Skip to main content

Tweet and Account Based Spam Detection on Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics in Engineering Problems (ICAIAME 2019)

Abstract

Today, with the spread of social media, the number of spam users identified as malicious users is increasing. Twitter is one of the most used social media platforms to send 500 million tweets per day. Twitter is used by every user, as well as malicious spam or fake users. One out of every 200 social media messages and 21 tweets is estimated to be spam. Spam detection is a critical issue because spam accounts are security-threatening accounts. Twitter cannot interfere with spam accounts. In this study, a method for spam detection was presented. Naive Bayes, J48 and Logistic machine learning methods were applied to obtain the accuracy of 97.2% with J48 algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupta, B.B., Sangaiah, A.K., Nedjah, N., Yamaguchi, S., Zhang, Z., Sheng, M.: Recent research in computational intelligence paradigms into security and privacy for online social networks (OSNs). Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 86, 851–854 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Inuwa-Dutse, I., Liptrott, M., Korkontzelos, I.: Detection of spam-posting accounts on Twitter. Neurocomputing 315, 496–511 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kabakus, A.T., Kara, R.: A survey of spam detection methods on Twiter. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8, 29–38 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, C., Wena, S., Zhanga, J., Xiang, Y., Oliver, J., Alelaiwi, A., Hassan, M.M.: Investigating the deceptive information in Twitter spam. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 72, 319–326 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sicilia, R., Giudice, S.L., Pei, Y., Pechenizkiy, M., Soda, P.: Twitter rumour detection in the health domain. Expert Syst. Appl. 110, 33–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mateen, M., Iqbal, M.A., Aleem, M., Islam, M.A.: A hybrid approach for spam detection for Twitter. In: Proceedings of 2017 14th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), pp. 466–471 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grier, C., Thomas, K., Paxson, V., Zhang, M.: @spam: the underground on 140 characters or less. In: 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS 2010, pp. 27–37. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. van der Walt, E., Eloff, J.H.P., Grobler, J.: Cyber-security: identity deception detection on social media platforms. Comput. Secur. 78, 76–89 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon, S., Cha, M., Jung, K., Chen, W., Wang, Y.: Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 1103–1108 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sedhai, S., Sun, A.: Semi-supervised spam detection in Twitter stream. IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 5(1), 169–175 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Setiawan, E.B., Widyantoro, D.H., Surendro, K.: Detecting Indonesian spammer on Twitter. In: 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), pp. 259–263 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benevenuto, F., Magno, G., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V.: Detecting spammers on twitter. In: Collaboration, Electronic Messaging, Anti-Abuse and Spam Conference, vol. 6, p. 12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCord, M., Chuah, M.: Spam detection on twitter using traditional classifiers. LNCS (LNAI. LNBI), vol. 6906, pp. 175–186 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sohrabi, M.K., Karimil, F.: A feature selection approach to detect spam in the Facebook social network. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43, 949–958 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., Tesconi, M.: Fame for sale: efficient detection of fake Twitter followers. Decis. Support Syst. 80, 56–71 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kübra Nur Güngör .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Güngör, K.N., Ayhan Erdem, O., Doğru, İ.A. (2020). Tweet and Account Based Spam Detection on Twitter. In: Hemanth, D., Kose, U. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics in Engineering Problems. ICAIAME 2019. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36178-5_79

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics