Skip to main content

Foreign Affairs of the European Union: How to Become an Independent and Dominant Power in the International Arena

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The EU in the 21st Century

Abstract

The European Union is facing external challenges of major implications for its success. The European Union cannot become an island of a common market without a strong voice in the world to protect its interest and the interest of the member states of the organization. The EU needs pushing forward the European model of society, as human rights, protection of the environment or any other policy that influences other parts of the world, but also the own Union. Obviously, currently, there is an unbalance situation between the historical and economic international influence of Europe and its power politically, based on the cooperation model of the EU external policy. The necessity of further integration is a must in all the areas implicated in foreign affairs in the EU, from trade to development, a wide political spectrum needs more coherence that can be achieved by speeding up the integration process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Booker and North (2016), p. 80.

  2. 2.

    http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=MEI_TRD.

  3. 3.

    http://www.eleconomista.es/empresas-finanzas/noticias/1388273/07/09/Russia-China-to-push-global-currency-at-G8-summit.html.

  4. 4.

    http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/Statis_e.htm.

  5. 5.

    Ramiro Troitino and Pando Ballesteros (2017).

  6. 6.

    Leonard (2005).

  7. 7.

    Moravcsik (2013), p. 144.

  8. 8.

    http://europa.eu/pol/comm/index_en.htm.

  9. 9.

    Färber (2017).

  10. 10.

    http://www.mauricilucena.es/docs/politica_competencia_europa_eeuu.pdf.

  11. 11.

    http://ec.europa.eu/development/geographical/lomegen_en.cfm.

  12. 12.

    http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/development/overseas_countries_territories/r12102_en.htm.

  13. 13.

    Booker and North (2016). p. 189.

  14. 14.

    http://europa.eu/pol/agr/index_en.htm.

  15. 15.

    With the exception of Svalbard, and archipelago in the Arctic Ocean.

  16. 16.

    It means the biggest part of the EU legislation.

  17. 17.

    Rifkin (2004), p. 120.

  18. 18.

    Not Kosovo because is not recognized as a State by many member states of the EU.

  19. 19.

    http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/index_en.htm.

  20. 20.

    Troitino and Faerber (2019).

  21. 21.

    http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/russia/index_en.htm.

  22. 22.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Rumsfeld.

  23. 23.

    http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/occupied_palestinian_territory/index_en.htm.

  24. 24.

    Pawlas (2015).

  25. 25.

    www.la-moncloa.es/.

  26. 26.

    Martín de la Guardia and Pérez Sánchez (2001).

  27. 27.

    http://www.ena.lu/davignon-report-luxembourg-27-October-1970-020002259.html.

  28. 28.

    Chochia et al. (2018).

  29. 29.

    http://www.ena.lu/interview-etienne-davignon-preparations-davignon-report-brussels-14-january-2008-022500863.html.

  30. 30.

    Rosamond (2000), p. 77.

  31. 31.

    Castro and Lago (2018).

  32. 32.

    http://www.ena.lu/the-tindemans-report-020100267.html.

  33. 33.

    http://www.jstor.org/pss/20081465.

  34. 34.

    http://www.iuee.eu/pdf-dossier/20/A7XQ4Brly5FP7Dd7AQHB.PDF.

  35. 35.

    http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/news04_en.html.

  36. 36.

    http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/institutional_affairs/treaties/treaties_singleact_en.htm.

  37. 37.

    Kerikmäe (2015).

  38. 38.

    Outeda (2001).

  39. 39.

    Kerikmäe (2019).

  40. 40.

    http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/economic_and_monetary_affairs/institutional_and_economic_framework/treaties_maastricht_en.htm.

  41. 41.

    Hix (1999), p. 389.

  42. 42.

    http://www.weu.int/.

  43. 43.

    Hamulák (2018).

  44. 44.

    http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/9/7/9/0/p97909_index.html.

  45. 45.

    Hix (1999), p. 390.

  46. 46.

    http://europa.eu/lisbon_treaty/index_en.htm.

  47. 47.

    http://www.eda.europa.eu/.

  48. 48.

    http://www.eurostep.org/wcm/dmdocuments/BP41_EEAS_080602.pdf.

  49. 49.

    Troitiño (2017).

  50. 50.

    Kerikmäe et al. (2019).

References

  • Booker, C., & North, R. (2016). The great deception: Can the European Union survive? Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, L. D., & Lago, J. R. R. (2018). Educación y diplomacia cultural en la primavera de Europa (1948-1954) = Education and Cultural Diplomacy in the Spring of Europe (1948-1954). Revista de educación, 383, 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chochia, A., Troitiño, D. R., Kerikmäe, T., & Shumilo, O. (2018). Enlargement to the UK, the Referendum of 1975 and Position of Margaret Thatcher. In Brexit (pp. 115–139). Springer, Cham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färber, K. (2017). Mitterrand and the Great European Design—From the Cold War to the European Union. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 7(2), 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamulák, O. (2018). La carta de los derechos fundamentales de la union europea y los derechos sociales. Estudios constitucionales, 16(1), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1999). The political system of the European Union. Macmillan International Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerikmäe, T. (2015). European history and the future of legal freedoms. Baltic Journal of European Studies, 5(2), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerikmäe, T. (2019). Euroopa Inimõiguste Konventsiooni tõlgendamisest. Juridica. International, 2019, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerikmäe, T., Troitiño, D. R., & Shumilo, O. (2019). An idol or an ideal? A case study of Estonian e-Governance: Public perceptions, myths and misbeliefs. Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae scientiarum, 7(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2005). Why Europe will run the 21st century (pp. 49–56). London: Fourth estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martín de la Guardia, R. M., & Pérez Sánchez, G. A. (2001). Historia de la integración europea. Ariel, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2013). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outeda, C. C. (2001). El proceso de constitucionalización de la Unión Europea: de Roma a Niza (No. 3). Univ Santiago de Compostela.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlas, I. (2015, September). The Visegrad countries and European union membership-selected issues. In Proceedings of International Academic Conferences (No. 2704866). International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramiro Troitino, D., & Pando Ballesteros, M. D. L. P. (2017). Churchill’s European integration model. REVISTA DE OCCIDENTE, 433, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2004). The European dream: How Europe’s vision of the future is quietly eclipsing the American dream Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troitiño, D. R. (2017). Jean Monnet before the first European Community: A historical perspective and critic. Trames, 21(3), 193–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troitino, D. R., & Faerber, K. (2019). Historical errors in the initial conception of the euro and its subsequent development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 39(2), 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ramiro Troitiño .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ramiro Troitiño, D., Kerikmäe, T., Chochia, A. (2020). Foreign Affairs of the European Union: How to Become an Independent and Dominant Power in the International Arena. In: Ramiro Troitiño, D., Kerikmäe, T., de la Guardia, R., Pérez Sánchez, G. (eds) The EU in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38399-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics