Abstract
Banking is an important industry, where financial transactions are performed to meet our needs in our everyday lives. Today, banks are frequently used to meet all kinds of financial transactions. In line with the increasing competition, the banks are aiming at acquiring new customers through customer satisfaction. At this point, studies on acquiring new customers by analyzing the customer data have gained importance recently. As a result, data analysis units have been established in the banks. In addition to the banks, these units have also been established for data analysis in customer focused industries such as insurance and telecommunication. In this study, models are established by using classification algorithms to estimate potential bank customers on the bank dataset obtained by telemarketing method in UCI Machine Learning Repository, and the results are compared. Using this comparison result, it is aimed to perform a more detailed and effective data analysis. Various models have been established with various classification algorithms for the estimation of customer acquisition. The classification algorithms used in this study include the C4.5 Decision Tree, Navie Bayes (NB) algorithm, K nearest neighbors algorithm (k-nn), Logistic Regression algorithm (LogReg), Random Forest algorithm (RanFor), and Adaptive Boosting algorithm (AdaBoostM1-Ada). While establishing the classification models, it is aimed to achieve consistency in the performance of the classification models by dividing the test and training data set by two different methods. K-fold Cross Validation and Holdout methods are used for this purpose. In the K-fold cross validation, training and test da-ta sets are separated with 5- and 10-fold cross validation. In the holdout method, the dataset was divided into training and test datasets with the 60–40%, 75–25% and 80–20% training and test separation ratios, respectively. These separations are evaluated for Accuracy (ACC), Precision (PPV), Sensitivity (TPR), and F-measure (F) performance. The performance results are similar in both separation results. According to the Accuracy and F-measure criteria, the classification model established by Random Forest algorithm highest results the other models, whereas the Naive Bayes algorithm gave highest results according to the precision criterion, and the AdaBoostM1 classification algorithm yielded better according to the sensitivity criterion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baynal, K., Çaliş, A.: Veri Madenciliğinde Kümeleme Analizi ile Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Beykent Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 9(1) (2016)
Çankiri, S., Kartal, E., Yildirim, K., Gülseçen, S.: Organizasyonlarda Bilgi Yönetimi Sürecinde Veri Madenciliği Yaklaşımı. Fırsatlar ve Tehditler Sempozyumu, İstanbul, Bilgi Çağında Varoluş (2009)
Bach, M.P., Juković, S., Dumiči, K., Šarlija, N.: Business client segmentation in banking using self-organizing maps. South East Eur. J. Econ. Bus. 8(2), 32–41 (2013)
Sumathi, S., Sivanandam, S.N.: Introduction to Data Mining Principles. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Keramati, A., Jafari-Marandi, R., Aliannejadi, M., Ahmadian, I., Mozaffari, M., Abbasi, U.: Improved churn prediction in telecommunication industry using data techniques. Appl. Soft Comput., 994–1012 (2014)
Nachev, A.: Application of Data Mining Techniques for Direct Marketing, Sofia (2014)
Elsalamony, H.A.: Bank direct marketing analysis of data mining techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 12–22 (2014)
Kumari, B., Shrivastava, V.: Evaluation and comparison of performance of different classifiers. Int. J. Emerg. Trend Eng. Basic Sci. (IJEEBS), 604–611 (2015)
Erol, Ç.: Sağlık Bilimlerinde R ile Veri Madenciliği, R ile Veri Madenciliği Uygulamaları, Çağlayan Kitabevi, İstanbul, pp. 25–46 (2016)
Azevedo, A.I.R.L., Santos, M.F.: KDD, SEMMA and CRISP-DM: a parallel overview, IADS-DM (2008)
Dolgun, M.Ö., Ersel, D.: Doğrudan Pazarlama Stratejilerinin Belirlenmesinde Veri Madenciliği Yöntemlerinin Kullanımı. İstatistikçiler Dergisi: İstatistik & Aktüerya 7, 1–13 (2014)
Bakioğlu, F.Ö.K., Kartal, E., Özen, Z., Erol, Ç., Gülseçen, S.: Aspects of students about ınformation technology courses in social science. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 176, 148–154 (2015)
Özkan, Y.: Veri madenciliği yöntemleri, 2. basım, İstanbul, Türkiye: Papatya Yayıncılık (2013)
Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data mining: concepts and techniques. In: Data Management Systems, pp. 230–240. The Morgan Kaufmann Series (2006)
Gordon, L.S., Berry, M.J.A.: Mastering data mining: for marketing, sales, and customer relationship management, 2nd ed. Willey Publishing, New York (2004)
Ayre, L.B.: Data Mining for Information Professionals, San Diego. California, USA (2006)
Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Thirteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 148–156 (1996)
Özgür, A., Erdem, H.: Saldırı Tespit Sistemlerinde Kullanılan Kolay Erişilen Makine Öğrenme Algoritmalarının Karşılaştırılması. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 5(2), 41–48 (2012)
Logistic Regression. https://wiki2.org/en/Logistic_regression+Newton. Accessed 20 Aug 2018
Anonymous. http://www.matlabyar.com/wp-content/uploads/edd/2016/03/knnng.png. Accessed 16 Apr 2018
Harrington, P.: Machine Learning in Action. Manning, New York (2012)
Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Mark, A.H.: Veri Madenciliği: Pratik makine öğrenme araçları ve teknikleri, 3. Baskı, p. 191. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2011)
Japkowicz, N.: Performance evaluation for learning algorithms. International Conference on Machine Learning, Scotland (2012)
Clark, M.: An introduction to machine learning: with applications in R
Flach, P.: The many faces of ROC analysis in machine learning. ICML Tutorial
Avrim, B., Adam, K., John, L.: Beating the hold-out: Bounds for k-fold and progressive cross-validation. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory. ACM (1999)
Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Ijcai 14, 1137–1145 (1995)
Moro, S., Cortez, P., Rita, P.: A data-driven approach to predict the success of bank telemarketing. Decis. Support Syst. 62, 22–31 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Başarslan, M.S., Argun, İ.D. (2020). Prediction of Potential Bank Customers: Application on Data Mining. In: Hemanth, D., Kose, U. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics in Engineering Problems. ICAIAME 2019. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36178-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36178-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36177-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36178-5
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)