Skip to main content

Framing Framing: Aliens, Animals, and Anthropological Différance Across Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Literature, Pedagogy, and Climate Change

Part of the book series: Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment ((LCE))

  • 376 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter continues the debate of ‘creature feeling’ and addresses new media and the more-than-human by returning to key questions in environmental and transcultural education and introducing the concept of frames. Discussing film (District 9) as well as children’s literature and graphic novels (The Stranger and The Rabbits), it sets out to approach the ‘species scale’ (David Herman) of narratives through a variety of media formats with different demands on linguistic capability. It uses well-known educational concepts such as ‘stubborn subjectivity’, ‘understanding alterity’, ‘transformation’ and cooperative tasks and opens the conversation this book has begun for new media and inclusive contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Anthropological difference’ is a translation of the German expression anthropologische Differenz, usually referred to as ‘human exceptionalism ’ in the English discussion. Whether on religious, moral or scientific grounds, human exceptionalism describes the assumption of an inherent and unquestionable superiority of humans over any other animal. Différance famously describes Derrida’s finding that reading can infinitely defer meaning and thus help deconstruct logocentrism. It was only after the completion of the first draft of this book that my attention was brought to Tom Ryan (2001) who speaks of ‘anthropological différance ’ in the context of anthropological research.

  2. 2.

    The qualifier ‘strictly speaking’ here is an important one. For, to be perfectly honest, I am not sure what to make of this strictness: Of course, animal studies does not mean that we are talking about our favourite pets all the time (although scholars in the field show a tendency for portraits with their companion animals). But is it really possible, would one have been drawn to this field, without a general interest in the plight on non-human animals, in ethics—humanist or posthumanist—and creaturely empathy? I doubt it—and wonder if such a caveat would have been felt necessary in other scholarly domains (‘One does not have to like Non-European humans to do postcolonial studies’)? For a suggestion what ‘creaturely ’ reading might entail, see Bartosch (2017), Vermeulen (2015), and Bouttier (2015).

References

  • Bartosch, Roman. 2014. Teaching a Poetics of Failure? The Benefit of Not-Understanding the Other, Posthumanism, and the Works of Shaun Tan and Wolf Erlbruch. In Teaching Environments. Ecocritical Encounters, ed. Roman Bartosch and Sieglinde Grimm, 59–73. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Animals Outside in the Teaching Machine. Anglistik – International Journal of English Studies 27 (2): 147–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Æsthetic Æffect: Relationality as a Core Concept in Environmental Studies and Education. In Ecocriticism: Environments in Anglophone Literatures, ed. Sonja Frenzel and Birgit Neumann, 33–58. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartosch, Roman, and Greg Garrard. 2013. The Function of Criticism: A Response to William Major and Andrew McMurry’s Editorial. Journal of Ecocriticism 5 (1): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, Janice. 2014. Ecocritical Sensitivity with Multimodal Texts in the EFL/ESL Literature Classroom. In Teaching Environments: Ecocritical Encounters, ed. Roman Bartosch and Sieglinde Grimm, 75–96. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouttier, Sarah. 2015. Creaturely Texts, Texts on Creatures. European Journal of English Studies 19 (1): 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, Matthew. 2018. The Three Ethologies. In Exploring Animal Encounters: Philosophical, Cultural, and Historical Perspectives, ed. Dominik Ohrem and Matthew Calarco, 45–62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chatman, Seymour. 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMello, Margo. 2012. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulstich, Werner. 2008. Grundkurs Filmanalyse. München: W. Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabardi, Wayne. 2017. The Next Social Contract: Animals, the Anthropocene, and Biopolitics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, Greg. 2015. Ecocriticism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Towards an Unprecedented Ecocritical Pedagogy. In Teaching Literature, ed. Ben Knights, 189–207. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodbody, Axel. 2012. Frame Analysis and the Literature of Climate Change. In Literature, Ecology, Ethics: Recent Trends in Ecocriticism, ed. Timo Müller and Michael Sauter, 15–33. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, Ursula K. 2016. Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David (ed.). 2018. Narratology Beyond the Human: Storytelling and Animal Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lioi, Anthony. 2012. Teaching Green Cultural Studies and New Media. In Teaching Ecocriticism and Green Cultural Studies, ed. Greg Garrard. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, John, and Shaun Tan. 2010. The Rabbits. London: Hodder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthewman, Sasha. 2011. Teaching Secondary English as if the Planet Matters. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, William, and Andrew McMurry. 2013. Response of William Major and Andrew McMurry. Journal of Ecocriticism 5 (1): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz Robles, Mario. 2016. Literature and Animal Studies. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham, John. 2006. The Deficiency of “Environmental Capital”: Why Environmentalism Needs a Reflexive Pedagogy. In Ecodidactic Perspectives on English Language, Literatures and Cultures, ed. Sylvia Mayer and Graham Wilson, 7–22. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Tom. 2001. Anthropological Différance: From Derrida to Lévi-Strauss. In Derrida Downunder, ed. Laurence Simmons and Heather Worth, 181–197. Palmerston North: Dunmore P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Jochen. 2013. Neill Blomkamp, District 9 (2009). In Teaching Contemporary Literature and Culture: Film (Part 1), ed. Susanne Peters, Klaus Stierstorfer, and Laurenz Volkmann. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom. 2012. CIFERAE. A Bestiary in Five Fingers. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Allsburg, Chris. 1986. The Stranger. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Pieter. 2015. Contemporary Literature and the End of the Novel: Creature, Affect, Form. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welling, Bart H., and Scottie Kapel. 2012. The Return of the Animal: Presenting and Representing Non-Human Beings Response-ably in the (Post-)Humanities Classroom. In Teaching Ecocriticism and Green Cultural Studies, ed. Greg Garrard, 104–116. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Cary. 2009. Human, All Too Human: “Animal Studies” and the Humanities. PLMA 124 (2): 564–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bartosch, R. (2019). Framing Framing: Aliens, Animals, and Anthropological Différance Across Media. In: Literature, Pedagogy, and Climate Change. Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33300-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics