Skip to main content

A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Urban Constructs as a Basis for Design Creativity

An Ontological Conception of Urbanism for Human-Computer Aided Spatial Experiential Simulation and Design Creativity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 178))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

“The phenomenon of place is not comprehensible without computation, and any effort for simulating spatial experience or for the creative manifestation of such phenomena is not attainable without the computation that possesses a comprehensive conceptualization of spatial signs” is a conclusion of the article. Place is a fairly complex phenomenon that encompasses several interrelated knowledge domains. For example, from the users’ point of view, the phenomenon of place manifests over the interrelation between spatial cognition, psychology, and behavioral utilization. In contrast, from the designers’ point of view, these interrelated dimensions should be innovatively crafted. Any creative crafting of the virtual phenomenon of place needs to be aware of the spatial subjective conceptions of the intended users.

To resolve such complexity, the article recognizes the phenomenon of place as a mere relationship between the two realms of spatial representations and spatial conceptions. The realm of representation is objectively analyzed over the two layers of spatial signs and spatial features, while the realm of conception is subjectively obtainable using knowledge graphs. The article’s recognition of place as the virtualization of space implies that the multi-knowledge domains’ complexity of place will be reduced to merely the conceptualization of any spatial representations. The article’s findings of conceptualization of space adhere to findings from the fields of analogy, cognition, psycholinguistics, and creativity. These findings are central for simulating the subjective spatial experiences, subjective potential spatial utilization, and finally, for design creativity. Structuring such conceptualization is founded on an ontology of urban constructs and on language. This explains the need for the computation-human integrative role in learning the spatial concepts and then on linking the comprehensively learned conception with the spatial representations. The article is a philosophical explanation of a parallel computational model for conceptualizing urban constructs. The proposed conceptualization is theoretical, and it will be supplemented in the future with empirical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ezzat, M.: A comprehensive proposition of urbanism. In: New Metropolitan Perspectives, ISHT 2018, Regio Calabria, Italy. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 100, pp. 433–443. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ezzat, M.: A framework for a comprehensive conceptualization of urban constructs: SpatialNet and SpatialFeaturesNet for computer-aided creative urban design. In: RE: Anthropocene, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishe, S.: Philosophy of architecture. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ventura, D.: The computational creativity complex. In: Besold, T., Schorlemmer, M., Smaill, A. (eds.) Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines. Atlantis Press, Paris (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ezzat, M.: A computational tool for mapping the users’ urban cognition - a framework and a representation for the evolutionary optimization of the fuzzy binary relation between the urban conceptions of “us” and “others”. In: The 36th eCAADe Conference (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tamari, T.: The phenomenology of architecture: a short introduction to Juhani Pallasmaa. Body Soc. 23(1), 91–95 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lefebvre, H.: The Production of Space. Blackwell, Oxford (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Derrida, J.: Of Grammatology. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Derrida, J.: Speech and Phenomena. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Funke, J.: On the psychology of creativity. In: Meusburger, P., Funke, J., Wunder, E. (eds.) Milieus of Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Spatiality of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brinck, I.: The gist of creativity. In: Andersson, Å.E., Sahlin, N.E. (eds.) The Complexity of Creativity. Springer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, V.: What’s in a concept? Analog versus parametric concepts in LCCM theory. In: Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (eds.) The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heath, D., Norton, D., Ventura, D.: A conveying semantics through visual metaphor. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 5(2), 31:1–31:17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heath, D., Norton, D., Ventura, D.: Autonomously communicating conceptual knowledge through visual art. In: ICCC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prinz, J.J.: Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Koolhaas, R., Harvard Graduate School of Design, Trüby, S., Westcott, J., Petermann, S.: Rem Koolhaas. Elements of Architecture. Taschen, Cologne (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goel, A.K., Craw, S.: Design, innovation and case-based reasoning. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 20, 271–276 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Richter, K., Donath, D.: Towards a better understanding of the case-based reasoning paradigm in architectural education and design. In: eCAADe (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peckham, A., Schmiedeknecht, T.: The Rationalist Reader. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stojanovski, T.: City Information Modeling (CIM) and urbanism: blocks, connections, territories, people and situations. In: SimAUD (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norton, D., Heath, D., Ventura, D.: Finding creativity in an artificial artist. J. Creat. Behav. 47(2), 106–124 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malt, B.C., Gennari, S.P., Imai, M., Ameel, E., Saji, N., Majid, A.: Where are the concepts? What words can and can’t reveal. In: Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (eds.) The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Ezzat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ezzat, M. (2021). A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Urban Constructs as a Basis for Design Creativity. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_55

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics