Skip to main content

Cost Benefit Analysis for a Hydraulic Project: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 178))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The European Community, with regulation no. 1303/2013, introduces the need to do for the “Major projects” of investment in different strategic sectors, including water supply services, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA), in order to assess their co-financing (Cohesion Fund 2014–2020). The paper presents an interesting case study of a CBA for the evaluation of a complex hydraulic system in Campania Region.

The results of the study highlight, on the one hand, the strategic nature of the investment for the improvement of collective well-being and, on the other hand the well known problems and limitations in the literature related to the application of the CBA to public projects.

Future developments in the methodology adopted may concern the estimation of external effects as well as an in-depth study of the choice of the social discount rate that reflects the importance of recovering existing works and therefore the need for investment in order to optimize public resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A review of the studies conducted and the parameters used is reported in C.M. Shreve I. Kelman, 2014

References

  1. EU: Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lichfield, N.: “L’approccio Costi-Benefici alla valutazione dei piani”. In Atti Colloquio Internazionale I.R.I.S./C.N.R. Metodi di valutazione nella pianificazione urbana e territoriale, Capri (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Florio, M.: La valutazione degli investimenti pubblici. I progetti di sviluppo nell’Unione Europea e nell’esperienza internazionale. Volume primo. Franco Angeli, Milano (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pennisi, G., Scandizzo, P.L.: Valutare l’incertezza. G. Giappichelli Editore, Torino (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lind, R.C.: Flood control alternatives and the economics of flood protection. Water Resour. Res. 3(2), 345–357 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Torrieri, F., Nijkamp, P.J., Shapira, A.: Real estate investment choices and decision support systems. Sustainability 11(11), 3110. MDPI AG (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tajani, F., Morano, P.: Concession and lease or sale? A model for the enhancement of public properties in disuse or underutilized. WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 11, art. 74, 787–800 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Saving soil and financial feasibility. A model to support the public-private partnerships in the regeneration of abandoned areas. Land Use Policy 73, 40–48 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Torrieri, F., Mancini, M., Mattia, S., Oppio, A.: A spatial model for the economic evaluation of flood risks. [Un modello spaziale di valutazione economica del danno atteso a supporto della gestione sostenibile delle aree a rischio alluvioni] in Territorio, Issue 79, pp. 118–126, Franco Angeli, Milano (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hallegatte, S., Przyluski, V.: The Economics of Natural Disasters Concepts and Methods, Policy Research Working Paper 5507, World Bank (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groom, B., Hepburn, C., Koundouri, P., Pearce, D.: Declining discount rates: the long and the short of it. Environ. Res. Econ. 32(4), 445–493 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mancini, M., Lombardi, G., Mattia, S., Oppio, A., Torrieri, F.: An integrated model for ex-ante evaluation of flood damage to residential building. In: Green Energy and Technology. Appraisal: From Theory to Practice, pp. 157–170 (2017). Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_12

  13. Weitzman, M.L.: Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36, 201–208 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Torrieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Torrieri, F., De Paola, P., Basile, M., Vacca, G., Del Giudice, V. (2021). Cost Benefit Analysis for a Hydraulic Project: A Case Study. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_204

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics