ann Oncol 23:508–516
Grignani G, Palmerini E, Ferraresi V et al (2015) Sorafenib and everolimus for patients with unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma progressing after standard treatment: a non-randomised phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 16:98–107
Grimer RJ, Bielack S, Flege S et al (2005) Periosteal osteosarcoma—a European review of outcome. Eur J Cancer 41:2806–2811
Guo W, Healey JH, Meyers PA et al (1999) Mechanisms of methotrexate resistance in osteosarcoma. Clin Cancer Res 5:621–627
Halldorsson A, Brooks S, Montgomery S, Graham S (2009) Lung metastasis 21 years after initial diagnosis of osteosarcoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 3:9298
Harris MB, Cantor AB, Goorin AM et al (1995) Treatment of osteosarcoma with ifosfamide: comparison of response in pediatric patients with recurrent disease versus patients previously untreated: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Med Pediatr Oncol 24:87–92
Harris MB, Gieser P, Goorin AM et al (1998) Treatment of metastatic osteosarcoma at diagnosis: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 16:3641–3648
Hawkins DS, Conrad EU 3rd, Butrynski JE et al (2009) [F-18]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography response is associated with outcome for extremity osteosarcoma in children and young adults. Cancer 115:3519–3525
Hortobagyi GN, Frye D, Buzdar AU et al (1989) Decreased cardiac toxicity of doxorubicin administered by continuous intravenous infusion in combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 63:37–45
Hug EB, Liebsch NJ, Munzenrider JE, Suit HD, Dillon KE, Gracia CR (2012) Pediatric and young adult patients and oncofertility. Curr Treat Options Oncol 13:161–173
Huh WW, Jaffe N, Durand J-B et al (2010) Comparison of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity in pediatric sarcoma patients when given with dexrazoxane versus as continuous infusion. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 27:546–557
Hunsberger S, Freidlin B, Smith MA (2008) Complexities in interpretation of osteosarcoma clinical trial results. J Clin Oncol 26:3103–3104
Isakoff MS, Goldsby R, Villaluna D et al (2018) A phase II study of eribulin in recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 30:e27524. [Epub ahead of print]
Jaffe N (1972) Recent advances in the chemotherapy of metastatic osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer 30:1627–1631
Jaffe N, Paed D, Farber S et al (1973) Favorable response of metastatic osteogenic sarcoma to pulse high-dose methotrexate with citrovorum rescue and radiation therapy. Cancer 31:1367–1373
Jaffe N, Frei E III, Traggis D et al (1974) Adjuvant methotrexate-citrovorum factor treatment of osteogenic sarcoma. N Engl J Med 291:994–997
Jaffe N, Carrasco H, Raymond K, Ayala A, Eftekhari F (2002) Can cure in patients with osteosarcoma be achieved exclusively with chemotherapy and abrogation of surgery? Cancer 95:2202–2210
Jenney ME, Jones PH (1992) Long term survival after heart transplantation for doxorubicin induced cardiomyopathy. Arch Dis Child 67:153
Jeys L, Grimer R (2009) The long-term risks of infection and amputation with limb salvage surgery using endoprostheses. Recent Results Cancer Res 179:75–84
Jeys LM, Kulkarni A, Grimer RJ et al (2008) Endoprosthetic reconstruction for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors of the appendicular skeleton and pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1265–1271
Kager L, Zoubek A, Pötschger U et al (2003) Primary metastatic osteosarcoma: presentation and outcome of patients treated on neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group protocols. J Clin Oncol 21:2011–2018
Kager L, Whelan J, Dirksen U et al (2016) The ENCCA-WP7/EuroSarc/EEC/PROVABES/EURAMOS 3rd European Bone Sarcoma Networking Meeting/Joint Workshop of EU Bone Sarcoma Translational Research Networks; Vienna, Austria, September 24–25, 2015. Workshop report. Clin Sarcoma Res 6:3
Kayton ML, Huvos AG, Casher J et al (2006) Computed tomographic scan of the chest underestimates the number of metastatic lesions in osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Surg 41:200–206
Kempf-Bielack B, Bielack SS, Jurgens H et al (2005) Osteosarcoma relapse after combined modality therapy: an analysis of unselected patients in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS). J Clin Oncol 23:559–568
Kerbusch T, de Kraker J, Keizer HJ et al (2001) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet 40:41–62
Krischer JP, Epstein S, Cuthbertson DD et al (1997) Clinical cardiotoxicity following anthracycline treatment for childhood cancer: the Pediatric Oncology Group experience. J Clin Oncol 15:1544–1552
Laitinen M, Parry M, Albergo JI et al (2015) The prognostic and therapeutic factors which influence the oncological outcome of parosteal osteosarcoma. Bone Joint J 97-B:1698–1703
Le Deley MC, Leblanc T, Shamsaldin A et al (2003) Risk of secondary leukemia after a solid tumor in childhood according to the dose of epipodophyllotoxins and anthracyclines: a case-control study by the Societe Francaise d’Oncologie Pediatrique. J Clin Oncol 21:1074–1081
Le Deley MC, Guinebretière JM, Gentet JC et al (2007) SFOP OS94: a randomised trial comparing preoperative high-dose methotrexate plus doxorubicin to high-dose methotrexate plus etoposide and ifosfamide in osteosarcoma patients. Eur J Cancer 43:752–761
Legha SS, Benjamin RS, Mackay B et al (1982) Reduction of doxorubicin cardiotoxicity by prolonged continuous intravenous infusion. Ann Intern Med 96:133–139
Leroy R, Benahmed N, Hulstaert F, Van Damme N, De Ruysscher D (2016) Proton therapy in children: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness in 15 pediatric cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:267–278
Link MP, Goorin MA, Miser AW et al (1986) The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity. N Engl J Med 314:1600–1606
Link MP, Goorin AM, Horowitz M et al (1991) Adjuvant chemotherapy of high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremity. Updated results of the Multi-Institutional Osteosarcoma Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 270:8–14
Lipshultz SE (2006) Exposure to anthracyclines during childhood causes cardiac injury. Semin Oncol 33:S8–S14
Lipshultz SE, Alvarez JA, Scully RE (2008) Anthracycline associated cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer. Heart 94:525–533
Lipshultz SE, Cochran TR, Franco VI et al (2013) Treatment-related cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10:697–710
Loh AH, Wu H, Bahrami A et al (2015) Influence of bony resection margins and surgicopathological factors on outcomes in limb-sparing surgery for extremity osteosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:246–251
Longhi A, Macchiagodena M, Vitali G et al (2003) Fertility in male patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 25:292–296
Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN et al (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:2500–2510
Machak GN, Tkachev SI, Solovyev YN et al (2003) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and local radiotherapy for high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities. Mayo Clin Proc 78:147–155
Marcove RC, Mike V, Hajek JV, Levin AG, Hutter RVP (1970) Osteogenic sarcoma under the age of twenty one. A review of 145 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:411–423
Marina N (1997) Long-term survivors of childhood cancer. The medical consequences of cure. Pediatr Clin North Am 44:1021–1042
Marina N, Jones D, Luo X et al (1995) Comparative renal toxicity of combination chemotherapy including IFosfamide (Ifos) + VP-16 (VP), Ifos + cisplatin (CDDP), and Ifos + carboplatin (Carbo). The American Society of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Alexandria, p 22
Marina N, Bielack S, Whelan J et al (2009) International collaboration is feasible in trials for rare conditions: the EURAMOS experience. Cancer Treat Res 152:339–353
Marina N, Hudson MM, Jones KE et al (2013) Changes in health status among aging survivors of pediatric upper and lower extremity sarcoma: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:1062–1073
Marina NM, Smeland S, Bielack SS et al (2016) Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1396–1408
Marko TA, Diessner BJ, Spector LG (2016) Prevalence of metastasis at diagnosis of osteosarcoma: an international comparison. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63:1006–1011
Matsunobu A, Imai R, Kamada T et al (2012) Impact of carbon ion radiotherapy for unresectable osteosarcoma of the trunk. Working Group for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Cancer 118:4555–4563
McHugh K, Roebuck DJ (2014) Pediatric oncology surveillance imaging: two recommendations. Abandon CT scanning, and randomize to imaging or solely clinical follow-up. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:3–6
Meyer JS, Nadel HR, Marina N et al (2008) Imaging guidelines for children with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group Bone Tumor Committee. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:163–170
Meyers PA, Heller G, Healey JH et al (1993) Osteogenic sarcoma with clinically detectable metastasis at initial presentation. J Clin Oncol 11:449–453
Meyers PA, Schwartz CL, Krailo M et al (2005) Osteosarcoma: a randomized, prospective trial of the addition of ifosfamide and/or muramyl tripeptide to cisplatin, doxorubicin, and high-dose methotrexate. J Clin Oncol 23:2004–2011
Meyers PA, Schwartz CL, Krailo MD et al (2008) Osteosarcoma: the addition of muramyl tripeptide to chemotherapy improves overall survival—a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 26:633–638
Mirabello L, Troisi RJ, Savage SA (2009) Osteosarcoma incidence and survival rates from 1973 to 2004: data from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. Cancer 115:1531–1543
Mitsuyoshi G, Naito N, Kawai A et al (2006) Accurate diagnosis of musculoskeletal lesions by core needle biopsy. J Surg Oncol 94:21–27
Mosende C, Gutierrez M, Caparros B, Rosen G (1977) Combination chemotherapy with bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin for the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer 40:2779–2786
Nagarajan R, Kamruzzaman A, Ness KK et al (2011) Twenty years of follow-up of survivors of childhood osteosarcoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 117:625–634
Ness KK, Gurney JG, Zeltzer LK et al (2008) The impact of limitations in physical, executive, and emotional function on health-related quality of life among adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89:128–136
Ness KK, Hudson MM, Ginsberg JP et al (2009) Physical performance limitations in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. J Clin Oncol 27:2382–2389
Nysom K, Holm K, Lipsitz SR et al (1998) Relationship between cumulative anthracycline dose and late cardiotoxicity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 16:545–550
Ochs JJ, Freeman AI, Douglass HO Jr et al (1978) Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum-II in advanced osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer Treat Rep 62:239–245
Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA et al (2006) Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1572–1582
Pagani PA, Bacci G, Figus E, Cagnano R, Donati U (1975) Association of radical surgery and cyclic polychemotherapy (with vincristine, methotrexate and adriamycin) in the treatment of some forms of osteosarcoma. Preliminary results. Chir Organi Mov 62:81–92
Palmerini E, Jones RL, Marchesi E et al (2016) Gemcitabine and docetaxel in relapsed and unresectable high-grade osteosarcoma and spindle cell sarcoma of bone. BMC Cancer 16(1):280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2312-3
Picci P, Sangiorgi L, Rougraff BT et al (1994) Relationship of chemotherapy-induced necrosis and surgical margins to local recurrence in osteosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 12:2699–2705
Picci P, Vanel D, Briccoli A et al (2001) Computed tomography of pulmonary metastases from osteosarcoma: the less poor technique. A study of 51 patients with histological correlation. Ann Oncol 12:1601–1604
Piperno-Neumann S, Le Deley MC, Rédini F et al (2016) Zoledronate in combination with chemotherapy and surgery to treat osteosarcoma (OS2006): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1070–1080
Pratt CB, Champion JE, Senzer N et al (1985) Treatment of unresectable or metastatic osteosarcoma with cisplatin or cisplatin-doxorubicin. Cancer 56:1930–1933
Pratt CB, Epelman S, Jaffe N (1987) Bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and dactinomycin in metastatic osteosarcoma: lack of tumor regression in previously treated patients. Cancer Treat Rep 71:421–423
Puri A, Gulia A, Hawaldar R et al (2014) Does intensity of surveillance affect survival after surgery for sarcomas? Results of a randomized noninferiority trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1568–1575
Raj S, Franco VI, Lipshultz SE (2014) Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a review of pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 16:315
Ramsey LB, Balis FM, O’Brien MM, Schmiegelow K, Pauley JL, Bleyer A, Widemann BC, Askenazi D, Bergeron S, Shirali A, Schwartz S, Vinks AA, Heldrup J (2018) Consensus guideline for use of glucarpidase in patients with high-dose methotrexate induced acute kidney injury and delayed methotrexate clearance. Oncologist 23(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0243
Reddy KI, Wafa H, Gaston CL et al (2015) Does amputation offer any survival benefit over limb salvage in osteosarcoma patients with poor chemonecrosis and close margins? Bone Joint J 97-B:115–120
Rosen G, Suwansirikul S, Kwon C et al (1974) High-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue and adriamycin in childhood osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer 33:1151–1163
Rosen G, Tan C, Sanmaneechai A, Beattie EJ Jr, Marcove R, Murphy ML (1975) The rationale for multiple drug chemotherapy in the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer 35(3 suppl):936–945
Rosen G, Nirenberg A, Caparros B et al (1981) Osteogenic sarcoma: eighty-percent, three-year, disease-free survival with combination chemotherapy (T-7). Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 56:213–220
Rossi R, Pleyer J, Schafers P et al (1999) Development of ifosfamide-induced nephrotoxicity: prospective follow-up in 75 patients. Med Pediatr Oncol 32:177–182
Sanchez-Medina J, Gonzalez-Ramella O, Gallegos-Castorena S (2010) The effect of dexrazoxane for clinical and subclinical cardiotoxicity in children with acute myeloid leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 32:294–297
Saumet L, Deschamps F, Marec-Berard P et al (2015) Radiofrequency ablation of metastases from osteosarcoma in patients under 25 years: the SCFE experience. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 32:41–49
Schinhan M, Tiefenboeck T, Funovics P et al (2015) Extendible prostheses for children after resection of primary malignant bone tumor: twenty-seven years of experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1585–1591
Schrager J, Patzer RE, Mink PJ et al (2011) Survival outcomes of pediatric osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma: a comparison of surgery type within the SEER database, 1988-2007. J Registry Manag 38:153–161
Schwartz CL, Wexler LH, Krailo MD et al (2016) Intensified chemotherapy with dexrazoxane cardioprotection in newly diagnosed nonmetastatic osteosarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63:54–61
Schwarz R, Bruland O, Cassoni A, Schomberg P, Bielack S (2009) The role of radiotherapy in osteosarcoma. Cancer Treat Res 152:147–165
Seif AE, Walker DM, Li Y et al (2015) Dexrazoxane exposure and risk of secondary acute myeloid leukemia in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:704–709
Skinner R (2003) Chronic ifosfamide nephrotoxicity in children. Med Pediatr Oncol 41:190–197
Skinner R, Pearson ADJ, Price L et al (1989) Hypophosphatemic rickets after ifosfamide treatment in children. Br Med J 298:1560–1561
Smeland S, Bruland OS, Hjorth L et al (2011) Results of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XIV protocol for classical osteosarcoma: 63 patients with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Acta Orthop 82:211–216
Smith MA, Ungerleider RS, Horowitz ME et al (1991) Influence of doxorubicin dose intensity on response and outcome for patients with osteogenic sarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1460–1470
Smith RE, Bryant J, DeCillis A et al (2003) Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project experience. J Clin Oncol 21:1195–1204
Staals EL, Colangeli M, Ali N et al (2015) Are complications associated with the Repiphysis(R) expandable distal femoral prosthesis acceptable for its continued use? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:3003–3013
Stiller CA, Botta L, Brewster DH, VKY H, Frezza AM, Whelan J, Casali PG, Trama A, Gatta G, EUROCARE-5 Working Group (2018) Survival of adults with cancers of bone or soft tissue in Europe—Report from the EUROCARE-5 study. Cancer Epidemiol 56:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.010
Stine KC, Saylors RL, Sawyer JR et al (1997) Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia following safe exposure to etoposide. J Clin Oncol 15:1583–1586
Strauss S, Anninga J, Baglio R et al (2018) Report from the 4th European bone sarcoma networking meeting: focus on osteosarcoma. Clin Sarcoma Res 8:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-018-0103-0
Sugahara S, Kamada T, Imai R et al (2012) Carbon ion radiotherapy for localized primary sarcoma of the extremities: results of a phase I/II trial. Radiother Oncol 105:226–231
Taupin T, Decouvelaere AV, Vaz G et al (2016) Accuracy of core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of osteosarcoma: a retrospective analysis of 73 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging 97(3):327–331. pii: S2211-5684(15)00367-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.09.013
Tawbi HA, Burgess M, Bolejack V et al (2017) Pembrolizumab in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma and bone sarcoma (SARC028): a multicentre, two-cohort, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:1493–1501
Tebbi CK, London WB, Friedman D et al (2007) Dexrazoxane-associated risk for acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome and other secondary malignancies in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 25:493–500
Tucker M, Meadows A, Boice J et al (1987) Leukemia after therapy with alkylating agents for childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 78:459–464
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Division of Biologic Oncology Products, Office of Oncology Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA Briefing Document May 9, 2007, Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee, NDA 022092. Mifamurtide (muramyl tripeptide phosphatidyl ethanolamine, MTP-PE). INT 0133 Cooperative Group Protocol. Immuno-Designed Molecules, Inc (IDM Pharma, Inc.)
van de Rijn M, Guo X, Sweeney RT et al (2014) Molecular pathological analysis of sarcomas using paraffin-embedded tissue: current limitations and future possibilities. Histopathology 64:163–170
Von Hoff DD, Layard MW, Basa P et al (1979) Risk factors for doxorubicin-induced congestive heart failure. Ann Intern Med 91:710–717
Wasilewski-Masker K, Liu Q et al (2009) Late recurrence in pediatric cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1709–1720
Wexler LH, Andrich MP, Venzon D et al (1996) Randomized trial of the cardioprotective agent ICRF-187 in pediatric sarcoma patients treated with doxorubicin. J Clin Oncol 14:362–372
Whelan J, Patterson D, Perisoglou M et al (2010) The role of interferons in the treatment of osteosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:350–354
Whelan J, McTiernan A, Cooper N et al (2012) Incidence and survival of malignant bone sarcomas in England 1979-2007. Int J Cancer 131:E508–E517
Whelan JS, Bielack SS, Marina N et al (2015) EURAMOS-1, an international randomised study for osteosarcoma: results from pre-randomisation treatment. Ann Oncol 26:407–414
Widemann BC, Adamson PC (2006) Understanding and managing methotrexate nephrotoxicity. Oncologist 11:694–703
Williams D, Crofton PM, Levitt G (2008) Does ifosfamide affect gonadal function? Pediatr Blood Cancer 50:347–351
Winkler K, Gaedicke G, Grosch-Wörner I et al (1977) Chemotherapy of osteosarcoma. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 102:1831–1835
Winkler K, Beron G, Delling G et al (1988) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response. J Clin Oncol 6:329–337
Yevich S, Gaspar N, Tselikas L et al (2016) Percutaneous computed tomography-guided thermal ablation of pulmonary osteosarcoma metastases in children. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1380–1386
Yu W, Tang L, Lin F et al (2014) Stereotactic radiosurgery, a potential alternative treatment for pulmonary metastases from osteosarcoma. Int J Oncol 44:1091–1098
Zhang W, Tanaka M, Sugimoto Y, Takigawa T, Ozaki T (2016) Carbon-ion radiotherapy of spinal osteosarcoma with long-term follow. Eur Spine J 25(Suppl 1):113–117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bielack, S. et al. (2021). Osteosarcoma-Approach to Therapy. In: Arndt, C.A.S. (eds) Sarcomas of Bone and Soft Tissues in Children and Adolescents. Pediatric Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51160-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51160-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51158-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51160-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)