Abstract
Transdisciplinary working (TDW) is a new model of knowledge production that has emerged in response to a changing research environment in the late twentieth century. In particular, researchers are increasingly required to be accountable and responsive to social priorities and needs, and there is greater pressure to bridge their research with real life (e.g., bench to bedside, discovery to commercialization). This has prompted researchers and funders to adopt new types of approaches to knowledge production that are context-driven, problem-focused, and participatory. These approaches involve the collaboration of multiple academics across scientific disciplines and experiential non-academics across sectors (e.g., industry, patients, policy-makers, health professionals). This is typically practiced in large-scale research and training initiatives where the purpose is to advance knowledge and create innovative solutions (Stokols, Hall, & Voge, 2013). Integration and innovation at this scale are difficult and require TDW to ensure the problem space and research processes and outcomes are not restricted by a single disciplinary and/or sectoral framing. TDW is thus most appropriate for the most complex and seemingly stubborn (often referred to as wicked) social problems, which necessitate not one but often multiple solutions (Boger et al., 2017). Solving wicked problems cannot be done by refining or adapting existing disciplinary or sector-specific knowledge, but rather it requires transcending current ways of thinking and progressing toward more holistic solutions. TDW supports the creation of a transformative space, that is, a rethinking of the problem area by linking diverse types of knowledge and actions, and envisioning how to mobilize resources and create new possibilities for social change (Marshall, Dolley, & Priya, 2018).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boger, J., Jackson, P., Mulvenna, M., Sixsmith, J., Sixsmith, A., Mihailidis, A., … Martin, S. (2017). Principles for fostering the transdisciplinary development of assistive technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(5), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2016.1151953
Dupuis, S., Kontos, P., Mitchell, G., Jonas-Simpson, C., & Gray, J. (2016). Re-claiming citizenship through the arts. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice, 15(3), 358–380.
Dupuis, S., Whyte, C., Carson, J., Genoe, R., Meshino, L., & Sadler, L. (2012). Just dance with me: An authentic partnership approach to understanding leisure in the dementia context. World Leisure Journal, 54(3), 240–254.
Grigorovich, A., Fang, M. L., Sixsmith, J., & Kontos, P. (2019). Defining and evaluating transdisciplinary research: Implications for aging and technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(6), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1496361
Marshall, F., Dolley, J., & Priya, R. (2018). Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability: Enhancing proper transformative agency in periurban contexts. Ecology and Society, 23(3), 8. www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss3/art8/#transformative.
Ofir, Z., Schwandt, T., Duggan, C., & McLean, R. (2016). Research quality plus [RQ+]: A holistic approach to evaluating research. Ottawa: IDRC. https://www.idrc.ca/sites/default/files/sp/Documents%20EN/Research-Quality-Plus-A-Holistic-Approach-to-Evaluating-Research.pdf.
Sixsmith, A. (2013). Technology and the challenge of aging. In A. Sixsmith & G. Gutman (Eds.), Technologies for active aging (pp. 7–25). New York: Springer.
Stokols, D., Hall, K. L., & Voge, A. L. (2013). Transdisciplinary public health: Definitions, core characteristics, and strategies for success. In D. Haire-Joshu & T. McBride (Eds.), Transdisciplinary public health: Research, methods, and practice (pp. 3–30). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wada, M., Grigorovich, A., Fang, M. L., Sixsmith, J., & Kontos, P. (2020, January). An exploration of experiences of transdisciplinary research in aging and technology. In Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research (Vol. 21, No. 1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.1.3332.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grigorovich, A., Kontos, P., Sixsmith, J., Fang, M.L., Wada, M. (2021). An Introduction to Transdisciplinary Working. In: Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., Mihailidis, A., Fang, M.L. (eds) Knowledge, Innovation, and Impact: A Guide for the Engaged Health Researcher. International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34390-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34390-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34389-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34390-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)