Abstract
This chapter sees the author develop a ‘theory of injustice’ that will provide the basis for a victimological perspective on justice processes. The chapter commences with some reflections on the consequence of viewing justice and injustice as poles of one dimension. As the author exposes his theory of injustice, he argues that the issue at stake is the manner in which this theory connects to victim’s participation in justice processes and criminal proceedings. Acknowledging that victims need to communicate their experience in justice processes, Pemberton casts doubt on the extent to which this is best understood in terms of reducing their stress symptoms: becoming less anxious or changing the sentence. He proposes that the justice process itself can be an important site for reconnection: of victim experience with society and with important symbols of shared values. This critical stance has some degree of synergy with the restorative justice perspective and central to his proposition is the need to understand that injustice concerns a relationship of victim with his or her self, rather than a relationship with other persons. The second requirement is to appreciate that this self is only accurately understood if it is conceived as being-in-the-world. Only then does the experience of injustice come into its own—when it amounts to an ontological assault. The arguments put forward in this chapter require a fundamental re-think about the way we experience our victimisation and by implication, the traditional ways in which we have come to think about activism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bakan, D. (1966). The Duality of Human Existence: Isolation and Communion in Western Man. Boston: Beacon Press.
Bernstein, J. M. (2015). Torture and Dignity: An Essay on Moral Injury. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brison, S. J. (2002). Aftermath: Violence and the Remaking of the Self. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Clark, M. (2000). On the Rejection of Morality: Bernard Williams’ Debt to Nietzsche. In R. Schacht (Ed.), Nietzsche’s Postmoralism (pp. 100–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crossley, M. L. (2000). Narrative Psychology, Trauma and the Study of Self/Identity. Theory & Psychology, 10, 527–546.
Davis, F. D. (1997). Phronesis, Clinical Reasoning and Pellegrino’s Philosophy of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine, 18, 173–195.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Freeman, M. (2000). When the Story’s Over: Narrative Foreclosure and the Possibility of Self-renewal. In M. Andrews, S. D. Sclater, C. Squire, & A. Treacher (Eds.), Lines of Narrative: Psychosocial Perspectives (pp. 81–91). London: Routledge.
Gadow, S. (1980). Existential Advocacy: Philosophical Foundation of Nursing. In S. Spicker & S. Gadow (Eds.), Nursing Images and Ideals: Opening Dialogue with the Humanities (pp. 79–101). New York: Springer.
Garro, L. C. (1992). Chronic Illness and the Construction of Narratives. In M. J. D. Good, P. E. Brodwin, B. J. Good, & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective (pp. 100–137). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Goodey, J. (2005). Victims and Victimology. Research, Policy, Practice. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered Assumptions: Towards a New Psychology of Trauma. New York: Free Press.
Levi, P. (1988). The Drowned and the Saved. London: Abacus.
Marshall, T. (1999). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. London: Home Office.
Nietzsche, F. (1888/1967). On the Genealogy of Morals (R. J. Hollingdale & W. Kaufman, Trans.). New York: Random House.
Nussbaum, M. (1990, 26 November). The Misfortune Teller. The New Republic, pp. 30–32.
Pellegrino, E. D. (1979). Toward a Reconstruction of Medical Morality: The Primacy of the Act of Profession and the Fact of Illness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4, 32–56.
Pemberton, A. (2009). Victim Movements: From Varying Needs to Diversified Criminal Justice Agenda’s. Acta Criminologica, 22, 1–23.
Pemberton, A. (2015). Victimology with a Hammer: The Challenge of Victimology. Tilburg: Prismaprint.
Pemberton, A., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2017). Judith Shklar’s Victimology and Restorative Justice. In I. Aertsen & B. Pali (Eds.), Criticial Restorative Justice (pp. 315–330). Oxford: Hart.
Pemberton, A., Aarten, P. G. M., & Mulder, E. (2017). Beyond Retribution, Restoration and Procedural Justice: The Big Two of Communion and Agency in Victims’ Perspectives on Justice. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23(7), 682–698.
Pemberton, A., Mulder, E., & Aarten, P. G. M. (2019). Stories of Injustice: Towards a Narrative Victimology. European Journal of Criminology, 16(4), 391–412.
Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Feelings of Being. Phenomenology, Psychiatry and the Sense of Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ratcliffe, M. (2012). The Phenomenology of Existential Feeling. In J. Fingerhut & S. Marienburg (Eds.), Feelings of Being Alive (pp. 23–54). Boston; Berlin: De Gruyter.
Ratcliffe, M. (2017). Real Hallucinations. Psychiatric Illness, Intentionality and the Interpersonal World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ratcliffe, M., Ruddel, M., & Smith, B. (2014). What Is a Sense of Foreshortened Future? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11.
Ricoeur, P. (1986). Life: A Story in Search of a Narrator. In M. Doeser & J. Kray (Eds.), Facts and Values (pp. 34–68). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
Rimé, B. (2009). Emotion Elicits the Social Sharing of Emotion: Theory and Empirical Review. Emotion Review, 1, 60–85.
Scheingold, S., Olson, T., & Pershing, J. (1994). Sexual Violence, Victim Advocacy and Republican Criminology: Washington’s Community Protection Act. Law and Society Review, 28(4), 729–763.
Sebold, A. (1999). Lucky. New York: Scribner.
Shklar, J. (1986). Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shklar, J. (1990). The Faces of Injustice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Strang, H. (2002). Repair or Revenge: Victims and Restorative Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Walgrave, L. (2008). Restorative Justice, Self-interest and Responsible Citizenship. Cullumpton, Devon, UK: Willan.
Wemmers, J. M. (1996). Victims in the Criminal Justice System. The Hague: The Netherlands, WODC/Kugler.
Williams, B. (1993). Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: CA. University of California Press.
Winkler, C. (1991). Rape as Social Murder. Anthropology Today, 7(3), 12–14.
Wolgast, E. (1987). The Grammar of Justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Yack, B. (1999). Putting Injustice First. Social Research, 66, 1103–1120.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale: Herald Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pemberton, A. (2020). A Theory of Injustice and Victims’ Participation in Criminal Processes. In: Tapley, J., Davies, P. (eds) Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42288-2_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-42287-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-42288-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)