Abstract
The chapter traces the main lines of Buber’s explicit reception of the intellectual legacy of the German idealist thinkers. It focuses on his discussions of Kant, Fichte and Hegel, which are at the center of this reception. While Buber devotes almost no attention to Schelling, Fichte’s Addresses to the German Nation played an important role in his pre-dialogical thinking. Buber’s treatment of Hegel—especially in the context of political philosophy and philosophical anthropology—is even more substantial. The most extensive and diverse aspect of this reception is Buber’s study and use of Kant’s philosophy which had a profound and lifelong effect on his thought. Buber’s assessment of the ideas of the German idealist thinkers is quite varied, ranging from enthusiastic affirmation to harsh criticism.
This work was produced at the Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences. It was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-15-0682.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Buber refers briefly to Schelling in Zur Geschichte des Individuationsproblems (Buber 1904, p. 31), Franz Rosenzweig (Buber 1953, p. 247) or Zu Bergsons Begriff der Intuition (Buber 1953, p. 221). He also discusses Schelling in his correspondence with Rudolf Pannwitz in early 1937 (Buber 1972–1975, vol. 2, pp. 633, 637, 640–641).
- 2.
Buber’s probably earliest reference to Fichte is found in Über Jakob Böhme (Buber 1901, p. 252).
- 3.
There are brief discussions of Hegel’s philosophy also in other works than those examined in this chapter. See, for example, Franz Rosenzweig (Buber 1953, pp. 244–245), Die Frage an den Einzelnen (Buber 1962, pp. 221–222), Die Forderung des Geistes und die geschichtliche Wirklichkeit (Buber 1953, p. 129), Pfade in Utopia (Buber 1962, pp. 846–847, 863).
- 4.
Buber discusess Kant in more than a dozen works. I follow here the main lines of his reception.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
A more extensive analysis of Buber’s picture of Hegel in What is Man? is provided by Nathan Rotenstreich. Cf. (Rotenstreich 2009, pp. 43–50).
- 9.
Bibliography
Bizoň, Michal. 2017. Vzájomnosť medzi Ja a Ty. Dialogická filozofia Martina Bubera. Trnava: UCM.
Buber, Martin. 1901. Über Jakob Böhme. Wiener Rundschau 5 (1): 251–253.
———. 1904. Zur Geschichte des Individuationsproblems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vienna.
———. 1916. Die Losung. Der Jude 1 (1): 1–3.
———. 1953. Hinweise, Gesammelte Essays. Zurich: Manesse Verlag.
———. 1957. Pointing the Way: Collected Essays. New York: Harper & Brothers.
———. 1960. Begegnung. Autobiographische Fragmente. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
———. 1962. Werke, vols. 1–3. Munich: Kösel & Lambert Schneider, vol. 1.
———. 1972–1975. Martin Buber. Briefwechsel aus sieben Jahrzehnten, ed. Grete Schaeder, vols. 1–3. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider.
———. 2001ff. Werkausgabe, vols. 1–22. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.
———. 2002a. Between Man and Man. Trans. Ronald Gregor-Smith, Ed. Maurice Friedman. London and New York: Routledge.
———. 2002b. Meetings. Autobiographical Fragments. Ed. Maurice Friedman. London and New York: Routledge.
———. 2016. Eclipse of God: Studies in the Relation Between Religion and Philosophy. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Casper, Bernhard. 2002. Das dialogische Denken. Franz Rosenzweig, Ferdinand Ebner und Martin Buber. Freiburg and Munich: Verlag Karl Alber.
Friedman, Maurice. 1991. Encounter on the Narrow Ridge: A Life of Martin Buber. New York: Paragon House.
Horwitz, Rivka. 1978. Buber’s Way to I and Thou. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider.
Mendes-Flohr, Paul R. 1979. Von der Mystik zum Dialog. Martin Bubers geistige Entwicklung bis hin zu “Ich und Du.” Königstein/Ts.: Jüdischer Verlag.
Rotenstreich, Nathan. 2009. Immediacy and Its Limits: A Study in Martin Buber’s Thought. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Schmidt, Gilya Gerda. 1995. Martin Buber’s Formative Years: From German Culture to Jewish Renewal, 1897–1909. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Shapira, Avraham. 1999. Hope for Our Time. Key Trends in the Thought of Martin Buber. Trans. Jeffrey M. Green. Albany: State University of New Your Press.
Stewart, Jon. 2018. Hegel’s Interpretation of the Religions of the World: The Logic of the Gods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Theunissen, Michael. 1984. The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wachinger, Lorenz. 1970. Der Glaubensbegriff Martin Bubers. Munich: Max Hueber.
Werner, Hans-Joachim. 1994. Martin Buber. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
Wyschogrod, Edith. 1996. The Demise of the Aufhebung and the Rise of the Between: From Ethics to Philosophy of Religion in Martin Buber. In Philosophie de la religion entre éthique et ontologie, ed. M. Marco, 727–746. Olivetti, Padova: CEDAM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Šajda, P. (2020). Buber and German Idealism: Between Philosophical Anthropology and Philosophy of Religion. In: Stewart, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44571-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44571-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44570-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44571-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)