Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Explorations in Ethics
  • 145 Accesses

Abstract

Ethics is a speculative discipline. We lose sight of this because of our current practices and due to our deep involvement with the contemporary literature. Explorations in Ethics has a distinctive speculative bent, although much that is addressed in it will be familiar to all ethicists. Ethics today is largely analytic in approach and is historically informed. A prominent part of contemporary ethics methodology is its piecemeal approach, formulating and arguing for definite smaller defensible claims. Central to the current ethics discussion are what I describe as safe claims. The problem with prioritizing safe claims is that it ensures the exclusion of unsafe claims that might be more explanatorily powerful and fruitful. This means that, currently, we choose theoretical safety over progress. The principal reason to speculate in ethics is to move ethics toward its ultimate aim: a comprehensive and correct ethical theory. Putting explanatory but unsafe claims back at the center of ethical inquiry is the key to progress in ethics. The proposal for putting ethics back on its natural footing of greater speculation is to encourage ethicists to identify a contemporary methodological constraint they wish to suspend, then, once it is lifted, to speculate about matters of ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    R. Eugene Bales proposed this solution (1971, 257). Most consequentialists accepted it (Pettit 1993, xvi).

  2. 2.

    What exactly is analytic philosophy is a source of dispute. For part of my take on the matter, see Kaspar (2016). For a thorough examination of the topic, see Glock (2008).

  3. 3.

    The inclusion of Hume makes sense if we consider that he influenced both utilitarians and moral skeptics.

  4. 4.

    Kant identifies this as a feature of the Categorical Imperative in Critique of Practical Reason (1993, 8).

  5. 5.

    The Benacerraf problem is covered in Justin Clarke-Doane’s chapter in this volume.

  6. 6.

    Hursthouse states that virtue ethics is a ‘fairly recent addition to contemporary moral theory’ (1999, 1).

References

  • Bales, R. Eugene. 1971. Act-Utilitarianism: Account of Right-Making Characteristics or Decision-Making Procedure? American Philosophical Quarterly 8: 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Lawrence. 1998. A New Stoicism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, Thomas. 1987. Sartor Resartus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, Hans-Johann. 2008. What Is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haybron, Daniel. 2008. The Pursuit of Unhappiness–The Elusive Psychology of Well-Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holiday, Ryan. 2014. The Obstacle Is the Way: The Timeless Art of Turning Trials into Triumph. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursthouse, Rosalind. 1999. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, William B. 2008. A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1993. Critique of Practical Reason. 3rd ed., Trans. Lewis White Beck. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar, David. 2016. Ross’s Place in the History of Analytic Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4): 657–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Christian. 2013. Moral Character: An Empirical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek. 2011. On What Matters. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip. 1993. Introduction. In Consequentialism, ed. Philip Pettit. London: Dartmouth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, Massimo. 2017. How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, William David. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1956. The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. In Logic and Knowledge, ed. Robert Charles Marsh, 175–281. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, Laura, and François Schroeter. 2019. The Generalized Integration Challenge in Metaethics. Nous 53 (1): 192–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Stephen P. 2012. A Brief History of Analytic Philosophy: From Russell to Rawls. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, Rowland. 2010. Twentieth-Century Moral Philosophy. In The Routledge Companion to Twentieth Century Philosophy, ed. Dermot Moran, 851–882. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton-Lake, Philip. 2000. Kant, Duty, and Moral Worth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W. Jay. 2014. Prudence. In Virtues and Their Vices, ed. Kevin Timpe and Craig S. Boyd, 37–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda Trinkaus. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I would like to thank an anonymous reviewer for quite helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kaspar, D. (2020). Introduction. In: Kaspar, D. (eds) Explorations in Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48051-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics