Skip to main content

Retake Rancitelli

The Regeneration of the Urban Common Goods as an Instrument of Social Inclusion and Empowerment of the Communities. Experiences of Research, Participation, Education for Active Criticism of the Urban Inequalities in the Southern Periphery of Pescara

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Metropolitan Perspectives (NMP 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 178))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

The urban regeneration of suburbs - places of inequality, even before geographical and social suburbs - must go hand in hand with the identification, description and measurement of these inequalities, and in particular those that concern the supply and access to urban commons - schools, parks, public libraries, health facilities, childcare facilities, public spaces and services - intended, as well as essential elements of welfare, as places and structures linked to the exercise of fundamental citizenship rights (Rodotà 2015). A good urban regeneration process arises first of all through shared investigation paths, in terms of data, descriptions, graphic representations. Secondly, it can and must be addressed to the care and enhancement of urban common goods - schools, public spaces, parks and green areas, libraries and other places of culture and social relations - promoting their full access and maximum use, in particular for those aimed and addressed to children and adolescents, with direct, simple, effective, and shared actions. Urban regeneration, understood as a set of actions of different nature and sector of intervention, well calibrated to each other, capable of revitalizing in a general sense territories marked by inequalities, so that it assumes real effectiveness, contributing to the effective reduction of these inequalities, it must put together innovative practices of administrative governance, and active citizenship, within new logics of horizontal subsidiarity, moreover increasingly favored, today, in Italy, by recent legislative and administrative innovations. These practices must open up more space for direct, in-formed participation of the inhabitants and grassroots associations, for shared care and active custody of these goods. The contribution tries to develop these hypotheses starting from the experiences carried out by the author around the urban realities of the southern ‘periphery’ of Pescara.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    PRUST, PRU, and the numerous programs that have followed since 1992 in the long season of complex programs and concerted urban planning.

  2. 2.

    URBAN 1 and 2. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/cities/cities_it.pdf.

  3. 3.

    The program covers the entire urban area of the city covering an area of 5.48 sq km with a population of 21,769 inhabitants. The Urban II program aims to stimulate an economic and social regeneration of cities and suburbs in crisis in order to promote sustainable urban development. The City of Pescara, for the years 2001–2006, will receive Community financial support in the amount of EURO 4.90 million. Furthermore, the Community funding will attract a total of EURO 7.35 million in investments from the public sector, thus creating a total amount of EURO 12.25 million to be invested in the City of Pescara.

  4. 4.

    “At school in the city”, a project conceived and conducted by the author of this essay, is an experimental laboratory/research in the world of childhood and adolescence in the urban suburbs of Pescara, composed of investigative and social research activities, analysis and urban discovery and direct practices of active citizenship. It is aimed at introducing and educating young citizens in formation of one of the most problematic neighborhoods, and together, richer in potential and resources of the city of Pescara, to the themes and practices of shared management of urban common goods. A school of the city is a didactic course of laboratory and field research, which takes place through the close collaboration between the world of research and university education (students, young graduates and researchers from the Department of Architecture of Pescara) with pedagogical structures and the students of schools present in the western suburbs of the city, and some voluntary associations and active citizenship operating in this urban sector. The Facebook page of the project is still active: A scuola di città.

References

  • Berdini, P.: Le città fallite. I grandi comuni italiani e la crisi del welfare urbano, Donzelli Editore, Roma (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibliotecacasadiquartierepescara Homepage. https://www.bibliotecacasadiquartierepescara.it/progetto/

  • Camera Deputati: Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sulle condizioni di sicurezza e sullo stato di degrado delle città e delle loro periferie. Stab.Tip. C. Colombo, Roma (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelo, K., Monni, S., Tomassi, F.: Le mappe della disuguaglianza. Una geografia sociale metropolitana. Donzelli Editore, Roma (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mibac: Direzione Generale Arte e Architettura contemporanee e Periferie urbane, progetto intersettoriale Piano Cultura Futuro Urbano (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodotà, S.: Il diritto di avere diritti. Editori Laterza, Roma - Bari (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Secchi, B.: La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Editori Laterza, Roma - Bari (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrillo, A.: La periferia nuova. In: Disuguaglianza, spazi, città. Franco Angeli Editore, Milano (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Rovigatti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rovigatti, P. (2021). Retake Rancitelli. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_199

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics