Skip to main content

Caring Democracy: How Should Concepts Travel?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State

Part of the book series: International Political Theory ((IPoT))

Abstract

Can the conceptual framework of ‘caring democracy’ be applied beyond the time and place where it first emerged? The chapters in this volume suggest so. Yet several dangers exist. First, such applications may be so remote as to render the concept of ‘caring democracy’ unintelligible. Second, past experience with western discourses, including discourses of care, suggest that they can become justifications for colonial and imperial domination. Many scholars have begun to propose ways in which scholars of care can avoid such dangers, drawing upon frameworks such as dislocation, solidarity, cosmopolitanism, intersectionality, and virtue. This chapter argues, though, the solution needs to arise out of the practices of a political conception of caring democracy itself, most especially, in thinking about and acting to foreground responsibility for more democratic practices in concrete and global frameworks. Some promising directions for doing so are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    And, of course, I have had the privilege of an academic position in a country in the Global North which has allowed me to become a scholar of these questions. It is important to keep always in mind the power dimensions that create such privileges and who benefits.

  2. 2.

    Among writers who consider postcolonial and decolonial thoughts who have been helpful in structuring the arguments here are Spivak (1987, 1988), Shilliam (2011a, b), Connell (2007), Comaroff and Comaroff (2012), as well as texts cited elsewhere in this chapter. See also Raghuram et. al. (2009).

  3. 3.

    Compare Marion Smiley’s critique of paternalism in this volume.

  4. 4.

    On the harmful nature of protectionist care discourses, see Young (2003).

  5. 5.

    Among exceptions, see, for example, Mignon Duffy (2011).

  6. 6.

    “Living as I have argued we do in the wake of slavery, in spaces where we were never meant to survive, or have been punished for surviving and for daring to claim or make spaces of something like freedom, we yet reimagine and transform spaces for an practices of an ethics of care (as in repair, maintenance, attention), an ethics of seeing, and of being in the wake as consciousness; as a way of remembering and observance that started with the door of no return, continued in the hold of the ship and on the shore” (Sharpe 2016, 130–131).

  7. 7.

    Of course, this is not to assert that all second- and perhaps third-generation care ethics writings address this issue.

  8. 8.

    To demonstrate this point thoroughly would go beyond the limits of this short chapter; indeed, it would require a retelling of much of recent feminist thought about disputes between more universalistic thinkers such as Martha Nussbaum and critics of that approach, including, for example, Mahadevan (also in this volume).

  9. 9.

    Another example of this problem is the treatment of worthy refugees in Europe.

References

  • Amoore, Louise. 2006. Invisible Subject(s): Work and Workers in the Global Political Economy. In Poverty and the Production of World Politics: Unprotected Workers in the Global Political Economy, ed. Matt Davies and Magnus Ryner, 13–37. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Marian. 2012. Care in Everyday Life: An Ethic of Care in Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Beyond the Dyad: Exploring the Multidimensionality of Care. In Ethics of Care: Critical Advances in International Perspective, ed. Marian Barnes, Tula Brannelly, Lizzie Ward, and Nicki Ward, 31–43. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Marian, Tula Brannelly, Lizzie Ward, and Nicki Ward, eds. 2015. Ethics of Care: Critical Advances in International Perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barvosa-Carter, E. 2007. Mestiza Autonomy as Relational Autonomy: Ambivalence the Social Character of Free Will. Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batnitzky, Leora. 2003. Dependency and Vulnerability: Jewish and Feminist Existentialist Constructions of the Human. In Women and Gender in Jewish Philosophy, ed. Hava Tirsosh-Samuelson. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannelly, Tula. 2018. An Ethics of Care Research Manifesto. International Journal of Care and Caring 2 (3): 367–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1990. Black Feminist Thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Stephanie. 2015. The Core of Care Ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, Jean, and John L. Comaroff. 2012. Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America Is Evolving Toward Africa. Boulder: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Raewyn. 2007. Southern Theory. Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalmiya, Vrinda. 2016. Caring to Know: Comparative Care Ethics, Feminist Epistemology, and the Mahābhārata. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dhamoon, Rita Kaur. 2011. Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 230–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Mignon. 2011. Making Care Count: A Century of Gender, Race, and Paid Care Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engster, Daniel. 2007. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1986. The History of Sexuality Volume 3: Care of the Self. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, Harry. 1982. The Importance of What We Care About. Synthese 53: 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. New York: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godrej, Farah. 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hankivsky, Olena. 2004. Social Policy and the Ethic of Care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Rethinking Care Ethics: On the Promise and Potential of an Intersectional Analysis. American Political Science Review 108 (2): 252–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herr, Ranjoo Seodu. 2003. Is Confucianism Compatible with Care Ethics? A Critique. Philosophy East and West 53 (4): 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, Eva Feder. 1999. Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koggel, Christine M. 1998. Perspectives on Equality: Constructing a Relational Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, Lynne. 2004. Relational No More. Annual of Psychoanalysis 32: 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leira, Arnlaug. 1994. Concepts of Care: Loving, Thinking and Doing. Social Science Review 68 (2): 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, Catriona, and Natalie Stoljar. 2000a. Introduction: Autonomy Refigured. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie and Natalie Stoljar, 3–34. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. 2000b. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevan, Kanchana. 2014. Between Femininity and Feminism: Colonial and Postcolonial Perspectives on Care. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayeroff, Milton. 1990. On Caring. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Thomas. 1992. Care of the Soul: A Guide for Cultivating Depth and Sacredness in Everyday Life. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munawar, Sarah. 2019. In Hajar’s Footsteps: A De-Colonial and Islamic Ethic of Care. University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, Uma. 1995. Colonialism and Its Others: Considerations on Rights and Care Discourses. Hypatia 10 (2): 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nedelsky, Jennifer. 2011. Law’s Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. The Reciprocal Relation of Judgment and Autonomy: Walking in Another’s Shoes and Which Shoes to Walk In. In Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law, ed. Jocelyn Downie and Jennifer J. Llewellyn, 35–62. Vancouver, Toronto: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, Nel. 2002. Starting at Home: Caring and Social Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Care Ethics and “Caring” Organizations. In Care Ethics and Political Theory, ed. Daniel Engster and Maurice Hamington, 72–84. New York: Oxford.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oeur, Freeden Blume. 2018. Black Boys Apart: Racial Uplift and Respectability in All-Male Public Schools. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuram, Parvati. 2016. Locating Care Ethics Beyond the Global North. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 15 (3): 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuram, Parvati, Clare Madge, and Pat Noxolo. 2009. Rethinking Responsibility and Care for a Postcolonial World. Geoforum 40 (1): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, Christina. 2016. In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shilliam, Robbie. 2011a. Non-Western Thought and International Relations. In International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism, and Investigations of Global Modernity, ed. Robbie Shilliam, 1–11. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011b. The Perilous but Unavoidable Terrain of the Non-West. In International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism, and Investigations of Global Modernity, ed. Robbie Shilliam, 12–26. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddle Walker, Vanessa, and John R. Snarey. 2004. Race-ing Moral Formation: African American Perspectives on Care and Justice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri. 1987. In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan C. 2010. Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose. Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2): 158–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality and Justice. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk, Marian. 2001. The Care Perspective and Autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3): 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012048907443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waerness, Kari. 1990. Informal and Formal Care in Old Age: What Is Wrong with the New Ideology in Scandinavia Today? In Gender and Caring: Work and Welfare in Britain and Scandinavia, ed. Claire Ungerson, 110–132. London: Harvester, Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waghid, Yusef. 2010. Education, Democracy and Citizenship Revised. Stellenbosch: Sun MeDIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Ubuntu Caring: Cultivating Moral, Compassionate, and Restorative Justice in University Education. In Towards a Philosophy of Caring in Higher Education: Pedagogy and Nuances of Care, 89–96. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Margaret Urban. 2007. Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society 29 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1): 102–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan C. Tronto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tronto, J.C. (2020). Caring Democracy: How Should Concepts Travel?. In: Urban, P., Ward, L. (eds) Care Ethics, Democratic Citizenship and the State. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41437-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics