Skip to main content

Application of Chicken Swarm Optimization in Detection of Cancer and Virtual Reality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Computational Intelligence Techniques for Virtual Reality in Healthcare

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 875))

Abstract

Cancer is a very common type of disease occurring amongst people and it is also amongst the main causes of deaths of humans around the world. Symptom awareness and needs of screening are very essential these days in order to reduce its risks. Several machine learning models have already been proposed in order to predict whether cancer is malignant or benign. In this paper, we have attempted to propose a better way to do the same. Here we discuss in detail about how we have applied the chicken swarm Optimisation as a feature selection algorithm to the cancer dataset of features in order to predict if the cancer is malignant or benign. Here we also elucidate how the Chicken Swarm Optimization provides better results than several other machine learning models such as Random Forest, k-NN, Decision Trees and Support Vector Machines. Feature Selection is a technique used to eliminate the redundant features from a large dataset in order to obtain a better subset of features to use for processing. In order to achieve this, we have used Chicken Swarm Optimization. The chicken swarm optimization algorithm is a bio-inspired algorithm. It attempts to mimic the order of hierarchy and the behavior of chicken swarm in order to optimize the problems. On the basis of these predictions we can also provide quick treatment by using virtual reality simulators that can be helpful for complex oncological surgeries. The results shown by this are better than the other models as this model achieves a very high accuracy as compared to the others discussed in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011). Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell, 144, 646–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Ervik, M., Dikshit, R., Eser, S & Mathers, C. (2013) GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC CancerBase no 11. Lyon; France. Accessed January 1, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Cancer Report. (2008). International agency for research on cancer. Retrieved February 26, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Polley, M. Y. C., Freidlin, B., Korn, E. L., Conley, B. A., Abrams, J. S., & McShane, L. M. (2013). Statistical and practical considerations for clinical evaluation of predictive biomarkers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105, 1677–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cruz, J. A., & Wishart, D. S. (2006). Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis. Cancer Informatics, 2, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parham, G., Bing, E. G., Cuevas, A., Fisher, B., Skinner, J., Mwanahamuntu, M., & Sullivan, R. (2019). Creating a low-cost virtual reality surgical simulation to increase surgical oncology capacity and capability. Ecancermedicalscience 13, 910.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katic, D., Wekerle, A. L., Gortler, J., et al. (2013). Context-aware augmented reality in laparoscopic surgery. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 37(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2013.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tyrer, J., Duffy, S. W., & Cuzick, J. (2004). A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med, 23(7), 1111–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moyer, V. A. (2013). Medications to decrease the risk for breast cancer in women: Recommendations from the U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159(10), 698–708.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Asri, H., Mousannif, H., Al Moatassime, H., & Noel, T. (2016) Using machine learning algorithms for breast cancer risk prediction and diagnosis. Procedia Computer Science, 83, 1064–1069. ISSN 1877-0509.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmad, L. G., Eshlaghy, A. T., Poorebrahimi, A., Ebrahimi, M., & Razavi, A. R. (2013). Using three machine learning techniques for predicting breast cancer recurrence. Journal of Health and Medical Informatics, 4, 124. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7420.1000124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mihaylov, I., Nisheva, M., & Vassilev, D. (2019). Application of machine learning models for survival prognosis in breast cancer studies. Information, 10, 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramaswami, M., & Bhaskaran, R. (2009). A study on feature selection techniques in educational data mining. arXiv preprint arXiv:0912.3924.

  14. Liu, H., & Yu, L. (2005). Toward integrating feature selection algorithms for classification and clustering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(3), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Genetic Algorithm. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/genetic-algorithms/.

  16. Eiben, A. E., & Smith, J. E. (2003). Introduction to evolutionary computing (Vol. 53). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Abo-Hammour, Z. S., Alsmadi, O. M., & Al-Smadi, A. M. (2011). Frequency-based model order reduction via genetic algorithm approach. In 7th International Workshop on Systems, Signal Processing and their Applications (WOSSPA).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mohamed, K. S. (2018) Bio-inspired machine learning algorithm: Genetic algorithm. In Machine learning for model order reduction (pp 19–34). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Xue, B., Zhang, M., Browne, W. N., & Yao, X. (2016). A survey on evolutionary computation approaches to feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 20(4), 606–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Evolutionary Algorithm as Feature Selection. https://www.kdnuggets.com/2017/11/rapidminer-evolutionary-algorithms-feature-selection.html.

  21. Meng, X. B., Yu, L., Gao, X., & Zhang, H. (2014). A new bio-inspired algorithm: Chicken swarm optimization. pp. 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11857-4_10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Das, S., & Suganthan, P. N. (2011). Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 15(1), 4–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, X. S. (2013). Bat algorithm: Literature review and applications. International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation, 5(3), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gandomi, A. H., & Alavi, A. H. (2012). Krill herd: A new bio-inspired optimization algorithm. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 17, 4831–4845.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuevas, E., Cienfuegos, M., Zaldivar, D., & Cisneros, M. (2013). A swarm optimization algorithm inspired in the behavior of the social-spider. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 6374–6384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar, S., Nayyar, A., & Kumari, R. (2019). Arrhenius artificial bee colony algorithm. In S. Bhattacharyya, A. Hassanien, D. Gupta, A. Khanna, I. Pan (Eds.) International conference on innovative computing and communications. Lecture notes in networks and systems (Vol. 56) Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, J., Neskovic, P., & Cooper, L. N. (2007). Improving nearest neighbor rule with a simple adaptive distance measure. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(2), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, Y., Li, Y., & Xia, S. (2009). An improved KNN text classification algorithm based on clustering. Journal of Computers, 4(3), 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. KNN. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-nearest_neighbors_algorithm.

  30. Decision Trees. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C4.5_algorithm.

  31. Quinlan, J. R. (2014). C4.5: Programs for machine learning (Vol. 302). https://books.google.com/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=b3ujBQAAQBAJ&pgis=1. Accessed January 5, 2016.

  32. Random Forests. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_forest.

  33. Berk, R. A. (2016). Random forests, statistical learning from a regression perspective (pp. 205–258). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Noble, W. S. (2006). What is a support vector machine? Nature Biotechnology, 24(12), 1565–1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1206-1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Support Vector Machine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Support-vector_machine.

  36. Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer Dataset. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/breast+cancer+wisconsin+%28diagnostic%29.

  37. Street, W. N., Wolberg, W. H., & Mangasarian, O. L. (1993) Nuclear feature extraction for breast tumor diagnosis. In IS&T/SPIE 1993 International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology (Vol. 1905, pp. 861–870), San Jose, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bennett, K. P. (1992) Decision tree construction via linear programming. In Proceedings of the 4th Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Society, pp. 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bennett, K. P., & Mangasarian, O. L. (1992). Robust linear programming discrimination of two linearly inseparable sets. Optimization methods and software, 1, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Antos, A., Kégl, B., Linder, T., & Lugosi, G. (2002). Data-dependent margin-based generalization bounds for classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 73–98.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Bradley, P. S., Bennett, K. P., & Demiriz, A. (2000). Constrained k-means clustering. Microsoft Res Redmond (Microsoft Research Dept. of Mathematical Sciences One Microsoft Way Dept. of Decision Sciences and Eng. Sys).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cervical cancer Dataset. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Cervical+cancer+%28Risk+Factors%29.

  43. Fernandes, K., Cardoso, J. S., & Fernandes, J. (2017). Transfer learning with partial observability applied to cervical cancer screening. In Iberian conference on pattern recognition and image analysis. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heat Map. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_map.

  45. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.00849.pdf.

  46. Ünlerşen, Muhammed, Sabanci, Kadir, & Ozcan, Muciz. (2017). Determining cervical cancer possibility by using machine learning methods. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 3, 65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dwivedi, R. K., Aggarwal, M., Keshari, S. K., & Kumar, A. (2019). Sentiment analysis and feature extraction using rule-based model (RBM). In S. Bhattacharyya, A. Hassanien, D. Gupta, A. Khanna & Pan, I (Eds.) International conference on innovative computing and communications. Lecture notes in networks and systems (Vol. 56). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayush Kumar Tripathi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tripathi, A.K., Garg, P., Tripathy, A., Vats, N., Gupta, D., Khanna, A. (2020). Application of Chicken Swarm Optimization in Detection of Cancer and Virtual Reality. In: Gupta, D., Hassanien, A., Khanna, A. (eds) Advanced Computational Intelligence Techniques for Virtual Reality in Healthcare. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 875. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35252-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics