Abstract
Over the past decades, the social protection of unemployed people has been high on policy agendas of many welfare states. Here, we address the question how the Dutch general public’s solidarity with the unemployed—in terms of the welfare benefits they would grant this group—has been influenced by economic developments and changes in unemployment rates over a longer time period. We analyse repeated cross-section data from the Netherlands (1975–2010). Our findings show that in times of higher unemployment people’s solidarity with the unemployed is higher, while independently from that, in times of economic downturn solidarity is lower. These macro-level effects vary only little across social groups, yet we do find that the unemployment rate affects people’s solidarity more positively during economic good times.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alt, J. E. (1979). The politics of economic decline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, J. (2005). De steun voor de verzorgingsstaat in de publieke opinie, 1970–2000. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Blekesaune, M. (2007). Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies. European Sociological Review, 23(3), 393–403.
Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427.
Bryson, C. (1997). Benefit claimants: Villains or victims? In R. Jowell, J. Curtice, A. Park, L. Brook, K. Thomson, & C. Bryson (Eds.), British social attitudes, the 14th report (pp. 73–88). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Coughlin, R. (1979). Social policy and ideology: Public opinion in eight rich nations. Comparative Social Research, 2(1), 3–40.
Deitch, C. (2004). Gender and popular support for the welfare state: Cross-national trends in a period of restructuring. Paper presented at the Annual Conference ISA-RC19 ‘Welfare State Restructuring: Processes and Social Outcomes’, Paris.
Eardley, T., & Matheson, G. (1999). Australian attitudes to unemployment and unemployed people. Sydney: Social Policy Research Centre, University of New South Wales.
Enns, P., & Wlezien, C. (Eds.). (2011). Who gets represented? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Erikson, R., MacKuen, M., & Stimson, J. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fraile, M., & Ferrer, M. (2005). Explaining the determinants of public support for cuts in unemployment benefits spending across OECD countries. International Sociology, 204, 459–481.
Furaker, B., & Blomsterberg, M. (2003). Attitudes towards the unemployed: An analysis of Swedish survey data. International Journal of Social Welfare, 12(3), 193–203.
Furnham, A. (1983). Attitudes toward the unemployed receiving social security benefits. Human Relations, 36(2), 135–150.
Galbraith, J. (1992). The culture of contentment. Harmondworth: Penguin Books.
Gallie, D., & Paugam, S. (2002). Social precarity and social integration. Brussels: European Commission.
Golding, P., & Middleton, S. (1982). Images of welfare: Press and public attitudes to poverty. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gonthier, F. (2016). Parallel publics? Support for income distribution in times of economic crisis. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12168.
Goul Andersen, J. (1999). Changing labour markets, new social divisions and welfare state support. In S. Svallfors & P. Taylor-Gooby (Eds.), The end of the welfare state? responses to state retrenchment (pp. 13–33). London: Routledge.
Hills, J. (2015). Good times, bad times: The welfare myth of them and us. Bristol: Policy Press.
Houtman, D. (1997). Welfare state, unemployment and social justice: Judgements on the rights and obligations of the unemployed. Social Justice Research, 10(3), 267–288.
Jeene, M., & van Oorschot, W. (2013). ‘The relative deservingness of the unemployed in the eyes of the European Public’. In L. Halman & W. Arts (Eds.), Value contrasts and consensus in present-day Europe: Painting Europe’s moral landscapes. The Hague: Brill, chapter 5, pp. 95–116.
Jeene, M., van Oorschot, W., & Uunk, W. (2013). Popular criteria for the welfare deservingness of disability pensioners: The influence of structural and cultural factors. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 1103–1117.
Jeene, M., van Oorschot, W., & Uunk, W. (2014). The dynamics of welfare opinions in changing economic, institutional and political contexts: An empirical analysis of Dutch deservingness opinions, 1975–2006. Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 731–749.
Kangas, O. (1997). Self-interest and the common good: The impact of norms, selfishness and context in social policy opinions. Journal of Socio-Economics, 26(5), 475–494.
Larsen, C. (2002). Unemployment and stigmatisation: The dilemma of the welfare state. In J. Goul Andersen & K. Halvorsen (Eds.), Unemployment and citizenship: Marginalisation and integration in the Nordic countries (pp. 55–72). Bristol: Policy Press.
Larsen, C. (2006). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Maassen, G., & De Goede, M. (1989). Public opinion about unemployed people in the period 1975–1985: The case of The Netherlands. The Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences, 25, 97–113.
Macleod, L., Montero, D., & Speer, A. (1999). America’s changing attitudes toward welfare and welfare recipients, 1938–1995. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 26(2), 175–185.
Sihvo, T., & Uusitalo, H. (1995). Economic crises and support for the welfare in Finland 1975–1993. Acta Sociologica, 38, 251–262.
Uunk, W., & van Oorschhot, W. (2017). How welfare reforms influence public opinion regarding welfare deservingness: Evidence from Dutch time-series data, 1975–2006. In W. van Oorschot, F. Roosma, B. Meuleman & T. Reeskens (Eds.), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness (pp. 149–166). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42.
van Oorschot, W., & Meuleman, B. (2014). Popular deservingness of the unemployed in the context of welfare state policies, economic conditions and cultural climate. In S. Kumlin & I. Stadelmann-Steffen (Eds.), How welfare states shape the democratic public: Policy feedback, participation, voting, and attitudes (pp. 244–268). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Robustness Analyses
Appendix: Robustness Analyses
We performed several analyses to check whether results were robust with distinct specifications. Results are available upon request with the authors.
-
‘Don’t knows’ on solidarity measure: We checked whether omitting the ‘don’t know’ answers (19%) from the ‘sufficient’ category influenced our findings. This hardly did so; only the effect of economic downturn varied somewhat more across social categories (notably a less negative effect for middle and higher educated than for lower educated), yet with the same pattern as displayed in Table 5.3. To preserve statistical power, we decided to keep the ‘don’t know’ answers in our analyses (coded as ‘sufficient’).
-
Lagged effects of economic cycle factors: Lagged measures (t = −1, t = −2) for economic downturn and unemployment rate displayed a weaker effect for economic downturn, but still a strong effect for the unemployment rate. This indicates that the effect of economic downturn is more immediate than that of the unemployment rate.
-
Political stance: Including political stance in our models did not change economic cycle effects (and accompanying interactions). Political stance in itself has an effect though (which is moderate in size): holding a more right-wing political stance lowers solidarity with the unemployed (also see Jeene et al., 2014).
Analyses per time period: We also tested whether cross-level interactive patterns (in specific with the unemployment rate) were more prominent in one period than the other. We did this because Model 3 of Table 5.2 showed that the unemployment rate has a distinct effect in beginning years than later on (effect became more positive over the years). Findings were inconsistent; e.g. while before 1993 the unemployment rate effect was weaker among higher income groups (significantly so), the reverse was true from 1993 onwards. We think this inconsistency may have to do with the power at the year level that is reduced when analysing only certain subperiods.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uunk, W., van Oorschot, W. (2020). Economic Fluctuation and Shifts in Popular Solidarity with Unemployed People. In: Van Hoyweghen, I., Pulignano, V., Meyers, G. (eds) Shifting Solidarities . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44062-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-44061-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-44062-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)