Abstract
Although characteristics of academic lectures in English-medium instruction (EMI) are well-documented within the framework of the functional and/or corpus-based approach, they have not been studied in terms of how they are affected by the classroom context; therefore, our study explores how similarly and/or differently instructors deliver their EMI lectures, considering the environment each instructor is put in. We video-recorded the lectures of three content professors for a total of about 180 minutes while observing and taking field notes of each class. We applied thematic analysis with no pre-determined framework and divided each instructor’s discourse into several categories in an inductive way. Our findings show that the instructors’ speech rate and their discourse organization varied greatly depending on the overall context, and that no general discourse patterns were observed. We suggest that the characteristics of EMI lectures be identified not only linguistically but also holistically, considering the classroom context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The authors are aware that the corpus represents norms of L1 speakers’ English, but the corpus-based approach is relevant to and useful for the current study.
- 2.
An n-gram is used in corpus linguistics to predict the next vocabulary item in a sequence in the form of n − 1. For example, in a sample sequence applied linguistics is fun, one-gram sequence consists of applied, linguistics, is, fun, two-gram sequence of applied linguistics, linguistics is, is fun, and three-gram sequence of applied linguistics is, linguistics is fun.
- 3.
Table 4 shows that explanation was more frequently used, but since we coded the utterances other than paraphrase, example, repetition, confirmation as explanation, which we usually expect to be frequent in academic lectures, we did not include explanation in the discussion here.
References
Antonio, J. D., & Cassim, F. T. R. (2012). Coherence relations in academic spoken discourse. Linguistica, 52(1), 323–336.
Biber, D., Reppen, R., Clark, V., & Walter, J. (2001). Representing spoken language in university settings: The design and construction of the spoken component of the T2K-SWAL Corpus. In Corpus linguistics in North America (pp. 48–57). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2013). The functional analysis of English. New York: Routledge.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2017). The evolving architecture of content-based instruction. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed., pp. 2–20). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.
Cogo, A. (2009). Accommodating difference in ELF conversations: A study of pragmatic strategies. In A. Mauranen & E. Ranta (Eds.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings (Vol. 254–273). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars.
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213–238.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (Vol. 23). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 2. Literacy (2nd ed., pp. 71–83). New York: Springer Science.
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 66–76.
DeCarrico, J., & Nattinger, J. R. (1988). Lexical phrases for the comprehension of academic lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 91–102.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Deroey, K. L. B. (2015). Marking importance in lectures: Interactive and textual orientation. Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 51–72.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47.
Duff, A. P. (2019). Social dimensions and processes in second language acquisition: Multilingual socialization in transnational contexts. The Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 6–22.
Duff, A. P., & Byrnes, H. (2019). SLA across disciplinary borders: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal, 103(S1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12537.
ELFA. (2008). The corpus of English as a lingua franca in academic settings. Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/elfa/.
Gal’perin, P. I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 30(4), 60–80.
Gotti, M. (2014). Explanatory strategies in university courses taught in ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(2), 337–361.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. New York: Routledge.
Harada, T. (2017). Developing a content-based English as a foreign language program: Needs analysis and curriculum design at the university level. In M. A. Snow & D. M. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: New perspectives on integrating language and content (2nd ed., pp. 37–52). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
Hülmbauer, C. (2007). You moved, aren’t?’—The relationship between lexicogrammatical correctness and communicative effectiveness in English as a lingua franca. VIEWS—Vienna English Working Papers, 16, 3–35.
Kao, S. M., & Wang, W. C. (2014). Lexical and organizational features in novice and experienced ELF presentations. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 3(1), 49–79.
Kaur, J. (2012). Saying it again: Enhancing clarity in English as a lingua franca (ELF) talk through self-repetition. Text & Talk, 32(5), 593–613.
Kudo, S., Harada, T., Eguchi, M., Moriya, R., & Suzuki, S. (2017). Investigating English speaking anxiety in English-medium instruction. Essays on English Language and Literature, 46, 7–23.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76.
Marx, A., Heppt, B., & Henschel, S. (2017). Listening comprehension of academic and everyday language in first language and second language students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 571–600.
Mauranen, A. (2018). Conceptualising ELF. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker, & M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp. 7–24). New York: Routledge.
McLean, S., Kramer, B., & Beglar, D. (2015). The creation and validation of a listening vocabulary levels test. Language Teaching Research, 19, 741–760.
Morell, T. (2004). Interactive lecture discourse for university EFL students. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 325–338.
Murata, K. (2019a). Exploring EMI in higher education from an ELF perspective: Introduction. In K. Murata (Ed.), English-medium instruction from an English as a lingua franca perspective (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.
Murata, K. (2019b). The realities of the use of English in the globalised world and the teaching of English: A discrepancy? (Invited papers by lecturers for JACET 44th Summer Seminar 2017, Tokyo). JACET Journal, 63, 7–26.
Murata, K., & Iino, M. (2018). EMI in higher education: An ELF perspective. In J. Jenkins, W. Baker, & M. Dewey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English as a lingua franca (pp. 400–412). New York: Routledge.
Murata, K., Konakahara, M., Iino, M., & Toyoshima, N. (2019). EMI参加に伴う学生のELFへの意識変化とELF使用へのビジネスピープルの意識差の調査と英語教育への示唆 [An investigation into attitudes towards English as a lingua franca (ELF) in English-medium instruction (EMI) and business settings and its implications for English language pedagogy]. Waseda Review of Education, 33(1), 19–38.
Saxena, M., & Martin-Jones, M. (2013). Multilingual resources in classroom interaction: Ethnographic and discourse analytic perspectives. Language and Education, 27(4), 285–297.
Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test. Language Testing, 18, 55–88.
Schnur, E. (2014). Phraseological signaling of discourse organization in academic lectures: A comparison of lexical bundles in authentic lectures and EAP listening materials. Yearbook of Phraseology, 5(1), 95–122.
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Suzuki, S., Harada, T., Eguchi, M., Kudo, S., & Moriya, R. (2018). Students’ perspectives on the role of English-medium instruction in English learning: A case study. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education of Waseda University. Separate Volume, 26(1), 1–18.
Taguchi, N. (2014). Pragmatic socialization in an English-medium university in Japan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 157–181.
Uchihara, T., & Harada, T. (2018). Roles of vocabulary knowledge for success in English-medium instruction: Self-perceptions and academic outcomes of Japanese undergraduates. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 564–587.
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Wang, Y. (2018). Formulaic sequences signalling discourse organisation in ELF academic lectures: A disciplinary perspective. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(2), 355–376.
Wu, S. (2013). Discourse structure and listening comprehension of English academic lectures. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1705–1709.
Yang, X., & Tao, X. (2018). Comparing discourse behaviors of a high-rated and a low-rated Chinese EFL teacher: A systemic functional perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 594–610.
Acknowledgements
This study has been supported by the Waseda Institute for Advanced Studies in Education (General Committee on IASE Research Projects, B-11 for 2018 and B-01 for 2019), and jointly done with Prof. Yasuyo Sawaki in the Faculty of Education and Integrated Arts and Sciences and Ms. Kana Matsumura in the Graduate School of Education. We thank the three instructors for allowing us to observe and videotape their lectures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harada, T., Moriya, R. (2020). Analyzing Discourse in EMI Courses from an ELF Perspective. In: Konakahara, M., Tsuchiya, K. (eds) English as a Lingua Franca in Japan. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33288-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33288-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33287-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33288-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)