Abstract
Territorial imbalances between catalysts of development and lagging areas are raising concerns in the majority of European regions. The divide between main urban nodes and marginal territories poses serious development challenges. The polarization of social, economic and cultural opportunities in urban areas and the phenomena of ageing, depopulation and impoverishment of inner areas are often the result of place-neutral, spatially-blind approaches to development, and constitute a hurdle towards the European objective of social, economic and territorial cohesion. In order to face these challenges, since a decade the European Union is pushing towards more place-based approaches to development, combining bottom-up and top-down logic within multilevel, multiactor and multifund context-sensitive processes. The experiences of the River Agreements and the National Strategy for Inner Areas represents interesting examples of the Italian take on the EU place-based logics, aiming at reversing the negative development trends that characterize the country’s marginal areas. Despite each presenting its own peculiarities, the two approaches share some common ground, as they both attempt to develop innovative, place-sensitive governance processes, featuring a participatory dimension and aiming at overcoming administrative and sectoral boundaries. This contribution discusses the potentials and limitations of the two approaches, with particular attention for the place-based flavour of the peculiar multilevel governance frameworks they adopt. The presented findings constitute an input to the debate on policies for the reactivation of marginal areas and the rebalance of territorial inequalities in a sustainable perspective.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Those territories are labelled by the strategy as “inner areas”. Inner areas typically feature small and sparsely populated settlements, and are affected by ageing, depopulation and impoverishment. At the same time, they often offer relevant environmental and cultural resources.
- 2.
Those classified as “Silver” by the Italian Rail Network manager.
- 3.
The CTAI is coordinated by the Department for the Cohesion Policy of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, and involves a number of sectoral ministries. Moreover, in each project area regional, provincial and local authorities and stakeholders are involved in the CTAI.
- 4.
The legal conditions for municipalities’ aggregation depend on specific regional laws.
- 5.
The total budget devoted to the 37 areas that reached the implementation phase is €600 million. On average, the highest share of funding comes from ESIF, among which the main source is the European Regional Development Fund (Agenzia per la Coesione Territoriale 2019).
References
Adams, N., Cotella, G., Nunes, R.J.: Spatial planning in Europe. The interplay between knowledge and policy development in an enlarged EU. In: Adams, N., Cotella, G., Nunes, R.J. (eds.) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, pp. 1–25. Routledge, London (2011)
Agenzia per la Coesione Territoriale: Relazione annuale CIPE sulla Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne (2019). http://old2018.agenziacoesione.gov.it/it/arint/. Accessed 22 Jan 2020
Affeltranger, B., Lasserre, F.: La gestion par bassin versant: du principe écologique à la contrainte politique – le cas du Mékong. Vertigo. La revue en sciences de l'environnement 4(3), 1–15 (2003, online)
Barca, F.: An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy: A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. European Communities, Brussels (2009)
Barca, F., Carrosio, G., Lucatelli, S.: Le aree interne da luogo di diseguaglianza ad opportunità per il Paese. In: Paolazzi, L., Gargiulo, T., Sylos Labini, M. (eds.) Le Sostenibili Carte dell’Italia, pp. 167–186. Ricerche Marsilio, Venice (2018)
Barca, F., Casavola, P., Lucatelli, S.: A Strategy for Inner Areas in Italy: Definition, Objectives, Tools and Governance. Ministry for Economic Development (2014) http://old2018.agenziacoesione.gov.it/it/arint/. Accessed 22 Jan 2020
Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., Solly, A.: Spatial governance and planning systems and the capacity for public control of spatial development: a European typology. Eur. Plan. Stud. 1–20 (2020, online)
Minot, D.: Le projet de territoire - Elaboration et conduite partagées d’un projet de territoire. Bergerie Nationale, Rambouillet (2001)
CEC – Commission of the European Communities: Seventh Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. European Commission, Brussels (2017)
Cotella, G.: The urban dimension of EU cohesion policy. In: Medeiros, E. (ed.) Territorial Cohesion, pp. 133–151. Springer, Cham (2019)
Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U.: Europeizzazione del governo del territorio: un modello analitico. Territorio 73, 127–134 (2015)
Cotella, G., Othengrafen, F., Papaioannou, A., Tulumello, S.: Socio-spatial and socio-political implications of the economic crisis and austerity politics in Southern-European cities. In: Knieling, J., Othengrafen, F. (eds.) Cities in Crisis. Socio-Spatial Impacts of the Economic Crisis in Southern European Cities, pp. 27–47. Routledge, Abingdon (2015a)
Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., Santangelo, M.: Transferring good territorial governance in Europe: opportunities and barriers. In: Schmidt, P., Van Well, L. (eds.) Territorial Governance Across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects, pp. 238–253. Routledge, Abingdon (2015b)
Cotella, G., Vitale Brovarone, E.: The Italian national strategy for inner areas. a place-based approach to regional development. In: Bański, J. (ed.) Dilemmas of Regional and Local Development, pp. 50–71. Routledge, London (2020)
Choay, F.: L’utopie et le statut anthropologique de l’espace édifié. Esprit, L’Architecture et l’esprit de l’urbanisme européen, pp. 93–113 (2005)
Carter, N.: The Politics of the Environment. Ideas, Activism, Policy. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)
Davies, S.: Does Cohesion policy work? Meta-review of research on the effectiveness of cohesion policy. EPRC Research Paper n.99. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow (2017)
Eckerberg, K., Joas, M.: Multi-level environmental governance: a concept under stress? Local Environ. Int. J. Justice Sustain. 9(5), 405–412 (2004)
Ingaramo, R., Voghera, A. (eds.): Topics and Methods for Urban and Landscape Design. From the River to the Project. Springer, Cham (2016)
Lucatelli, S.: Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne: un punto a due anni dal lancio della Strategia. Agriregionieuropa 12(45), 4–10 (2016)
Moccia, F.D., Voghera, A.: Contratti di Fiume per il progetto di territorio. In: Rapporto dal Territorio INU 2019. INU edizioni, Roma (2019)
Solly, A., Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U.: How sustainable are land use tools? A Europe-wide typological investigation. Sustainability 12(3), 1257 (2020)
Tantillo, F.: La co-progettazione locale e la strategia d’area: il metodo di lavoro e le missioni di campo. Territorio 74, 97–101 (2015)
Tulumello, S., Cotella, G., Othengrafen, F.: Spatial planning and territorial governance in Southern Europe between economic crisis and austerity policies. Int. Plan. Stud. 25(1), 72–87 (2020)
Voghera, A.: River agreements in Italy. An experience for river management. Recent advances in environmental and earth sciences and economics. Energy Environ. Struct. Eng. Ser. 39, 351–362 (2015)
Voghera, A., Regis, D.: Progetti per territori in trasformazione. Archivio di studi urbani e regionali 117, 137–156 (2016)
Voghera, A.: The river agreement in Italy. Resilient planning for the co-evolution of communities and landscapes. Land Use Policy 91(104377), 1–9 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cotella, G., Vitale Brovarone, E., Voghera, A. (2021). Italy Testing the Place-Based Approach: River Agreements and National Strategy for Inner Areas. In: Bevilacqua, C., Calabrò, F., Della Spina, L. (eds) New Metropolitan Perspectives. NMP 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 178. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-48278-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-48279-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)