Abstract
It has taken a while to get here but we are nearing the end of our journey towards an understanding of governance and policy-making and more specifically that for the maritime sector and its problems and needs. In the final chapter, we shall provide an overview of the whole process and see where this might take the reader to the next but here, we focus on a last look at juxtaposition, policy and governance and in particular, the difficulties and drawbacks faced in attempting to develop such an approach for although it might sound like an obvious and desirable thing to achieve, the problems that remain reflect the general failure that exists. We begin with a look at private governance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamson, E., & Baumard, P. (2008). What lies behind organizational facades and how organizational facades lie; An untold story of organizational decision-making. In G. Gerard, P. Hodgkinson, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational decision-making (pp. 437–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acharya, A. (2007). State sovereignty after 9/11; Disorganised hypocrisy. Political Studies, 55, 274–296.
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience; Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.
Andersen, R. (2002). The time dimension in international regime interplay. Global Environmental Politics, 2(3), 98–117.
Arcarazo, D. A., & Freier, L. F. (2015). Turning the immigration policy paradox upside down? Populist liberalism and discursive gaps in South America. International Migration Review, 3, 659–696.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning; A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Bartelson, J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Belintsev, B. N. (1983). Dissipative structures and the problem of biological pattern formation. Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 26(9), 775–800.
Bennett, P. (2000). Environmental governance and private actors: Enrolling insurers in international maritime regulation. Political Geography, 19, 875–899.
Biermann, F. (2008). Earth system governance: A research agenda. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schroeder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change; Principal findings, applications and research frontiers (pp. 287–290). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biermann, F., & Brohm, R. (2005). Implementing the Kyoto protocol without the United States; The strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border. Climate Policy, 4(3), 289–302.
Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., Van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures; A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14–40.
Biersteker, T., & Weber, C. (1996). State sovereignty as a social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blazquez, J., Fuentes-Bracamontes, R., Bollino, C. A., & Nezamuddin, N. (2018). The renewable energy policy paradox. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1–5.
Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy; Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Copenhagen: Abstrakt Forlag.
Brunsson, N. (2007). The consequences of decision-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Buijs, J. (2010). Understanding connective capacity of program management from a self-organization perspective. Emergence, Complexity and Organization, 12(1), 29–38.
Buijs, B., Sievers, H., & Tercero Espinoza, L. (2012). Limits to the critical raw materials approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 165(4), 201–208.
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational facades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism; Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
Clark, I. (1997). Globalization and fragmentation. International relations in the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coglianese, C. (1999). The limits of consensus. Environment, 41(3), 28–33.
Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping. Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Chichester: Wiley.
Cox, K. R. (1998). Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or; Looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1), 1–23.
Darier, E. (1996). Environmental governability; The case of Canada’s green plan. Environmental Politics, 5, 585–606.
Davis, S. (1982). Transforming organizations; The key to strategy is context. Organizational Dynamics, 10, 64–80.
De Burca, G., O’Keohane, R. O., & Sabel, C. (2012). New modes of pluralist global governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 45, 723–786.
De Jong, S. P. L., Smit, J., & Van Drooge, L. (2016). Scientists’ response to societal impact policies; A policy paradox. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 102–114.
Derkx, B., & Glasbergen, P. (2014). Elaborating global private meta-governance: An inventory in the realm of voluntary sustainability standards. Global Environmental Change, 27, 41–50.
Dewulf, J., Blengini, G. A., Pennington, D., Nuss, P., & Nassar, N. T. (2016). Criticality on the international scene: Quo vadis? Resources Policy, 50, 169–176.
Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.
Egnell, R. (2010). The organised hypocrisy of international state-building. Conflict, Security and Development, 10(4), 465–491.
Eichenbaum, J., & Gale, S. (1971). Form, function and process: A methodological inquiry. Economic Geography, 47(4), 525–544.
Erdmann, L., & Graedel, T. E. (2011). Criticality of non-fuel minerals; A review of major approaches and analyses. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(18), 7620–7630.
Essletzbichler, J., & Rigby, D. L. (2010). Generalized Darwinism and evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 43–61). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Falkner, R., & Gupta, A. (2009). Limits of regulatory convergence; Globalization and GMO politics in the south. International Environmental Agreements, 9(2), 113–133.
Forster, E. M. (1909). The machine stops. In E. M. Forster (Ed.), The machine stops and other stories. London: Andre Deutsch.
Fox, N. J., & Ward, K. J. (2008). What governs governance, and how does it evolve? The sociology of governance-in-action. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(3), 519–538.
Freeman, J. (1997). Collaborative governance in the administrative state. UCLA Law Review, 45(1), 1–98.
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Emergent complex systems. Futures, 26(6), 568–582.
Gemmill, G., & Smith, C. (1985). A dissipative structure model of organization transformation. Human Relations, 38(8), 751–766.
Golombiewski, R., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1975). Measuring change and resistance in human affairs; Types of change generated by OD design. Journal of Applied Behavior Science, 12, 133–157.
Graedel, T. E., & Reck, B. K. (2016). Six years of criticality assessments; What have we learned so far? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(4), 692–699.
Gupta, A. (2008). Global biosafety governance; The current state of play. In O. R. Young, W. Bradnee Chambers, J. A. Kim, & C. ten Have (Eds.), Institutional interplay: The case of biosafety (pp. 19–46). Yokohama: UNU Press.
Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (1985a). The geopolitics of capitalism. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures. London: Macmillan.
Harvey, D. (1985b). The urbanization of capital. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile Books.
Hirschmann, G. (2012). Peacebuilding in the UN peacekeeping exit strategies; Organized hypocrisy and institutional reform. International Peacekeeping, 19(2), 170–185.
Holling, C. S., Schindler, D. W., Walker, B. W., & Roughgarden, J. (1995). Biodiveristy in the functioning of ecosystems; And ecological synthesis. In C. Perrings, K. G. Maler, C. Folke, C. S. Holling, & B. O. Jansson (Eds.), Biodiveristy loss; Economic and ecological issues (pp. 44–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobs, M. (1995). Sustainability and ‘the market’; A typology of environmental economics. In R. Eckersley (Ed.), Markets the state and the environment (pp. 46–70). London: Macmillan.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism or the culture of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Jantsch, E. (1981). The evolutionary vision. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Jasanoff, J. (2000). Remarks at Workshop on Science and Governance, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Brussels, March 29–30.
Jessop, B. (2003). Governance and metagovernance; On reflexivity, requisite variety and requisite irony. In H. Bang (Ed.), Governance as social and political communication. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kanie, N. (2007). Governance with multilateral environmental agreements; A healthy or ill-equipped fragmentation. In L. Swart & E. Perry (Eds.), Global environmental governance; Perspectives on the current debate (pp. 69–86). New York: Center for UN Reform.
Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R., & Turner, B. L., II. (1996). Regions at risk. Exploring environmental criticality. Environment, 38(10), 4–29.
Kickert, W. J. M. (2003). Beneath consensual corporatism; Traditions of governance in The Netherlands. Public Administration, 81(1), 119–140.
Kouzmin, A. (2002). Symposium—The new ‘political’ economy of the ‘smart’ state. Transitions in governance capacities. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(1), 25–30.
Kouzmin, A., Dixon, J., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (2001). From self-referential economics to managerialism and the ‘economic holocaust’ of down-sizing/re-engineering; A global reckoning begins! In K. Thorne & G. Turner (Eds.), Global business regulation; Some research perspectives (pp. 1–37). Sydney: Prentice Hall.
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Krasner, S. D. (2013). Recognition; Organized hypocrisy once again. International Theory, 5(1), 170–176.
Kumar, S. (2014, November). Why we can’t (or won’t) govern. The Hindu.
Kumar, S. (2019, January). The Modi government’s reservation gambit is neither sound nor smart politics. The Hindu.
Laughland, J. (2008, October). Bloom off the rose; Georgian ‘democracy’ owes more to Josef Stalin than Thomas Jefferson. Abkhaz World.
Lee, H. Y. (2013). A policy paradox from paternalism to populism; The case of foot and mouth disease in South Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 18(3), 233–255.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.
Lindroos, A., & Mehling, M. (2005). Dispelling the chimera of ‘self-contained regimes’. International law and the WTO. European Journal of International Law, 16(5), 857–877.
Lipson, M. (2007). Peacekeeping; Organized hypocrisy? European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 5–34.
Mackinnon, D., & Derickson, K. D. (2012). From resilience to resourcefulness; A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 253–270.
Mangat, R. (2001). The death of distance? Globalism in international relations. E-merge, 2, 1–13.
Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2010). Complexity thinking and evolutionary economic geography. In R. Boschma & R. Martin (Eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography (pp. 93–119). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Marx, K. (1969). Theories of surplus value, part 2. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Masten, A. S., & Powell, J. L. (2003). A resilience framework for research policy and practice. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptations in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGinnis, M. D. (2005). Costs and challenges of polycentric governance. In Workshop on Analyzing Problems of Polycentric Governance in the Growing EU. Berlin: Humboldt University.
McGrew, A. (1992). A global society? In S. Hall, D. Held, & A. McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures. Cambridge: Polity Press/Open University.
Mee, A. (2007). E-learning funding for schools; A policy paradox. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 63–71.
Mendoza, R. (2007). Shaking up international development. What one hand gives, the other takes. Industrial countries’ policy coherence for development. Challenge, 50(5), 28–56.
Menzel, U. (1998). Globalisierung versus Fragmentierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Meuleman, L. (2010). The cultural dimension of metagovernance; Why governance doctrines may fail. Public Organization Review, 10, 49–70.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P. (1982). Structural change and performance; Quantum versus piecemeal-incremental approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 25(4), 867–892.
Morison, E. E. (Undated) Poetry and policy. Working Paper No. 3, Program in Science, Technology and Society. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Neuhoff, K. (1990). Private funding for university research in Europe—Some models and conceptions. Higher Education Quarterly, 44(2), 163–173.
Onuf, N. (1991). Sovereignty; Outline of a conceptual history. Alternatives, 16, 425–446.
Ostrom, V. (1995). The meaning of democracy: The vulnerability of democracies. Bloomington, IN: Indian University.
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide; Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
Perlmutter, H. V. (1991). On the rocky road to the first civilization. Human Relations, 44(9), 897–920.
Peters, B. G. (2012). The meta-governance of policy networks; Steering at a distance but still steering. Working Papers. Roskilde: Democratic Network Governance in Europe.
Prigogine, I. (1980). From being to becoming. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1977). Self organization in non-equilibrium systems. New York: Wiley.
Prigogine, I., Nicolis, G., & Babloyantz, A. (1972). Thermodynamics of evolution. Physics Today, 25, 23–28.
Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos; Man’s new dialogue with nature. New York: Bantam New Age Books.
Rashish, M. (1982). Statement of Myer Rashish to the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, August 13.
Ravetz, J. (2003). A paradoxical future for safety in the global knowledge economy. Futures, 35, 811–826.
Ravetz, J. (2006). Post-normal science and the complexity of transitions towards sustainability. Ecological Complexity, 3, 275–284.
Ravetz, J. (2011). Post normal science and the maturing of the structural contradictions of modern European science. Futures, 43, 142–148.
Roe, M. (2016). Maritime governance. Speed, flow, form, process. Heidelberg: Springer.
Rutter, M. (2000). Resilience reconsidered; Conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications. In J. P. Shonkoff & S. J. Meisels (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention (pp. 651–682). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sack, R. D. (1974). The spatial separatist theme in geography. Economic Geography, 50(1), 1–19.
Selin, H., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2003). Mapping institutional linkages in European air pollution politics. Global Environmental Politics, 3(3), 14–46.
Sheldon, A. (1980). Organizational paradigms; A theory of organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 8, 61–80.
Sidaway, R. (1994). Political geography in the time of cyberspaces; New agendas? Geoforum, 25, 487–503.
Sonnemann, G., Gemechu, E. D., Adibi, N., De Bruille, V., & Bulle, C. (2015). From a critical review to a conceptual framework for integrating the criticality of resources into life cycle sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 94, 20–34.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.
Stokke, O. S. (2001). The interplay of international regimes; Putting effectiveness theory to work? (FNI Report 10/2001). Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
Torfing, J., Peters, G. B., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tseng, P., & Pilcher, N. (2017). Port governance in Taiwan: How hypocrisy helps meet aspirations of change. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 22, 38–48.
Turner, R. K., Pearce, D., & Bateman, I. (1994). Environmental economics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Voets, J., Verhoest, K., & Molenveld, A. (2015). Coordinating for integrated youth care. The need for smart metagovernance. Public Administration Review, 17(7), 981–1001.
Wang, G. (2003, January). Policy escapism during the implementation of policies. Guihong Tribune (in Chinese).
Weber, C. (1995). Simulating sovereignty: Intervention the state and symbolic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weingast, B. R. (1993). Constitutions as governance structures; The political foundations of secure markets. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149, 286–311.
Weingast, B. R. (1995). The economic role of political institutions; Market-preserving federalism and economic development. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 11(1), 1–31.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions; A cultural theory of preference formation. The American Political Science Review, 81(1), 3–22.
Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. (1994). The institutions and governance of economic development and reform. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Wuisan, L., Van Leeuwen, J., & Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2012). Greening international shipping through private governance; A case study of the clean shipping project. Marine Policy, 36, 165–173.
Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international society. Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2(1), 1–24.
Zelli, N. (2008). Regime conflicts in global environmental governance. A framework for analysis. Global Governance Working Paper No. 36, The Global Governance Project, Amsterdam.
Zelli, F., & Van Asselt, H. (2013). The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance; Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roe, M. (2020). Negative Juxtaposition. In: Governance, Policy and Juxtaposition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31848-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31847-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31848-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)