Abstract
This article outlines the stakes and practical considerations for initiatives to diversify and decolonize German Studies curricula. Despite educators’ increasing awareness of the field’s complicity in reifying systems of injustice and their efforts to reflect the diversity within the German-speaking world, German curricula often still project a monolithic and exclusionary image of “Germanness.” To diversify topics and texts without interrogating the social stratification implied in the ways that “Others” of the German-speaking world are presented (or not) is not enough; German Studies must be concomitantly decolonized. That is, where diversifying curricula entails recognizing and engaging the internal diversity and complexity of German-speaking societies, decolonizing entails recognizing, questioning, and destabilizing the hegemonies implicated in the construction of cultures, canons, and curricula.
This essay is a shortened version of my blog post, Randall (2017). For their comments and suggestions during the preparation of the original blog post and of the present essay, my heartfelt thanks go to Wendy Allen, Katherine Arens, Janet Swaffar, Ervin Malakaj, and Regine Criser.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Quoted in Ryshina-Pankova and Byrnes (2017, p. 424).
- 3.
Research networks include the Black German Heritage and Research Association (http://bghra.org/) and the German Studies Association networks for Asian-German Studies and Black Diaspora Studies (https://thegsa.org/interdisciplinary-networks). On the teaching side, two new beginning-level textbooks—Grenzenlos Deutsch (open-access) and Impuls Deutsch (Klett USA)—are designed with the express intent to integrate diverse identities within the German-speaking world.
- 4.
Consider the sequestering of diverse identities in the final chapter, entitled “Kulturelle Vielfalt,” of the beginning-level textbook, Neue Horizonte (Cengage, 8th Edition), or the ethno-national image of Germany reflected in fictional main characters of Kontakte (McGraw-Hill, 5th Edition).
- 5.
Recall here Vicki Galloway’s adaptation of Claude Lévi-Strauss: “It is the assumption of sameness that triggers facile interpretation, immediate judgment, and turgid culture-ranking criteria” (Galloway 1999, p. 152).
- 6.
Today the training, research, and teaching of Germanists extends from the traditional core of language and literature into all disciplinary directions—from film and media studies to STEM and all configurations of cultural studies and social sciences. See Halverson and Costabile-Heming (2015) and the GSA Fortieth Anniversary Issue of German Studies Review (Hake 2016).
- 7.
On the implications of the humanities crisis for foreign language departments, see Berman (2011).
- 8.
While debates about the value and role of the humanities in US higher education have their roots in the 1970s/80s, the political climate surrounding the 2016 presidential election has infused the discussion with a new urgency to move past the discourse of “crisis” and toward actionable imagining of ways forward that recall the traditional mission of humanities education while also recapturing them for a new set of social and political realities. See Newfield and Strickland (1995), Newfield (2016), Nussbaum (1997, 2010), Smith (2015).
- 9.
- 10.
See, for example, Eric Adler, “When Humanists Undermine the Humanities” (2017).
- 11.
See, for instance, Tania Lombrozo, “The Humanities: What’s the Big Idea?” (2015).
- 12.
Examples include the University of Rhode Island International Engineering Program and Northern Arizona University’s Interdisciplinary Global Programs. See also the STEM/MINT initiatives of AATG (www.aatg.org/group/MINTDaF) and the Goethe-Institut (https://www.goethe.de/de/spr/unt/kum/clg.html).
- 13.
A perusal of ACTFL convention German contributions on diversity, inclusivity and social justice reveals an increasing dedication to integrating these topics into curricula and pedagogy. The same can be said of contributions to Die Unterrichtspraxis, beginning with the 1992 special issue on diversity.
- 14.
For a reflection on the notion of higher education as good for the public and a public good, see Newfield (2016).
- 15.
Incidents of discrimination on college campuses is increasingly well documented in media reporting and on public and private online message boards. Advocacy-oriented entities such as the Harvard University Voices of Diversity project and The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education contribute analyses and documentation of cases and trends.
- 16.
For an account of the events at St. Olaf College and links to media documentation, see Randall (2017).
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
See Footnote 4.
- 20.
- 21.
On genre-based instruction, see Byrnes and Sprang (2004).
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
Ryshina-Pankova and Byrnes likewise emphasize the need for meaningful curricular change to be a program-level effort: “To respond effectively to the external societal and internal institutional pressures…changes cannot be limited to a specific course taught by a specific faculty member, no matter how exemplary it might otherwise be…. Rather, change will need to occur across these three fundamental and interrelated areas of educational practice: (a) a programmatic mission statement that is anchored in collegiate humanistic learning, (b) an intellectually stimulating content- and language-integrated curriculum sequenced to enable the attainment of the specified goals over the 4 years of the program, and (c) language- and content learning-oriented assessment to provide publically available evidence for student achievement and advocacy for the program” (2017, p. 425).
- 26.
References
Adler, Eric. 2017. “When Humanists Undermine the Humanities.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 14. Accessed 15 March 2019. http://www.chronicle.com/article/When-Humanists-Undermine-the/240067.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), et al. 2011 [orig. 1996]. World-Readiness Standards for Learning Languages. Accessed 13 April 2018. www.actfl.org/files/public/StandardsforFLLexecsumm_rev.pdf.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), et al. 2012 [1986]. “ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines.” Accessed 13 April 2018. https://www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdf.
Anderson, Lorin W., and Lauren A. Sosniak. 1994. Bloom’s Taxonomy: A 40-Year Retrospective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Berman, Russell A. 2011. “The Real Foreign Language Crisis.” American Association of University Professors, September–October. Accessed 14 April 2018. https://www.aaup.org/article/real-language-crisis#.WTmnUDOZPR0.
Bernhardt, Elizabeth, and Russell Berman. 1999. “From German 1 to German Studies 001: A Chronicle of Curricular Reform.” Die Unterrichtspraxis 32 (1): 22–31.
Bhabha, Homi J. 1993. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Bloom, Benjamin S., ed. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and John B. Thompson. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, Jerome S. 1960. The Process of Education. Cambridge: The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
Byrnes, Heidi. 2002. “The Role of Task and Task-Based Assessment in a Content-Oriented Collegiate Foreign Language Curriculum.” Language Testing 19 (4): 419–37.
Byrnes, Heidi, and Susanne Kord. 2002. “Developing Literacy and Literacy Competence: Challenges for Foreign Language Departments.” In SLA and the Literature Classroom: Fostering Dialogues, edited by Holly Tucker and Virginia Scott, 31–69. Boston: Heinle Thomson.
Byrnes, Heidi, and Katherine A. Sprang. 2004. “Fostering Advanced L2 Literacy: A Genre-Based, Cognitive Approach.” In Advanced Foreign Language Learning: A Challenge to College Programs, edited by Heidi Byrnes and Hiram H. Maxim, 47–85. Boston: Heinle Thomson.
Clifford, James, and George E. Marcus. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Galloway, Vicki. 1999. “Bridges and Boundaries: Growing the Cross-Cultural Mind.” In Language Learners of Tomorrow: Process and Promise, edited by Margaret A. Kassen, 152–87. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co.
Hake, Sabine, ed. 2016. “The GSA Fortieth Anniversary Issue.” German Studies Review 39 (3).
Halverson, Rachel J., and Carol A. Costabile-Heming. 2015. Taking Stock of German Studies in the United States: The New Millennium. New York: Camden House.
Hammer, Judith, and Janet Swaffar. 2012. “Assessing Strategic Cultural Competency: Holistic Approaches to Student Learning Through Media.” The Modern Language Journal 962: 209–33.
Jauss, Hans Robert. 1970. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory.” New Literary History 2 (1): 7–37.
Kern, Richard. 2000. Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kramsch, Claire. 2009. “Third Culture and Language Education.” In Contemporary Applied Linguistics: Language Teaching and Learning, edited by Vivian Cook and Li Wei, 233–54. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Kroskrity, Paul V. 2003. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research.
Lee, Horng-Yi. 2014. “Inquiry-Based Teaching in Second and Foreign Language Teaching.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5 (6): 1236–44.
Lombrozo, Tania. 2015. “The Humanities: What’s the Big Idea?” NPR online, October 26. Accessed 15 March 2019. https://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2015/10/26/452003593/the-humanities-what-s-the-big-idea.
Marcus, George E. 1998. Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marcus, George E., and Michael M. J. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McCumber, John. 2016. “How Humanities Can Help Fix the World.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, October 2. Accessed 14 April 2018. https://www.chronicle.com/article/How-Humanities-Can-Help-Fix/237955.
Modern Languages Association (MLA) Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. 2007. “Foreign Languages and Higher Education: New Structures for a Changed World.” Profession 12: 234–245.
National Council of State Supervisors of Languages (NCSSFL) and American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), et al. 2017. “NCSSFL-ACTFL Can-Do Statements.” Accessed 14 April 2018. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/ncssfl-actfl-can-do-statements.
Newfield, Christopher. 2016. The Great Mistake: How We Wrecked Public Universities and How We Can Fix Them. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Newfield, Christopher, and Ronald Strickland. 1995. After Political Correctness: The Humanities and Society in the 1990s. Boulder: Westview Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1997. Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
———. 2010. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paisani, Kate, Heather Willis Allen, and Beatrice Dupuy. 2015. A Multiliteracies Framework for Collegiate Foreign Language Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Randall, Amanda. 2017. “Assembled Thoughts on the ‘Why’ and ‘How’ of Diversifying and Decolonializing German Studies,” July 6. Accessed 15 March 2019. https://diversityingermancurriculum.weebly.com/ddgc-blog/assembled-thoughts-on-the-why-and-how-of-diversifying-and-decolonializing-german-studies.
Redmann, Jennifer, and Kathryn Sederberg. 2017. “The First World War in the Literacy-Focused Classroom: Teaching German Through Cultural Themes.” Die Unterrichtspraxis 50 (1): 45–66. Accessed 14 April 2018. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12021/full.
Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna, and Heidi Byrnes. 2017. “Embracing the Language-Educational Challenge in FL-Departments: Reflections on Ways Forward.” The Modern Language Journal 101 (2): 424–27.
Samudzi, Zoé. 2016. “We Need a Decolonized, Not a ‘Diverse,’ Education.” Harlot Media. Updated 29 March 2016. Accessed 14 April 2018. Archived http://archive.is/xlrnA.
Smith, Sidonie. 2015. Manifesto for the Humanities: Transforming Doctoral Education in Good Enough Times. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sørensen, Asger. 2015. “From Critique of Ideology to Politics: Habermas on Bildung.” Ethics and Education 10: 252–70.
Stover, Justin. 2018. “There Is No Case for the Humanities.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 4. https://www.chronicle.com/article/There-Is-No-Case-for-the/242724.
Swaffar, Janet K., and Katherine Arens. 2005. Remapping the Foreign Language Curriculum: An Approach Through Multiple Literacies. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
Swaffar, Janet K., and Per Urlaub, eds. 2016. Transforming Postsecondary Foreign Language Teaching in the United States. Dordrecht: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Randall, A. (2020). Habits of Mind, Habits of Heart: Cultivating Humanity Through a Decolonized German Studies Curriculum. In: Criser, R., Malakaj, E. (eds) Diversity and Decolonization in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34342-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34342-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34341-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34342-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)