Abstract
Legality was fundamental to Weber’s concept of legitimacy. Predictable rules construct orders that people believe in. As discussed in the previous chapter, Weber did not pursue ultimate or transcendental criteria for assessing legitimacy, other than belief in the order underpinned by rules and evidenced as a social fact. So does legality ‘legitimize’ violence? Or what is the relationship between the two? And then we have the awkward question posed by Walter Benjamin: when does violence become law? This leads us not only to question the origins of law and the violence used in its ‘making’ and ‘preserving’, but also the relationship between the law, justice and violence. The great challenge facing a world of multiple injustices, is whether they can/should be resolved by violence in a world where violence in varied guises, including legally inflicted state violences, upholds unjust structures. In exploring violence as a phenomenon, both state violence in the name of legality and non state violence in the name of justice, are still meaning laden and generating acts and actions of somatic harm. The idea of just non legal violence has been compelling in history and continues to be so. This chapter argues that the idea of ‘legitimate’ and/or ‘just’ violence’ must be revisited, but from the lens of violence as a phenomenon rather than from the lens of an imaginary of ‘just violence’ to end all violence. By placing violence as a phenomenon at the centre, this chapter argues, we can explore the potential for its ‘designification’, through greater understanding of the triggers to aggression in our vulnerable biological bodies and its conversion into violence through our social relations/social body. Understanding aggression and reducing violences, opens up more social and political space for acting on injustices, including potentially, through the law if it can be ‘liberated from violence’ (Loick, Law without Violence. In C. Menke (Ed.), Law and Violence: Christoph Menke in Dialogue (pp. 96–111). Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2018: 97). And in addressing injustices, we further our capacity to reduce violences in all expressions. Legitimacy in the order grows as conscious social action impacts on our sensibilities towards the vulnerable body and as (if) the order responds effectively and transforms accordingly. The temporality for this must be processual, rather than imagining a non-violent politics on the immediate horizon. Rather, violence is ‘designified’ and ‘desanctioned’ over time. As sensibility and understanding grows, violence no longer conveys and generates the meanings it once did so potently. Rather, we understand better and acknowledge the damage violence as a phenomenon does to individuals and to our human communities. And just as our sensibilities to racism, sexism, to slavery and exploitation have changed, albeit slowly and not universally, so they could change towards violence, through social and political action and agency on violence. Widening circles of shared meanings of what is ‘just ‘ are part of the democratizing impetus and outcome from recognition of our vulnerability to acts and actions of somatic harm. This is what the conclusion to this book will call an individual, social and, ultimately, historical momentum towards ‘Emotional Enlightenment’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G., Fabbri, L., & Fay, E. ([1970] 2009). On the Limits of Violence. Diacritics, 39(4), 103–111.
Anter, A. (2014). Max Weber’s Theory of the Modern State: Origins, Structure and Significance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. New York: A Harvest Book.
Ashenden, S. (2014). On Violence in Habermas’s Philosophy of Language. European Journal of Political Theory, 13(4), 427–452.
Balibar, E. (2009). Reflections on Gewalt. Historical Materialism, 17, 99–125.
Balibar, E. (2015). Violence and Civility: On the Limits of Political Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bandes, S. (1999). The Passions of Law. New York: New York University Press.
BBC News. (2019, May 8). Threats to MPs at ‘Unprecedented’ Levels Says Met Chief. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-48205408
Bernstein, R. (2013). Violence: Thinking without Bannisters. Cambridge: Polity.
Benjamin, W. (1999). Critique of Violence. In M. Steger & N. Link (Eds.), Violence and Its Alternatives: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan Press.
Bingham, T. (2010). The Rule of Law. London: Penguin Books.
Bredekamp, H. (2018). Walter Benjamin’s Esteem for Carl Schmitt. In J. Meierhenrich & O. Simons (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Carl Schmitt (pp. 679–691). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brewster, P., & Buchner, H. C. (1979). Language and Critique: Jurgen Habermas on Walter Benjamin. New German Critique, No. 17. Special Walter Benjamin Issue, pp. 15–29.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
Butler, J. (2006). Critique, Coercion, and Sacred Life in Benjamin’s “Critique of Violence”. In H. de Vries & L. E. Sullivan (Eds.), Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World. New York: Fordham Press.
Cornell, D., Rosenfield, M., & Carlson, D. G. (1992). Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. London: Routledge.
Cotterrell, R. (1997). Legality and Legitimacy: The Sociology of Max Weber. Oxford Scholarship Online, March 2012. Downloaded February 4, 2017. https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264903.001.0001/acprof-9780198264903-chapter-7.
Derrida, J. (2002). Force of Law. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Acts of Religion (pp. 230–298). London: Routledge.
Der Standard. (2019, January 23). Kickl Stellt Menschenrechtskonvention infrage, Kritik von Ministerkollegen and Ken der Bellen.
D’Entreves, A. P. (1963). Legality and Legitimacy. The Review of Metaphysics, 16(4), 687–702.
Dyzenhaus, D. (1997). Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
El Diario Vasco. (2019, June 23). El Fallo del TS es positivo, pero la cárcel no soluciona la violencia machista.
Fanon, F. ([1961] 2001). The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (2004). Society Must Be Defended. London: Penguin Books.
Fraser, N. (1999). The Force of Law: Metaphysical or Political? In M. Steger & N. Lind (Eds.), Violence and Its Alternatives (pp. 84–88). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(4), 167–191.
Giustozzi, A. (2011). The Art of Coercion. London: Hurst.
Grundy, K. W., & Weinstein, M. A. (1974). Ideologies of Violence. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Habermas, J. (1999). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hanssen, B. (2000). Critique of Violence: Between Postructuralism and Critical Theory. London: Routledge.
Khatib, S. (2016). Towards a Politics of “Pure Means”: Walter Benjamin and the Question of Violence. In E. Arrieta Burgos, Tomo 1, Teoriá crítica de la violencia y prácticas de memoir y resistencia (pp. 41–66). Medellin: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.
Liebsch, B. (2013). What Does (Not) “Count” as Violence” On the State of Recent Debates about the Inner Connection between Language and Violence. Human Studies, 36(1), Special Issue Violence-Phenomenological Contributions, 7–24.
Loick, D. (2018). Law without Violence. In C. Menke (Ed.), Law and Violence: Christoph Menke in Dialogue (pp. 96–111). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Loick, D. (2019). A Critique of Sovereignty. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Menke, C. (2018). Law and Violence. In Law and Violence: Christopher Menke in Dialogue (pp. 3–76). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Muller, J.-W. (2003). Myth, Law and Order: Schmitt and Benjamin Read Reflections on Violence. History of European Ideas, 29(4), 459–473.
Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political Emotions. Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1998). Violence and Language. Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, 10(2), 32–41.
Schmitt, C. ([1932] 2004). Legality and Legitimacy. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sennett, R., & Cobb, J. (1972). The Hidden Injuries of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorel, G. (1999). Sorel: Reflections on Violence (J. Jennings, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Guardian. (2013). Teenager Hannah Smith Killed Herself Because of Online Bullying Says Father. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/06/hannah-smith-online-bullying
The Guardian. (2019, June 9). German Student in Serious Condition after Attack in Canterbury. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jun/09/german-student-serious-condition-after-attack-kent
Tilly, C. (1985). War Making and State Making as Organised Crime. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the State Back In (pp. 169–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wacks, R. (2015). Law: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weber, M. ([1915] 1991a). Religious Rejections of the World and Their Directions. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 323–359). London: Routledge.
Weber, M. ([1919] 1991b). Politics as Vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (pp. 77–156). London: Routledge.
Weber, M. ([1978] 2013). Economy and Society Vols 1 and 2 (G. Roth & C. Witch, Eds.). Berkely: University of California Press.
Wexler, D., & Winick, B. (Eds.). (1996). Law in a Therapeutic Key: Developments in Therapeutic Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Wolgast, E. (1991). Getting Even. In J. Brady & N. Garver (Eds.), Justice, Law and Violence (pp. 117–133). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Zizek, S. (2009). Violence. London: Profile Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pearce, J. (2020). The Legality and Justice of Violence. In: Politics without Violence?. Rethinking Political Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26082-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26082-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26081-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26082-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)