Skip to main content

Welcome to the “Shit Show”: Leveraging Emotions for Theory Building

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Security Management

Abstract

This essay is a methodological reflection on conducting research in extreme contexts, the impact of this on researchers’ emotions, and its subsequent use in theory building. The essay draws on personal experience of conducting research on the Greek island of Lesbos in the aftermath of the European refugee crisis in 2017 and 2018. The essay adds to the literature on reflexivity, theory building and metaphors, spanning both the macro perspective of global grand challenges and the micro perspective of individuals’ emotional burdens. It proffers the metaphor of a “settled emergency” to describe a multi-faceted situation encountered in the field that can also be found in many organisational contexts in which an unbearable situation is perpetuated by informal dynamics.

The term “shit show” originates from an interviewee’s answer: “We call it the ‘shit show’ to be honest. […] The number we are talking about, really isn’t so big that Europe can’t deal with it. And it’s just a lack of political will. And where is all this money going? I mean, there are people living in Moria camp now, and winter is like weeks away. They haven’t even got summer tents. […] It’s just politics. […] It’s wanting to discourage people from coming. It’s wanting to make an example. […] It’s just plain inhumane mismanagement. […] The shit show doesn’t start on this island; it’s starting in the countries that people are being forced to leave. You know, most of them, they would love to go home” (Professional Aid Worker).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on information provided by the municipality of Lesbos.

  2. 2.

    Based on author’s own count and listing.

References

  • Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 480–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behar, R. (2014). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston, US: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claus, L. J., De Rond, M., Howard-Grenville, J., & Lodge, J. (2018). When fieldworks hurts: On the lived experience of conducting research in unsettling contexts. In T. B. Zilber, J. M. Amis, & J. Mair (Eds.), The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory (pp. 157–172). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P. (2006). Making sense of theory construction: Metaphor and disciplined imagination. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1579–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. (2008). Metaphors and theory building in organization theory: What determines the impact of a metaphor on theory? British Journal of Management, 19(4), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danou, M. (2017). Ekathimerini. The cameras have left Lesvos, but bitterness remains. https://www.ekathimerini.com/223655/article/ekathimerini/community/the-cameras-have-left-lesvos-but-bitterness-remains. Accessed 28 Nov 2019.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Etzion, D., & Gehman, J. (2015). Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited. Organization Studies, 36(3), 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, L. (2018). “The worst refugee camp on earth”BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45271194. Accessed 28 Aug 2019.

  • Fotaki, M. (2019). A crisis of humanitarianism: Refugees at the gates of Europe. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 8(6), 321–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2019). “Through the looking glass”: On phantasmal tales, distortions and reflexivity in organizational scholarship. In T. B. Zilber, J. M. Amis, & J. Mair (Eds.), The production of managerial knowledge and organizational theory: New approaches to writing, producing and consuming theory (pp. 157–172). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, G. (2009). Hating Israel in the field: On ethnography and political emotions. Anthropological Theory, 9(1), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klag, M., & Langley, A. (2013). Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornberger, M., Leixnering, S., Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2018). Rethinking the sharing economy: The nature and organization of sharing in the 2015 refugee crisis. Academy of Management Discoveries, 4(3), 314–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langenbusch, C. (2020). A lot to lose. Organizational identity and emotions in institutional contexts (No. 3). RSM Dissertations in Management. Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Médecins Sans Frontières. (2017). Confronting the mental health emergency on Samos and Lesbos. Why the containment of asylum seekers on the Greek islands must end. https://www.msf.org/sites/msf.org/files/2017_10_%20mental_health_greece_report_final_low.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.

  • Pascucci, E., & Patchett, E. (2018). Hotspots: Questioning the future of Europe through its borders. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 14(4), 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, P. (1987). Preventing industrial crises: The challenges of Bhopal. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5(3), 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. (2020). The Guardian. Crisis on Lesbos as more refugees arrive. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/09/tensions-refugees-and-islanders-crisis-on-lesbos. Accessed 14 Apr 2020.

  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondo, L. (2018). The Guardian. “We have found hell”: Trauma runs deep for children at dire Lesbos camp. https://www.theguardian.com/globaldevelopment/2018/oct/03/trauma-runs-deep-for-children-at-dire-lesbos-camp-moria. Accessed 3 Oct 2019.

  • Van Maanen, J. (2011). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25(4), 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This essay evolved over years, and I have many to thank. I benefited from feedback at the Academy of Management Discovery workshop, the VU Business and Society workshop and the EGOS conference. Thanks also to Mark van der Giessen for the first joint attempts of sensemaking in the field. A special thanks to Peter Bamberger and Arno Kourula for supporting major leaps. Thank you Joep Cornelissen and Gabriele Jacobs for continuously exercising a counter-checking distance and scrutinising my theory building over the years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Langenbusch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Langenbusch, C. (2021). Welcome to the “Shit Show”: Leveraging Emotions for Theory Building. In: Jacobs, G., Suojanen, I., Horton, K., Bayerl, P. (eds) International Security Management. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42523-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics