Abstract
Serious water contamination and freshwater shortage result in the urgent requirements of advanced technologies for water treatment. Membrane separation is an alternative technology to address the global water crisis. Hence the research for membrane materials with excellent properties is being undertaken vigorously. Recently, successful attempts have been made towards applying carbon-based membrane materials, such as carbon membranes, carbon nanotube membranes, carbon fiber membranes, activated carbon membranes, graphene-based membranes, etc. for achieving a high separation performance. The intrinsic properties of the carbon materials can potentially lead to enhancements in fouling mitigation, hydrophilicity, and permeate quality. This chapter provides a brief and comprehensive overview of the fabrication and synthesis mechanisms of the carbon-based membrane materials, characterization methods, and practical applications in water treatment. The major points are:
-
1.
Carbon membranes, derived from phenolic resin and coal as precursors, have been widely used in water treatment, specifically utilizing the electrical conductivity of coal-based carbon membrane as the electrode and membrane filter simultaneously demonstrate great potential on water treatment.
-
2.
Four types of carbon nanotube membranes are presented and indicate high separation performance due to the remarkable physicochemical properties of carbon nanotubes.
-
3.
Carbon fiber membranes possess abundant functional groups on the surface, favoring high permeability in water treatment.
-
4.
Activated carbon membranes are promising for organic matter removal owing to high surface area, micro–meso and macroscopic structure, and various chemical functional groups.
-
5.
Graphene-based membranes as the novel carbon-based membrane materials with unique laminar pores are attracting more and more attentions.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
4.1 Introduction
The industrial development and population growth have led to serious and sustainable challenge towards the water resources in the twenty-first century (Menachem and William 2011; Ma et al. 2017; Salgot and Folch 2018). The prediction from the United Nations indicates that half of the countries worldwide will be confronted with water shortage in the coming decades (Goh and Ismail 2018). The World Health Organization (WHO) also estimates that more than 1.2 billion people worldwide have gotten sick or died through drinking contaminated water, and the number is expected to significantly grow in the coming years (Montgomery and Elimelech 2007; Wilson et al. 2018). Hence, in order to reduce the hazards from water pollution to humankind, various technologies and industrial processes for water treatment or purification have been developed and applied rapidly in recent years (Zheng et al. 2015; Pintor et al. 2016; Hayat et al. 2017; Jiao et al. 2017).
Among them, membrane separation has been accepted as a promising and pervasive technology arising from its numerous advantages of no chemical additives requirement, low energy demand, easy operation, high separation selectivity , and good stability (Gin and Noble 2011; Li et al. 2016b; Thakur and Voicu 2016; Chowdhury et al. 2018; Lau et al. 2018). To date, membrane separation has been widely applied in industrial wastewater treatment and drinking water purification and desalinization (Pendergast and Hoek 2011; Singh and Hankins 2016; Parimal 2017; Zhang et al. 2018). As one of the dominated factors to determine membrane performance, membrane materials should be primarily concerned for exploring high-performance membranes.
Recently, carbon-based materials have been used to develop membranes with optimal structure and performance due to their excellent physicochemical properties (Goh et al. 2016; Thines et al. 2017; Anand et al. 2018; Wei et al. 2018). The carbon-based materials not only can improve the wetting ability and surface charges of the membranes but also introduce additional functions such as antimicrobial ability and photocatalytic and electrochemical reactions (Liu et al. 2011; Ong et al. 2018). According to previous works, several kinds of carbon-based membrane materials including carbon membranes, carbon nanotube membranes, carbon fiber membranes, activated carbon membranes, graphene-based membranes, etc. (Inagaki et al. 2014; Jiang et al. 2016; Lawler 2016; Vatanpour and Safarpour 2018) are described. This chapter aims to provide an overview on recent developments of carbon-based membrane materials for water treatment. A brief discussion of the existing challenges and their prospects are also considered.
4.2 Carbon Membranes
Carbon membranes, as novel porous inorganic membranes, are usually prepared by pyrolysis of carbonaceous materials, such as polyimide and its derivatives, polyacrylonitrile, poly(furfuryl alcohol), phenol–formaldehyde, coal, etc. In the past several decades, carbon membranes have demonstrated excellent gas separation performance (Hamm et al. 2017), however, only a few carbon membranes are applied on water treatment due to their high cost and complex preparation process. In the following parts, several kinds of carbon membranes used in water treatment will be introduced.
4.2.1 Phenolic Resin-Based Carbon Membranes
Phenolic resins have presented suitable features to be applied as the precursors of carbon membranes due to their low cost, thermosetting property, and high carbon yield (Muylaert et al. 2012). Several scholars have successfully prepared carbon membranes with phenolic resins for water treatment . Song et al. (2017) developed carbon alumina mixed-matrix membranes by impregnating phenolic resin in porous alumina matrix via a vacuum-assisted method. Their results showed that carbon alumina mixed-matrix membranes with high water fluxes and salt rejections could be easily tailored. However, the carbon membrane, formed by dip coating a phenolic resin solution on an alumina substrate, could not exclude small molecules of glucose and sucrose. It only demonstrated high removal rates (80% and 100%, respectively) for 36 kda and 400 kda of polyvinylpyrrolidone polymers (Abd et al. 2017). Wu et al. (2016) prepared phenolic resin-based carbon membrane to treat oily waste water . The oil concentration dramatically reduced from initial 200 mg/L in feed to below 10 mg/L in permeate, with the oil rejection rate of 95.3%. Zhao et al. (2018) prepared the original precursor membrane by compressing the mushy mixture composed of phenolic resin, hexamethylenetetramine, carboxymethylcellulose sodium, and distilled water. The results showed that these carbon membranes could effectively remove phenol and phosphoric acid from water. The maximum removal rates were 81.9% for phenol and 55.3% for phosphoric acid. In addition, the carbon membrane derived from phenolic resin was also effective to treat dye wastewater. Asymmetric tubular carbon membranes on an ultrafiltration substrate were prepared by thermosetting phenolic resin and carbon black (Tahri et al. 2016), and such carbon membranes could be applied efficiently to the treatment of industrial dyeing effluent. According to the above research, carbon membranes made from phenolic resin as raw material or part of raw material have been applied in many aspects of water treatment and showed their unique performance.
4.2.2 Coal-Based Carbon Membranes
Coal, as a kind of natural mixture composed of macromolecular cross-linked polymers and inorganic minerals, is a good candidate for preparing carbon membranes because of its low price and abundant deposit. In the past two decades, our group explored the preparation technology of carbon membranes derived from coal, which was shown in Fig. 4.1. The coal was ground into fine particles first, and then mixed with binder into a dough, which was extruded into a tube of 10 mm external diameter by a hydraulic extruder at 2.5–3.0 MPa. After drying at ambient atmosphere, the tubular membrane was carbonized in Ar up to 900 °C at the rate of 3 °C/min and held for 1 h. The final product was cooled to room temperature naturally. A series of systematic investigations on the controlled preparation of coal-based carbon membranes were carried out, and the pore structure, mechanical strength, and electrical conductivity of CBCMs were further optimized. As expected, the coal-based carbon membranes showed excellent water treatment performance (Song et al. 2006).
During treatment, the retention and accumulation of pollutants on the membrane surface and inside the membrane pores would give rise to serious membrane fouling. In order to improve the antifouling ability of coal-based carbon membranes, an electric field was exerted on the treatment system; our group utilized the electrical conductivity of coal-based carbon membranes and designed a coupling system which employs coal-based carbon membranes as the anode and Ti plate surrounding the membrane as the cathode. This system achieved significant improvement on removal efficiency and antifouling ability under an external electric field due to the electrochemical oxidation (Fig. 4.2). This system not only displayed excellent removal efficiency for organic pollutants (such as oil droplets) larger than the membrane pores (Li et al. 2016a) but also demonstrated great potential on those pollutants with a smaller molecule size than the membrane pore size including dyes, phenol, etc. (Yin et al. 2016); Tao et al. 2017b; Sun et al. 2018). Moreover, microorganisms such as microalgae and Vibrio cholerae were also effectively removed (Tao et al. 2017a). Compared with other membrane processes such as ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, and reverse osmosis, this technology possessed obvious advantages on processing capacity and energy consumption.
Although the coupling system has been proved to be effective for organic wastewater treatment , further potential for improvement in the removal efficiency and life span of the coupling system is often limited by the relatively low electrochemical activity of membrane electrode materials. Therefore, improving electrochemical activity of the membrane electrode material is a key to make a significant breakthrough in this field. Yang et al. (2011) presented the design of a novel electrocatalytic membrane reactor by loading electrocatalyst on carbon membrane (Fig. 4.3). In the research, TiO2 as the electrocatalyst and hydrophilic agent was coated on the membrane surface by a sol–gel approach to enhance electron transfer and improve membrane permeability . In this operation process, once the membrane anode was electrified, excitation of electrons in the conduction band took place at the TiO2 surface. The obtained electrons and holes not only electrochemically decomposed H2O into O2 and H2, inducing gas and liquid microflows to reduce concentration polarization and avoid membrane fouling, but also reacted with the adsorbed H2O and O2 at the TiO2 surface to generate reactive intermediates, which could indirectly decompose the organic foulants into CO2 and H2O or biodegradable products, so as to realize the self-cleaning function of the electrocatalytic membrane. Similarly, Wang et al. (2014) also used an electrocatalytic membrane reactor constituted by TiO2 loading carbon membrane to treat phenol wastewater. Besides, the Bi–SnO2/C electrocatalytic membrane was fabricated via a simple electrochemical reduction and hydrothermal method by Wang et al. (2018b). The Bi–SnO2/C membrane could continuously remove and inactivate E. coli in water through flow-through mode. As a result, the sterilization efficiency reached more than 99.99% under the conditions of cell voltage of 4 V, flow rate of 1.4 mL/min, and E. coli initial concentration of 1.0 × 104 CFU/mL, owing to the synergistic effect of the membrane separation and electrocatalytic oxidation.
4.3 Carbon Nanotube Membranes
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), as an important kind of carbon materials , have many remarkable electrical, thermal, mechanical, and optical properties, which make them be widely used in sensor, supercapacitor, lithium–ion battery, etc. (Ren et al. 2011; Gupta et al. 2013; Yu et al. 2014; Apul and Karanfil 2015; Patino et al. 2015). Generally, carbon nanotubes can be divided into single-walled carbon nanotubes and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Fig. 4.4) (Ahn et al. 2012; Ihsanullah 2019). As we have known, carbon nanotubes were firstly discovered by Sumio Iijima (1991). Soon after, researchers observed ultrahigh water flow rates in carbon nanotubes, and this discovery produced great expectation that carbon nanotubes could be used as an ideal material for water treatment (Whitby and Quirk 2007; Lee et al. 2011; Ahn et al. 2012).
The concept of carbon nanotube membrane was introduced by Li and Richard (2000) when they studied the mass transfer phenomenon in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Recently, carbon nanotube membranes for water purification are getting more and more attention. According to the arrangement patterns of carbon nanotubes, carbon nanotube membranes are usually classified into vertically aligned carbon nanotubes (VA-CNT) membranes, horizontally aligned carbon nanotubes (HA-CNT) membranes, mixed-matrix carbon nanotube membranes, and electrochemical carbon nanotube membranes (as shown in Fig. 4.5).
4.3.1 Vertically Aligned Carbon Nanotube Membranes
Bruce et al. (2004) firstly constructed a multi-walled vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane, and its typical preparation process was shown in Fig. 4.6 (Das et al. 2014), and the separation performance of vertically aligned carbon nanotube membranes was listed in Table 4.1. The work from Baek et al. (2014) showed the superiority of vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane with the water permeation almost three times higher than a typical ultrafiltration membrane . Besides, the membrane prepared by Holt (2004) with silicon nitride (Si3N4)-filled carbon nanotube array obtained much higher water flux which was three times larger than that calculated by the Hagen–Poiseuille equation. This was mainly owing to the effect of the compact nanotube forest and short nanochannel length. In addition, some researchers prepared novel vertically aligned carbon nanotube membranes that possessed certain antimicrobial and antifouling capacities (Lee et al. 2015). A key challenge on preparing these kinds of membranes was to align the carbon nanotubes over a sufficiently large area for comprehensive water treatment (Ali et al. 2019). Instead of conventional preparation methods, Wu et al. (2014) utilized an electric field to obtain vertically aligned carbon nanotube membranes. Electro-casting allowed multi-walled carbon nanotubes to grow vertically and disperse more evenly. However, complex manufacturing techniques were still major obstacle to make these membranes suitable for large-scale applications (Ihsanullah 2019).
4.3.2 Horizontally Aligned Carbon Nanotube Membranes
In addition to vertically aligned pattern, carbon nanotubes can aggregate with each other by the van der Waals interactions to form horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes (Fig. 4.5B) (Ihsanullah 2019). This type of carbon nanotube membranes possesses several advantages such as a high specific surface area, large porous 3D network, etc. The most common methods for synthesizing horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes are electrospinning, vacuum filtration, and layer-by-layer deposition (Sears et al. 2010).
The preparation processes of horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes usually involve two steps: the functionalization of carbon nanotubes and vacuum filtration (Fig. 4.7). Firstly, the functionalized carbon nanotubes (horizontally aligned carbon nanotubes) are ultrasonically treated for uniformly dispersing in water or other solvents. Then, the dispersion is placed on the substrate membrane by vacuum filtration, after drying in an oven to remove the solvent (Lee et al. 2016a).
The related works on horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes are listed in Table 4.2. Due to the disordered arrangement of functionalized carbon nanotubes, the horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes can provide rich porous structure and large specific surface area (Sears et al. 2010), which makes the horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes possess high adsorption capacity to natural organic matter (Yang et al. 2013) and strong antimicrobial actions (Kang et al. 2007). Li et al. (2015) found that a “slanted carbon nanotube membrane” exhibited a higher water flux than a typical vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane, because this kind of art structure could obviously lower the energy barrier for filling water into the carbon nanotubes. Brady Estevez et al. (2008) reported that the horizontally aligned single-walled carbon nanotube membrane displayed high removal rate for the virus MS2 bacteriophage. Ihsanullah et al. (2015) synthesized a silver-doped carbon nanotube membrane and demonstrated good antibiofouling and antibacterial properties. Subsequently, they found that an iron oxide composite carbon nanotube membrane could present excellent antifouling property (Ihsanullah et al. 2016). Dumée et al. (2010) applied horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes to direct contact membrane distillation . Their work proved that horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes possessed high water flux and good desalination ability. After that, they modified high-purity carbon nanotubes by two chemical ways, and the resultant horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membrane had a larger contact angle (140° compared with 125°), which further improved the performance of the horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membrane (Dumée et al. 2011).
However, carbon nanotubes usually tended to aggregate when they were dispersed in a polymer matrix or solvent. Therefore, it was difficult to prepare a uniform dispersion. For this reason, several surfactants such as Triton X-100, sodium lauryl sulfate, etc. were adopted to improve the dispersion of carbon nanotubes in aqueous solution (Wu et al. 2010c). Besides, another efficient method was chemical functionalization (Yang et al. 2013), which had been proved to increase the hydrophilicity and stability of carbon nanotube suspensions (Ansón-Casaos et al. 2010). For example, some researchers covalently grafted functional groups including amines, fluorine, and sulfhydryl groups onto carbon nanotubes to help them disperse in horizontally aligned carbon nanotube membranes (Ansón-Casaos et al. 2010; Darryl et al. 2010).
4.3.3 Mixed-Matrix Carbon Nanotube Membranes
The main role of carbon nanotubes in mixed-matrix carbon nanotube membranes is to improve the performance of conventional polymer membrane (Ihsanullah 2019). Compared with the above two types of membranes, mixed-matrix membranes are easier to be commercialized for their simple preparation procedures. For preparing mixed-matrix carbon nanotube membranes, functional carbon nanotubes are generally added into polymeric membranes by several synthesis techniques (Ali et al. 2019; Ihsanullah 2019). The most common methods are phase inversion (Choi et al. 2006; Brunet et al. 2008; Majeed et al. 2012), interfacial polymerization (Shen et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2014), solution mixing (Ahmed et al. 2013), spray-assisted layer-by-layer (Liu et al. 2013), polymer grafting (Shawky et al. 2011), in situ polymerization (Zhao et al. 2014; Zarrabi et al. 2016), and in situ colloidal precipitation (Ho et al. 2017). The prepared membranes often exhibit excellent properties for reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, and forward osmosis applications (Lee et al. 2016a). Some researches about the membrane performance of mixed-matrix nanotube membranes are listed in Table 4.3.
Mixed-matrix carbon nanotube membranes typically exhibited high removal efficiency and water flux . Zheng et al. (2017) prepared a novel sulfonated multi-walled carbon nanotube membrane by using the interfacial polymerization method. By adding 0.01% multi-walled carbon nanotubes, the membrane showed high salt rejection (96.8%) and water permeation (13.2 L/(m2·h·bar)). Moreover, a polysulfone membrane (Choi et al. 2006) and a polyether sulfone membrane (Celik et al. 2011b) doped with carbon nanotubes were more hydrophilic and demonstrated an enhanced antifouling ability because of the hydrophilic carboxylic groups of functionalized carbon nanotubes.
4.3.4 Electrochemical Carbon Nanotube Membranes
Electrochemical carbon nanotube membrane for wastewater treatment is a novel technique which combines electrochemical degradation with conventional membrane filtration to remove target contaminants (de Lannoy et al. 2012; Lalia et al. 2015; Ahmed et al. 2016; Elimelech and Boo 2017; Ho et al. 2018; Yi et al. 2018). In this process, the electrochemical carbon nanotube membranes are used both as a filter for contaminant sorption and an electrode for electrochemical degradation of aqueous pollutants (Ali et al. 2019).
The electrochemical carbon nanotube membranes exhibited great potential on wastewater treatment due to high degradation efficiency, low energy consumption, and simple operation process (Motoc et al. 2013; Bakr and Rahaman 2016, 2017; Liu et al. 2017). Besides, by transferring electrons directly through the surface of the electrochemical carbon nanotube membrane electrode, the solute transfer restriction of the conventional batch electrochemical process was overcome. Therefore, this method was more advantageous than conventional batch electrolysis. Table 4.4 provides some works on electrochemical carbon nanotube membranes. For example , Wei et al. (2017b) prepared a novel carbon nanotube-based hollow fiber membrane with a sandwich-like structure. Low concentration of microcystin-LR (0.5 mg/L) was removed economically and efficiently (>99.8%) by simple switching with adsorption and desorption as well as electrochemical oxidation by these carbon nanotube ultrafiltration membranes .
4.4 Graphene-Based Membranes
Graphene, consisting of a compact accumulation of sp2 hybrid carbon atoms, was reported for the first time by Geim and Novoselov (2004). Since then, graphene and graphene-based materials have been extensively studied and used to synthesize various multifunctional materials. As we know, graphene can be obtained by chemical vapor deposition or chemical reduction of graphene oxide. Generally, it is easy to fabricate single-layered or several-layered graphene on some catalytic substrates via chemical vapor deposition. Compared with the tedious and expensive chemical vapor deposition, reducing graphene oxide is more favorable for scale production. Graphene oxide is usually prepared by oxidizing graphite through the famous Hummer’s method, which has abundant oxygen-containing functional groups on its surface and edges. After chemical reduction by hydrogen iodide acid, hydrazine, or thermal treatment, the oxygen-containing groups are reduced to obtain reduced graphene oxide which possesses similar properties to graphene. To date, both graphene and graphene oxide have also been applied to construct novel membranes with laminar pores. Besides, these materials are also used as blender to improve the hydrophilicity, surface charges, and antifouling ability of the polymeric membranes.
4.4.1 Support-Free Graphene Membranes
The ideal separation membrane should possess uniform pore size, ultrathin thickness, high mechanical strength, and excellent physicochemical properties to provide good permeability and selectivity . Graphene membrane may be a suitable candidate to meet such requirements. According to the theoretical calculation, the single-layered graphene membrane can completely desalinate brine water and seawater, showing great potential for water treatment (Cohen-Tanugi and Grossman 2012).
Previous research suggested that salt rejection was negatively correlated to improve pore size and applied pressure (Anand et al. 2018). Meanwhile, ionization of functional groups surrounding nanopores could influence desalination efficiency of single-layered graphene membrane (Chao et al. 2017). Therefore, single-layered graphene membranes could achieve highly permeable desalination by controlling the pore size and functional groups of nanopores (Cohen-Tanugi and Grossman 2012). To date, the nanopores in single-layered graphene membranes were usually produced by ion beam and electron beam exposure, ion bombardment, UV-induced oxidation etching, hydroxyl radical etching, oxygen plasma etching, etc. (Anand et al. 2018). O’Hern et al. (2014) reported their works on the controllable high-density subnanometer pores in single-layered graphene membranes which allowed the transport of salt but rejected larger organic molecules.
Compared with single-layered graphene membranes , Celebi et al. (2014) reported highly efficient mass transfer across physically perforated double-layered graphene membrane . Wei et al. (2017a) reported a four-layered graphene membrane with about 2 nm thickness, indicating outstanding permeability and selectivity . Cohen-Tanugi et al. (2016) also reported a reverse osmosis membrane stacked by multilayer nanoporous graphene for desalination by using classical molecular dynamic simulation. They found that double-layered nanoporous graphene membranes with the 3.0 Å of nanopore radius exhibited full salt rejection. Compared to the single-layered graphene membranes, the bilayer nanoporous graphene membranes showed excellent salt rejection. Recently, the effects of pressure and wall interaction on the water transport through multilayer nanoporous graphene membranes were carried out by molecular dynamic simulation (Shahbabaei et al. 2017). They found the water flux was mostly doubled in the multilayered hydrophilic pore membrane owing to strong hydrogen bonds. And then Chang et al. (2017) reported the nanofiltration properties of reduced graphene-based membrane with adjustable porous structure. Similarly , Yi (2013) prepared ultrathin (≈22–53 nm thick) graphene nanofiltration membranes on microporous substrates. The performance of such ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membranes was tested on a dead-end filtration device, and the pure water flux of ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membranes was high (21.8 L/m2·h·bar). Furthermore , Kabiri et al. (2016) synthesized a thiol-functionalized graphene composite with a unique three-dimensional porous structure to remove mercury ions (Hg2+) from water. The results indicated that the removal efficiency of the membrane reached almost 100% for low (4 mg/L) and high (120 mg/L) concentration of Hg2+. Due to excellent permeability and selectivity , support-free graphene membranes exhibited great potential in selective ion transportation and separation.
4.4.2 Graphene Oxide Membranes
Recently, graphene oxide has attracted increasing attention on membrane preparation and modification due to its excellent hydrophilic properties (Choi et al. 2013). Graphene oxide is usually obtained by oxidizing graphite with a strong acid or oxidant. Graphene oxide is a reforming form of graphene in which oxygen and hydrogen atoms are bonded with carbon atoms (Hu and Mi 2013). Due to the presence of oxygen- and hydrogen-based functional groups, graphene oxide can be well dispersed in water and other organic solvents, which favors the preparation of graphene oxide-based membranes (Stankovich et al. 2007).
Sun et al. (2014a) used graphene oxide membranes to recover acids from iron-based electrolyte wastewater. The mechanism was that Fe3+ was blocked by graphene oxide membranes, while H+ could migrate fast. Sun et al. (2014b) also studied ion mobility and interactions with graphene oxide membranes. They found that ion permeability exhibited the order of Mg2+> Na+>Cd2+ >Ba2+= > Ca2+ >K+ > Cu3+ > Fe3+. Various interactions between ions and graphene oxide sheets, such as chelation, static electricity, van der Waals forces, etc., were attributed to the selectivity of graphene oxide membranes. Figure 4.8 showed the schematic diagram of graphene oxide membranes for water transport (Wang et al. 2016a). Water molecules firstly arrived in the hydrophilic sites in graphene oxide and then slipped through the hydrophobic nanochannel with low or no friction.
A dopamine-coated polysulfone membrane has been prepared to investigate the dependence of water flux and charge effect on separation. They revealed that the water flux was independent of the number of graphene oxide layers and salt exclusion but depended on interlayer spacing (Hu and Mi 2013). However, the volume of graphene oxide membrane would swell in the aqueous environment . Nair et al. (2012) studied the water mobility in nanochannels between graphene oxide tablets under different condition. They showed that the interlayer spacing between the original graphene oxide membrane region and the stacked graphene oxide membrane was about 0.6 nm in the dry conditions. Because of the diffusion of water molecules to graphene oxide layer, the increased interlayer spacing between graphene oxide membranes resulted in high mobility for water molecules. However, when the graphene oxide membrane was immerged in an ionic solution, the increased gap by the hydration cannot repel K + and Na + ions, making the membrane inappropriate for desalination applications (Joshi et al. 2014). Addressing to this issue, graphene oxide was functionalized with glycine and carboxylation for preparing membrane by pressure-assisted self-assembly to achieve high salt rejection efficiency (Yuan et al. 2017). Xu et al. (2017a) reported that the water flux and separation ability of graphene oxide membrane was related to the inner nanostructure of graphene oxide membrane. In addition to the interlayer spacing, it was found that the morphological characteristics of graphene oxide membranes, such as corrugation, could improve the separation performance (Qiu et al. 2011). Wang et al. (2012) presented that a graphene oxide/polyelectrolyte composite membrane had obvious nanofiltration performance in removing dyes, separating monovalent and divalent ions, and dehydrating solvent–water mixture . O’Hern et al. (2014) also verified the water purification and ion permeation (rather selective) properties of the graphene oxide membrane.
Similar to the study of graphene oxide membrane in ion transport , Chang et al. (2017) reported that carboxylation could increase the hydrophilicity of graphene oxide membrane, improving the efficiency of dye removal. Such improvement was potentially attributed to surface charge density. On the contrary, it was found that reduced preoxidized graphene membrane could increase the rejection efficiency of methyl orange dye to >90%. In addition, a graphene oxide hydrogel membrane was synthesized by Qin et al. (2012) via suspending the graphene oxide (graphene oxide) in water. This graphene oxide hydrogel exhibited pH responsiveness and good mechanical properties. Meanwhile, graphene oxide hydrogel had a good adsorption capacity for organic dye Rhodamine B and anionic chromate.
Graphene oxide membrane also possessed superior metal ion adsorption characteristics. The graphene oxide membranes, which were modified with hyperbranched polyethylenimine, were applied to obtain high permeability and rejection (>90%) of heavy metal ions (Zhang et al. 2015). The divalent metal ions, such as Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Pb2+, etc., could be chemically adsorbed by graphene oxide membranes, and the membranes could be reused for up to ten cycles (Sitko et al. 2016).
Nowadays, graphene oxide membranes were also applied to oil–water separation. With vacuum-assisted filtration , Zhao et al. (2016) intercalated palygorskite nanorods into adjacent graphene oxide nanosheets and assembled graphene oxide nanosheets into laminate structures to prepare the freestanding graphene oxide membranes. Under various conditions (different concentration, pH, or oil species), the graphene oxide membranes showed excellent anti-oil performance in the separation process of water-containing oil emulsion.
4.4.3 Graphene Oxide Hybrid Membranes
Although graphene oxide membranes with a good desalination capability can be prepared by simple methods, these membranes could be trapped by the use of pressure-driven systems . Liu et al. (2015) found that the composite membrane prepared by adding graphene oxide to polysulfone displayed superior pressure-resisted ability, mechanical strength, and water permeability .
In order to increase water flux further , Dai et al. (2015) introduced a large quantity of nitrogen-containing and oxygen-containing groups into the surface of graphene oxide membrane and filled the interlayer space with polypropylene. The novel polypropylene-based composite membrane apparently improved the hydrophilicity and adsorption capacity. With the development of materials science, membranes consisted of polymeric materials , including nylon, aromatic polyamides, polyvinylidene fluoride, polysulfone, and polyethersulfone, as well as non-polymer materials, such as ceramics, metals, and composites, which have been readily fabricated and applied on the filtration of diverse solutions. Compared to pure polymer membranes, the polyamide membranes doped with graphene oxide showed higher water flux and desalination rate (Bano et al. 2015). The resultant increase in the permeate water flux was from 1.8 L/(m2· h1) to 22 L /(m2· h1), while salt rejection maintained at essentially above 80%. Similarly, research conducted by Lai et al. (2016) demonstrated that water flux and salt removal were improved by integrating graphene oxide in polyamide membrane. Moreover , Ali et al. (2016) prepared thin composite membranes embedded with graphene oxide to evaluate their desalination performance. They found that adding a small amount of graphene oxide (100 ppm) significantly improved water flux and mechanical stability and reduced membrane fouling. For salt solution with 2000 ppm NaCl, the launching flux at 1.5 MPa was 29.6 L/m2, and the salt removal rate was 97%. Besides , Kochameshki et al. (2017) synthesized a polysulfone nanocomposite membrane modified with graphene grafted with diallyldimethylammonium chloride. The results showed that the water flux increased to about 450 L/m2·h, the antifouling performance was improved, and the heavy metal ion rejection rate increased to 86.68% (Cu2+) and 88.68% (Cd2+).
In addition, polyethylenimine membrane integrated with tannic acid-functionalized graphene oxide showed excellent ion separation performance against NaCl and MgSO4 (Lim et al. 2017). A thin nanofiltration membrane was prepared by aggregating piperazine and trimesoyl chloride with reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 composite, which demonstrated good separation performance and antifouling property in cross-flow filtration system due to the hydrophilicity of reduced graphene oxide (Safarpour et al. 2015b). Zhang et al. (2017c) synthesized a novel layered structure membrane which was prepared by coating graphene oxide sheets on the surface of electrospun aminated polyacrylonitrile (APAN) fibers, exhibiting ultrahigh flux (10,000 L/(m2·h) ), promising rejection (98%) and excellent antifouling performance for the separation of oil–water emulsions. Besides , Choi et al. (2013) also fabricated a dual-action barrier coating layer of graphene oxide on the surface of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane . The antifouling tests indicated that the graphene oxide coating layer can increase the surface hydrophilicity and decrease the surface roughness, which promoted the significantly improved antifouling performance against a protein foulant. Similarly, graphene oxide nanosheets were successfully doped across 200-nm-thick polyamide membranes by He et al. (2015). They observed the significant increase of water flux (80%) in the reverse osmosis membranes modified with graphene oxide nanosheets. Moreover, polyamide nanofiltration membranes modified with reduced graphene oxide–NH2 were prepared by Li et al. (2017b) to enhance water flux and antifouling capability. There were some researchers reporting the improvement in the chlorine resistance of the polyamide membranes incorporated with graphene oxide (Safarpour et al. 2015a). In their opinion, the chemically stable graphene oxide plate embedded in the polyamide layer acted as a barrier layer, protecting the polyamide from chlorine erosion, as shown in Fig. 4.9 (Choi et al. 2013).
The researchers also identified that adding graphene to polymer membranes had positive influences on dye absorption. Polypyrrole-hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile composite NF membrane doped with graphene oxide was prepared by Shao et al. (2014). It is found that the effectiveness of Rose Bengal dye rejection was approximately 99.0%, and the solvent permeability was enhanced. And the NF performance of graphene oxide mixed polyether sulfone membrane used for dyestuff (Direct red 16) removal was higher than that of polyethersulfone membrane (99% vs. 90%) (Zinadini et al. 2014). The NF membrane fabricated by multilayered deposition of graphene oxide on a polysulfone support exhibited high water permeability and superior rejection (93–95%) of Rhodamine B dye (Qiu et al. 2011). In addition, a polyamide membrane assembled with carboxyl-functionalized graphene oxide showed 98.1% dye rejection rate of the New Coccine (Zhang et al. 2017b).
Due to superior separation characteristic, graphene oxide-doped polymer membranes were also applied on oil–water separation. Hu et al. (2015) successfully fabricated a novel graphene oxide hybrid membrane on commercial 19-channel ceramic by adopting a vacuum method. During the treatment, the water permeation fluxes of modified membranes were about 667 L/(m2·h·bar) after 150-min operation, which was higher about 27.8% than that of the unmodified membrane (522 L/(m2·h·bar)). These results showed that graphene oxide modification played a crucial role on improving oil–water separation performance. Similarly, in addition to the application of membrane in above wastewater treatment , the novel membranes were more widely applied to more intricate wastewater (Huang et al. 2015). Zinadini et al. (2015) synthesized three different hybrid membranes which were fabricated in three concentrations of 13, 15, and 17 wt% of polyethersulfone polymer. Polyethersulfone/graphene oxide membrane with 15 wt% of polyether sulfone and graphene oxide content of 0.5 wt% showed the most superior performances and was selected as optimal membrane for treatment of milk processing wastewater. Similarly , Sun et al. (2015) developed an antibiofouling membrane by in situ fabrication of graphene oxide–AgNPs onto cellulose acetate membranes. The presence of graphene oxide–AgNPs composite on the membrane caused an inactivation of 86% Escherichia coli after contacting with the membrane for 2 h. Compared to modifying graphene oxide with active substances, graphene oxide hybrid membranes by adding graphene oxide into polymer membranes achieve more significant advantages on improved water flux, mechanical stability, and fouling resistance. There is no doubt that graphene oxide hybrid membranes will provide us the new insight on the optimization of graphene-based membranes (Table 4.5).
4.5 Carbon Fiber Membranes
Since Shimpei (1986) accidentally found that carbon fibers facilitated microbial attachment, and possessed excellent adsorption capacity for pollutants, the research works focused on carbon fibers for water treatment were widely carried out. It was believed that these advantages opened the “surprise door” for the application of carbon fibers (Xu and Luo 2012; Manawi et al. 2018). Especially, carbon fiber membranes, as one of the novel membrane materials, have been explored and applied in recent years (Xiao et al. 2016).
4.5.1 Support-Free Carbon Fiber Membranes
The support-free carbon fiber membranes are generally obtained by forming carbon fiber precursors into membrane shape and then stabilized and carbonized via thermal treatment. Beck et al. (2017) prepared carbon nanofiber membranes by electrospinning followed by carbonization (Fig. 4.10). The adsorption capacity, permeability , and adsorption kinetics of the carbon nanofiber membranes were about 10, 6, and 2 times larger than that of the traditional activated carbon membrane, respectively. However, such carbon fiber membranes usually suffered from serious membrane fouling, limiting their application.
4.5.2 Carbon Fiber Hybrid Membranes
In order to expand the application of carbon fiber membrane in water treatment and improve the removal efficiency of pollutants, researchers have developed a variety of carbon fiber hybrid membranes, which combined the advantages of carbon fiber and membrane technology , improving its treatment efficiency.
Yang and Tsai (2008, 2009) prepared carbon fibers /carbon/alumina tubular composite membrane and applied it in a cross-flow electrocoagulation/electrofiltration module for Cu chemical mechanical polishing wastewater treatment . Under the optimal experimental conditions, the turbidity of the permeate was less than 1 NTU, and the removal rates of total solid content, copper, total organic carbon, and silicon were 72%, 92%, 81%, and 87%, respectively. Li et al. (2013a, b) reported their works on domestic sewage treatment using biological carbon fiber membrane. The biological carbon fiber membrane could effectively intercept sludge and most organic matter. Moreover, the bio-carbon fiber inside the membrane had a strong adsorption performance, which could further adsorb the organic matter across the membrane surface, thus ensuring a higher and more stable removal rate of organic matter.
Besides, Tai et al. (2014) developed a novel freestanding and flexible electrospun carbon–silica composite nanofibrous membrane. This composite membrane was more tough than the original carbon nanofibers when the SiO2 concentration was 2.7 wt%. They found that after coating with silicone oil, the composite membrane became ultra-hydrophobic and superoleophilic, which enabled the membrane to serve as an effective substrate for separating free oil from water. Yue et al. (2018) fabricated layered porous dynamic separation membranes containing primary and secondary nanostructures by in situ growth of ZnO nanowires on carbon fibers (Fig. 4.11). The membrane could switch wettability between high hydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity by simply annealing alternatively in vacuum and air environment (Fig. 4.12) and indicated more than 98% separation efficiency in deoiling and dewater modes. Han et al. (2017) prepared 3D structural Fe2O3–TiO2@activated carbon fiber membranes by a modified electrospinning process followed by a thermal treatment. The membrane possessed high adsorption and visible light excitable photocatalytic properties and could be used to remove dyes and heavy metal ions.
4.5.3 The Composite Membranes Using Carbon Fiber Cloth as the Substrate
These composite membranes usually are obtained by loading various functional materials on carbon fiber cloth, which is adopted as the substrate. They can combine the advantages of functional materials and membrane technology . Meanwhile, the carbon fiber substrate has good mechanical properties and can reduce the loss of functional material in the process of water treatment.
Li et al. (2016c) successfully prepared a catalytic cathode membrane on the basis of low-cost carbon fiber cloth with Pd-reduced graphene oxide–CoFe2O4 catalyst (Fig. 4.13). The cathode membrane was used in microbial fuel cell /membrane bioreactor coupling system, exhibiting great potential on simulated wastewater treatment . Xiao et al. (2017) obtained carbon fiber/C3N4 cloth by a dip-coating and thermal condensation method with carbon fiber cloth as substrate (Fig. 4.14). The carbon fiber/C3N4 cloth possessed excellent flexibility and strong visible light absorption, which displayed good treatment performance for the degradation of flowing wastewater. To further improve the treatment efficiency, Shen et al. (2018) inserted TiO2 between C3N4 and carbon fiber (Fig. 4.15). The carbon fiber/TiO2/C3N4 cloth showed enhanced photocatalytic activity for degrading various organic pollutants in comparison with carbon fiber/C3N4 cloth.
4.6 Activated Carbon Membranes
Activated carbon, as a unique multifunctional material with high surface area, micro–meso and macroscopic structure, and various chemical functional groups, is recognized worldwide as one of the most popular adsorbents in water treatment (Amit et al. 2013; Danish and Ahmad 2018). Up to now, activated carbon has been widely used in various industrial processes including food processing (Alvarez et al. 2011), chemical manufacturing (Jaria et al. 2018), pharmaceutical (Karelid et al. 2017), paper making (Ou Yang et al. 2013), etc. to remove water-soluble chemical pollutants from inorganic and organic wastewater (Abdel-Nasser and El-Hendawy 2001; Mohammed 2011). Jacangelo (1995) found that activated carbon could adsorb organics to prevent the formation of membrane fouling in membrane separation processes. Several studies also demonstrated that membrane bioreactor achieved high removal efficiency for trace organic pollutants in synthetic and real wastewater by the use of granular activated carbon (Amaral et al. 2014; Jia et al. 2014). In this section, the membrane materials integrated with activated carbon, including activated carbon-coated membranes, support-free activated carbon membranes, and activated carbon mixed-matrix membranes for wastewater treatment, were described as follows.
4.6.1 Activated Carbon-Coated Membranes
Activated carbon could be coated on membranes to enhance membrane separation performance while removing contaminants from wastewater. Thiruvenkatachari et al. (2006) prepared activated carbon pre-coated microfiltration hollow fiber membrane using wood-based, coal-based, and coconut shell-based activated carbon for wastewater treatment (Fig. 4.16). After 8 h of operation, 63% of organic pollutants were removed by wood-based activated carbon-coated membrane, 57% by coal-based activated carbon-coated membrane, and 56% by coconut shell-based activated carbon-coated membrane, which were higher than that of non-pre-coated membrane. Simultaneously, the decrease of membrane flux was prevented effectively (less than 20% of initial flux). This work strongly confirmed that the membranes coated by activated carbon could significantly relieved membrane fouling, enhance membrane treatment performance, and improve membrane life. Amaral et al. (2016) developed microfiltration membranes coated by superfine powdered activated carbon for drinking water treatment. The coated membranes achieved excellent removal efficiency because superfine powdered activated carbon was more favorable for the adsorption of pollutants due to its smaller particle size compared with conventional activated carbon. Bae et al. (2007) designed activated carbon membrane with carbon whiskers for wastewater and drinking water treatments. The carbon whiskers on the activated carbon membrane could significantly prevent the deposition and accumulation of particles, extending membrane lifetime (Fig. 4.17).
4.6.2 Support-Free Activated Carbon Membranes
Activated carbon membrane is a novel carbon-based membrane, which not only has excellent thermal stability and chemical stability of inorganic membrane materials but also has excellent electrical conductivity and rich pore structure of carbon materials . Li et al. (2017a) designed and prepared a support-free activated carbon membrane by mixing activated carbon, binder, pore former, and conductive agent followed by compression modeling and carbonization. The activated carbon membrane realized the integration of the triple function of adsorption/electrocatalysis/membrane separation for deep water purification .
4.6.3 Activated Carbon Hybrid Membranes
In order to further improve membrane performance, activated carbon was also adopted as function material to be mixed in membrane matrix. Aghili et al. (2017) prepared a novel powdered activated carbon mixed-matrix membrane for cheese whey wastewater treatment . This membrane integrated a powdered activated carbon adsorption mechanism with the separation property of the polysulfone membrane, indicating high treatment efficiency for organic matter removal. Ahmad et al. (2018) fabricated high-performance hybrid ceramic/activated carbon symmetric membrane to purify oily wastewater (Fig. 4.18). The hybrid Al2O3/activated carbon membrane possessed complex microchannel–nanochannel networks, which achieved two times higher porosity in comparison with Al2O3 membrane. As expected, the oil removal efficiency of the hybrid Al2O3/activated carbon membrane could reach 99.02%. On the whole, the development of a cost-effective membrane by doping a cheap material, such as activated carbon, could create a complementary structure, producing strong competitiveness in wastewater treatment.
4.7 Other Carbon Materials Incorporated Membrane
In addition to these carbon materials mentioned above, several other carbon materials such as asphalt were also be adopted to prepare membranes for water treatment. Liang et al. (2016b) used a tubular electrochemically reactive graphite membrane acting as cathode and evidenced the advantages of coupled advanced oxidation process (electro-Fenton reaction) for dynamic filtration . Liu et al. (2017) designed a novel b-cyclodextrin (β-CD)-functionalized g–C3N4 composite membrane with the integration of dual function of microfiltration and visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation. The membrane could remove the organic dye by adsorption, microfiltration, and photodegradation. Yvonne (2014) prepared a sulfonated asphalt sodium alginate hybrid membrane.
4.8 Conclusion and Future Prospects
Numerous studies have been performed in membrane technologies with diverse materials for highly efficient water treatment. Among them, carbon materials with outstanding properties have been proven with potential benefits to prepare carbon-based membranes and exhibit superiority over other membrane processes. To further enhance membrane separation performance and antifouling properties, several kinds of carbon-based membrane materials including carbon membranes, carbon nanotube membranes, carbon fiber membranes, activated carbon membranes, graphene-based membranes, etc. are explored for highly efficient water treatment. Various methods including surface modification, operation parameter optimization, and technologies combination are adopted to optimize membrane performance. All these attempts have been proved with fruitful results and make great progress in this field.
Although these carbon-based membrane materials have exhibited promising potential in the field of water treatment, further studies are still required to achieve the commercial application level. The concerned challenges are listed below:
-
1.
More advanced membrane preparation technology should be developed to fabricate high-performance carbon-based membrane materials.
-
2.
The electric assistance might speed up the corrosion of carbon-based membrane materials, shorten the lifetime, and cause secondary pollution. Therefore, developing the modification technology of existing carbon materials and exploring novel carbon materials with great potential are important to pursue higher separation efficiency and better antifouling performance.
-
3.
Besides electrochemical action, other innovative coupling processes should be further extended.
-
4.
The vast majority of carbon-based membrane materials are carried out in laboratory scale, while much efforts should be paid before the pilot- and industrial-scale applications. In this process, the stability of carbon-based membrane materials needs to be further investigated during long-term operation.
Thus, these issues deserve more attention for membrane researchers. Although it would take a long time and quite great effort to resolve the remaining challenges, it is worth affirming that carbon-based membrane materials have promising potential in dealing with a large variety of industrial wastewater application in the future.
References
Abd JSN, Wang DK, Yacou C, Motuzas J, Smart S, Diniz da Costa CJ (2017) Vacuum-assisted tailoring of pore structures of phenolic resin derived carbon membranes. J Membr Sci 525:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.002
Abdel-Nasser A, El-Hendawy Samra SE (2001) Adsorption characteristics of activated carbons obtained from corncobs. Colloid Surf A 180:209–221
Abidin MNZ, Goh PS, Ismail AF, Othman MHD, Hasbullah H, Said N, Kadir S, Kamal F, Abdullah MS, Ng BC (2017) Development of biocompatible and safe polyethersulfone hemodialysis membrane incorporated with functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng C 77:572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.273
Aghili F, Ghoreyshi AA, Rahimpour A, Rahimnejad M (2017) Coating of mixed-matrix membranes with powdered activated carbon for fouling control and treatment of dairy effluent. Process Saf Environ 107:528–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.03.013
Ahmad K, Anita B, Marijke J, Gordon M, Muataz AA (2018) Novel hybrid ceramic/carbon membrane for oil removal. J Membr Sci 559:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.05.003
Ahmed F, Santos CM, Mangadlao J, Advincula R, Rodrigues DF (2013) Antimicrobial PVK:SWNT nanocomposite coated membrane for water purification: performance and toxicity testing. Water Res 47:3966–3975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.055
Ahmed F, Lalia BS, Kochkodan V, Hilal N, Hashaikeh R (2016) Electrically conductive polymeric membranes for fouling prevention and detection: a review. Desalination 391:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.01.030
Ahn C, Baek Y, Lee C, Kim S, Kim S, Lee S, Kim SH, Bae SS, Park J, Yoon J (2012) Carbon nanotube-based membranes: fabrication and application to desalination. J Ind Eng Chem 18:1551–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.04.005
Ali MEA, Wang L, Wang X, Feng X (2016) Thin film composite membranes embedded with graphene oxide for water desalination. Desalination 386:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.02.034
Ali S, Rehman SAU, Luan HY, Farid MU, Huang H (2019) Challenges and opportunities in functional carbon nanotubes for membrane-based water treatment and desalination. Sci Total Environ 646:1126–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.348
Alpatova A, Meshref M, McPhedran KN, Gamal El-Din M (2015) Composite polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane impregnated with Fe2O3 nanoparticles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes for catalytic degradation of organic contaminants. J Membr Sci 490:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.001
Alvarez PM, Pocostales JP, Beltran FJ (2011) Granular activated carbon promoted ozonation of a food-processing secondary effluent. J Hazard Mater 185:776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.088
Amaral MCS, Lange LC, Borges CP (2014) Evaluation of the use of powdered activated carbon in membrane bioreactor for the treatment of bleach pulp mill effluent. Water Environ Res 86:788–799. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143014x13975035526383
Amaral P, Partlan E, Li M, Lapolli F, Mefford OT, Karanfil T, Ladner DA (2016) Superfine powdered activated carbon (S-PAC) coatings on microfiltration membranes: effects of milling time on contaminant removal and flux. Water Res 100:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.034
Amini M, Jahanshahi M, Rahimpour A (2013) Synthesis of novel thin film nanocomposite (TFN) forward osmosis membranes using functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Membr Sci 435:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.01.041
Amit B, William H, Marcia M, Mika S (2013) An overview of the modification methods of activated carbon for its water treatment applications. Chem Eng J 219:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.038
Anand A, Unnikrishnan B, Mao J, Lin H, Huang C (2018) Graphene-based nanofiltration membranes for improving salt rejection, water flux and antifouling–a review. Desalination 429:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.12.012
Ansón-Casaos A, González-Domínguez JM, Terrado E, Martínez MT (2010) Surfactant-free assembling of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube buckypapers. Carbon 48:1480–1488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.043
Apul OG, Karanfil T (2015) Adsorption of synthetic organic contaminants by carbon nanotubes: a critical review. Water Res 68:34–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.032
Bae SD, Lee CW, Kang LS, Sakoda A (2007) Preparation, characterization, and application of activated carbon membrane with carbon whiskers. Desalination 202:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.061
Baek Y, Kim C, Seo D, Kim T, Lee J, Kim Y, Ahn K, Bae S, Lee S, Lim J, Lee K, Yoon J (2014) High performance and antifouling vertically aligned carbon nanotube membrane for water purification. J Membr Sci 460:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.042
Beck RH, Zhao Y, Fong H, Menkhaus TJ (2017) Electrospun lignin carbon nanofiber membranes with large pores for highly efficient adsorptive water treatment applications. J Water Process Eng 16: 240-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.02.002
Bakr AR, Rahaman MS (2016) Electrochemical efficacy of a carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotube filter for the removal of ibuprofen from aqueous solutions under acidic conditions. Chemosphere 153:508–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.078
Bakr AR, Rahaman MS (2017) Removal of bisphenol A by electrochemical carbon-nanotube filter: influential factors and degradation pathway. Chemosphere 185:879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.082
Bano S, Mahmood A, Kim S, Lee K (2015) Graphene oxide modified polyamide nanofiltration membrane with improved flux and antifouling properties. J Mater Chem A 3:2065–2071. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta03607g
Bounos G, Andrikopoulos KS, Moschopoulou H, Lainioti GC, Roilo D, Checchetto R, Ioannides T, Kallitsis JK, Voyiatzis GA (2017) Enhancing water vapor permeability in mixed matrix polypropylene membranes through carbon nanotubes dispersion. J Membr Sci 524:576–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.076
Brady Estevez AS, Kang S, Elimelech M (2008) A single-walled-carbon-nanotube filter for removal of viral and bacterial pathogens. Small 4:481–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200700863
Bruce J, Hinds N, Chopra T, Rantell R, Andrews VG, Leonidas GB (2004) Aligned multiwalled carbon nanotube membranes. Science 303:62–65
Brunet L, Lyon DY, Zodrow K, Rouch JC, Caussat B, Serp P, Remigy JC, Wiesner MR, Alvarez PJJ (2008) Properties of membranes containing semi-dispersed carbon nanotubes. Environ Eng Sci 25:565–576. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.0076
Celebi K, Buchheim J, Wyss RM, Droudian A, Gasser P, Shorubalko I, Kye JI, Lee C, Park HG (2014) Ultimate permeation across atomically thin porous graphene. Science 344:289–292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1249097
Celik E, Liu L, Choi H (2011a) Protein fouling behavior of carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone composite membranes during water filtration. Water Res 45:5287–5294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.036
Celik E, Park H, Choi H, Choi H (2011b) Carbon nanotube blended polyethersulfone membranes for fouling control in water treatment. Water Res 45:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.060
Chai PV, Mahmoudi E, Teow YH, Mohammad AW (2016) Preparation of novel polysulfone-Fe3O4/GO mixed-matrix membrane for humic acid rejection. Water Process Eng 15:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.06.001
Chan W, Chen H, Surapathi A, Taylor MG, Shao X, Marand E, Johnson JK (2013) Zwitterion functionalized carbon nanotube/polyamide nanocomposite membranes for water desalination. ACS Nano 7:5308–5319
Chang Y, Shen Y, Kong D, Ning J, Xiao Z, Liang J, Zhi L (2017) Fabrication of the reduced preoxidized graphene-based nanofiltration membranes with tunable porosity and good performance. RSC Adv 7:2544–2549. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra24746f
Chao F, Zhou Y, Rui Q (2017) Impact of surface ionization on water transport and salt leakage through graphene oxide membranes. J Phys Chem C 121:13412–13420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04283
Chen K, Xiao C, Huang Q, Liu H, Tang Y (2017) Fabrication and properties of graphene oxide-embedded cellulose triacetate RO composite membrane via melting method. Desalination 425:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.004
Choi J, Jegal J, Kim W (2006) Fabrication and characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polymer blend membranes. J Membr Sci 284:406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.08.013
Choi W, Choi J, Bang J, Lee JH (2013) Layer-by-layer assembly of graphene oxide nanosheets on polyamide membranes for durable reverse-osmosis applications. ACS Appl Mater Inter 5:12510–12519. https://doi.org/10.1021/am403790s
Chowdhury ZZ, Sagadevan S, Johan RB, Shah ST, Adebesi A, Md SI, Rafique RF (2018) A review on electrochemically modified carbon nanotubes (CNTs) membrane for desalination and purification of water. Mater Res Express 5:102001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aada65
Cohen-Tanugi D, Grossman JC (2012) Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. Nano Lett 12:3602–3608. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3012853
Cohen-Tanugi D, Lin LC, Grossman JC (2016) Multilayer nanoporous graphene membranes for water desalination. Nano Lett 16:1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04089
Dai J, Liu X, Xiao Y, Yang J, Qi P, Wang J, Wang Y, Zhou Z (2015) High hydrophilicity and excellent adsorption ability of a stretched polypropylene/graphene oxide composite membrane achieved by plasma assisted surface modification. RSC Adv 5:71240–71252. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra10310j
Danish M, Ahmad T (2018) A review on utilization of wood biomass as a sustainable precursor for activated carbon production and application. Renew Sust Energ Rev 87:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.003
Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N, Ahmadi Monfared H, Khadivi MA (2013a) Fabrication of PES nanofiltration membrane by simultaneous use of multi-walled carbon nanotube and surface graft polymerization method: comparison of MWCNT and PAA modified MWCNT. Sep Purif Technol 104:32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.11.004
Daraei P, Madaeni SS, Ghaemi N, Khadivi MA, Astinchap B, Moradian R (2013b) Enhancing antifouling capability of PES membrane via mixing with various types of polymer modified multi-walled carbon nanotube. J Membrane Sci 444:184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.020
Darryl NV, Rebecca AS, Kan-Sheng C, Haifa HH, Kimberly AR, Thomas JF, Chol SY, Geoffrey FS, Harold WK, Steve FAA (2010) Assembly of cross-linked multi-walled carbon nanotube mats. Carbon 48:987–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.11.016
Das R, Ali ME, Hamid SBA, Ramakrishna S, Chowdhury ZZ (2014) Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: a bright future in water desalination. Desalination 336:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.026
de Lannoy CF, Jassby D, Davis DD, Wiesner MR (2012) A highly electrically conductive polymer–multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposite membrane. J Membr Sci 415–416:718–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.05.061
de Lannoy CF, Soyer E, Wiesner MR (2013) Optimizing carbon nanotube-reinforced polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes through carboxylic acid functionalization. J Membr Sci 447:395–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.023
Duan W, Chen G, Chen C, Sanghvi R, Iddya A, Walker S, Liu H, Ronen A, Jassby D (2017) Electrochemical removal of hexavalent chromium using electrically conducting carbon nanotube/polymer composite ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 531:160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.050
Dumée LF, Sears K, Schütz J, Finn N, Huynh C, Hawkins S, Duke M, Gray S (2010) Characterization and evaluation of carbon nanotube Bucky-Paper membranes for direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 351:36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.025
Dumée L, Germain V, Sears K, Schütz J, Finn N, Duke M, Cerneaux S, Cornu D, Gray S (2011) Enhanced durability and hydrophobicity of carbon nanotube bucky paper membranes in membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 376:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.024
Dumée L, Sears K, Schütz J, Finn N, Duke M, Gray S (2012) Carbon nanotube based composite membranes for water desalination by membrane distillation. Desalin Water Treat 17:72–79. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1701
Efosa I, Yaolin F, Ramamoorthy M, Kimberly LJ, Vernon M (2016) Graphene oxide functionalized polyethersulfone membrane to reduce organic fouling. J Membr Sci 514:518–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.024
Elimelech M, Boo C (2017) Thermal desalination membranes: carbon nanotubes keep up the heat. Nat Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.114
Esfahani MR, Jameson TL, Holly SA, Martha WJM (2015) Effects of a dual nanofiller, nano-TiO2 and MWCNT, for polysulfone-based nanocomposite membranes for water purification. Desalination 372:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.06.014
Farahbakhsh J, Delnavaz M, Vatanpour V (2017) Investigation of raw and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes in fabrication of reverse osmosis polyamide membranes for improvement in desalination and antifouling properties. Desalination 410:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.031
Gao F, Du X, Hao X, Li S, Zheng J, Yang Y, Han N, Guan G (2017a) A potential-controlled ion pump based on a three-dimensional PPy@GO membrane for separating dilute lead ions from wastewater. Electrochim Acta 236:434–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.03.187
Gao F, Du X, Hao X, Li S, Zheng J, Yang Y, Han N, Guan G (2017b) Electrical double layer ion transport with cell voltage-pulse potential coupling circuit for separating dilute lead ions from wastewater. J Membr Sci 535:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.009
Ghaemi N, Madaeni SS, Daraei P, Rajabi H, Shojaeimehr T, Rahimpour F, Shirvani B (2015) PES mixed matrix nanofiltration membrane embedded with polymer wrapped MWCNT: fabrication and performance optimization in dye removal by RSM. J Hazard Mater 298:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.018
Gin DL, Noble RD (2011) Designing the next generation of chemical separation membranes. Science 332:674–676
Goh PS, Ismail AF (2018) A review on inorganic membranes for desalination and wastewater treatment. Desalination 434:60–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.07.023
Goh K, Karahan HE, Wei L, Bae TH, Fane AG, Wang R, Chen Y (2016) Carbon nanomaterials for advancing separation membranes: a strategic perspective. Carbon 109:694–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.077
Gu J, Gu H, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Li N, Xiong J (2018) Sandwich-structured composite fibrous membranes with tunable porous structure for waterproof, breathable, and oil-water separation applications. J Colloid Interf Sci 514:386–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.12.032
Guo J, Zhang Q, Cai Z, Zhao K (2016) Preparation and dye filtration property of electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate–calcium alginate/carbon nanotubes composite nanofibrous filtration membrane. Sep Purif Technol 161:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.01.036
Gupta VK, Kumar R, Nayak A, Saleh TA, Barakat MA (2013) Adsorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution onto carbon nanotubes: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 193–194:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.03.003
Hamm JBS, Griebeler JG, Marcilio NR, Tessaro IC, Pollo LD (2017) Recent advances in the development of supported carbon membranes for gas separation. Int J Hydrogen Energ 42:24830–24845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.071
Han C, Mao X, Xiang Q, Guan J (2017) Preparation and characterization of 3D nano Fe2O3–TiO2@activated carbon fiber membrane for waste water treatment. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 17:5327–5334. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2017.13811
Hayat K, Menhas S, Bundschuh J, Chaudhary HJ (2017) Microbial biotechnology as an emerging industrial wastewater treatment process for arsenic mitigation: a critical review. J Clean Prod 151:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.084
He L, Dumée LF, Feng C, Velleman L, Reis R, She F, Gao W, Kong L (2015) Promoted water transport across graphene oxide–poly(amide) thin film composite membranes and their antibacterial activity. Desalination 365:126–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.032
Ho KC, Teow YH, Ang WL, Mohammad AW (2017) Novel GO/OMWCNTs mixed-matrix membrane with enhanced antifouling property for palm oil mill effluent treatment. Sep Purif Technol 177:337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.01.014
Ho KC, Teow YH, Mohammad AW, Ang WL, Lee PH (2018) Development of graphene oxide (GO)/multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) nanocomposite conductive membranes for electrically enhanced fouling mitigation. J Membr Sci 552:189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.02.001
Holt JK, Noy A, Huser T, Eaglesham D, Bakajin O (2004) Fabrication of a carbon nanotube-embedded silicon nitride membrane for studies of nanometer-scale mass transport. J Am Chem Soc 4:2245–2250
Hsieh C, Hsu J, Hsu H, Lin W, Juang R (2016) Hierarchical oil–water separation membrane using carbon fabrics decorated with carbon nanotubes. Surf Coat Technol 286:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.12.035
Hu M, Mi B (2013) Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes. Environ Sci Technol 47:3715–3723. https://doi.org/10.1021/es400571g
Hu X, Yu Y, Zhou J, Wang Y, Liang J, Zhang X, Chang Q, Song L (2015) The improved oil/water separation performance of graphene oxide modified Al2O3 microfiltration membrane. J Membrane Sci 476:200–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.043
Huang Y, Li H, Wang L, Qiao Y, Tang C, Jung C, Yoon Y, Li S, Yu M (2015) Ultrafiltration membranes with structure-optimized graphene-oxide coatings for antifouling oil/water separation. Adv Mater Interfaces 2:1400433. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201400433
Ihsanullah (2019) Carbon nanotube membranes for water purification: Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. Sep Purif Technol 209:307–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.043
Ihsanullah LT, Al-Amer AM, Khalil AB, Abbas A, Khraisheh M, Atieh MA (2015) Novel anti-microbial membrane for desalination pretreatment: a silver nanoparticle-doped carbon nanotube membrane. Desalination 376:82–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.017
Ihsanullah, Al Amer AM, Laoui T, Abbas A, Al-Aqeeli N, Patel F, Khraisheh M, Atieh MA, Hilal N (2016) Fabrication and antifouling behaviour of a carbon nanotube membrane. Mater Des 89:549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.018
Inagaki M, Kang F, Toyoda M, Konno H (2014) Nanoporous carbon membranes and webs. In: Advanced materials science and engineering of carbon, pp 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407789-8.00010-7
Jacangelo JG, Laîné JM, Cummings EW, Adham SS (1995) UF with pretreatment for removing DBP precursors. J Am Water Works Assoc 87:100–112
Jaria G, Calisto V, Silva CP, Gil MV, Otero M, Esteves VI (2018) Obtaining granular activated carbon from paper mill sludge – a challenge for application in the removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewater. Sci Total Environ 653:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.346
Jia S, Han H, Hou H, Zhuang H, Fang F, Zhao Q (2014) Treatment of coal gasification wastewater by membrane bioreactor hybrid powdered activated carbon (MBR-PAC) system. Chemosphere 117:753–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.085
Jiang Y, Biswas P, Fortner JD (2016) A review of recent developments in graphene-enabled membranes for water treatment. Environ Sci-Water Res 2:915–922. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ew00187d
Jiao W, Luo S, He Z, Liu Y (2017) Applications of high gravity technologies for wastewater treatment: a review. Chem Eng J 313:912–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.125
Joshi RK, Carbone P, Wang FC, Kravets VG, Su Y, Grigorieva WHA IV, Geim AK, Nair RR (2014) Precise and ultrafast molecular sieving through graphene oxide membranes. Science 343:752–754. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245711
Kabiri S, Tran DNH, Cole MA, Losic D (2016) Functionalized three-dimensional (3D) graphene composite for high efficiency removal of mercury. Environ Sci-Water Res 2:390–402. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ew00254k
Kaminska G, Bohdziewicz J, Calvo JI, Prádanos P, Palacio L, Hernández A (2015) Fabrication and characterization of polyethersulfone nanocomposite membranes for the removal of endocrine disrupting micropollutants from wastewater. Mechanisms and performance. J Membr Sci 493:66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.047
Kang S, Pinault M, Pfefferle LD, Elimelech M (2007) Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit strong antimicrobial activity. Langmuir 23:8670–8673
Karelid V, Larsson G, Bjorlenius B (2017) Pilot-scale removal of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater: comparison of granular and powdered activated carbon treatment at three wastewater treatment plants. J Environ Manag 193:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.042
Khalid A, Al-Juhani AA, Al-Hamouz OC, Laoui T, Khan Z, Atieh MA (2015) Preparation and properties of nanocomposite polysulfone/multi-walled carbon nanotubes membranes for desalination. Desalination 367:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.001
Kim E, Hwang G, Gamal El-Din M, Liu Y (2012) Development of nanosilver and multi-walled carbon nanotubes thin-film nanocomposite membrane for enhanced water treatment. J Membr Sci 394–395:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.041
Kim E, Liu Y, Gamal El-Din M (2013) An in-situ integrated system of carbon nanotubes nanocomposite membrane for oil sands process-affected water treatment. J Membr Sci 429:418–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.077
Kim HJ, Choi K, Baek Y, Kim DG, Shim J, Yoon J, Lee JC (2014) High-performance reverse osmosis CNT/polyamide nanocomposite membrane by controlled interfacial interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:2819–2829. https://doi.org/10.1021/am405398f
Kiran SA, Thuyavan YL, Arthanareeswaran G, Matsuura TAF, Ismail AF (2015) Impact of graphene oxide embedded polyethersulfone membranes for the effective treatment of distillery effluent. Chem Eng J 286:528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.091
Kochameshki MG, Marjani A, Mahmoudian M, Farhadi K (2017) Grafting of diallyldimethylammonium chloride on graphene oxide by RAFT polymerization for modification of nanocomposite polysulfone membranes using in water treatment. Chem Eng J 309:206–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.008
Lai GS, Lau WJ, Goh PS, Ismail AF, Yusof N, Tan YH (2016) Graphene oxide incorporated thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane for enhanced salt removal performance. Desalination 387:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.03.007
Lalia BS, Ahmed FE, Shah T, Hilal N, Hashaikeh R (2015) Electrically conductive membranes based on carbon nanostructures for self-cleaning of biofouling. Desalination 360:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.006
Lau WJ, Emadzadeh D, Shahrin S, Goh PS, Ismail AF (2018) Ultrafiltration membranes incorporated with carbon-based nanomaterials for antifouling improvement and heavy metal removal. In: Carbon-based polymer nanocomposites for environmental and energy applications, pp 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813574-7.00009-5
Lawler J (2016) Incorporation of graphene-related carbon nanosheets in membrane fabrication for water treatment: a review. Membranes (Basel) 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6040057
Lawrence AD, Alam J, Alhoshan M (2012) Carbon nanotubes-blended poly(phenylene sulfone) membranes for ultrafiltration applications. Appl Water Sci 3:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-012-0063-0
Lee C, Baik S (2010) Vertically-aligned carbon nano-tube membrane filters with superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity. Carbon 48:2192–2197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.02.020
Lee KP, Arnot TC, Mattia D (2011) A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential. J Membr Sci 370:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.036
Lee B, Baek Y, Lee M, Jeong DH, Lee HH, Yoon J, Kim YH (2015) A carbon nanotube wall membrane for water treatment. Nat Commun 6:7109. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8109
Lee J, Jeong S, Liu Z (2016a) Progress and challenges of carbon nanotube membrane in water treatment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:999–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2016.1191894
Lee J, Ye Y, Ward AJ, Zhou C, Chen V, Minett AI, Lee S, Liu Z, Chae S, Shi J (2016b) High flux and high selectivity carbon nanotube composite membranes for natural organic matter removal. Sep Purif Technol 163:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.02.032
Li S, Richard MC (2000) Single carbon nanotube membranes: a well-defined model for studying mass transport through nanoporous materials. J Am Chem Soc 122:12340–12345. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja002429w
Li M, Hai R, Yang L, Wang X, Li Y (2013a) Comparative study on biological carbon fiber membrane and common membrane treating sewage. Environ Sci Technol 36:126–130. (in Chinese)
Li M, Hai R, Yang L, Wang X, Li Y (2013b) Performance parameter optimization of biological carbon fiber membrane treating domestic wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 36:54–60. (in Chinese)
Li S, Liao G, Liu Z, Pan Y, Wu Q, Weng Y, Zhang X, Yang Z, Tsui OKC (2014) Enhanced water flux in vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays and polyethersulfone composite membranes. J Mater Chem A 2:12171–12176. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta02119c
Li J, Kong X, Lu D, Liu Z (2015) Italicized carbon nanotube facilitating water transport: a molecular dynamics simulation. Sci Bull 60:1580–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0888-7
Li C, Song C, Tao P, Sun M, Pan Z, Wang T, Shao M (2016a) Enhanced separation performance of coal-based carbon membranes coupled with an electric field for oily wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 168:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.05.020
Li L, Chen M, Dong Y, Dong X, Cerneaux S, Hampshire S, Cao J, Zhu L, Zhu Z, Liu J (2016b) A low-cost alumina-mullite composite hollow fiber ceramic membrane fabricated via phase-inversion and sintering method. J Eur Ceram Soc 36:2057–2066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.02.020
Li Y, Liu L, Yang F (2016c) High flux carbon fiber cloth membrane with thin catalyst coating integrates bio-electricity generation in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 505:1300–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.038
Li L, Pan Z, Yang J, Tao P, Song C, Wang C, Wang T (2017a) Carbon membranes with triple functions of adsorption/electrocatalysis/membrane separation and their preparation methods. China patent No. CN 107051218A
Li X, Zhao C, Yang M, Yang B, Hou D, Wang T (2017b) Reduced graphene oxide-NH2 modified low pressure nanofiltration composite hollow fiber membranes with improved water flux and antifouling capabilities. Appl Surf Sci 419:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.080
Liang B, Zhang P, Wang J, Qu J, Wang L, Wang X, Guan C, Pan K (2016a) Membranes with selective laminar nanochannels of modified reduced graphene oxide for water purification. Carbon 103:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.001
Liang P, Rivallin M, Cerneaux S, Lacour S, Petit E, Cretin M (2016b) Coupling cathodic Electro-Fenton reaction to membrane filtration for AO7 dye degradation: a successful feasibility study. J Membr Sci 510:182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.02.071
Lim MY, Choi YS, Kim J, Kim K, Shin H, Kim JJ, Shin DM, Lee JC (2017) Cross-linked graphene oxide membrane having high ion selectivity and antibacterial activity prepared using tannic acid-functionalized graphene oxide and polyethyleneimine. J Membr Sci 521:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.067
Liu S, Zeng T, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, Kong J, Chen Y (2011) Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5:6971–6980
Liu L, Son M, Chakraborty S, Bhattacharjee C, Choi H (2013) Fabrication of ultra-thin polyelectrolyte/carbon nanotube membrane by spray-assisted layer-by-layer technique: characterization and its anti-protein fouling properties for water treatment. Desalin Water Treat 51:6194–6200. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.780767
Liu X, Duan J, Yang J, Huang T, Zhang N, Wang Y, Zhou Z (2015) Hydrophilicity, morphology and excellent adsorption ability of poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes induced by graphene oxide and polyvinylpyrrolidone. Colloid Surf A 486:172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.09.036
Liu Z, Zhu M, Zhao L, Deng C, Ma J, Wang Z, Liu H, Wang H (2017) Aqueous tetracycline degradation by coal-based carbon electrocatalytic filtration membrane: Effect of nano antimony-doped tin dioxide coating. Chem Eng J 314:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.093
Liu Y, Hou C, Jiao T, Song J, Zhang X, Xing R, Zhou J, Zhang L, Peng Q (2018) Self-assembled AgNP-containing nanocomposites constructed by electrospinning as efficient dye photocatalyst materials for wastewater treatment. Nanonaterials-Basel 8:35. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4186
Luan H, Teychene B, Huang H (2019) Efficient removal of As(III) by Cu nanoparticles intercalated in carbon nanotube membranes for drinking water treatment. Chem Eng J 355:341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.104
Ma J, Zhao Y, Xu Z, Min C, Zhou B, Li Y, Li B, Niu J (2013) Role of oxygen-containing groups on MWCNTs in enhanced separation and permeability performance for PVDF hybrid ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 320:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.04.012
Ma L, Dong X, Chen M, Zhu L, Wang C, Yang F, Dong Y (2017) Fabrication and water treatment application of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)-based composite membranes: a review. Membranes (Basel) 7:16. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes7010016
Madaeni SS, Zinadini S, Vatanpour V (2013) Preparation of superhydrophobic nanofiltration membrane by embedding multiwalled carbon nanotube and polydimethylsiloxane in pores of microfiltration membrane. Sep Purif Technol 111:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.03.033
Mahdavi MR, Delnavaz M, Vatanpour V (2017) Fabrication and water desalination performance of piperazine–polyamide nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes embedded with raw and oxidized MWCNTs. J TAIWAN Inst Chem E 75:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.03.039
Mahlangua OT, Nackaertsb R, Thwalac JM, Mambaa BB, Verliefdeb ARD (2016) Hydrophilic fouling-resistant GO-ZnO/PES membranes for wastewater reclamation. J Membr Sci 524:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.018
Mainak M, Nitin C, Bruce JH (2005) Effect of tip functionalization on transport through vertically oriented carbon nanotube membranes. J Am Chem Soc 127:9062–9070
Majeed S, Fierro D, Buhr K, Wind J, Du B, Boschetti-de-Fierro A, Abetz V (2012) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) mixed polyacrylonitrile (PAN) ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 403–404:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.029
Manawi YM, Ihsanullah SA, Al-Ansari T, Atieh MA (2018) A review of carbon nanomaterials’ synthesis via the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method. Materials (Basel) 11:882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050822
Mansourpanah Y, Madaeni SS, Rahimpour A, Adeli M, Hashemi MY, Moradian MR (2011) Fabrication new PES-based mixed matrix nanocomposite membranes using polycaprolactone modified carbon nanotubes as the additive: property changes and morphological studies. Desalination 277:171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.022
Masoomaa HB, Irfanc M, Woei-Jye L (2015) Acid functionalized MWCNT/PVP nanocomposite as new additive for fabrication of ultrafiltration membrane with improved anti-fouling resistance. RSC Adv 5:1–17
Matsumoto H, Tsuruoka S, Hayashi Y, Abe K, Hata K, Zhang S, Saito Y, Aiba M, Tokunaga T, Iijima T, Hayashi T, Inoue H, Amaratunga GAJ (2017) Water transport phenomena through membranes consisting of vertically-aligned double-walled carbon nanotube array. Carbon 120:358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.05.034
Mavukkandy MO, Zaib Q, Arafat HA (2018) CNT/PVP blend PVDF membranes for the removal of organic pollutants from simulated treated wastewater effluent. J Environ Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.029
Medina-Gonzalez Y, Remigy JC (2011) Sonication-assisted preparation of pristine MWCNT–polysulfone conductive microporous membranes. Mater Lett 65:229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2010.10.016
Mehwish N, Kausar A, Siddiq M (2015) High-performance polyvinylidene fluoride/poly(styrene–butadiene–styrene)/functionalized MWCNTs-SCN-Ag nanocomposite membranes. Iran Polym J 24:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0346-z
Menachem E, William AP (2011) The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333:712–717
Mohammed D (2011) Activated carbons: preparations and characterizations. In: Taylor JC (ed) Adv Chem Res, pp 1–38
Mohammad P, Toraj M, Omid B (2018) Effective treatment of dye wastewater via positively charged TETA-MWCNT/PES hybrid nanofiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 194:488–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.070
Montgomery MA, Elimelech M (2007) Water and sanitation in developing countries: including health in the equation. Environ Sci Technol 41:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1021/es072435t
Motoc S, Remes A, Pop A, Manea F, Schoonman J (2013) Electrochemical detection and degradation of ibuprofen from water on multi-walled carbon nanotubes-epoxy composite electrode. J Environ Sci 25:838–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1001-0742(12)60068-0
Muylaert I, Verberckmoes A, De Decker J, Van Der Voort P (2012) Ordered mesoporous phenolic resins: highly versatile and ultra stable support materials. Adv Colloid Interface 175:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2012.03.007
Nair RR, Wu HA, Jayaram PN, Grigorieva IV, Geim AK (2012) Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335:442–444. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1211694
Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669
O’Hern SC, Boutilier MS, Idrobo JC, Song Y, Kong J, Laoui T, Atieh M, Karnik R (2014) Selective ionic transport through tunable subnanometer pores in single-layer graphene membranes. Nano Lett 14:1234–1241. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404118f
Ong C, Al-Anzi BS, Lau WJ (2018) Recent developments of carbon nanomaterials-incorporated membranes, carbon nanofibers and carbon membranes for oily wastewater treatment. In: Carbon-based polymer nanocomposites for environmental and energy applications, pp 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-01539-5
Ou Yang Z, Xu H, Xiong C, Huang W, Xie D, Luo B, Lv B (2013) Preparation of TiO-supported activated carbon and its application in papermaking wastewater. Adv Mater Res 791–793:7–11. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.791-793.7
Parimal P (2017) Water treatment by membrane-separation technology. In: Industrial water treatment process technology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 173–242
Park J, Choi W, Kim SH, Chun BH, Bang J, Lee KB (2012) Enhancement of chlorine resistance in carbon nanotube based nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes. Desalin Water Treat 15:198–204. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1686
Park S, Jung J, Lee S, Baek Y, Yoon J, Seo D, Kim Y (2014) Fouling and rejection behavior of carbon nanotube membranes. Desalination 343:180–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.10.005
Patino Y, Diaz E, Ordonez S, Gallegos-Suarez E, Guerrero-Ruiz A, Rodriguez-Ramos I (2015) Adsorption of emerging pollutants on functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere 136:174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.089
Pendergast MTM, Hoek EMV (2011) A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energ Environ Sci 4:1946. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00541j
Phao N, Nxumalo EN, Mamba BB, Mhlanga SD (2013) A nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube enhanced polyethersulfone membrane system for water treatment. Phys Chem Earth 66:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2013.09.009
Pintor AMA, Vilar VJP, Botelho CMS, Boaventura RAR (2016) Oil and grease removal from wastewaters: sorption treatment as an alternative to state-of-the-art technologies. A critical review. Chem Eng J 297:229–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.121
Qin S, Liu X, Zhuo R, Zhang X (2012) Microstructure-controllable graphene oxide hydrogel film based on a pH-responsive graphene oxide hydrogel. Macromol Chem Phys 213:2044–2051. https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201200281
Qiu S, Wu L, Pan X, Zhang L, Chen H, Gao C (2009) Preparation and properties of functionalized carbon nanotube/PSF blend ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 342:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.06.041
Qiu L, Zhang X, Yang W, Wang Y, Simon GP, Li D (2011) Controllable corrugation of chemically converted graphene sheets in water and potential application for nanofiltration. Chem Commun (Camb) 47:5810–5812. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc10720h
Rahimpour A, Jahanshahi M, Khalili S, Mollahosseini A, Zirepour A, Rajaeian B (2012) Novel functionalized carbon nanotubes for improving the surface properties and performance of polyethersulfone (PES) membrane. Desalination 286:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.039
Ren X, Chen C, Nagatsu M, Wang X (2011) Carbon nanotubes as adsorbents in environmental pollution management: a review. Chem Eng J 170:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.045
Roy S, Ntim SA, Mitra S, Sirkar KK (2011) Facile fabrication of superior nanofiltration membranes from interfacially polymerized CNT-polymer composites. J Membr Sci 375:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.012
Saadati J, Pakizeh M (2017) Separation of oil/water emulsion using a new PSf/pebax/F-MWCNT nanocomposite membrane. J TAIWAN Inst Chem E 71:265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.024
Safarpour M, Khataee A, Vatanpour V (2015a) Thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane modified by reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 with improved desalination performance. J Membr Sci 489:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.010
Safarpour M, Vatanpour V, Khataee A, Esmaeili M (2015b) Development of a novel high flux and fouling-resistant thin film composite nanofiltration membrane by embedding reduced graphene oxide/TiO2. Sep Purif Technol 154:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.039
Salehi E, Madaeni SS, Rajabi L, Vatanpour V, Derakhshan AA, Zinadini S, Ghorabi S, Ahmadi Monfared H (2012) Novel chitosan/poly(vinyl) alcohol thin adsorptive membranes modified with amino functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for Cu(II) removal from water: preparation, characterization, adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics. Sep Purif Technol 89:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.002
Salgot M, Folch M (2018) Wastewater treatment and water reuse. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 2:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.03.005
Santosh V, Gopinath J, Babu PV, Sainath AVS, Reddy AVR (2018) Acetyl-d-glucopyranoside functionalized carbon nanotubes for the development of high performance ultrafiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 191:134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.018
Saranya R, Arthanareeswaran G, Dionysiou DD (2014) Treatment of paper mill effluent using Polyethersulfone/functionalised multiwalled carbon nanotubes based nanocomposite membranes. Chem Eng J 236:369–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.096
Sears K, Dumée L, Schütz J, She M, Huynh C, Hawkins S, Duke M, Gray S (2010) Recent developments in carbon nanotube membranes for water purification and gas separation. Materials 3:127–149. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3010127
Shah P, Murthy CN (2013) Studies on the porosity control of MWCNT/polysulfone composite membrane and its effect on metal removal. J Membr Sci 437:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.042
Shahbabaei M, Tang D, Kim D (2017) Simulation insight into water transport mechanisms through multilayer graphene-based membrane. Comput Mater Sci 128:87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.044
Shao L, Cheng X, Wang Z, Ma J, Guo Z (2014) Tuning the performance of polypyrrole-based solvent-resistant composite nanofiltration membranes by optimizing polymerization conditions and incorporating graphene oxide. J Membr Sci 452:82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.021
Shawky HA, Chae S, Lin S, Wiesner MR (2011) Synthesis and characterization of a carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposite membrane for water treatment. Desalination 272:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.051
Shen J, Yu C, Ruan H, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B (2013) Preparation and characterization of thin-film nanocomposite membranes embedded with poly(methyl methacrylate) hydrophobic modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes by interfacial polymerization. J Membr Sci 442:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.018
Shen X, Song L, Luo L, Zhang Y, Zhu B, Liu J, Chen Z, Zhang L (2018) Preparation of TiO2/C3N4 heterojunctions on carbon-fiber cloth as efficient filter-membrane-shaped photocatalyst for removing various pollutants from the flowing wastewater. J Colloid Interfac Sci 532:798–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.028
Shimpei G, Tomio A, Fumio M, Kunio M, Sugio O (1986) Process for the preparation of carbon fibers. Carbon 24:II patent No. 4554148 https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(86)90196-X
Singh R, Hankins NP (2016) Introduction to membrane processes for water treatment. In: Emerging membrane technology for sustainable water treatment. LLC, Colorado Springs, pp 15–52
Sitko R, Musielak M, Zawisza B, Talik E, Gagor A (2016) Graphene oxide/cellulose membranes in adsorption of divalent metal ions. RSC Adv 6:96595–96605. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra21432k
Song C, Wang T, Pan Y, Qiu J (2006) Preparation of coal-based microfiltration carbon membrane and application in oily wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol 51:80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2005.12.026
Song Y, Wang DK, Birkett G, Smart S, Diniz da Costa JC (2017) Vacuum film etching effect of carbon alumina mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 541:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.082
Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45:1558–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034
Sumio Iijima (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0
Sun P, Wang K, Wei J, Zhong M, Wu D, Zhu H (2014a) Effective recovery of acids from iron-based electrolytes using graphene oxide membrane filters. J Mater Chem A 2:7734–7737. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta00668b
Sun P, Zheng F, Zhu M, Wang K, Zhong M, Wu D, Zhu H (2014b) Realizing synchronous energy harvesting and ion separation with graphene oxide membranes. Sci Rep-UK 4:5528. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05528
Sun X, Qin J, Xia P, Guo B, Yang C, Song C, Wang S (2015) Graphene oxide–silver nanoparticle membrane for biofouling control and water purification. Chem Eng J 281:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.059
Sun M, Feng G, Zhang M, Song C, Tao P, Wang T, Shao M (2018) Enhanced removal ability of phenol from aqueous solution using coal-based carbon membrane coupled with electrochemical oxidation process. Colloid Surf A 540:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.01.006
Tahri N, Jedidi I, Ayadi S, Cerneaux S, Cretin M, Ben Amar R (2016) Preparation of an asymmetric microporous carbon membrane for ultrafiltration separation: application to the treatment of industrial dyeing effluent. Desalin Water Treat 57:23473–23488. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1135826
Tai MH, Gao P, Tan BY, Sun DD, Leckie JO (2014) Highly efficient and flexible electrospun carbon-silica nanofibrous membrane for ultrafast gravity-driven oil-water separation. ACS Appl Mater Inter 6:9393–9401. https://doi.org/10.1021/am501758c
Tao P, Xu Y, Zhou Y, Song C, Shao M, Wang T (2017a) Coal-based carbon membrane coupled with electrochemical oxidation process for the enhanced microalgae removal from simulated ballast water. Water Air Soil Pollut 228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3608-x
Tao P, Xu Y, Song C, Yin Y, Yang Z, Wen S, Wang S, Liu H, Li S, Li C, Wang T, Shao M (2017b) A novel strategy for the removal of rhodamine B (RhB) dye from wastewater by coal-based carbon membranes coupled with the electric field. Sep Purif Technol 179:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.014
Thakur VK, Voicu SI (2016) Recent advances in cellulose and chitosan based membranes for water purification: a concise review. Carbohyd Polym 146:148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.030
Thines RK, Mubarak NM, Nizamuddin S, Sahu JN, Abdullah EC, Ganesan P (2017) Application potential of carbon nanomaterials in water and wastewater treatment: a review. J TAIWAN Inst Chem E 72:116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2017.01.018
Thiruvenkatachari R, Shim W, Lee J, Aim R, Moon H (2006) A novel method of powdered activated carbon (PAC) pre-coated microfiltration (MF) hollow fiber hybrid membrane for domestic wastewater treatment. Colloid Surf A 274:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.08.026
Tian M, Wang Y, Wang R (2015) Synthesis and characterization of novel high-performance thin film nanocomposite (TFN) FO membranes with nanofibrous substrate reinforced by functionalized carbon nanotubes. Desalination 370:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.016
Vatanpour V, Safarpour M (2018) Carbon-based polymer nanocomposite membranes for desalination. In: Carbon-based polymer nanocomposites for environmental and energy applications, pp 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-01539-5
Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Moradian R, Zinadini S, Astinchap B (2011) Fabrication and characterization of novel antifouling nanofiltration membrane prepared from oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyethersulfone nanocomposite. J Membr Sci 375:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.055
Vatanpour V, Madaeni SS, Moradian R, Zinadini S, Astinchap B (2012) Novel antibifouling nanofiltration polyethersulfone membrane fabricated from embedding TiO2 coated multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sep Purif Technol 90:69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.014
Vatanpour V, Esmaeili M, Farahani MHDA (2014) Fouling reduction and retention increment of polyethersulfone nanofiltration membranes embedded by amine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Membr Sci 466:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.04.031
Vijwani H, Nadagouda MN, Mukhopadhyay SM (2018) Robust nanocatalyst membranes for degradation of atrazine in water. J Water Process Eng 25:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.05.016
Wan Azelee I, Goh PS, Lau WJ, Ismail AF (2018) Facile acid treatment of multiwalled carbon nanotube-titania nanotube thin film nanocomposite membrane for reverse osmosis desalination. J Clean Prod 181:517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.212
Wang N, Ji S, Zhang G, Li J, Wang L (2012) Self-assembly of graphene oxide and polyelectrolyte complex nanohybrid membranes for nanofiltration and pervaporation. Chem Eng J 213:318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.09.080
Wang H, Guan Q, Li J, Wang T (2014) Phenolic wastewater treatment by an electrocatalytic membrane reactor. Catal Today 236:121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.05.003
Wang L, Song X, Wang T, Wang S, Wang Z, Gao C (2015a) Fabrication and characterization of polyethersulfone/carbon nanotubes (PES/CNTs) based mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for nanofiltration application. Appl Surf Sci 330:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.183
Wang W, Shi J, Wang J, Li Y, Gao N, Liu Z, Lian W (2015b) Preparation and characterization of PEG-g-MWCNTs/PSf nano-hybrid membranes with hydrophilicity and antifouling properties. RSC Adv 5:84746–84753. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra16077d
Wang J, Zhang P, Liang B, Liu Y, Xu T, Wang L, Cao B, Pan K (2016a) Graphene oxide as an effective barrier on a porous nanofibrous membrane for water treatment. Acs Appl Mater Inter 8:6211–6218. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12723
Wang L, Wang N, Li J, Li J, Bian W, Ji S (2016b) Layer-by-layer self-assembly of polycation/GO nanofiltration membrane with enhanced stability and fouling resistance. Sep Purif Technol 160:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.01.024
Wang J, Huang T, Zhang L, Yu QJ, Hou L (2018a) Dopamine crosslinked graphene oxide membrane for simultaneous removal of organic pollutants and trace heavy metals from aqueous solution. Environ Technol 39:3055–3065. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1371797
Wang P, Deng Y, Hao L, Zhao L, Zhang X, Deng C, Liu H, Zhu M (2018b) Continuous efficient removal and inactivation mechanism of E. coli by bismuth doped SnO2/C electrocatalytic membrane. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(11):11399–11409
Wei G, Quan X, Chen S, Yu H (2017a) Superpermeable atomic-thin graphene membranes with high selectivity. ACS Nano 11:1920–1926. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b08000
Wei G, Quan X, Fan X, Chen S, Zhang Y (2017b) Carbon-nanotube-based sandwich-like hollow fiber membranes for expanded microcystin-LR removal applications. Chem Eng J 319:212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.02.125
Wei Y, Zhang Y, Gao X, Ma Z, Wang X, Gao C (2018) Multilayered graphene oxide membrane for water treatment: a review. Carbon 139:964–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.040
Whitby M, Quirk N (2007) Fluid flow in carbon nanotubes and nanopipes. Nat Nanotechnol 2:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2006.175
Wilson R, George G, Jose AJ (2018) Polymer membranes reinforced with carbon-based nanomaterials for water purification. In: New polymer nanocomposites for environmental remediation, pp 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2016-0-00649-6
Wu H, Tang B, Wu P (2010a) Novel ultrafiltration membranes prepared from a multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polymer composite. J Membr Sci 362:374–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.064
Wu H, Tang B, Wu P (2010b) MWNTs/polyester thin film nanocomposite membrane: an approach to overcome the trade-off effect between permeability and selectivity. J Phys Chem C 114:16395–16400. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp107280m
Wu Q, Zhu W, Zhang C, Liang Z, Wang B (2010c) Study of fire retardant behavior of carbon nanotube membranes and carbon nanofiber paper in carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Carbon 48:1799–1806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.01.023
Wu H, Tang B, Wu P (2013) Optimization, characterization and nanofiltration properties test of MWNTs/polyester thin film nanocomposite membrane. J Membr Sci 428:425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.10.042
Wu B, Li X, An D, Zhao S, Wang Y (2014) Electro-casting aligned MWCNTs/polystyrene composite membranes for enhanced gas separation performance. J Membr Sci 462:62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.015
Wu Y, Zhang X, Liu S, Zhang B, Lu Y, Wang T (2016) Preparation and applications of microfiltration carbon membranes for the purification of oily wastewater. Sep Sci Technol 51:1872–1880. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2016.1187169
Xiao L, Jing N, Shi X, Yan L, Xin Z, Hai N (2016) Research process of new material carbon fiber in water treatment applications. J Environ Eng 10:1577–1587. (in Chinese)
Xiao F, Tian Y, Peng F, Li S, Jian S, Zhi G (2017) Growth of C3N4 nanosheets on carbon-fiber cloth as flexible and macroscale filter-membrane-shaped photocatalyst for degrading the flowing wastewater. Appl Catal B-Environ 219:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.059
Xing R, Wang W, Jiao T, Ma K, Zhang Q, Hong W, Qiu H, Zhou J, Zhang L, Peng Q (2017) Bioinspired polydopamine sheathed nanofibers containing carboxylate graphene oxide nanosheet for high-efficient dyes scavenger. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:4948–4956. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00343
Xu D, Luo Y (2012) The application of carbon fiber in harness of water environment- new task in 21th century. Hi-Tech Fiber Appl 37:49–56. (in Chinese)
Xu W, Fang C, Zhou F, Song Z, Liu Q, Qiao R, Yu M (2017a) Self-assembly: a facile way of forming ultrathin, high-performance graphene oxide membranes for water purification. Nano Lett 17:2928–2933. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00148
Xu Z, Li X, Teng K, Zhou B, Ma M, Shan M, Jiao K, Qian X, Fan J (2017b) High flux and rejection of hierarchical composite membranes based on carbon nanotube network and ultrathin electrospun nanofibrous layer for dye removal. J Membr Sci 535:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.029
Yanez HJ, Wang Z, Lege S, Obst M, Roehler S, Burkhardt CJ, Zwiener C (2017) Application and characterization of electroactive membranes based on carbon nanotubes and zerovalent iron nanoparticles. Water Res 108:78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.055
Yang GCC, Tsai CM (2008) Preparation of carbon fibers/carbon/alumina tubular composite membranes and their applications in treating Cu-CMP wastewater by a novel electrochemical process. J Membr Sci 321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.04.060
Yang GCC, Tsai CM (2009) Preparation of carbon fibers/carbon/alumina tubular composite membranes and their applications in treating Cu-CMP wastewater by a novel electrochemical process: Part 2. J Membr Sci 331:100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.01.021
Yang Y, Li J, Wang H, Song X, Wang T, He B, Liang X, Ngo HH (2011) An electrocatalytic membrane reactor with self-cleaning function for industrial wastewater treatment. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:2148–2150. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201005941
Yang X, Lee J, Yuan L, Chae S, Peterson VK, Minett AI, Yin Y, Harris AT (2013) Removal of natural organic matter in water using functionalised carbon nanotube buckypaper. Carbon 59:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.005
Yi H, Zhen X, Chao G (2013) Ultrathin graphene nanofiltration membrane for water purification. Adv Funct Mater 23:3693–3700. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201202601
Yi G, Chen S, Quan X, Wei G, Fan X, Yu H (2018) Enhanced separation performance of carbon nanotube–polyvinyl alcohol composite membranes for emulsified oily wastewater treatment under electrical assistance. Sep Purif Technol 197:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.12.058
Yin J, Zhu G, Deng B (2013) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs)/polysulfone (PSU) mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes for enhanced water treatment. J Membr Sci 437:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.03.021
Yin Y, Li C, Song C, Tao P, Sun M, Pan Z, Wang T, Shao M (2016) The design of coal-based carbon membrane coupled with the electric field and its application on the treatment of malachite green (MG) aqueous solution. Colloid Surf A 506:629–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.07.038
You H, Li X, Yang Y, Wang B, Li Z, Wang X, Zhu M, Hsiao BS (2013) High flux low pressure thin film nanocomposite ultrafiltration membranes based on nanofibrous substrates. Sep Purif Technol 108:143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.014
Yu C, Yu H, Chu Y, Ruan H, Shen J (2013) Preparation thin film nanocomposite membrane incorporating PMMA modified MWNT for nanofiltration. Key Eng Mater 562-565:882–886. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.562-565.882
Yu JG, Zhao XH, Yang H, Chen XH, Yang Q, Yu LY, Jiang JH, Chen XQ (2014) Aqueous adsorption and removal of organic contaminants by carbon nanotubes. Sci Total Environ 482–483:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.129
Yuan Y, Gao X, Wei Y, Wang X, Wang J, Zhang Y, Gao C (2017) Enhanced desalination performance of carboxyl functionalized graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 405:29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.024
Yue X, Yang D, Qiu F, Zhu Y, Fang J (2018) In situ fabrication dynamic carbon fabrics membrane with tunable wettability for selective oil–water separation. J Ind Eng Chem 61:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.016
Yvonne LFM, Catherine MS, Maria Lourdes PD, Debora FR (2014) Surface modification of membrane filters using graphene and graphene oxide-based nanomaterials for bacterial inactivation and removal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500044p
Zarrabi H, Yekavalangi ME, Vatanpour V, Shockravi A, Safarpour M (2016) Improvement in desalination performance of thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane using amine-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube. Desalination 394:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.05.002
Zhang L, Shi G, Qiu S, Cheng L, Chen H (2011) Preparation of high-flux thin film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes by incorporating functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Desalin Water Treat 34:19–24. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2011.2801
Zhang J, Xu Z, Shan M, Zhou B, Li Y, Li B, Niu J, Qian X (2013) Synergetic effects of oxidized carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide on fouling control and anti-fouling mechanism of polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 448:81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.07.064
Zhang Y, Sui Z, Chung TS (2015) Nanometric graphene oxide framework membranes with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration. Environ Sci Technol 49:10235–10242
Zhang C, Wei K, Zhang W, Bai Y, Sun Y, Gu J (2017a) Graphene oxide quantum dots Incorporated into a thin film nanocomposite membrane with high flux and antifouling properties for low-pressure nanofiltration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:11082–11094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12826
Zhang H, Bin L, Pan J, Qi Y, Shen J, Gao C, Van der Bruggen B (2017b) Carboxyl-functionalized graphene oxide polyamide nanofiltration membrane for desalination of dye solutions containing monovalent salt. J Membr Sci 539:128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.05.075
Zhang J, Xue Q, Pan X, Lu W, Ding D, Guo Q (2017c) Graphene oxide/polyacrylonitrile fiber hierarchical-structured membrane for ultra-fast microfiltration of oil-water emulsion. Chem Eng J 307:643–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.124
Zhang Y, Wei S, Hu Y, Sun S (2018) Membrane technology in wastewater treatment enhanced by functional nanomaterials. J Clean Prod 197:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.211
Zhao X, Ma J, Wang Z, Wen G, Jiang J, Shi F, Sheng L (2012) Hyperbranched-polymer functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for poly (vinylidene fluoride) membranes: from dispersion to blended fouling-control membrane. Desalination 303:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2012.07.009
Zhao H, Yu H, Chang H, Quan X, Chen S (2013a) CNTs–TiO2/Al2O3 composite membrane with a photocatalytic function: fabrication and energetic performance in water treatment. Sep Purif Technol 116:360–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.06.007
Zhao Y, Xu Z, Shan M, Min C, Zhou B, Li Y, Li B, Liu L, Qian X (2013b) Effect of graphite oxide and multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the microstructure and performance of PVDF membranes. Sep Purif Technol 103:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.012
Zhao H, Qiu S, Wu L, Zhang L, Chen H, Gao C (2014) Improving the performance of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane by incorporation of modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Membr Sci 450:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.09.014
Zhao X, Su Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Jiang Z (2016) Free-standing graphene oxide-palygorskite nanohybrid membrane for oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:8247–8256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12876
Zhao W, Liang Y, Wu Y, Wang D, Zhang B (2018) Removal of phenol and phosphoric acid from wastewater by microfiltration carbon membranes. Chem Eng Commun 205:1432–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2018.1457027
Zheng X, Zhang Z, Yu D, Chen X, Cheng R, Min S, Wang J, Xiao Q, Wang J (2015) Overview of membrane technology applications for industrial wastewater treatment in China to increase water supply. Resour Conserv Recycl 105:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.012
Zheng J, Li M, Yu K, Hu J, Zhang X, Wang L (2017) Sulfonated multiwall carbon nanotubes assisted thin-film nanocomposite membrane with enhanced water flux and anti-fouling property. J Membr Sci 524:344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.032
Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Vatanpour V, Zangeneh H (2014) Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Membr Sci 453:292–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.070
Zinadini S, Vatanpour V, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Rahimi Z, Kian M (2015) Preparation and characterization of antifouling graphene oxide/polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane: application in MBR for dairy wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 7:280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.07.005
Zinadini S, Rostami S, Vatanpour V, Jalilian E (2017) Preparation of antibiofouling polyethersulfone mixed matrix NF membrane using photocatalytic activity of ZnO/MWCNTs nanocomposite. J Membr Sci 529:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.047
Zirehpour A, Rahimpour A, Jahanshahi M, Peyravi M (2014) Mixed matrix membrane application for olive oil wastewater treatment: process optimization based on Taguchi design method. J Environ Manage 132:113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.10.028
Zuo K, Liu H, Zhang Q, Liang P, Vecitis CD, Huang X (2016) Enhanced performance of nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube membrane-based filtration cathode microbial fuel cell. Electrochim Acta 211:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.104
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21476034) and Key R&D Program Projects in Liaoning Province (2017308005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, C. et al. (2020). Developments of Carbon-Based Membrane Materials for Water Treatment. In: Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Membranes for Environmental Applications. Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33978-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33978-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33977-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33978-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)