Skip to main content

The Impact of Public and Private Partnerships on the Liveability of Eco-Cities in China’s Pearl River Delta

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Partnerships for Livable Cities
  • 486 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, Li Sun, Haiyan Lu and Martin de Jong discuss the role of public and private actors in three eco-city projects in China. Although these eco-city projects are often state-led, the chapter shows how planners, experts, private investors, and citizens are becoming increasingly involved in financing these projects and in knowledge sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: All-China Federation of Industry & Commerce: www.acfic.org.cn, accessed in June 2019.

References

  • Baeumler, A., Chen, M., Dastur, A., Zhang, Y., Filewood, R., Al-Jamal, K., Peterson, C., Randale, M., & Pinnoi, N. (2009). Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City (SSTEC): A case study of an emerging eco-city in China. Working paper no. 59012. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boers, I., Hoek, F., Van Montfort, C., & Wieles, J. (2013). Public-private partnerships: International audit findings. In P. de Vries & E. B. Yehoue (Eds.), The Routledge companion to public-private partnerships (pp. 451–478). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruijn, H., & Ten Heuvelhof, E. (2012). Management in networks: On multi-actor decision making. Management in networks: On multi-actor decision making. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, M., Yu, C., Joss, S., Wennersten, R., Yu, L., Zhang, X., & Ma, X. (2016). Eco city development in China: addressing the policy implementation challenge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134(Part A), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.083.

  • Dempsey, N., Burton, M. & Duncan, R. (2016). Evaluating the effectiveness of a cross-sector partnership for greenspace management: The case of Southey Owlerton, Sheffield, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 15(1), 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo, K., Martin, D., Polsky, C., Wool, C. & Ziemer, M. (2015). Social well-being and environmental governance in urban neighbourhoods in Boston, MA. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 138–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, A. (2013). Swedish production of sustainable urban imaginaries in China. Journal of Urban Technology, 20(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. L. (2010). The Impact of Public Participation on the Effectiveness of, and Users’ Attachment to, Urban Neighbourhood Parks. Landscape Research, 35(5), 551–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joss, S. (2011). Eco-city governance: A case study of Treasure Island and Sonoma Mountain village. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 13(4), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, Y., Wang, S. Q., Chan, A. P. C., & Lam, P. T. I. (2010). Preferred risk allocation in China’s public-private partnership (PPP) projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28(5), 482–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, J. R. (2006). The eco-city: Ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environment and Urbanization, 18(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H., & Teisman, G. (2005). Public–private partnerships as the management of co-production: Strategic and institutional obstacles in a difficult marriage. In G. A. Hodge & C. Greve (Eds.), The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience (pp. 95–116). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, M. M., & Zhang, X. Q. (2001). Governmental role in BOT-led infrastructure development. International Journal of Project Management., 19(2001), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H., de Jong, M., & ten Heuvelhof, E. (2018). Explaining the variety in smart eco city development in China-what policy network theory can teach us about overcoming barriers in implementation? Journal of Cleaner Production, 196(2018), 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, R., de Jong, M., & Koppenjan, J. (2011). The rise and fall of public-private partnerships in China: A path-dependent approach. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 794–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2018). China Stastistics Year Book 2018. Retrieved July 8, 2019, from https://doi.org/data.stats.gov.cn/.

  • Rapoport, E. (2014). Utopian visions and real estate dreams: The eco-city past, present and future. Geography Compass, 8(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Register, R. (2002). EcoCities: Rebuilding cities in balance with nature – Richard Register. Berkeley: Berkeley Hills Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseland, M. (1997). Dimensions of the eco-city. Cities, 14(4), 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagalyn, L. B. (2007). Longer view: Public/private development: Lessons from history, research, and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., Shen, Q., & Cheng, E. W. L. (2010). A review of studies on public – Private partnership projects in the construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 683–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent-Jones, P. (2000). Contractual governance: Institutional and organizational analysis. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20(3), 317–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2012). China’s eco-cities. Geoforum, 43(2), 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (2015). Planning for growth: Urban and regional planning in China. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Y., Olsson, A. R., & Håkansson, M. (2016). The role of local governance and environmental policy integration in Swedish and Chinese eco-city development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, L. (2014). Low carbon eco-city: New approach for Chinese urbanisation. Habitat International, 44, 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, C., & de Jong, M. (2017). Financing Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City: What lessons can be drawn for other large-scale sustainable city-projects? Sustainability, 9(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin de Jong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lu, H., Sun, L., de Jong, M. (2020). The Impact of Public and Private Partnerships on the Liveability of Eco-Cities in China’s Pearl River Delta. In: van Montfort, C., Michels, A. (eds) Partnerships for Livable Cities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40060-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics