Skip to main content

The French Socialist Party, Civil Servants and the State. A Comparative Approach to Social Reforms Between the Popular Front Period (1936–1938) and the Early Years of the Mitterrand Presidency (1981–1983)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Socialists and the State in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements ((PSHSM))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Machu and Tracol compare the way in which the French Socialists carried out social reforms when they came to power in 1936 and in 1981. Their chapter focuses on the historical transformations in the relationship between senior civil servants and the Socialist Party. In the 1930s, socialist programmes were formed primarily within the party, which did not take part on the debate on collective agreements that agitated reformist circles at the time. On the contrary, in the 1970s, the Parti Socialiste (PS) elaborated its reforms according to the data provided by the state economic expertise. Both periods, however, were characterized by a concern for efficiency that led to giving the executive power the dominant role. The party itself and the socialist deputies remained marginalized.

Translated by Cynthia Schoch and Trista Selous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    As an example in relation to the 1980s, Yvon Gattaz and Philippe Simonnot, Mitterrand et les patrons, 1981–1986, Paris, Fayard, 1999, 325 p.

  2. 2.

    Amongst executive civil servant, senior civil servants characterize themselves by their significant responsibilities but also the prestige of the public service body they belong to. This category includes, for instance, finance inspectors but also members of the highest administrative court (Conseil d’État) and of the Court of Auditors, and after 1945 the National School of Administration (ENA) graduates.

  3. 3.

    Fondation Jean-Jaurès, Centre d’Archives socialistes (later FJJ-CAS), note from Michel Rocard to Pierre Mauroy, 27 August 1981.

  4. 4.

    These were the economists Etienne Antonelli and Lucien Laurat as well as Ludovic Zoretti (professor of science) and Louis Vallon (graduate of the École Polytechnique).

  5. 5.

    The historian Olivier Dard notes that “technocrats are thus mainly men who have spent time in the private sector”.

  6. 6.

    The institution founded in 1925 can be seen as the ancestor of both the Conseil économique et social and the Commissariat général du Plan.

  7. 7.

    A single bill submitted by Raoul Evrard in 1934 (Journal officiel, Chambre des Députés, documents parlementaires, Proposition de résolution no. 3408, pp. 736–737).

  8. 8.

    At the conference of 1934 Jean Lebas called for a “working week of forty hours with a minimum wage” or a “fixed minimum wage”, without specifying the methods by which minimum salaries would be fixed (SFIO, XXXIe congrès national tenu à Toulouse, 20-23 mai 1934: compte-rendu sténographique, Paris, Librairie Populaire, 1935, pp. 334–335).

  9. 9.

    SFIO, 30th National Congress, 14–17 July 1933, reports, Librairie du Parti, 1933, 199 p.

  10. 10.

    On Jean Lebas, see infra.

  11. 11.

    AN 19760121/380, Note on the bill of MM. Evrard, Louis Gros and a number of their colleagues relating to the 40-hour week (no date or author).

  12. 12.

    It was mainly Jules Moch, Robert Marjolin and Etienne Weill-Raynal.

  13. 13.

    In fact, in its legal aspects the bill submitted by Antonelli is a direct copy of the law on the eight-hour work day.

  14. 14.

    Alain Chatriot, “Débats internationaux, rupture politique et négociations sociales: le bond en avant des 40 heures 1932–1938”, art. cit.

  15. 15.

    AN 19760121/380, Memo from the head of the office of the President of the Council to Charles Picquenard, 15 March 1935.

  16. 16.

    A graduate of the École Polytechnique, Moch joined the SFIO in 1924. In 1928 he was elected to Parliament as the Deputy for Drôme. He was close to Léon Blum and regarded as one of the SFIO’s best experts.

  17. 17.

    As noted by Alain Chatriot, this is recorded by the unionist René Belin, a well-informed but biased source.

  18. 18.

    AN 19920452/18, unsigned memo from the CGP, 26 May 1975.

  19. 19.

    Échange et Projets, La révolution du temps choisi, Paris, Albin Michel, 1980, pp. 191–192.

  20. 20.

    Le Poing et la Rose, “Pour une politique socialiste de l’emploi”, supplement to no. 66, December 1977.

  21. 21.

    Parti socialiste, Le programme commun de gouvernement de la gauche: propositions socialistes pour l’actualisation, Paris, Flammarion, 1978, p. 12; Projet socialiste pour la France des années 80, Paris, Club socialiste du livre, 1980, p. 175.

  22. 22.

    Television program “Cartes sur tables”, 16 March 1981.

  23. 23.

    Propositions 60 and 61.

  24. 24.

    La réforme de l’entreprise : rapport du comité présidé par Pierre Sudreau, Paris, Union générale d’éditions, 1975, pp. 41 and 79. Pierre Sudreau was a senior civil servant and a centre-right politician.

  25. 25.

    Commissariat général du Plan, Rapport du Comité emploi et travail, Paris, La Documentation française, 1976, 400 p.; Rapport de la Commission emploi et relations du travail, Paris, La Documentation française, 1980, 245 p.

  26. 26.

    Le Monde, 17 February 1975; Le Nouvel Observateur, 17 February 1975.

  27. 27.

    Echange et projets no. 10, 1976.

  28. 28.

    Les lettres sur la réforme gouvernementale were first published in 1918 and republished in 1936 with the title La réforme gouvernementale.

  29. 29.

    Hôtel Matignon is the residence and office of French Prime ministers.

  30. 30.

    Ordonnance no. 82-41 of 16 January 1982; laws no. 82-689 of 4 August 1982; no. 82-915 of 28 October 1982; no. 82-957 of 13 November 1982; no. 82-1097 of 23 December 1982. The Auroux laws were designed to improve French industrial relations, by giving new rights to workers and by promoting collective bargaining, particularly at company level. A workers’ right to express about their working conditions was created, as well as an annual obligation to negotiate at company level.

  31. 31.

    FJJ-CAS fonds Mauroy, CAB 18, memo by Pierre Joxe, 15 July 1982.

  32. 32.

    Interview with Bernard Brunhes, 13 May 2008. Bernard Brunhes was social advisor to Pierre Mauroy 1981–1983. Cf. infra.

  33. 33.

    FJJ-CAS fonds Mauroy, unindexed, memo from Robert Lion to Pierre Mauroy, 20 September 1981.

  34. 34.

    Interview with Bernard Brunhes, 13 May 2008. This work included the conference organized by the “Work and Society” research centre at Université Paris-Dauphine in April 1979. AN 19920452/36.

  35. 35.

    AN 19850743/435, memo from Bernard Brunhes to his collaborator René Cessieux, 15 July 1981.

  36. 36.

    The law of 11 June 1917 on the “English Week” gave Saturday afternoons off to workers in the clothing industry.

  37. 37.

    AN 198950743/435, minutes of the tripartite meeting in Matignon on 12 June 1981.

  38. 38.

    Nouvelles CFDT no. 43/81, 13 November 1981.

  39. 39.

    The number of working days lost in February 1982 rose to 450,000, as opposed to 125,000 in January. Source: Bulletin mensuel des statistiques du travail.

  40. 40.

    AN 19820430/4, transcription of the Council of Ministers of 10 February 1982.

  41. 41.

    Full compensation was set out in “almost all” the sector agreements. AN 5AG4/2484, memo by the Director of Employment Relations, 8 February 1983.

  42. 42.

    Jean Auroux, Les droits des travailleurs : rapport au président de la République et au Premier ministre, Paris, La Documentation française, 1981, 104 p.

  43. 43.

    Interview with Bernard Brunhes, 13 May 2008.

  44. 44.

    AN 19850743/354, memo from René Cessieux to Pierre Mauroy, 5 April 1982.

  45. 45.

    AN 19850743/354, memo from René Cessieux to Pierre Mauroy, 27 April 1982.

  46. 46.

    This was in fact the adoption of a recommendation from the International Labour Organisation (Convention no. 155, June 1981, article 13).

References

  • Asselain, Jean-Charles. 1974. Une erreur de politique économique: la loi de quarante heures de 1936. Revue économique 25 (4): 672–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergounioux, Alain, and Gérard Grunberg. 2007. Les socialistes français et le pouvoir: l’ambition et le remords. Paris: Hachette littératures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carré De Malberg, Nathalie. 2011. Le grand état-major financier: les inspecteurs des finances, 1918–1946. Paris: CHEFF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatriot, Alain. 2002. La démocratie sociale à la française. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Débats internationaux, rupture politique et négociations sociales: le bond en avant des 40 heures 1932–1938. In La France et le temps de travail 1814–2004, ed. Patrick Fridenson and Bénédicte Reynaud, 83–108; 198–203. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. La réforme de l’entreprise. Du contrôle ouvrier à l’échec du projet modernisateur. Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 114: 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cointepas, Michel. 1992. Eugène Chaillé, inspecteur du travail, biographie du premier inspecteur général du travail. Paris: Association pour l’Etude de l’histoire de l’Inspection du travail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dard, Olivier. 2000. Les technocrates: archéologie d’un concept, généalogie d’un groupe social. In L’Occupation, l’Etat français et les entreprises, ed. Olivier Dard, Jean-Claude Daumas, and François Marcot, 212–222. Paris: ADHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Le rendez-vous manqué des relèves des années trente. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descamps, Florence. 2006. L’Etat moderne, une contribution originale des fonctionnaires des finances à la réforme de l’Etat (1928–1940). Revue française d’administration publique 120 (4): 667–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraboulet, Danielle. 2007. Quand les patrons s’organisent, stratégies et pratiques de l’Union des industries métallurgiques et minières 1900–1950. Lille: Presses du Septentrion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frobert, Ludovic. 1997. L’économie politique d’Etienne Antonelli (1879–1971). Revue économique 48 (6): 1529–1559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gattaz, Yvon, and Philippe Simonnot. 1999. Mitterrand et les patrons, 1981–1986. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohl, Thierry. 2006. Du réformisme aux blumistes: socialistes au temps du Front populaire. In Le pain, la paix, la liberté. Expériences et territoires du Front populaire, ed. Xavier Vigna, Jean Vigreux, and Serge Wolikow, 43–52. Paris: Les Editions sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Julian. 1985. The Politics of Depression in France, 1932–1936. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Machu, Laure. 2011. Les conventions collectives du Front populaire, construction et pratiques du système français de relations professionnelles. PhD in history. UPOND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margairaz, Michel. 1975. Les socialistes face à l’économie et la société en juin 1936. Le Mouvement social 93: 87–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. L’État, les finances et l’économie, histoire d’une conversion. Vol. 1. Paris: CHEEF.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. L’ajustement périlleux entre relance, réforme et rigueur. In Les années Mitterrand, les années du changement, 1981–1984, ed. Serge Berstein, Pierre Milza, and Jean-Louis Bianco, 333–350. Paris: Perrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Gilles. 2007. Les socialistes et la société française. Réseaux et milieux (1905–1981). Vingtième Siècle. Revue d’histoire 96: 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, Bernard H. 1989. La réforme de la législation du travail sous la Ve République: un triomphe du modernisme? Le Mouvement social 148: 63–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudiz, Gilles, Emmanuel Raoul, and Henri Sterdyniak. 1979. Réduire la durée du travail: quelles conséquences? Économie et statistique 111: 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollet, Gilles. 2000. Technocratie et démocratie. Elites dirigeantes et réforme technicienne de l’Etat dans la France de l’entre-deux-guerres. In La question technocratique: de l’invention d’une figure aux transformations de l’action publique, ed. Vincent Dubois and Delphine Dulong, 35–53. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousselier, Nicolas. 2006. Le Front populaire, un régime politique nouveau? In Les deux France du Front populaire, ed. Gilles Morin and Gilles Richard, 267–278. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudischhauser, Sabine. 2017. From the 8-Hour Day to the 40-Hour Week: Legitimization Discourses of Labour Legislation between the Wars in France and Belgium. Politics and Governance 5 (1): 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvy, Alfred. 1967. Histoire économique de la France entre les deux guerres. Tome 2: De Pierre Laval à Paul Reynaud. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soubiran Paillet, Francine. 2007. Parlement, administrateurs et experts 1900–1914. Vingtième siècle. Revue d’histoire 93 (1): 151–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracol, Matthieu. 2015. La rigueur et les réformes. Histoire des politiques du travail et de l’emploi du gouvernement Mauroy (1981–1984). Doctoral thesis, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Julian. 2005. Social Reform, State Reform and Aristide Briand’s Moment of Hope in France. French Historical Studies 28 (1): 31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Machu, L., Tracol, M. (2020). The French Socialist Party, Civil Servants and the State. A Comparative Approach to Social Reforms Between the Popular Front Period (1936–1938) and the Early Years of the Mitterrand Presidency (1981–1983). In: Fulla, M., Lazar, M. (eds) European Socialists and the State in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries. Palgrave Studies in the History of Social Movements. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41540-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41540-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41539-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41540-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics