Abstract
Set in the context of an extensive budgeting and accounting reform, this chapter offers insights into the new reporting tools’ relative advantage and usefulness from the perspective of public managers (directors general and heads of department in ministries and central government agencies) as well as from the perspective of politicians (federal legislators, i.e. members of parliament). The findings suggest that practices and procedures that create a time lag between the disclosure of financial statements and outcome reports prevent legislators as the main addressees of such reports from gaining an integrated view of the government’s financial and non-financial performance. The chapter also highlights the role of intermediaries and approaches of popular reporting (also known as citizen-centric reporting) in ‘translating’ rich financial and non-financial information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The respective full reports are available via: https://www.bmf.gv.at/budget/haushaltsrechtsreform/externe-evaluierung-bundeshaushaltsrecht.html; last accessed: 10 May 2019.
References
Alves, M., Sayegh, A., Renteria, C., et al. (2017, November). Austria. Fiscal Transparency Evaluation. International Monetary Fund. Technical Assistance Report.
Andriani, Y., Kober, R., & Ng, J. (2010). Decision Usefulness of Cash and Accrual Information: Public Sector Managers’ Perceptions. Australian Accounting Review, 20(2), 144–153.
Bergmann, A. (2012). The Influence of the Nature of Government Accounting and Reporting in Decision-Making: Evidence from Switzerland. Public Money & Management, 32(1), 15–20.
BHG. (2013). Bundesgesetz über die Führung des Bundeshaushaltes (Bundeshaushaltsgesetz 2013 – BHG 2013) StF: BGBl. I Nr. 139/2009 (NR: GP XXIV RV 480 AB 578 S. 51.)
Bourdeaux, C. (2008). Integrating Performance Information into Legislative Budget Processes. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(4), 547–569.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
Downes, R., Von Trapp, L., & Jansen, J. (2018). Budgeting in Austria. Paris: OECD.
Ezzamel, M., Hyndman, N., Johnsen, A., Lapsley, I., & Pallot, J. (2005). Accounting, Accountability and Devolution: A Study of the Use of Accounting Information by Politicians in the Northern Ireland Assembly’s First Term. The Irish Accounting Review, 12(1), 39–62.
Ezzamel, M., Hyndman, N., Johnsen, A., & Lapsley, I. (2014). Reforming Central Government: An Evaluation of an Accounting Innovation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4–5), 409–422.
Grossi, G., Reichard, C., & Ruggiero, P. (2016). Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(3), 581–606.
Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of Accrual Accounting in the Australian Public Sector–Rhetoric or Reality. Financial Accountability & Management, 14(1), 1–19.
Guthrie, J., Olson, O., & Humphrey, C. (1999). Debating Developments in New Public Financial Management: The Limits of Global Theorising and Some New Ways Forward. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(3–4), 209–228.
Ho, A. T.-K. (2006). Accounting for the Value of Performance Measurement from the Perspective of Midwestern Mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2), 217–237.
IFAC. (2000). Government Financial Reporting. Accounting Issues and Practices. Study 11. New York: International Federation of Accountants. http://www.ifac.org
IFAC. (2006). IPSAS 1 – Presentation of Financial Statements. http://www.ifac.org
Jones, S., & Puglisi, N. (1997). The Relevance of AAS 29 to Australian Public Sector: A Cause for Doubt? Abacus, 33(1), 1–18.
Joyce, P. G., & Sieg, S. (2000). Using Performance Information for Budgeting: Clarifying the Framework and Investigating Recent State Experience. Prepared for the 2000 Symposium of the Center for Accountability and Performance of the American Society for Public Administration.
Jorge, S. M., da Costa Carvalho, J. B., & Fernandes, M. J. (2008). From Cash to Accruals In Portuguese Local Government Accounting: What Has Truly Changed. Revista de Estudos Politécnicos/Polytechnical Studies Review, VI(10), 239–261.
Katsikas, E., Manes-Rossi, F., & Orelli, R. L. (2016). Towards Integrated Reporting: Accounting Change in the Public Sector. Cham: Springer.
Kober, R., Lee, J., & Ng, J. (2010). Mind Your Accruals: Perceived Usefulness of Financial Information in the Australian Public Sector Under Different Accounting Systems. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(3), 267–298.
Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Rubecksen, K. (2008). Performance Information and Performance Steering: Integrated System or Loose Coupling? In V. Dooren & V. de Walle (Eds.), Performance Information in the Public Sector (Governance and Public Management Series). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some Like it Non-Financial... Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922.
Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190.
Montesinos, V., Brusca, I., Rossi, F. M., & Aversano, N. (2013). The Usefulness of Performance Reporting in Local Government: Comparing Italy and Spain. Public Money & Management, 33(3), 171–176.
Moynihan, D., & Beazley, I. (2016). Toward Next-Generation Performance Budgeting: Lessons from the Experiences of Seven Reforming Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Nasi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2008). Implementation of Accounting Reforms. An Empirical Investigation into Italian Local Governments. Public Management Review, 10(2), 175–196.
Nogueira, S. P. S., & Jorge, S. M. F. (2017). The Perceived Usefulness of Financial Information for Decision Making in Portuguese Municipalities the Importance of Internal Control. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18(1), 116–136.
OECD. (2007). Performance Budgeting in OECD Countries. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/
Posner, P., & Park, C.-K. (2007). Role of the Legislatur in the Budget Process: Recent Trends and Innovations. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(3), 1–26.
Rauskala, I., & Saliterer, I. (2015). Public Sector Accounting and Auditing in Austria. In I. Brusca et al. (Eds.), Public Sector Accounting and Auditing in Europe – The Challenge of Harmonization (pp. 12–22). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ricci, P. (2019). Accountability. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. New York: Springer.
Robinson, M. (Ed.). (2007). Performance Budgeting: Linking Funding and Results. New York: Springer.
Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2018). Externe Evaluierung der Haushaltsrechtsreform des Bundes im Jahr 2017. Endbericht. Available via: https://www.bmf.gv.at/
Saliterer, I., Korac, S., Bergmann, A., & Fuchs, S. (2018). Evaluierung der Haushaltsrechtsreform des Bundes im Jahr 2017. Arbeitspaket 3 – Doppisches Haushaltswesen. Available via: https://www.bmf.gv.at/
Saliterer, I., Korac, S., Moser, B., & Rondo-Brovetto, P. (2019). How Politicians Use Performance Information in a Budgetary Context – New Insights from the Central Government Level. Public Administration online first.
Shah, A. (Ed.). (2007). Budgeting and Budgetary Institutions. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Steger, G. (2012). Budget Reform in Austria: From Traditional to Modern Budgeting. Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 69, 147–162.
Sterck, M., & Scheers, B. (2006). Trends in Performance Budgeting in Seven OECD Countries. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(1), 47–72.
Taylor, J. (2009). Strengthening the Link Between Performance Measurement and Decision Making. Public Administration, 87(4), 853–871.
Ter Bogt, H. J. (2008). Management Accounting Change and New Public Management in Local Government: A Reassessment of Ambitions and Results – An Institutionalist Approach to Accounting Change in the Dutch Public Sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(3), 209–241.
Ter Bogt, H. J., Van Helden, G., & Van Der Kolk, B. (2015). Challenging the NPM Ideas About Performance Management: Selectivity and Differentiation in Outcome-Oriented Performance Budgeting. Financial Accountability & Management, 31(3), 287–315.
Van Dooren, W., & Van de Walle, S. (Eds.). (2008). Performance Information in the Public Sector: How It Is Used. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Helden, J. (2016). Literature Review and Challenging Research Agenda on Politicians’ Use of Accounting Information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531–538.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saliterer, I., Korac, S. (2020). New Reporting Tools at the Central Government Level: Experiences in Light of a Budgeting and Accounting Reform in Austria. In: Manes-Rossi, F., Levy Orelli, R. (eds) New Trends in Public Sector Reporting. Public Sector Financial Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40056-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40056-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40055-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40056-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)